Yeah you did do good but I think you should have lead with the knight first and put it where you did then send the dark bishop and if you wanted to bring it back to finish the one square knight bird and have the bird of paradise opening complete and from there and do what you do you would have had it easy and I still can't wait to see you perform a real beautiful game❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊
I understand exactly what you mean when you where talking about your first game and how you played just fine and out of nowhere they find some BS. Chess is really frustrating sometimes.
I believe in you Levy. Ofc.. depends on you coz it takes enormous effort to learn and practice and remember like a calculator to be on par with these GMs. But, I feel technically; you have in your mind what it takes, you have that brainpower.
"It's unfathomable the amount of luck involved in chess" Levy, describing a game where all information is known and there is no actual luck involved. Love it! :)
but u know hes talking about the overall luck where for instance sometimes u have winning positions but ur opponent tries to take over suddenly and u lose but u played well
@@leafyumm stop crying u dont know what i meant and i know that u r saying that im wrong because i said that "sometimes we lose but we played well" that doesnt mean that we played with 100% accuracy, i means that u played good but suddenly u made one inaccuracy and ur opponent found the best move and u lose. This whole scenario obviously is based on luck where ur opponent found the best move only when u misplayed only a little like in GM games for example i saw hikaru playing against magnus and he missed a knight sac and drew but he had a winning position, now what is this not luck?when u just miss one move and go from winning to not winning in a sec. I know it's our mistake to make that inaccuracy but the timing of these things is based on luck obviously and ur opponent blundering, playing top level in a winning position (for you) or not is also based on that luck. This whole paragraph was meant to tell u what i meant now hopefully u dont come back like a kid saying i am wrong, be mature about it and try to understand
You played completely fine until you blundered the rook lev dog let’s be honest. It’s not witchcraft, it’s tunnel vision. Just some constructive criticism to which you are already aware of. P.S. with that said, we will understand if you slow up just a little on your content in order to chase your goal/reality of becoming GM!
You didn’t play completely fine. Why would you have taken that knight trade to open up the file for his rook while all his bishops are staring at your king. That was just insane for you to do that
@@cheesenutz3854 doesn’t really matter does it. The facts of that game are the facts nothing can change that. I forget you young people don’t believe in facts and truth. The facts are he did not play that game completely fine. Just go do a review with an engine and you’ll see the facts are pretty clear.
