Buy i3 if you just like playing older games and wanted a really super cheap pc build, buy r3 3300x if you like to play modern games, have a decent budget and know things about overclocking
there's like,0% headroom left for the i3 to run background tasks while gaming. holy frick,the 3300x is a beast. also 4 core but with hyper threading. AMD have come a long way
the build goes from 500 bucks to 700 you just look at the cpu price you dont mention faster memory an more expensive motherboard and a better power supply the price range isent comperable tbh and for what 10 fps diffrence the i3 9100f destroyed the Ryzen 3 3300X
that would have made the "cpu comparison " part literally pointless. so many people on every benchmark video always yell at the creator for this and it makes no sense in the slightest first of all, there would be no "comparison" using a gpu that hits 100% all your doing is testing the gpu and the numbers would be the same in any system you put it in where the gpu is the bottleneck in 1-2 years these "budget" cards wont be usable anymore in new titles. just so you know, and high end cards will become mid range and budget.... that's how it works. saying "hur durr 2080 is too strong for i3 9100f" is completely stupid in the sense 1-2 yeas you'll probably have a 3060 that is on par with a 2080.
it is not the GPU power the design of assassins' creed DRM and encryption need more than 4 core so it doesn't matter what GPU you used like if you cape the fps to 30 you will notice huge decline of CPU usage .this game not optimized to run more than 30 fps lazy port from console that's it. any developer should targets the most owned CPU (4 cores or less) as the report from steam ( players pc spec) so they maximize the people can play the game. anyway because console use 8 cores one of them reserved for system since ps4, Xbox one and the new console same cores count so the developers now target the 6 core CPU lately and that will benefit 3300x.
1.The rtx 2080 super is the one being bottlenecked 2.By doing so, You're showing the most amount of frames it will output(which shows which ones better)
Only a single intel processor in current market which is value for money. It actually beats r3 3100, 3200g and both costs more that i3 - 9100f but yes r3 3300x beats all Well done team red
I was looking for a good value Ryzen, but the R5 1600 was at 105$, it is good but I fell short so the i3 9100f was the best option at 76$, plus I just have a gtx1050, planing for a 1060 6g in the future.
@@avyaykhaire7187 don't buy 1660 ti.. it is waste of money..either u buy 1660 or rtx 2060.. Do u know rtx 2060 is more powerful than 1660ti and both hav similar price
i guess. i'd still buy the i3 9100f for 60$ over the 3300x for $120 for games the i3 9100f is enough for 60+fps,it's not much slower then the 3300x in gaming. and it's half the price. 3300x great for budget production and mid range gaming but it's not really worth double the price to me. or imo someone who only play games and is on a strict budget.
@@rustedyoda7339 Yes, it is also for those who just want to play, but the idea of taking a 4-core 8-core processor at this price is amazing because it deserves the i7 7700, so I think someone who wants to take a processor to play in the future i3 10100 or Resin 3 3300x / Resin 3 3100.
