Impressive Dassault Rafale Display | Kauhava Airshow 2020 

It's more like Porsche Cayenne 911 in the sky. Swift, agile and precise. Light and small build wise.

You all prolly dont give a shit but does anyone know of a way to get back into an Instagram account?? I was dumb lost the password. I love any help you can give me!

@Rodrigo Van Instablaster ;)

@FUCK SHIT Bugatti is an exceptional french car builder. Peugeot is less exceptional.

But lamborghini is ugly

Canada belong to US market :)

Le Canada? Une colonie américaine non? On a déjà du mal avec nos amis Belges alors vendre du Rafale au Canada ...

Politics !

One of the reasons is just a five letters acronym : NORAD !

It's a little more complicated than that. Canada is integrated with NORAD. In order to ensure "compatibility" with NORAD functions and networks, the US demanded every contender of the competition to give away the signatures of their radar and electronics. Including radar modes and whatnot, even PRIOR to the result of the comptition. Just for the sake of "checking if everything is compatible" you see? Which is a nice joke since radar modes, especially WAR modes, are the most secretive part of any fighter aircraft. The Rafale, back then, was the only european aircraft featuring an AESA radar that was present in the competition. Others only had (and still do by the way) prototypes AESA with in-development modes. The RBE2 AESA for its part is operational since more than 10 years. And since it's not really a different radar, just a different array compared to the older RBE2 PESA, both antennas being plug&play, it would have basically meant the US would have known in a snap of a finger absolutely every little secret of the Rafale regarding its radar and its electronic warfare. So Thalès (France) was more than pissed since this was literally normalized espionnage. Dassault then tried to get the other 2 european contenders to leave the competition . They refused. So Dassault left, alone. After years preparing to compete for this canadian prospect. Lesson learned.

Thanks! Glad you enjoyed

Thanks for Dassault Aviation I would say ... 😉

Thank you!

No problem!

Για να τα Βλέπουμε μόνο 😂😂

@FUCK SHIT ?????-?

Turkish dont play with Greek airforce when they will received this killer aircraft

@@evenhazertannecy8134 Now we are Playing with You

In ur dreams.

N'oublions pas Dassault Aviation qui a juste pensé, conçu et développé cette merveilleuse machine.

perfect for a country that doesn't ever intend to fight a war, yes

@@radicalrodriguez5912 The multirole Rafale has proven its capacity over the past 20 years in different war zones but CH decided to buy F35 (hasn't yet proven its fighting capacity), very expensive at purchase and horrific expensive maintenance following the reports of US specialists, a baby that has still lots of problems to resolve. For what, just protect a post stamp?

Biden en personne est venu dire aux suisses choisissez le F35 su vous ne voulez pas que les banques suisses soient pénalisées aux USA....une semaine après nous connaissions le résultat F35

Haha!

R.IP TO TURKISH PILOTS.....🤣🤣

Thanks!

Because Rafale can do that the other can't;

Merci!

no thats sukhoi the f22 is god to

@@arildrichstad8958 certainly not, have a look at the weight of both.

@@arildrichstad8958 the Sukhoi is twice the size of the Rafale. It has no chance in dogfight against the French fighter.

@@chrissoubibi i agree

Most probably the most agile of the NON-thrust-vectoring jet fighters.

The Rafale Solo Display is known to go up to 11G. There is some videos showing it's HUD during the demo . . .

Here is a twitter video of the HUD of the Rafale Solo Display in Dubaï Air Show, november 2019. The pilot was Sébastien "Babouc" Nativel. The footage was taken during the "square dance" figure, which is a serie of 4 breaks with barrel rolls in-between them. During the breaks the Rafale reaches 11G as indicated on the HUD. twitter.com/Amitraaz/status/1203283895321427974?s=20

There are spruced up g-suits nowadays in scandinavian circles. Not widely advertised but developed in the late nineties.

Timo Lindroos sure you can, that will be only 2 million per month. Do you still want to make the order, sir?

