look it up. he uses sustainable fuels and offsets the carbon footprint of his family's commercial travel. he also invests in zero carbon energy technologies.
Why does he have to live in a tent and own a bicycle to fit your idea of a good person? Do you live in a tent? The point is it's all relative and he was also a kid at some point and did not understand the best principles for sustainability, etc. But thinking is hard..
@@couldyourewindplease3653 he can do whatever he wants to do but just don’t point your fingers on other people and tell them the way they live their life is wrong. He doesn’t even vaccinate his own children which is totally fine for me but then just let everyone have their own choice.
@@user-rj3wx2ig2o NO NEED TO SHOUT! I'll let you look up "stage 3 of demographic transition " in wikipedia for details (note the exhaustive list of sources), but basically, when living conditions improve, people choose to have less children, so the rate of population increase is diminished.
@@josephpublico2337 you don't think it could have anything to do with Dr. Shanna Swan's research on phthalates? Or you just assume people have less children because they spontaneously become more environmentally responsible in developed nations?
@@josephpublico2337 exactly if overall quality of life is improved as there are less sick people then the production is increased which leads the the multiplexer effect which leads to a economic growth which leads to development of new industries which leads to less people working on farms which leads to less need for have lots of children in order to work the farms which leads to a lower rise in population
@@eeeaten He literally said: "One of these numbers is going to have to get pretty close to zero (referring to population, and the other things that were related to the population)" It's impossible to get our carbon emissions to zero, I mean we literally breathe out carbon! The only way he thinks he'll meet his goal is by killing almost all humans. If you think that climate change justifies that you are a psychopath.
he's not telling you to cut consumption, he's saying we need to develop no/low carbon energies so our energy consumption doesn't create so much co2. at least you didn't say he's trying to cut population!
@@eeeaten Do you realise, we are made from carbon? He wants to get rid of us. His father was head of the Eugenics Department all those years ago. Like father like son.
@@eeeaten I see you under every comment under every video, No matter how hard you try shilling for these billionaires, they do not care about you, they will still come after you
| CAME HERE TO LEARN HOW TO INVEST AFTER LISTENING TO A GUY ON RADIO TALK ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF INVESTING AND HOW HE MADE $460,000 IN 4 MONTHS FROM $160k, SOMEHOW THIS VIDEO HAS HELPED SHED LIGHT ON SOME THINGS, BUT I'M STILL CONFUSED, I'M A NEWBIE AND I'M OPEN TO IDEAS......
It is possible to produce superior performance provided you do something different from the majority. However most of us tend to pay more attention to the shiniest position in the market to the cost of proper diversification.
The real irony is that he made billions of dollars in an industry that contributes to massive pollution and child labor, and he’s telling people how many children they’re allowed to have
He talking about improving our quality of life so people dont have 10 children as a survival mechanism, if you grew up with major infant mortality in a country like africa where resources are abundant you'd probably have 10 kids too. everybody cant have 10 kids, the earth will be miserable with 10, 20 30 billion competing for resources in our current paradigm.
i agree, they see the name, asociates it with the countless microsoft haters, and then assume that its something bad.. Forget the damn planet for a sec, and think about the many advancements that we should do on the subject.. Energy is as important as breathing nowdays, so lets make it better, for everyone.. and stop thinking about COSTS.. why is costs always the barrier for advancements? if we promoted advancement instead of limiting it by cost, then we would be an interstellar race by now..
0 disappeared beach shorelines in every capital city of Earth 4,000+ covID vaccine deaths in 1 country alone the USA,where's 200+countries V.A.E.R.S. affiliated statistics? Where's covID-20,21? 18 months later Northern Territory Australia population 245,000 (Aboriginal heartland) 0 covID deaths discriminates borders,Originals of land 0 virus Billions Do Not Consent
he's not talking about no co2. you have misunderstood. he's talking about NET zero co2, as in the same amount of co2 going into the atmosphere as out of it each year. the problem is the billions of tons of excess co2 humans dump into the atmosphere every year.
@@Statuslock he acknowledges his own carbon footprint is huge, but at the same time uses sustainable jet fuel, electric cars, spends millions on offsetting his carbon footprint, and invests hundreds of millions in low/zero carbon energies.
“The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent.” Gates can be heard saying this sentence at 4 minutes and 32 seconds into the video. Gates was discussing ways the world could reduce carbon emissions and suggested that one way was by reducing population growth through improving healthcare.
