That guy who lied about not being an Officer. He needs to be off the Force. Can you imagine how many lies he will tell to fit someone up? Anyone who is up in Court where he is the witness, needs to get their solicitor to show that he is a liar and his evidence then becomes inadmissible. He is a liability now for the Police. But we know he will get away with it. He is one of our protected "friends" above the law. Pathetic. Just pathetic the calibre of Police in Britain.
Well said this should be shown all over the Internet. That policemen who pushed you. Needs reporting along with the two outside the gate who just did not want to know about the lies and asalt on you
Well said they are literally all full of shit the taller officer had the nerve to say doctoring of footage after Plod had been assaulted by that Civilian officer who lied on camera stating he wasn't they literally doctor footages all the time and complete and utter corrupt and full of shit they lie in every interaction the crap they spew is mindboggling in itself that there are dumb people out there believing their shit they come out with etc
Thats his undercover role blown ... was he drunk on duty? Why do they always feel their twisted logic and unwanted opinions are superior and should be forced on people? Winging it ... their paranoid imaginations and naivety are security risks to the public
The sad part is the judge will not do anything as it’s all ready established that in a court of law that the police can lie to a member of the public in the street or in the police station to gather evidence and judges also allow police to commit perjury on the stand and even if you tell the judge that you have proof that the officer has lied and committed perjury the judge will not care. As this happened to me in court.
If the red Audi driver is indeed an officer, he has lied. Any evidence he ever provides in any future court cases should be thrown out as it can be proven shown to be of poor character and untrustworthy.
I would LOVE to know just how many calls were received by this police station during this interaction asking for police assistance only to be told nobody was available to come out as all the police officers were 'busy'! Well done to you for standing your ground against these obvious bullies who think they are above the law!
It is under the terms and code of practice that police officers must conduct themselves in when approaching and talking to members of the pubic in uniform and out, on duty and of duty, and if not then their behaviour should be challenged at every oppertunity, so record all contacts with them no matter how trivial it may be, and by doing so it's going to percolate through their thick skulls they serve us not us serving them.
If he denies being a cop, it makes one ask what is he hiding? If he is not proud to be a cop he needs to find another job. Regardless of all this he is bad news to be out "interacting" with the public he serves. Fair chance he has a dirty history of these "interactions".
Shocking!! Notice how that officer came out with blue gloves on, ready for a detainment & search, you outwitted them perfectly. Hats off to you.Great job👍👍
@@ElliHarper this guy Chris has been commenting on lots of these videos. I asked him if it was keeping him up at night, because one comment was at 4 am. It’s highly likely he was the star of one of these audits himself. Let it go Chris, life’s too short.
@@toplodornottoplod The fact that the officer lied and importantly used force without identifying himself opens him up personally to a lawsuit and criminal charges. I would strongly recommend you sue him personally and demand that he be charged we assault and battery.
@@RM-qv9rb all well and good but when approaching a member of public in the Manor he did then deny he's a police officer takes that away, If he's approached and asked its a different matter I'd assume... but he's approaching someone who's doing something lawful and engaging and assaulting them
'Obstructive' and 'in this day and age': amongst Plod's favourite utterances. I'm well impressed by you. You know your stuff and you articulate it really well. You're far too clever for Plod, and you expose their terrifying ignorance brilliantly.
That Asian needs a disciplinary….clearly a rogue…..he must have just ticked a box to get his job, because he’s no professional for sure….mind you the rest of them were bellends to be fair.
"I have just been assaulted". Officers response - "What are you doing here?" Just unbelievable.........ignore the reported crime, and instead 'investigate' the Lawful activity. What an embarrassment.
when they asked "is this an audit" you could have answered "yes and all of you failed it miserably in every aspect. shame on you!". i loved the threat level questions that made their hypocrisy and paranoia evidently clear.
I would very much doubt that without the benefit of ethnic equality or whatever they call it could he would have passed the basic police entrance tests let alone any psych tests which I believe are a part of the vetting process - anger management, tendency to lie, lack of reasoning etc.
@@mattpayne3349100% agree. A low intellect man in a menial job is fine but in a position of responsibility and supposed authority he is a danger to the public.
And u could bump into him and he could have a lethal weapon upon his person and with his irrational behaviour , shudder to think what it could lead to !
