@Kazumaf yeah, the romans didnt used to fight such enemies, unlike china whose got annoyed for decades, searched west for european horses and used fort like chariot to defeat them. Had given enough time, and opportunity the roman could adapt to fighting style of nomads. The thing is they got atilla which was a great general, making romans lost great amount of their population unlike the xiangnu. However, impressively when mongol tried to attack europe centuries later, they were impressed by european knights
@@pattersonstopmotions1282 yea and Vietnam wasn't Captured too. In this places were total partisan war like against the USA and Mongols went out from the Vietnam
no no no. this is a misconception. first of all. Estonians and finns are bot related to mongolic peoples. While bulgarians are partially turkick and thus related (very very distantly) to mongolians. they migrated to bulgaria much before the mongolian empire existed. Please do not spread misinformation
If you were in China and your place hasn't been conquered by the Mongols yet at those times You're gonna die with the entire village sparing no cattle.
I mean the Mongols were seen just as another barbaric nomadic tribe and out of nowhere they fukin conquered the Chinese dynasties and then into Eastern Europe. They didnt even acknowledge them as a full on Empire
@@FierceLord He probably meant Genghis Khan's world (AKA his perception of the world), also Genghis Khan didn't even own all of Asia and also invaded parts of Europe.
Bro honestly realise, every Nomadic country, that has little farming, and harsh envoirment always ends up being war lords like Afghanistan, persians, The early arabs from saudi arabia, mongolians and alot other, its like their mind is telling them ''We dont have resources, lets seek for some'' atleast most of the time, its very intresting, and invading those countries is alsmot impossible because those people are hard you can't invade their land thats already useless and natrually Uninvadable!
@@saccorhytus fax huns invaded europe during roman empire age AD 300-400s. While mongol invaded in 1200's. Hungarians came from a place where called magna hungaria way after the hunnic invasion and originally were uralic but they have mixed with oghuric tribes onoghurs to be specific remained tribes of Huns like sabars and Avars. Before magyars came there was avars and oghuric bulgars in modern day hunagry territory, magyars lived with turkic pechenegs then came to europe descendants of western huns are the western turkic people only living language is chuvash as they were volga bulgars and had their own khaganate while other turks got different khagantes. Huns arent mongols by the way they were made of western steppe people but for xiongnu they are the mix of scythians and proto mongols who then expanded to west to conquer other scyhtian territories which eventually makes at least eastern scyhtians were proto turkic who attributed in xiongnus heredity. If xiongnus were different people than scythians they wouldnt erase scythian cultures easily because they didnt they knew they had same origin. Modu chanyu (Mete han) especially united the western steppe people who were known as scyhtians till caspian sea after caspian sea its more likely to be eastern iranic the ancestors of sogdians and bactrians. Turkic languages are in fact closer to the uralic langauges like hungarian rather mongolian and tungusic eastern eurasian languages. So are huns hungarian no, but they have ancestral connection the huns expanded to where proto magyars were living in time some other people like slavs balts and germanic tribes were also been in hunnic empire but initial ones came from around caspian sea. In fact the hunnic rulers names like Attila Rugila Dengizik Uldız are made of turkic nouns dengizik is deniz which means sea and uldız is yıldız which means star oghuric tribes continution were bulgars which have been called kutrigurs and utrigurs initially in eastern roman sources. They even had khanate after Gokturks left there also khazars were part of western Gokturks. Turkish people turkmens and azerbaijani also gagauzes are oghuz turks which are western turks they were always between caspian sea and Aral sea who were scythians huns gokturks etc. Mongols came as xianbei and rourans way after xiongnu empire fell. So they have nothing to do with western huns who invaded europe turkic people in fact werent always slanted eyes but the eastern turks due slab grave genetics got more slanted eyed over time however oghuz turks were never slanted eye. European huns had much likely scythian genetics because thats what they were so are huns iranic ofc no because not all scythians were iranic after all from balkans to altai mountains they were a big confederation. So proto turks were part of scyhtian confederation and speaking similiar to uralic people they expanded to western mongolia and formed xiongnu culture, xiongnus