More than half of the elctricity (mainly from coal or gas powerplants!) is lost before it is put in your "green" EV. You need to tell that part of the story too!!!
Ev is for future, the cost of renewable energy is reducing constantly. Once we can completely rely on these sources Evs will be cleaner. But for getting the best version of cars that time our research and development should start by now atleast. We can't wait until energy production is completely clean
The real point here is that you can substitute cleaner and more efficient renewable energy sources as and when new technologies emerge. You don’t have that option with fuel. The future is so bright with electric vehicles.
You missed the elephant in the room: A single Chinese PHEV model can outsell all the PHEV models you listed in this video, combined. If you really need to demostrate the working of a PHEV using a model that is not exclusive to China, you can use Honda's model. It's a series-parallel powertrain that can automatically switch between several modes for efficiency and power.
For my use, a plug-in hybrid truck. However, my day today Aaron running, work commute, and leisure travel I have selected the solar powered Aptera (The only one I’m aware of this time). In the future I will be trading in my present vehicle for a plug-in hybrid truck.
Would you please separate the types of hybrid series-parallel Vehicles, which i think they are the bridge between ic vehicles and fully e ones? You are the expert.
FCEV is the way to go, but I think we will soon see a PFCEV (plug in fuel cell electric vehicle), to bridge the gap in infrastructure, before FCEVs really go mainstream
Hey, nice and informative video. Thxs! However it's definitely biased towards EV and FCV. For example, there's no mention to additional costs and weight for PHEV vs HEV, this alone may well justify HEV for most drivers depending on accessibility to charging points on a daily basis. I would have loved to hear more about which is more efficient under urban and national road driving, for instance. Very little has been said about maintenance and second hand prices of all options. FCV are an inch away from being a fairytale. How many H2 charging points are in operation currently? It's not so serious to put this tech at the same level of maturity than all the rest. This can be confusing for most of the public. Great work!
Your statement of features of BEVs is complete Bull Scat I think EVs are cool and would love to have one but, please stop the bull shet. 1. No emissions, BEVs simply move the emissions from the tail pipe to the smoke stack. please stop 2. Not dependent on oil, not true where do you think the electric comes from. And does this thing have gears and bearings? 3. Cost effective, not, have you priced one? 4. Low maintenance, not true. Different maintenance. 5. Reduced noise, this is some what true. 6. Easy driving, not true, some what slightly different driving. Given the problems around and limits of batteries, EV are a break even proposition at best. EVs are more efficient 100 mpge versus 35 mpg but with much higher entergy input up front. Thus the much higher price.
I have a Honda Insight, Hybrid. I average 45 MPG and I have a lead foot. Just to see what would happen I drove 50 miles at 65 Mph and came away with 66.7 MPG. At least I don't have charging station anxiety!
I would love a Toyota Mirai but only 2 states in the US have fueling stations. Luckily I live in California but the fueling stations are all out of my way and it would be a hour trip from home to fill up. Also, from my understanding only one other state has fueling stations and its on the other side of the US. I would not be able to travel out of state via car...
we are taking 1000 mile plus trips and stopping to recharge is not an option and all the stations may be busy, bought a 2021 toyota xenza and is the right hybrid for us
Using hydrogen is like using gas/ petrol since you are tied to a distribution system like the present, visiting a gas station and all that entails, price gouging, lines, paying ,just driving to the station and standing in the cold, No thanks, I pull in my garage plug in and top up while in the comfort of home. My electric cost is supplemented by solar and cheaper than paying someone for hydrogen. The fuel cell car is essentially an electric car but with a smaller battery plus the extras of a fuel cell plus huge storage tank or tanks for the hydrogen. Big oil will just morph into big hydrogen by ridiculing pure battery electric cars.
I am not ready for 100% electric vehicle yet! I would like to drive a hybrid car charging itself while I am driving instead I have to remember plug it in every time as long as the hybrid can save my car using less gasoline I am more happy to have than a electric car! It’s cost more with battery replacement and the future earth will fill with all dead batteries waste have produced from electric cars, i am sure electric car is not for me! I will continue to drive hybrid gasoline until the day I die!
Actually not, read up all the examples of already existing Hybrid Diesel cars. All of them have a horrible MPG compared to regular diesel or Gasoline Hybrid Equivalent. Some manufacturers already discontinued the production of hybrid diesels, like Mercedes, Volvo, it's mainly used now as a mild hybrid in Audi A7
May the second type is most efficient with assist with internal combustion engine and all time auto changing but still produced carbon, the tipe one is most easy almost everyone can made it too, but the truth future is the last type but the only problems is just investment and price fuel itself.
To keep carbon under control inside the engine I use Sea Foam in my gas...I once had an engine apart and was using Sea Foam to soften up the carbon deposits on the valves...guess what, Sea Foam Dissolved the carbon and clean up was easy with an old rag.
I’ve learned the PHEVs are much more expensive that HEVs. The cost of a hybrid ranges from about $2,000 to $7,000 more than a similar ICE. PHEVs are several thousand more still.
The best vehicle is the new hybrid cars. It is true one can plug in at home/on the road but it is better to get gas delivered to the home or office I think.
