What are u telling,China will reclaim all it has lost. First thing first China must know how to respect the:- 1.sovereign countries, 2.their neighbors,(Tibet and East Turkistan). 3.acknowledge written agreements. If you think China wanted to build their empire sorry,most of the countries will boycott,your trading will be affected and finally your super economy will collapse. Try to make this universe a peaceful place to live after all we won't be permanent in this world. Do good and you will be Bless.
@@seheransubbaiah7218 erstwhile slaves of Mongols(Mughals) and British slaves like you will always talk the slave language, you bootlickers must understand that the Tawang region was occupied by British and handed over to you fools when your master granted your independence out of magnanimity via an act in British Parliament.
China keeps doing this BS because as and when negotiations happen they will say I will give you Aksai Chin if you give me Arunachal (so negotiate between both land pieces that belong to India with India!!!) - This is the "cunning art of negotiation"!!
@@JingJao if India lost arunachal then that's mean they lost the whole northeast Sikkim and arunachal is like wall against China for northeast and if the wall break we know China is always hungry for the weak land that look like asian
@@zengpang3177 You have an "Zero IQ" Level "you are talking about " South tibet " It's under "China" Not "India" It's called "Zangnan" So how is india responsible for it.. "Tibet was invaded by china in 1950..
for the past, Indians were told,Tibet was not a part of China but an independent country, however, the Indian government knew the history and fact, so Indian government 's position is Tibet is a part of China, this created a strange situation in India, ordinary Indians say Tibet is not a part of China, since they are just nobody, do not represent India, so what they say totally has no meaning, no significance outside India.
@@firetree2007 unfortunately the whole world knows Tibet is not a part of China. China is a bully occupying foreign lands and harassing its neighbours.
Tibet at 1914 was a part of China, that is why China's representative was in the Simla meeting or it would make no sense to have China in the meeting, the UK scholar's article recorded this "The Simla Conference as a whole failed when the Chinese Government refused to recognize the validity of the initialling done by their delegate Chen I-fan. The Foreign Secretary to the Government of India concludes that "the Simla Convention has not been signed by the Chinese Government or accepted by the Russian Government and is, therefore, for the present invalid." "
Thèse ancien maps published by the western countries, UN, who confirmed the Tibet before 1950. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-2RMxWiiyXis.html
In Chinese history, the 1911 revolution overthrew the Qing Dynasty. Upon inspection, you'll find that the aim of the revolution was to establish a "Harmonic Republic" comprising of 5 major ethnic groups of China, Han (the majority of Chinese) , Hui (Muslims), Tibetans, Mongolians, and Manchus. This republic was named the Republic of China (ROC), a name still utilized by the current government in Taiwan. The ROC was Asia's first democracy and the world's largest at the time. It's worth noting that during this period, there was no country known as India; instead, it was under British Raj.
the 93 96 agreement is the agreement for cease fire, not the settlement of the border, China's position is the border is not settled till today. China believe South Tibet is a part of Tibet , Tibet is a part of China, as Indian government also recognized and agreed, South Tibet is therefore a part of China too.
for the past, Indians were told,Tibet was not a part of China but an independent country, however, the Indian government knew the history and fact, so Indian government 's position is Tibet is a part of China, this created a strange situation in India, ordinary Indians say Tibet is not a part of China, since they are just nobody, do not represent India, so what they say totally has no meaning, no significance outside India.
@@PavanKumar54387 China has unified their language 2500 years ago, India cannot unified their language so far, you need English to be your national language. Ha ha ha ha ha
@@kicker3595 china unified in your dreams 🤣 kings and dictator killed people and forced to be in china Example tibet invasion , china communist party now forcing tibet people to do in mandrian🤡🤣🤣??
Arunachal and Ladakh are disputed territory left by British legacy. China's claim is that Ladakh and Tawang(Arunachal) are part of Tibet and were illegally occupied by UK and upon independence in 1947 handed over to India which rightfully belongs to Tibet and as now Tibet is part of China(also acknowledged by Dalai Lama), they claim that these 2 regions belong to them. So PRC have merits in their argument which cannot be dismissed just like that. So this is a complex issue.
