Indian atheist debates Evangelical Christian 

At least the Atheist is honest when he says "I don't know". Something that seems very hard for some people to admit. And to his defense. There is yet to be any proof of any supernatural existence.

This was a good debate and I hope Otangelo revisits his core beliefs.

Your mental endurance is great 😅 i am easily irritated by these dodgy arguments, good job pinning it right before things got loopy.

Atheist :- i don't know, i will explore and will find an answer. Theist - Well it must be God, God did that, God did this 😂 so God is the answer for theist's "don't knows".

'I dont know' is better than ' my good god made us in his image, he did this did that and he loves you'

I don't know is better than asserting something without evidence.

Good explanation vimoh sir.. Thanks please do more debate with Indian thiests also in hindi.

Not having a reason to believe in God is not a good reason to not believe in God? I can't help myself. I think we're going to need to list a few things we don't have good reason to believe. Starting with the obvious: -Santa -the tooth fairy -easter bunny -the flying spaghetti monster -mermaids -Bigfoot Does it follow that not having a reason to believe in mermaids is not a good reason to not believe in mermaids? I don't think it's necessarily the case that the universe is expand "into something" since space-time is within the universe. Think of it like all the galaxies are dots drawn on the skin of a balloon as it's blowing up, but the skin of the balloon itself is space-time. The analogy is weak because the balloon is in atmosphere, so you need to focus just on the skin and ignore the atmosphere. The atmosphere is in space-time but it wouldn't be true for the balloon as the universe. The *inflation* of the universe had a beginning. That's not the same thing as the universe having a beginning. Wasn't the demonstration of the existence of the Higgs-Boson particle ontological? They had calculated it should exist and set about an experiment to show it existed. I'm still not that confident with ontology.

The Werewolf analogy got me ROFL! 😂😂😂✌️✌️✌️✌️

Wow!

You should do a collab with thecosmicsceptic!!

💙🙏💯👌

👍👍👍

They ask questions in round and won't on point as they want to make the word i believe come from your mouth , they keep creating logically fallacies

Hi this was a very interesting conversation. I don't want to debate but just explore it further. We all know that the physical world is ruled by very strict laws. They are almost mathematical in nature and no one calls mathematics, God. However we don't know the spiritual rules, we don't even know that spiritual rules exist. So we know, that we don't know much about anything or many things. So far God per se is defined differently by different people and has remained elusive to all. But if we understand spiritual rules (if they exist) maybe we can then kind of pinpoint multiversal God. Just a thought.

What’s the difference between your imagination and god and how can you tell the difference? There’s no difference.

The old man what thinks is logical. And other thinking is illogical. He can say without any evidence that God created this universe. But when vimoh says there a thing which is half human and half werewolf. Will u believe it. He is saying an illogical question. What is the logic behind the old man's thinking.

I don't have enough faith to be an atheist.

You seem to be willing to admit both that there is no absolute proof that God exists and that there is no absolute proof of any other explaination as to how creation was formed. The question then becomes what makes you choose one belief over the other?

To those who believe, no proof is necessary. To those who don't, no proof is possible Vimoh, stop wasting your time.