Another problem with PHEV's is that at some point the weight of the battery harms fuel efficiency more then it helps it. Not necessarily to the point to where it's worse then a conventional vehicle, but definitely to where it's worse then a conventional hybrid with a smaller battery. If you only ever plan on using gas then you are wasting money compared to a normal hybrid. Also Why do places always mention regen braking as a power source? Don't get me wrong, it's a great way of increasing fuel efficiency, but it's never going to generate more power then it took to get the wheels moving in the first place. It's still powered by whatever gave it the power to move in the first place whether that's Hydrogen, gasoline, diesel, or the mainline. And just should mention that saying EV's have "no emissions" can trigger people. It's more accurate to say they have no emissions at the place they are driving and while there are still conflicting opinions most agree that the overall emissions either are or have the potential to be less then with an ICE.
Thanks for this complete and engineering explaining about different hybrids powertrain configuration!!👍 One of the best explains about that topic. Thanks. Solving your question I prefer actually the plug in hybrid vehicles. But if the hydrogen's problems are solved this are the best powertrain solution for transportation!!!
Purely electric vehicles rule the market if more mileage per charge and service stations are available. Cost effective EVs will hasten takeover of traditional cars market by EVs. High cost, low mileage per charge and availability of service stations are hurdles to go for EVs. Recharging of batteries by internal auto-mechanism like in Hybrid vehicles will solve the problem to a large extent. Cheap battery replacement is also, need of the EVs market. Amruta INDIA.
Hybrid vehicles are supposed to bridge the gap between technologie. But instead it seems technologies are branching out into so many different directions, bridging has become nearly impossible with each motor company trying to gain the advantage over each other simply by being different. The BEV is a battery intensive technology, while the HEV technology tends utilize fossil fuel energy and electric storage in unison. However, much of the HEV marketing has been off-shore from the U.S., which only market HEV in huge pickup and less affordable models that don'treally help the emissions advantage of the HEV technology and only marginally in MPG economy. Getting HEV technology popularity to grow while using fossil fuelsfor the larger Commercial transportation & Military applications is the smartest use of transportation for the immediate situation wefind ourselves in. IT's too bad billions of dollars cannot be funneled off the economy by the petroleum and automotive industry, or right compbination would have been arrived at decades ago.
H2 is not an efficient source, as it costs 3 times as much energy to create as it will give you to drive. Creating H2 needs complex and expensive equipment , also conversion H2 to electric current needs a high priced complex and high maintenance fuel cell likely to be replaced within the lifespan of your car . Best thing of H2 is you still need to go to the gas station every few days ;-)
The best vehicle would be Fuel Cell types, once the Green Hydrogen is available in abundance then these vehicles would be the best for humanity. Cheaper and greener hydrogen should be available any time between 2025 to 2028.
A little misinformation or deceptive comment. That an all electric vehicle can run further than a hybrid. Deceiving people to think it can go more miles on a full charge than a hybrid can with a full tank of gas. Which is untrue. Maybe they can reword it to say the battery is bigger and, therefore, the battery can run more miles than a hybrid battery at full charge
Let's promote the unlimited super fuel the fuel of the future. My car is using it no refuelling no recharging needed. Super fuel is around us available whenever we need it
Hydrogen is the future! Charging batteries will be limited because the power net cannot deliver enough at a certain time. Japan has understood this and is investing in Hydrogen chrarcing facilities, bying Hydrogen from Australië.
For at this time of day and age at the moment plug-in hybrids are way to go but the car makers don't know how to make cars these days GM had it and gave it away support your country not foreign
@@metalgear131 because people don't understand it people don't use their minds they're so sucked into the computer world and teach to be victims in big cities by crooked Democrat you can see our leadership how it is right now buy foreign products get rid of jobs be a victim high taxes on the working class
Just my opinion but for practicality hybrids are the best option or at least a hybrid that runs off mainly the battery with a reserve engine in case of storms and such imagine a world where you can’t evacuate a town that’s having a wild fire bc their power is out
A friend sent this to me - A different perspective ☝️ What is a battery? I think Tesla said it best when they called it an Energy Storage System. That's important. They do not make electricity - they store electricity produced elsewhere, primarily by coal, uranium, natural gas-powered plants, or diesel-fueled generators. So, to say an EV is a zero-emission vehicle is not at all valid. Also, since forty percent of the electricity generated in the U.S. is from coal-fired plants, it follows that forty percent of the EVs on the road are coal-powered, do you see?" Einstein's formula, E=MC2, tells us it takes the same amount of energy to move a five-thousand-pound gasoline-driven automobile a mile as it does an electric one. The only question again is what produces the power? To reiterate, it does not come from the battery; the battery is only the storage device, like a gas tank in a car. There are two orders of batteries, rechargeable, and single-use. The most common single-use batteries are A, AA, AAA, C, D. 9V, and lantern types. Those dry-cell species use