Just a little mistake : The stealth cruise missile is the "SCALP-EG" (or "Storm Shadow" for British). The METEOR is a beyond visual range air-to-air missile with hybrid propulsion : booster (for initial boost) + throttleable ramjet (for long range) with the best no-escape zone in western arsenal . . . Both are MBDA (Aribus, BAE, Leonardo) products.

@@obelixator3853 Mach 4 Please Storm Shadow range up to 600km

@@PAPASTHEGREAT Mach 4 is for the METEOR. SCALP-EG = STORM-SHADOW is a subsonic cruise missile (Mach 0.8 to 0.95)

@@obelixator3853 I know the Mach 4 was for the Meteor.

@@PAPASTHEGREAT My bad, I didn't understood your previous answer . . .

Well you better take a look om f 22 not bad that plane to

@@arildrichstad8958 The F-22 is good, but it has thrust-vectoring, while the Rafale doesn't. And still, the F-22 is not as responsive as the Rafale, because it's heavier.

@Thor Odinson He doesn't say otherwise

Yup. Thanks!

Thanks

It's in Finland

Rafalle+greek pilots=💪💪💪

@@ace-pv4hy Best of both worlds

con fuzz + Maybe because the Air-Force/Navy Commander know's a little more than to base it on an air show mucker, that and he doesn't want his balls blown off in combat.

henryv agincourt they must be the same commanders that decided that they wanted carriers without Catobar systems, preventing any AWACS capability and limiting the service range and carried load of the planes embarked on said carriers... Truly masters of their craft at work.

F22 why not but F35 :((

@@henryvagincourt4502 it is also because with the f16 my country made parts for the upgrade programs ( we even trained americans in f16 combat) , i suspect it will be the same in the f35 cycle , its all about compensations

@@cnfuzz + Israel? If so, you didn't buy them, I think you know that mucker.

Yeah, i was pretty sad when i heard that there's not going to be any Lockheed Martins.

The F35 stays away from euro continental public air show since this event : www.intelligent-aerospace.com/military/article/14067798/twinvis-radar-f-35-tracked

NO MORE DOGFIGHT WITH RAFALE SAId THE AMERICANS :))

The F35 has trouble making transatlantic flight. Finland know this with HX Challenge when half of the F35 did not make it. 😈

@@lordtemplar9274yes finland test was a disaster for the f35 ^^, but netherland daily use of it is funny too, theirs can't even fly by rainy days ;) ( true story ) The best way for the russians to invade europe now is to choose a rainy and cold winter day, and to fly only through F35 equipped countries.

It's in real-time, not speeded up or anything. The pilot manoeuvred the aircraft well.

The Rafale Solo Display is always like that ! Look at this wonderful video : ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-IgD4QvxhFyU.html

Your suspicious question is the best tribute one could imagine to Rafale's flight capabilities. :)

4.5 gen

pour ton info la génération de l'avion n'a rien à voir avec ses performances, pour preuve le merdique et rater F35! c'est juste une date de projet!

Unfortunately no, but don't worry! There will be more videos from Kauhava to come.

Thank you

C est vraiment drôle ce que tu dis là. Je me suis demandé à un moment si ce n était pas une blague. La Turquie est un grand pays, une puissance militaire, ça ne fait aucun doute, mais pour ce qui est de sa capacité à développer et fabriquer des armes performante on repassera. C est comme si tu disais que les russes font de meilleures voitures que les allemands !

That's true! F35 is horrible

@@utilisateurlambda7983 so horrible everyone is buying it

no it is a french Rafale from the Armée de l'Air. Why do you think it is from India ?

Sorry no, french airforce actually.

I see the emblem mark on IAF on it..so it belongs to india..so the pilot would be from IAF. It is french made aircraft

oo Please dude, check the French Airforce emblem. It's the same as Indian Airforce except the blue ring in place of green. Start have a look on Google on French Airforce history (one of the first created in the world). These airshows are made to promote aircraft builders, and as you said, Rafale is build by Dassault and fly for his service (Dassault) by the French Airforce, that is why the fighter has french colors. Btw, India only has a few Rafale at the moment that just have been delivered and the Indian Airforce has far more important tasks than bringing a new fighter to an airshow.