expanded back to west during modu chanyu's rule. And there is no way that this new people can assimilate scythians who are claimed to be indo european not all were they. So xiongnus collapsed but ther name didnt erase eastern xiongnus were replaced by xianbei mongols or tungusic people. Xiongnus also conquered what called donghus who are believed to be ancient tungusic people and mongols that didnt mix with scythians. So xianbeis replaced western huns remained empireless then mongol rourans (Juan juans) replaced them western huns went into south which became white huns and also west to became European huns. European huns assimilated some uralic peoples like magyars later who proclaimed to be descendants of huns of Attila. European hunnic empire collapsed and sabirs and oghuric tribes appeared who speaks languages both similiar to turkic and uralic. eastern and central huns were under rouran rule then they rebelled and formed Göktürk Khaganate the biggest turkic empire ever. Gokturks dominated every hunnic descendants also mongols and tungusic people united a big empire from manchuria/korea to crimea. Except 2 tribes of White huns who later known as Avars to form Avar khaganate in europe their ruler titles were turkic titles like khagans but Gokturks were against them. When oghuric tribes freed from gokturks they united and formed old great bulgar khanate above black sea then came europe with rule of Asparuh Khan which then they fought to avars. Turks above caucasia were called Khazars and this are people who are reason of bulgars migrated balkans but some went volga to became what known as volga bulgars as i said chuvashes are their descendants. Khazars replaced by pechenegs and the uralic magyar people who have mixed with onogurs came pechenegs land then went to europe in 9th century during Arpad's rule. Magyars had name hungarians in time because there was a clear relationship between them but they arent directly coming from huns then stayed in europe from 400'sAD to today. Still they carry the heritage so its not wrong to call them descendants of huns and related to turkic people in sense. But mongols? Mongols also can claim to be descendants of xiongnus but again they werent the rulers of xiongnu just citizens they first got conquered then replaced xiongnus with xianbeis and rourans which has nothing to do with western huns who came europe who carry more proto turkic scyhtian heredity more than they werent as slanted eyed as eastern huns the xiongnu. Xiongnu is just hiung-nu which is hun in chinese language. These people dominated europe, persia,india,entire steppes,china, eastern north asia they were just monsters. Hope i clarified it good.
@@saccorhytus fax huns invaded europe during roman empire age AD 300-400s. While mongol invaded in 1200's. Hungarians came from a place where called magna hungaria way after the hunnic invasion and originally were uralic but they have mixed with oghuric tribes onoghurs to be specific remained tribes of Huns like sabars and Avars. Before magyars came there was avars and oghuric bulgars in modern day hunagry territory, magyars lived with turkic pechenegs then came to europe descendants of western huns are the western turkic people only living language is chuvash as they were volga bulgars and had their own khaganate while other turks got different khagantes. Huns arent mongols by the way they were made of western steppe people but for xiongnu they are the mix of scythians and proto mongols who then expanded to west to conquer other scyhtian territories which eventually makes at least eastern scyhtians were proto turkic who attributed in xiongnus heredity. If xiongnus were different people than scythians they wouldnt erase scythian cultures easily because they didnt they knew they had same origin. Modu chanyu (Mete han) especially united the western steppe people who were known as scyhtians till caspian sea after caspian sea its more likely to be eastern iranic the ancestors of sogdians and bactrians. Turkic languages are in fact closer to the uralic langauges like hungarian rather mongolian and tungusic eastern eurasian languages. So are huns hungarian no, but they have ancestral connection the huns expanded to where proto magyars were living in time some other people like slavs balts and germanic tribes were also been in hunnic empire but initial ones came from around caspian sea. In fact the hunnic rulers names like Attila Rugila Dengizik Uldız are made of turkic nouns dengizik is deniz which means sea and uldız is yıldız which means star oghuric tribes continution were bulgars which have been called kutrigurs and utrigurs initially in eastern roman sources. They even had khanate after Gokturks left there also khazars were part of western Gokturks. Turkish people turkmens and azerbaijani also gagauzes are oghuz turks which are western turks they were always between caspian sea and Aral sea who were scythians huns gokturks