@@aarnyMagic indians are proud of india. But no the people of kashmir, khalistan,manipur,mijoram,assam etc. World can see. These are not becouse of religion. They want to be separate by nation wise. Besides every neighbor countries have conflict due to land margin with india. Pakistan,china,nepal ......India is such a poor nation.Not by money but the ideology
This question of Arunachal Pradesh is a most complex one, in that Indian renamed it such in 1986, previously constituted part of the British North East Frontier. This section of Southern Tibet was transferred to Britain in about 1912 by Tibet, which China deemed as not binding because while Tibet was an autonomous province of China, China deemed that Tibet didn’t have the authority to change State Boundaries. So when India obtained its independence from Britain in 1947, the Republic of India assumed all territories under British rule as part of the new India. When the PRC took over control of China in 1949, it resumed control of Tibet from being an autonomous state by invading Tibet in 1951. Until then China was too weak to challenge Britain for the transfer of Southern Tibet to the NE Frontier as part of British rule from about 1912 during the collapse of the Qing Dynasty. It needs a lot of good will on the part of both China and India to resolve this dispute. It hinges on the legality of an autonomous province which Tibet was of China, to have its boundary changed. China denies Tibet having such power, but the other school of thought says in the affirmative, as well as claiming Tibet was an independent country. There will be a great deal of propaganda on this dispute, but the world community has to judge the merits of each claimant. Perhaps, splitting it down the middle may seem fair, but there is much emotion invested by both sides that a solution is a long way off.
South Tibet was never claimed by the British; the McMahon Line was merely proposed by the British in 1914 as a negotiation tactic with the Chinese government. However, no Chinese government ever agreed to it. This is why Tawang, which should be on the west side of the McMahon Line according to maps, remained under the control of the Tibetan local government throughout the British Raj period, rather than being controlled by the British Raj. Tawang was only occupied on February 14, 1951, not by the British, but by Nehru's dispatched army. The PLA reached Lhasa in October 1952. "Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Pema Khandu today announced that his government will set up a memorial for Major Bob Khathing, an Army officer who commanded a small team of soldiers to establish India's administrative control in Tawang, which borders China, in 1951."
India Tibet Relation - Arunachal Pradesh China had never a border with India. It was, is and will always be the India Tibet border. If China makes too much pressure on and provocation of India? In response India should sponsor an International Forum Discussion on Shimla Treaty between India & Tibet 1914 to internationalise Tibet China Conflict India has no obligation to stick on to One China Policy if China dont respect One India Policy - precisely speaking International Relation is not one way traffic system as China thinks Geopolitics Simplified Analysis
Ancient India spanned from Tajikistan to south east Asia including Myanmar, Nepal, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and more. So going by this are all these nations ours today? No..... China needs to wake up from its weird dream..
Yah Welcome to the club our Friends and allies India from your Brothers and Friends Filipinos! Just like they put water barriers in our EEZ Exclusive economic zone and claimed it as their own and renaming islands in Chinese names close to it! K
Tibet has been part of China for close to 1,000 years and has not been an independent country. It was illegally annexed by the British and has never been acknowledged by the Chinese ever since.
global regions BORDERLESS FREEDOM land/water/sky for democratic NEW ERA ONE GLOBAL BODY of mortal mankind inhabitants. .GREAT DIVINE universal resources ENDOWMENT for PEACE, PROTECTION and PROSPERITY. Very pleasing and lovely given by GOD for anyone else needs for life. NOT FOR DEADLY SIN FOR GLUTONY AND GREED.
China claims etire sea south of China as their territory. Whereas Philippine Vietnam and other countries have their should share of claim of territories.
@@momochaphijam4728 No my dear friend. Himachal is the original indian name. Himalayas is english name from Britishers. Indeed Himachal means all of Himalayas which belong to India.