@@thierrymilan2039 Oh...I got it...thanks for correcting me.

Did you just call this "old technology"? 🤡

That's what i was asking myself..is it indeed the Indian logo?

@@kaamdev810 no its the french cocarde en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cockade_of_France

French emblem cocarde, it exists before India had an air force or a flag. Read description.

Very similar to Indian Airforce but blue color, not green. French airforce.

Passively speaking, the Rafale is certainly not a VLO (Very Low Observable) aircraft, "just" a LO (Low Observable) aircraft with its 0.06 m² frontal RCS, far better than "4Gen" fighters. Passive "stealth" is not the alpha & omega of fighter jets, it has lot of cons . . . The aim of LO/VLO is to increase the plane survivability, but for the Rafale this goal is not only based on a single property (VLO) but on a smart balance between RCS, agility, endurance, ground following, self-defense suite (SPECTRA), reliability, supercruise, ease of employment, etc...

VLO + active cancellation thanks to SPECTRA.

Stealthy is still outdated. Certainly not a game changer for big airforces.

@@thierrymilan2039 Let’s say some countries are just incapable to build a stealth fighter, therefore they simply argue stealth is not a game changer.

@@jasc4364 Ok all your comments shows you are not aware of last defense techs. Stealth aircraft tech is available since the 70s. So you really think the big powers in the world who are able to detect missiles smaller and way faster than an aircraft don't have radars to detect your so-called furtive plane ? Wake up and read more about the world defence, not only US tech. First danger in war zone is to be too much confident.

Pangolin eaters always ready for à good joke. Need to see your J20 flying saucer shot down by our "White flag jet", 150km away.

Go Fuck

Whats the menu in Chengdu? Oh..bat soup..

Jean Valjean actually I do, as long as your flying it you froggy cretin 🐸🐸🐸🐸

MERCATOR313 Go fuck ur self. Looked all nite for a french ww1 or ww2 pilot or good plane but ace no luck though seems pilots as bad as Rafael : meaning is slight breeze or fart for better accuracy their then 🤣😂😜🦃🦃

Lol jealous , any sources to back your conspiracy theories? FYI all planes fly clean config during airshows.

You’re wrong.

@@lordtemplar9274 No just check the videos from the same airshows and you´ll see

You think you can tune a jet engine as you would with a car at low cost ?

@@thierrymilan2039 More or less you can.... Volvo flygmotor been doing it since the fifties. Not as easy as a carengine with turbo of course but doable.

You simply don't know what you're talking about. F35 is a mess even after 10 years, still unreliable. The US airforce is actually planning to cancel order of that fat iron. F35 is a warrior only in Hollywood movies !

@@thierrymilan2039 Clearly its yourself that is clueless and do not understand that the f-35 A & B & C variants are all operational with between 82-92 % operational usage after flight (far greater than the typhoon or the rafale) which languishes around 60% operational use due to the high maintenance time to service them. Thanks for pointing out you clearly do not know the mainenance stats for each jet.

@MrTherealpadYou clearly think that situational awareness does not matter and that OODA loop is just a made up word. He who can react fast enough within engagement and has all the data to hand lives to fight another day. The Rafale fully loaded with ordanance is a slug and hardly as manueverable as seen at air shows. If the F-35 engaged it at BVR it would be toast. It cannot outrun the missiles it cannot dodge the missiles. Its EM is not sofisticated enough for missiles that track in mulitiple ways. Once the missile gets close enough then their is a no escape scenario. Rafale is old tech built on a doctorine that is outdated.

@@llamudos9809 Well it seems you're trully convinced of what you're saying so I will not start trying to explain the matter of facts like autonomy and carry of ammunitions far superior of the Rafale than F35, also fusion of data or reliability which is simply something F35 will never be able to achieve. Not to forget Rafale is combat proven and has successfully enter in denial airzones to bomb russian equipment in Libya.

@@thierrymilan2039 So you fail to prove your point or debate the opposing view yet want to be critical. Seems like a cop out!