etc. Mongols came as xianbei and rourans way after xiongnu empire fell. So they have nothing to do with western huns who invaded europe turkic people in fact werent always slanted eyes but the eastern turks due slab grave genetics got more slanted eyed over time however oghuz turks were never slanted eye. European huns had much likely scythian genetics because thats what they were so are huns iranic ofc no because not all scythians were iranic after all from balkans to altai mountains they were a big confederation. So proto turks were part of scyhtian confederation and speaking similiar to uralic people they expanded to western mongolia and formed xiongnu culture, xiongnus expanded back to west during modu chanyu's rule. And there is no way that this new people can assimilate scythians who are claimed to be indo european not all were they. So xiongnus collapsed but ther name didnt erase eastern xiongnus were replaced by xianbei mongols or tungusic people. Xiongnus also conquered what called donghus who are believed to be ancient tungusic people and mongols that didnt mix with scythians. So xianbeis replaced western huns remained empireless then mongol rourans (Juan juans) replaced them western huns went into south which became white huns and also west to became European huns. European huns assimilated some uralic peoples like magyars later who proclaimed to be descendants of huns of Attila. European hunnic empire collapsed and sabirs and oghuric tribes appeared who speaks languages both similiar to turkic and uralic. eastern and central huns were under rouran rule then they rebelled and formed Göktürk Khaganate the biggest turkic empire ever. Gokturks dominated every hunnic descendants also mongols and tungusic people united a big empire from manchuria/korea to crimea. Except 2 tribes of White huns who later known as Avars to form Avar khaganate in europe their ruler titles were turkic titles like khagans but Gokturks were against them. When oghuric tribes freed from gokturks they united and formed old great bulgar khanate above black sea then came europe with rule of Asparuh Khan which then they fought to avars. Turks above caucasia were called Khazars and this are people who are reason of bulgars migrated balkans but some went volga to became what known as volga bulgars as i said chuvashes are their descendants. Khazars replaced by pechenegs and the uralic magyar people who have mixed with onogurs came pechenegs land then went to europe in 9th century during Arpad's rule. Magyars had name hungarians in time because there was a clear relationship between them but they arent directly coming from huns then stayed in europe from 400'sAD to today. Still they carry the heritage so its not wrong to call them descendants of huns and related to turkic people in sense. But mongols? Mongols also can claim to be descendants of xiongnus but again they werent the rulers of xiongnu just citizens they first got conquered then replaced xiongnus with xianbeis and rourans which has nothing to do with western huns who came europe who carry more proto turkic scyhtian heredity more than they werent as slanted eyed as eastern huns the xiongnu. Xiongnu is just hiung-nu which is hun in chinese language. These people dominated europe, persia,india,entire steppes,china, eastern north asia they were just monsters. Hope i clarified it good.
Wow I didn't know someone as dumb as you could exist. Clearly they were manually archived by the tibetan-indian tribes of Mount Gunbabad in middle-earth by the turn of the 1st millenia as dictated by the holy god-emperor. Those monks did work in the 8th century and here you are slandering their effort for some usurper in 1250!
Wasn't Gheghis whole thing uniting the Steppe and actually creating settlements and establishing an Empire instead of living nomadically and just raiding?
@@xZzirrSicK Genghis Khan sure did reduce the carbon footprint at that time by killing millions and destroying countless cities. Environmentalists should be thankful to the Khan.
Interestingly enough, before the Mongol invasion of Europe, the Mongols had no idea that Europe actually existed, so I do believe that when they invaded Europe, they believed they were still in Asia.
@@arkhammemery4712 I’m pretty sure people knew about continents prior to the knowledge about tectonic plates. It wasn’t at the same time that continents and tectonic plates were acknowledged.
@@arkhammemery4712 I mean herodotus referred to Asia and Europe as separate entities around 1600 years before the mongols and over two millennia before tectonic plate theory.
3xxxxxx Cxaxp Ñxcxa Hxcxa 6xcxp Cxaxp Ñxcxa Hxcxa 3Cxaxp bem g de minha mãe ela faleceu e tá broca de minha mãe ela faleceu e tá broca por causa deste povo 5par e
@@No-xh1jv stfu we are absolutely fucking same amk may be we fight each others but every brothers fights in their own home. Home:world. LONG LIVE TEMUÇİN. LONG LIVE THE URAL ALTAI CULTURE.