zinc, manganese, lithium, silver oxide, or zinc and carbon to store electricity chemically. Please note they all contain toxic, heavy metals. Rechargeable batteries only differ in their internal materials, usually lithium-ion, nickel-metal oxide, and nickel-cadmium. The United States uses three billion of these two battery types a year, and most are not recycled; they end up in landfills. California is the only state which requires all batteries be recycled. If you throw your small, used batteries in the trash, here is what happens to them….. All batteries are self-discharging. That means even when not in use, they leak tiny amounts of energy. You have likely ruined a flashlight or two from an old, ruptured battery. When a battery runs down and can no longer power a toy or light, you think of it as dead; well, it is not. It continues to leak small amounts of electricity. As the chemicals inside it run out, pressure builds inside the battery's metal casing, and eventually, it cracks. The metals left inside then ooze out. The ooze in your ruined flashlight is toxic, and so is the ooze that will inevitably leak from every battery in a landfill. All batteries eventually rupture; it just takes rechargeable batteries longer to end up in the landfill. In addition to dry cell batteries, there are also wet cell ones used in automobiles, boats, and motorcycles. The good thing about those is, ninety percent of them are recycled. Unfortunately, we do not yet know how to recycle single-use ones properly. But that is not half of it. For those of you excited about electric cars and a green revolution, I want you to take a closer look at batteries and also windmills and solar panels. These three technologies share what we call environmentally destructive “embedded costs." Everything manufactured has two costs associated with it, embedded costs and operating costs. A typical EV battery weighs one thousand pounds, about the size of a travel trunk. It contains twenty-five pounds of lithium, sixty pounds of nickel, 44 pounds of manganese, 30 pounds cobalt, 200 pounds of copper, and 400 pounds of aluminum, steel, and plastic. Inside are over 6,000 individual lithium-ion cells. It should concern you that all those toxic components come from mining. For instance, to manufacture each EV auto battery, you must process 25,000 pounds of brine for the lithium, 30,000 pounds of ore for the cobalt, 5,000 pounds of ore for the nickel, and 25,000 pounds of ore for copper. All told, you dig up 500,000 pounds of the earth's crust for just - one - battery." Sixty-eight percent of the world's cobalt, a significant part of a battery, comes from the Congo. Their mines have no pollution controls, and they employ children who die from handling this toxic material. Should we factor in these diseased kids as part of the cost of driving an electric car?" I'd like to leave you with these thoughts. California is building the largest battery in the world near San Francisco, and they intend to power it from solar panels and windmills. They claim this is the ultimate in being 'green,' but it is not! This construction project is creating an environmental disaster. Let me tell you why. The main problem with solar arrays is the chemicals needed to process silicate into the silicon used in the panels. To make pure enough silicon requires processing it with hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid, nitric acid, hydrogen fluoride, trichloroethane, and acetone. In addition, they also need gallium, arsenide, copper-indium-gallium- diselenide, and cadmium-telluride, which also are highly toxic. Silicon dust is a hazard to the workers, and the panels cannot be recycled. Windmills are the ultimate in embedded costs and environmental destruction. Each weighs 1688 tons (the equivalent of 23 houses) and contains 1300 tons of concrete, 295 tons of steel, 48 tons of iron, 24 tons of fiberglass, and the hard to extract rare earths neodymium, praseodymium, and dysprosium. Each blade weighs 81,000 pounds and will last 15 to 20 years, at which time it must be replaced. We cannot recycle used blades. Sadly, both solar arrays and windmills kill birds, bats, sea life, and migratory insects. There may be a place for these technologies, but you must look beyond the myth of zero emissions. I predict EVs and windmills will be abandoned once the embedded environmental costs of making and replacing them become apparent. "Going Green" may sound like the Utopian ideal and are easily espoused, catchy buzz words, but when you look at the hidden and embedded costs realistically with an open mind, you can see that Going Green is more destructive to the Earth's environment than meets the eye, for sure.
So how can people "go green"? From all of what you said im sure nuclear fission/fusion is out of the picture, and we cant really continue our current pollution trajectory. In short, your idea of going green is to stop human civilization growth right? Or maybe a mass genocide like someone like thanos would think of? Because seeing you comment or watching a youtube vid means you definitely have some kind of lithium battery powering your device, or a computer which use electricity. Better follow your very own advice yeah?
It’s funny how a person can sit around and come up with all the problems but HiSSStory tearStorm waves hight higher fine hide search comes up an AsSolution?
விதவிதமான கார்கள் இருக்க பயன்படுத்த முடியுமா ஸ்மார்ட் சிட்டியில் நல்ல தரமில்லாத வாகனமாக இருக்க வேண்டியது அவசியமாகும் விலை அதிகமாக இருப்பதால் வாங்க முடியாது லாபநோக்கத்துடன் தாங்க சிந்திக்க வேண்டிய து
Surprised there was a study in the UK that suggests hybrids were more reliable owning to Toyota's build quality while BEVs are one of the least reliable owing to Tesla. But yeah after seeing how much cooling and ducting is required for performance ICEVs and issues encountered by many engines due to EGR/emissions standards, my next car purchase will be a BEV but probably five to six years down the road at the earliest since my two Toyota/Lexus HEVs and Honda ICEV are still mostly trouble-free and they're non-gas guzzlers.
