InGen vs Real Dinosaurs. PART 1/6 : Jurassic Park. Size comparison 

Wow It will be amazing!

I can’t wait to see more!!

This was a really neat format for a video. I’m looking forward to seeing more!

me gusataria que hicieses un video de ti haciendo paleoarte como el del gigantoraptor

The editing is great! I especially liked the part at the end that was the nedry “you didn’t say the magic word” thing except it had your face. That definitely made me laugh! Can’t wait to see part two!

Beautifully spoken mate!

Yes thease are not monster they are animals like you said beautiful

I do not see as awesome anymore

Noooo the real is unacurrate

Dinosaurs ARE beautiful, they’re animals, not monsters

Rest in peace

@@flightlesslord2688 what?

It's film adaptation will be turned 30 years old in 2023

Now it's 32 years old now its 2022

​@@TheHedgehogEnthusiastHe died 😞

Honestly dakotaraptor and achilobator are oddly convenient for the Jurassic Park Universe. In the start of the first movie, a JP raptor sized skeleton is being dug in Montana, now Deinonychus is too small and didnt live there, but dakotaraptor did and is pretty much the perfect size. But theres even more than that, achilobator could easily explain why the raptors were called velociraptor in the first place, the scientists didn't know exactly what species they had before it hatched, so when the 'raptor' hatched they had a dromaeosaur. Assuming they got the DNA from Asia (at the very least in most games raptor DNA is from Asia) they likely assumed that this was velociraptor, when in fact it was achilobator. Hence the large size. I wouldnt be surprised if Ingen just kinda mushed a bunch of dromaeosaurs together and went with the most dramatic name, and I'd guess that either in-Universe theres some debate on the naming of different dromaeosaurs, or that Grant was just using velociraptor as a colloquialism for dinosaurs that resembled it, acknowledging that he didnt know what species it was. But that's a just a theory, a Jurassic Park theory.

@@flightlesslord2688 a great, well presented theory, might I add

Highly agree

The jurassic park velociraptor is based of deinonychus, and only its bigger and with a other name

Wowwwww i play it

Thank you!

@@MarioLanzas. No problem! :D

Thanks! It was indeed a lot of work, but also very fun to make!

Thank you!!

@@MarioLanzas. You're Welcome Man.

Yo si son muy ovias paro no sabia que fueran tantas aun asi se ven geniales los dinos

Plr ejemplo no lograron agregar todo el adn de una escpecie de dino y lo rellenaron con adn de rana y por eso se ven un poco diferentes que los ejemplares orijinales como el mosasaurio que tiene astodermos por el adn de cocodrio

​@@adrymonts403and is oversized

thanks a lot!

no todos los americanos son como pensaba eso es bueno (solo digo)

@@themechbuilder6171 ay I’m an American and I think ur great :)

Thank you! :)

@@MarioLanzas. your welcome

@@MarioLanzas. also my fav dinosaur is ankylosaurus

Yes, I like that we can both appreciate the creature design in JP while still acknowledging the ways in which the real animals differed.

That's a reasonable possibility. Supported in part by the Dilophosaurus hologram from Jurassic World's Innovation Center, which was at least JW raptor sized.

Yes,confirmed, in 1993 Jurassic park , the dilophosaurus that attack nedry is juvenile,

@@esmerald6627 confirmed where? In jurassic park the game all the dilophosaurus were smaller too. And the hologram in JW is still not as big as the real dilo...

@@leonardogrande6144 I think someone from the film production confirmed this, I don't remember exactly, i think is Steven Spielberg, sorry

Still all JP works that followed from the movies depict the Dilophosaurus as a 3meter animal, even in adult form. So they kinda like that size I guess?

It'll have 5 parts

Gracias!!😁

gracias!!

In universe its because the DNA is incomplete, in reality its because big raptors werent feathered in 1993 according to science. And to maintain continuity they kept the scaly look in Jurassic World and went even deeper into 'these are not authentic' kinda thing

Maybe new raptors and other creatures with feathers? Maybe InGen will change the dna for birds instead!

Frog DNA i guess

yea...even though the real ones are more special i believe...take triceratops for example...what is it? just an almost tail dragging brown creature with more elephant features....real triceratops with more colors and it's real own features make it more special i believe and show the way how different animals adapt for same niche without having many similarities to each other definitely the accurate ones are more interesting

Baby-Velociraptor Dilophosaurus Velociraptor Galliminus Triceratops Tyrannosaurus-Rex Brachiosaurus

Parsaurolophus is barely visible in Jurasdic Park. It will have their proper appearance on the video for The Lost World

​@@MarioLanzas. Yes, that's understandable. Thanks, and I can't wait for the next episodes of Jurassic Park franchise.

it's from the jurassic world video game for mobiles

@@MarioLanzas. Awesome, thanks

Gracias!

It won't be the next one, but for sure Hadrosaurs will have their own video too

@@MarioLanzas. Okay, but thank you anyways!

No necesitas darme crédito por la info. Lo único que me pertenece son los diseños😉

@@MarioLanzas. Muchas gracias y que bonitos dibujos, me encanta el del Espinosaurio es mi favorito, espero no te moleste saber que estoy usando ese dibujo tuyo para enseñarle sobre la postura de los brazo en los espinosauridos un amigo mio de Japón que me esta preparando un regalo especial por mi cumpleaños [No te preocupes, le dije que el dibujo era tuyo] , ¡El también dibuja y hace animaciones como tu! (Canal de mi amigo: ru-vid.com/show-UCR4ggGHr1gsfqi4DdMHc_Zg) Bueno estoy planeando una novela escrita tipo crossovers, uno de los ejes de la novela es Jurassic Park, gracias por todo.

Blasphemy! The original JP should never be remade/rebooted..

@@MichaelSmith-lm6xl I agree. I love the Jurassic franchise, but I feel like we need to move away from the idea that it owns dinosaurs. I’d rather see other dinosaur stories be told on the big screen than see the same story told again.

@@MichaelSmith-lm6xl well, a reinterpretation is legit. a different style, updated.. it would be cool,. never to remplace the original of course, just to have another version of the story. the original will always be a classic

50/50 i mean you can't expect it from the film makers they had their chance with JW a legit chance to make their dinosaurs more realistic or at least y'know feathered and with a very easy explanation, it's in the future they found more fossil evidence and blah blah blah

I mean I guess a reboot wouldn’t be too bad depending on how you handle it but honestly I personally think we need a new, interesting kind of dinosaur related media to be adapted to the big screen instead like Primitive war, Raptor red or Dinotopia. Jurassic park as a concept gets stale after a while and it’s high time new stories get some time in the sun, that and we can also put scientifically accurate dinosaurs in them.

Yes ,galliminus is the second large ornithomimid, the first is deinocheirus

coming up soon!

Extincts

@@pmsm5829 LOL

Probably in the video for The Lost World since they make more of an appearance there.

@@EryxUK ooh ok,make sence, thank you

@@pmsm5829 com esse nome é fácil saber que tú é brasileiro

To give it a more distinctive look. They also made it smaller so it would initially seem inoffensive, which worked. It's a good example of a very well-used creative license

It's average sized🥲@@MarioLanzas.