@@Crimsrn Many states that split from the Mongol empire are today known as Turkish states. The Golden Horde state is one of them. They prevented the Russians from going south and emerging on the stage of history. The Chagatai Khanate is also known as a Turkish state. There is even an old Turkish language called Chagatai. Timur state, which separated from Chagatai, is a Turkish state. He conquered Izmir from Christians and wanted to Islamize China. Timur's descendants, the Mughals, also ruled in India for centuries. It is also considered a Turkish state. In fact, Bâbürnâme is a very valuable Turkish work. The Taj Mahal was built thanks to them. As you can see, if a Mongol becomes a Muslim, he becomes Turkic. This is the only difference between us. Throughout history, Turks have fought among themselves, but today no one is hostile to each other. War is a natural thing. Just because of this you cannot say no, you are not like the Mongols, they are your enemies.
Blessed by the eternal skiy Born of the steppe Everywhere in blue-skied mongolia His name resounds in the world Eeeeeeeeeeiaaaaeiaaaaaa The courageous mongol genghis The subline lord genghis Even in burning wounds A mind strong as steel Like temporal sworlds As powerful as a planetary bird Эээ... The courageous mongol genghis The subline lord genghis Destined by heaven. Possessed half the world Engrained is his spirit In the majestic and mighty world Эээ... The courageous mongol genghis The subline lord genghis The courageous mongol genghis The subline lord genghis!
Tatars is a name of tribe in Mongolia. Tatars in Mongolia have no connection with Tatars in Kazan. Actually mongols weren't Buddhist. Among mongols were Christian as well as Tengri
@@luxinvictus9018 hmmmmm maybe. The thing is that so many semi literate cultures wrote about mongolian warfare and expansion. It's one thing if a couple European cultures wrote about this central asian menace, but to have all these cultures and nations that span thousand of miles write about the Mongolians in a negative way is probably a sign that the mongols were a giant shock to the ancient world. Those are just my 2 cents.
@@AsiaMinor12 I'm turkic iranian and I love both sides(both Iranic and Turkic people) I'm probably turkic-iranic mixed like most Iranian turks. I have no east Asian features but some of my cousins do It is important to notice that turkic people migrated to iran in many different time periods from as far back as the sassanid Era until mongol invasion (they came with Mongols from the far east) and even later(Uzbeks in Khorasan)
A lot of women want to date Mongolian men because they have a reputation of coming from a culture that knows how to treat women and that treat women a lot better than a lot of other cultures including Western cultures too. Mongols gave women status in their own right as human beings when the vast majority of cultures considered them chattel and some countries and cultures still do. Some cultures do not value their women at all which is absolutely shameful.
@@lorriemiller6750 thank you for spreading that knowledge amongst our fellow neighbors! We mongolians also respect the land, animals, and the sky. As did (and do) the native and indigenous cultures in the Americas.
@@xZzirrSicK You are totally welcome I have the utmost respect for Mongolia and the Mongolian people and their history and culture and Western people need to be better informed with the truth as it really is and truly was rather than just be ethnocentric and totally wrong when they can find out the real facts themselves.
Я все еще удивляюсь насколько Монгольская империя была огромная, ведь мой город, Тегеран, Багдад, Сеул, Пекин, Москва и Киев тогда были под владением одного государства 😮
It is crazy to hear again and again that Japan, a small country at that time, ignored all the letters from the Mongol Empire, the most powerful empire in the world, and killed all the messengers sent from Mongolia with swords. Some say that this is why Japan was invaded by the Mongols. (Well, Japan won the war as a result).
My favourite part of this song, which I'm sure is deliberate, is that for the first half of the song they could just be singing about a really well-respected Mongolian chieftain, irrelevant to the rest of the world. After the throat singing/instrumental in the middle, they mention that he possessed half the known world. I would imagine the first part is praising him for uniting the Mongols under him, and the second part for what he did afterwards.
@@No-xh1jvAs a Turk, there is nothing I find more ridiculous than being described as "Muslim". Islam is the religion of the Arabs, not ours.. and the majority of Turkish countries are secular countries. I couldn't help myself because you always used the same sentence in the comments I read. And yes, we are all different, but what makes us different from each other is not our religion.
