I promise this isn't dumb. - Veeo Transparent Display 

I think the idea is that the camera is where the person’s head would be, meaning it’s obscured by the person you’re talking to.

That's what the enclosed version of the display is. I think the transparent versions are basically just to demonstrate the tech.

​@@aspuzlinga tech demo at CES? Crazy

Yeah, you can really tell this company tried to "find a purpose" for this tech without..... ya know, actually thinking it through.

Aster, I thought that was _exactly_ the entire point of this video. My understanding is that what they are demonstrating is a panel that will be used in a closed back scenario when a camera is involved. Transparent panels have been demonstrated before and could have all sorts of salesy type uses, but this video is not demonstrating that. This video is demonstrating technology integration.

They even dimmed the lights...

I agree, this is gonna be huge for stores. Just imagine an apple store with this

also it looks cool

Exactky. Not everything is about consumers. Sometimes tech is just for businesses.

@@segiraldovi Counter argument to what I said about that main application of transparent displays is a few things. First, it's still prohibitively expensive. While paper is inflexible and changing what's on it requires reprinting the paper; ink, paper, whatever time is spent on the design is all cheaper than displays that likely cost tens of thousands of dollars each. Unless it's a business that needs to change their signage constantly it'll be at least a decade before these kinds of displays are more economical than just reprinting signs. There's also the cost of electricity and repair. A normal window and paper sign doesn't continually cost money to keep working. Any kind of large retail brand with multiple brick and morter locations has a specific look they maintain for branding purposes. So a company like Apple wouldn't be able to use these kind of displays in just 1 store. They'd have to use them in hundreds of stores. Which again, is a lot of money. Maybe as a pop up concept type of store just to boost consumer interest/awareness it would be done, but outside that purpose I don't see it happening for some time. I brought up the main utility of what I imagine transparent displays would be used for (not as TVs people watch things on). Doesn't mean I think we'll actually be seeing them in use any time soon

It also creates the opportunity to create a faux holographic image around an object as seen through a window, or as a layer over a mirror.

On the phones the under screen cameras take up like 1% of the whole screen. The cameras used here seem to take up close to 10% so if you're going through the trouble of making that much of the screen transparent might as well make the whole thing transparent.

It has something to do with eye contact. If you put the camera at the top and not at the center, then you'd rather have a traditional screen

​@@360tomahawk_obese_gorilla87 added to that, they are working towards the "EYE CONTACT" thing, which means camera cannot be at a corner or an edge, it needs to be near the centre of the screen. Currently under display cameras work by COMPLETELY TURNING OFF the display above them when they are operating. This cannot be done if the camera is near the centre of the screen else there will be a black spot in between of your video conference.

How about you watch the video? He specially addresses the use case of this technology

i think its gonna useful with smart glasses like meta have today, VR headsets gonna become smart glasses, that’s the future I believe it

I think it depends on each person, some people go insane if they dont go out of their house for long periods of time, or dont like having their work area and relax area to be the same place

these fools trying to scam people for a problem nobody cares enough to solve

@@erickr199 you're part of the problem.

@@erickr199 there are some things called gyms, parks and other public spaces where you go out instead of wasting 2 hours daily commuting. as for the dedicated work area just make one at your house where you only works and that's it wallah.

@@colliebutt7104 Why? It does depend on each person. Some people hate staying at home every day. Some people don't have extra dedicated space to separate the "work area" from the "time off" area. I'd love to be able to work from home.. At least *some* of the time. But I can't be cooped up in my house for days on end.

Yeah, that was just a complete lie from them.. the whole monitor is a sacrifice for terrible quality

They could have also used a smaller camera like a phone and only use the transparent screen in that tiny spot

for a good camera I would think they'd use more than a tiny spot but 5-10% of the screen is a hell of a lot more reasonable than 100%

THANK YOU these screens look TERRIBLE, they are low res and are SUPER expensive, to solve a problem most don't care about and phones have already solved for cheaper and with superior results, Fully Transparent Displays still a solution looking for a problem

​@@__Brandon__this is exactly what I said. Why use a massive camera with a fully transparent screen, when you could treat it like a phone and put a small camera in the middle behind a small section of transparent screen.