The other cop in the blue gloves thought that it was funny - be a different story if the auditor lunged at him - there would ne no laughing then. That is why I think not only should that vop be fired but the station should be close until the officers are all re-trained and made aware that we live in a free society. Those that do not want tolive in a free society can leave!
10 minutes into the video and the sublime way you dealt with the 1st off duty PC. A slap in the face (with words) if ever I saw one. I know before viewing the rest is going to be top notch.
There is no such thing as a copper being " genuinely interested" in what you or any Auditor is doing .. they all hate it when they get told the correct law . I love watching them squirm when you pull them on things..
Start addressing the blatant intimidation and harassment. They didn't 'just' learn that you were legal, they tried to politely bully you. It looks disgusting and is a violation regardless of how polite they try to sound while doing it.
No, well, it has specific laws for certain things like general prohibiting cycling on the pavement and Bylaws in Royal parks.Nothing in the Terrorism Act or the Feds COE that applies specifically to London.
Another brilliant video, they don't know what they're getting themselves in for when they meet you.... your on the ball with every question & answer! 👍👍👍 I hope you don't let the assault go, its really scary to think what he's like when there are no cameras around!
Here we go again and again and again.... The old "terrorism" argument again... It really wears very very thin after a while, it really does. PS this guy in the red car really does have a problem.
Well done plod, another perfect example of why there is total hate For all these tyrants that pose as coppers. It must be an offence to tell a member of public that your not a copper if you are, without him assaulting you.
I think he thought he could get away with it by saying he wasn’t an officer. His two buddies dropped him right in it by saying he was an officer. Notice how he disappeared real quick to let the uniforms deal with his shit……
You totally owned them brilliant but please sue that guy for assault he was totally out of order and does not deserve to be a police officer they all need to be re trained I expected nothing less from Islington
It must cause them sleepless nights, not LIKING something,and finding out it's perfect legal.and they're powerless, and then be childish and say "you are distracting us from our kettle ----- I mean duties."! oh ,what a dilemma.🤔
"this man assaulted me" "yes but that's alright, because you were breathing at the time and he's a policeman" After the disgraceful Couzens scandal, it's time the Met got what it deserves.
When they come out with the T word, translates into this: I don't like you filming, but because I can not ripe the camera out of your hands and put in jail, I have to resort to something else that I think has legal support, even tough I do not have any evidence of that!!
Complaints filed on all of these “cops” ?? Dereliction of duty charges for not taking your report of an assault Or the video is a complete waste of time and they will just carry on acting like that
That is if we the people do nothing and allow it to continue, the more this sort of behaviour is allowed to continue the more auditing should and will continue at a pace, that is why they are getting audited the lenth and breadth of the courty to highlight such abuse by so called police officers,if the police are not going to do anything about it,then it's time for all us to support bringing such incedents before the courts, lets us all put our hands in our pockets and financialy give support to bring about private prosocutions, and as they say the cammera does not lie, all these officers behaviour should be challenged in the court.
The arrogance and corruption within the police is huge. Thank you for exposing that again. To the corrupt police it is more important to harass an innocent person acting within the law, who was already attacked by a lying PC than to take a complaint about their lying attacking collegae. Threatening with sect 43. Sigh. Obviously they need to be retrained and get rid of that arrogance. Do file a complaint abt them. That is the only thing that will have some impact on the imbeciles.
It amazes me just how little these "officers" know about the laws they are spouting! If more auditors used this interaction as an example you guys would have an easier life. Great job.
The signs on the gates clearly state that the entrance is for "operational vehicles only" so the red Audi is presumably an operational police vehicle. Members of the public don't normally drive operational police vehicles.
It appears the Red Audi is taxed and MoT'd. Operational Police vehicles are maintained by the Police themselves and I believe are exempt from a MoT Test. So I suggest there is a good chance that is a personal vehicle and if the policy behind the operational vehicles only sign is in force then the car should not have been in there....perhaps the reason behind the attempt to take the camera
Aha Plod love your interaction with those kids, that was spot on!! :D Very sad that straight after a positive interaction you had that buffoon try and jump you.
Are you filing a complaint on the red audi driver. His behaviour was disgraceful and abusing his power telling a lie that he wasn't an officer. The others should have a complaint on not letting you report a crime. Great audit as usual.