The khan had sex with his 52+ girlfriends and had a child with some of them resulting in 0.2% of the human population becoming a relative to him/descendant to him
@Genghis Khan Well, in reality the Mongol Empire didn't exist anymore by the 1260s. The four khanates were de facto independent and completely seperate from each other at that point. In my view the Mongol Empire stopped existing with the death of Möngke Khan. Nonetheless, pretty much all historians agree that it was the second largest empire, and some have recently started to suggest that it was the biggest.
Instead of thinking of it (the mongol) as an empire i think of it more as a temporarily existing unstoppable force that just kinda shattered after a few years.
I am half Manchurian half Mongolian. Love both cultures/languages. Би монгол хэл соёлдоо хайртай! Монгол ахан дүүсдээ энэ өдрийн мэндийг хүргэе! ᠯᠣᠨᠬ ᠯᠢᠥᠡ ᠲᠾᠡ ᠠᠨᠾᠤᠷᠢᠠᠨ ᠠᠨᠳ ᠣᠨᠬᠣᠯᠢᠠᠨᠰ, ᠮᠠᠶ ᠲᠾᠡᠶ ᠯᠢᠥᠡ ᠲᠣᠬᠡᠲᠾᠡᠷ ᠢᠨ ᠾᠠᠷᠮᠣᠨᠶ -
When Genghis Khan had unified the mongol tribes, he had 2 options A) Settle down and live a peaceful life Or B) *Conquer literally everything that exists*
he actually didn't have option A since mongolia is a barren wasteland, you either kill all the other tribes or you conquer the world. That's why he's so revered in Mongolia. For the love of his people he set the world ablaze.
@@HP_lovecrafts_cat67 that or it was a conservative backlash due to an impoverishement. The same thing happened in India after the Muslim conquests of Delhi and in "atheist" China after the Mongol conquests.
Pillagers should of been on horseback with bows rather than axes and crossbows, the four horseman/skeleton horses are the closest to having full on horse archers
@@randomdude_138 Я и не сочиняю. Если передо мной встанет выбор : Умереть самой мучительной смертью или возложить цветы к могиле этого плешивого, я сделаю первое. А те немногочисленные, которые любят его - предатели, таких в моём селе в лучшем случае предавали анафеме, в худшем - сжигали заживо. Хватит нас ассоциировать с большевиками, именно мы от них пострадали больше всего!
Fun fact about Chingges: After the Shah of Persia had insulted him by decapitating Chingges' messenger, Chingges proceeded to annihilate so much of the persian population that it took them 600 years to regain their original population. How bout dat.
@@EdgyMemer_ You may be right, when i went back I couldnt find the source where it said 600 years, but you can read what the Persian's did to incite war with the Mongols in the ending of the section labelled "Origins of the confilct" in: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_conquest_of_Khwarezmia
It also states in there that the Mongols killed 25% of the total population initially due to war and in: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destruction_under_the_Mongol_Empire - under "Demographic changes in wartorn areas" they say the population dropped from 2.5 million to 250k due to famine and extermination thereof.
Germany: We're so sorry about the nazis. Japan: Nobody talks about it so no need to mention it. Turkey: It didn't happen. Serbia: My dad is a war criminal, and nobody has the balls to convict him. Mongolia: *intense throat singing in praise of Genghis Khan*
Germany and Japan: we are sorry for are war crimes and we will do everything in our power to pay reparations Turkey: hahaha nice joke, Armenian genocide? Pffff Serbia: **insert epic war crime embracing beat** Mongolia: *ЭЭЭЭЭЭЭЭЭЭЭЭЭЭЭЭЭЭЭЭЭЭЭЭЭЭЭЭ*
Bruh no. The British empire owned nearly a quarter of the whole world, Genghis and his descendants conquered a little over half of Eurasia. Still doesn't change the fact that Mongolia was the second largest empire in history though...
@@Asbjorn268 Still the brits werent as fast as the mongols, the brits took a lotta years just to conquer almost all of the moon and genghis only took 2/3 of asia with ukraine, belarus, european russia and some of romania, they took almost the entire known world during the 1200s
U could have said literally any other empire in history (Rome , Persian, Ottoman, French, Spanish etc) but you said the one empire that did grow bigger than the mongols