It will replace promters

The eye contact use case is easily solved with AI tools that are already released. There's a even a company doing this that has almost the same name, VEED.

Literally is a nvidia RTX program that does that already, and its free lmao

Yup, given that both Apple and Nvidia already has eye contact built out, the monitor for the only purpose of eye contact is ridiculous. But given that this is for businesses they'll be able to sell a decent amount.

logitech already has options to fix this for years with their rally systems and the like for bussiness

@@PrimyFritzellz yeah, but the AI enhanced pupil placement is farrrrr from natural lol

@@gingaming_gg I'd rather use an uncanny AI pupil replacement thing than use a transparent monitor with a black box in the center. Give about 2 years and we'll not even know if the image was "AI Enhanced" or not

exactly what i thought lmao

THANK YOU!!!!

Somewhere I still have the 3D screen HTC phone. It was useless.

Still have my 3D TV from 2014, hope it lasts because I don't think 3D TVs are coming back.

well think about people in rooms of the bottom of ship decks below the water line..

I don't think this video is about transparent panels yo.

@@SixOThreeAre you watching the same video?

@@ernieoporto1111 yup and they’re not demonstrating something that already exists - transparent oled. They’re demonstrating the integration of technologies, specifically cameras and transparent oled, in a way that improves outcomes.

@@SixOThree and that's the fault of the video and the demo folks. They just need to ditch the term entirely, and use something even dumber that actually makes sense, like "smart monitor", or "AI display".

@@deano1699 I could be stupid too. But both are possible as well.

The box is large enough to live in. Technically, you'd be saving money.

The host specifically said this is targeted at business not at consumers. Chill

The issue with making the glass part of glasses a display is that the light emitted from the screen isn't focused. That isn't insurmountable, but that's why a screen alone won't work.

If I'm taking a course and someone has an AI filter on that's making them always stare right at me... I'm gonna be creeped out.

@@enemyv This could be partially solved if the tech developed so that it'd only manipulate ur gaze toward the camera if you are both looking at ur computer screen and speaking

@@enemyv It would need to be smart enough to only make them look straight out when they look in the middle of the screen. Perhaps with calibration.

Agreed, although it will likely take years to get this tech that small. It would still probably be best to have a real-time live feed of your surroundings to solve the low pixel density issues, as without this it would be the return of heavy screen door effect

I work remotely and in my experience, that multitasking is one of the biggest issues with remote work. People are empowered to work away during a meeting rather than be fully present. Sometimes that is more productive because if you were pulled into a meeting you didn't really need to be in you can at least get some other work done, but just as often you end up with the people you really wanted feedback from not giving it their full attention. When designing complex systems, there's really nothing like three or four fully engaged engineers working around a whiteboard. It's the thing I miss the most.

I still think Holograms are the best use for these, the Window Idea is cool but, I worry abut what the being exposed to the hot sun all day long would do to these screens, especially with how exspensive they are

Why are these tech grandpa’s so demanding about eye contact when most of us don’t even show their faces when talking to our friends online?

I don’t understand why we need webcams at all. I don’t need to see someone’s face if he talks to me I just need to hear him.

A teleprompter with a 50 inch screen would be extremely huge.

I just imagined my car bluescreening and me going off a cliff....

That defeats the most important purpose of trying things on. Most people don't return things because they don't like the design. They do so cuz they don't fit / they don't like the materials. also there is no reason for a transparent display for this.

@@Stay_away_from_my_swamp_water the display only needs to be transparent where the camera is (adjustable to onlooker's eye level). As for trying things on, yes, in the end the shopper will still have to try it on if they think it looks good in the mirror, but it will at least help with those things that they thought would look good but doesn't match their skin tone/body type/etc.

@thaNorthStar if thats how you think than there should be nothing but barren walls ... if people are stupid and destroy stuff they should pay for it so at least if those idiots would be found they will have hurt themselves even more

AR is already a thing, it works and has numerous implementations. This? WHY? If you´d use a stationary display, you alway have use the same Background, most likely your wall. It doesn´t make sense, just use black or white or whatever to fill the void. This isn´t thought through in the slightest and it is a useless fad.