Technically he didn't lie. An officer only has to identify themselves when they seek to use their powers. What it mean though, is because he said he wasn't and officer, the assault and battery he committed can't be fobbed of as him working in his police capacity. Therefore he is liable for charges and liable for a personal lawsuit
guy walks up to you with 2 back packs ,1 front and 1 back , I would think he was a terrorist .Also when he was force to identify I though he was going to say he was 1 of the 3 Musketeers!
Plodders, old boy, I'm speechless. Better & better. I can't recall ANYONE talking themself out of an S43 search in such an eloquent & robust manner. Great that you're raising the (5 surely?) complaints, but what about filing the assault charge? That was bang out of order by the unidentified cop. I note how the others buried your accusation in a blur of obfuscating tosh. (Can't say it was deliberate, tbh, as none appeared to have the intelligence to understand what they did. Perhaps they just fell back on their 'training'). Deffo report the assault. If nothing eventually comes of it, at least he'll get the fright of his life during the proceedings. He might also learn the law & the need for restraint. Wonder why he didn't want his photo taken?
You dealt with this absolutely brilliantly. I like audits but soo many auditors act out with chips on their shoulders so it’s great to see this assertive legal attitude.
"Hmm, victim of a crime...perhaps you caused him to assault you whilst acting legally, account for yourself". Thick as bricks. Love the bit about personal cars, someone might want to harm them so they have to get out and assault member of the public in case they want to harm them. Yeah, got that.
18:42 the guy who parks the red Audi in the entrance/ exit of the the police yard, gives Plod a hard time and then speaks on the intercom. Just as well that a police vehicle on blues and twos didn't need to get out for an emergency call whilst he left his car there.
Great Audit. Keep up the good fight. Unbelievable how many times you had to answer the same question. Filming in pubic. Anything your eyes can see. Cheers mate from the USA.
Some egos getting bruised because you knew your rights and its obvious they've had the memo about Auditors because they did the walk of shame as soon as Auditing was mentioned. Please continue to complain about the tyrant PC who assaulted you as he definitely needs retraining, my first time of watching your content and I'm very impressed with your style.
don’t let the matter drop. You threatened to make a complaint so please follow through. It’s the only way tools like that and the rest of the corrupt filth will take notice.
When he asks "how does it look when you are filming cars...". Ask him if he is okay as he sounds paranoid and you are concerned about his mental health
They checked your camera for evidence and then walked away without taking a statement. The notice to leave auditors alone is NOT part of Section 43. It was issued by the Police themselves.
Actually section 43 does have a specific section about photos & filming which states that photography/filming alone CANNOT be used as suspicion. It was the IOPC that issued the memo to every police station(& therfore every police officer) that filming police stations is allowed and to leave filmers alone. Therefore no pig in the country has any excuse for unlawfully questioning & harassing filmers.
"Let me tell you, after my colleagues already admitted they have no idea at all about the actual threat level, that I too have absolutely no idea what I'm talking about. But that level, of which I have clue, allows me to keep you occupied by standing here talking shite"
Isn't it great that they ignore your report of a "crime" and interrogate you for a non-crime and a human right. They dont like being accountable and immediately cover for their colleague.
The first officer who lied about being an officer needs firing, no control of emotions. The rest of them is a prime example of the police gang, you were assaulted and by a gang member and they did nothing about it. They are all eating from the same trough.
ah you saw that fat cops face of defeat when he realized he couldn't do anything, and props to Plod or Not to Plod for having the knowledge of asking what section under 43 they were detaining him under....
Being an ex squaddie.i find the actions of police totally hilarious, I've seen real heros blown to bits because they've stood too close to a real terrorist , in fact the poor sods at Manchester suffered the same fate . I fully encourage cops to gather around the protentialy terrorists because one day they will detain a terrorist and there will be a bomb may be then they'll learn
My goodness, he must be dismissed immediately. If he will lie about this most important issue he is dangerous. If he has to give evidence in court it could not be relied upon. I would suggest anyone convicted on his evidence should immediately have their case reviewed.
Good job you moved quickly or your camera would have got damaged. Now if you had of done that to him you would be in the custody suit by now facing assault charges with a couple of other trumpt up charges. He would not identify as a police officer as he knows he is a corrupt officer. He gives the good officers a bad name. Disgusting behaviour. Section 5 public order but of course he gets away with it. One rule for the general public one for the corrupt officers.
@@gsigsi9938 Absolutely right. There are many good officers. It's the corrupt ones that need weeding out. Totally agree with you. I know many fantastic coppers.
