Important topic. Many modern humans are significantly less challenged in terms of food scarcity…especially in North America and Europe. We have the luxury of debating a hierarchy of methods. For our ancestors and many humans in underdeveloped parts of the world, survival trumps all of that. Perspective as always 🙏🏽
Great video! Love what you're doing. I've had friends who looked down on me for hunting in blind and over feed at times. They had limited experience and perspective. Also different regions have different terrain which makes it possible to stalk or not. Different regions also have deer with different temperament. Some deer are more cautious of predation which changes how you should hunt them.
You were in Siberia? And you did not release on single video from there? Mysterious 😅 In the video you wrote: " I just returned from Far East Russia where I tracked Siberian tigers and learned how they interact with animals like a grizzly bear. Some of the evidence about Siberian tigers is too incredible not to share. Remember that a Siberian tiger is 5-700 pounds and a grizzly bear is up to 1200 pounds." -Why is it to incredible to share evidence? What kind of evidence is that? Because I happen to have a relative working in tiger research in Sikhote- Alin, Siberia. She says that grown brown bears at 200 or more dont mind the tigers. They are pretty much immune from tiger attacks. In fact, they thrive if there are tigers in their habitat as they will even force male tigers off their kills. And they have even killed large males in disputes. But no evidence of any 200 kg or larger bears getting killed. So I dont get where you got the idea that tigers will be "a winner" in fights between tigers and brown bears. Evidence points the other direction. Hope you respond to my critical questions here :)
Review "The Tiger" for more evidence! It's in that book and comes directly from indigenous people in the area :) I haven't released more footage because it was a pilot for a TV show that will hopefully be on major platforms in the near future ;)
@@bloodandspirit It cotradicts the findings on the ground the last 80 years since the first books came out about the issue and even more, the research done for 30 years tracking the tigers. The book has no real merit.
@@rogeru73 I'm open to that. If you want to paste some evidence other than your own, I'm open to seeing it and doing a follow up video. But as of now I have a book from an author who visited Far East Russia and did research with tons of locals vs you, a random RU-vid commenter who says it isn't so. Who should I believe? I'm open, but send some links!