THE BIRTHRATE HAS BEEN GOING DOWN IN AMERICA SINCE THE 1940;S AND THE BIRTHRATE OF ALL COUNTRIES ARE NOW IN DECLINE, AS PEOPLES HEALTH IMPROVES, THEY GET JOBS BETTER JOBS, AND MAKE MORE MONEY, NOW THEY WANT, BETTER HOUSES, NEW CARS, FANCY VACATIONS, BUT, THEY WANT LESS CHIDREN, THEY CAN NOT AFFORD TO HAVE BOTH, THE AVERAGE BIRTHS RIGHT NOW IN THE USA IS ONLY 1.6 PER WOMEN, /FAMILY, THAT IS NOT ENOUGH TO CONTINUE ANY CULTURES, THIS IS HAPPENING ALL OVER THE WORLD, (EXCEPT AFRICA) AND IS NOW A THREAT TO THE ECONOMIES AROUND THE WORLD, WHICH IS NOT ENOUGH PEOPLE TO WORK IN ALL THE JOBS, FACTORIES, HOTELS, RESURANTS, ETC, AND THIS AFFECTS TAX REVENUE TO PAY FOR ALL THE RETIRED PEOPLE THAT NOW EXIST IN THE USA AND AROUND THE WORLD, IF IT WAS NOT FOR ALL THE REFFUEGS COMING HERE FROM ALL OVER, AMERICA WOULD BE IN REAL TROUBLE, RIGHT NOW THERE ARE OVER 11 MILLION JOBS GOING BEGGING, AND WITH THE PANDEMIC, OVER 800 THOUSAND PEOPLE NOW DEAD, I AM SURE A LOT OF THEM WORKED, SO EXPECT IN THE FUTURE, A LOT OF GREEN WORK PERMITS AND SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS WILL BE GIVEN TO ALL THE PEOPLE COMING ACROSS THE BOARDER SO THAT THEY CAN WORK AND PAY TAXES, ( THIS IS WHY GERMANY LET IN OVER 1 MILLION MUSLIMS INTO THEIR COUNTRY, TO FILL ALL THE FACTORIES THAT NEED PEOPLE) ITALY IS NOW BEGGING FOR PEOPLE TO COME LIVE THERE AND HAVE CHILDREN AND ARE GIVIING AWAY HOUSES IF YOU COME THERE TO LIVE, (WITH CONDITIONS OF COURSE) S0 GET READY FOR MAJOR CHANGES COMING. AND THEY ARE ALREADY HERE,
@@domcizek - ty jses dobre jeblej tvl , podivej se kolik lidi tu bylo po prvni a druhy svetovy valce , a ani jedna zem nepotrebovala muslimy aby se vzpamatovala
@@AsifRafique_ its not capalists. Stop focusing on fucking politics!!! Look at the BIG PICTURE! Our enemies are and always have been Aristocrats and Billionares. They are the ones who implement everything. They are the ones who plan out our lives and tax us and create laws so as to ticket people which is another form of tax.
@@eternapesadilla2355, Look at the program that was banned in Russia( use subtitles, time code 12:20) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-MEtaaNNuVCI.html
Yeah I want to hear more about it. How do thousands of internet commenters watch a video about reduce population GROWTH and all come to the same hive-mind conclusion that he's secretly an evil villain who's talking about killing people who are already alive?
@Get Real he is talking about CO2 :/ look at the fucking equation, the C should be closest if not 0. The equation is a multiplication. Do you know that a multiplication with 0 does???? It results 0!! Also look at the arrows above all letters. P and S is growing, while E should be down, and C as close as possible to 0
@@synergygirl1209 You should learn some simple math and then start talking to me. How about you stop taking sentences out of context and use that tiny brain you got there? It may not have an IQ above 2 digits but i'm sure it can comprehend simple things that even children comprehend
@@synergygirl1209 oh yeah, sfaw news, the most trustworty news site on the planet that no one heard of, good job. Just because a lot of people say the same thing that doesn't mean it's right. Or do you believe in flat earth? They have a pretty big community, you know?
Its just part of the equation you can have the math without it. Soo it a number thag not going down by force but its been shown that good health care and life actually leads to lower offspring.
At 4:42 is where he begins to talk about depopulation, WHY are most people not understanding exactly what he’s saying?? Blows my mind that he has the audacity to determine the fate of the world population!!!
I cant comprihend how much of an idiot someone like you can be. Population decrease is the no.1 thing that could decrease our carbon footprint and he's not talking about killing kids, poorer countries need to simply make less kids.
@@photon2724 poorer countries need to make less kids? Poor countries have a smaller carbon footprint than a big country like America regardless of how many self centered people are driving teslas in your California city, its still a shithole thats infested with trash and just 17 million gallons of sewage dumped into santa monica bay a couple days ago… Poorer countries living a more off the land lifestyle are of far less concern than you. America and china two of the biggest countries with a ton of resources both responsible for the majority of this earths pollution.. Also learn to spell comprehend before calling someone an idiot
Dia I get it correctly? "The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10% or 15%"
@@austinjohnson4890 your inability to understand is what’s informing your conspiracy theory about gates, not your eyes and ears. You have just misunderstood.
Nah, they're on full swing climate change now, ccp virus was for depopulation.. you see these massive storms and heat waves hitting worldwide, they could possibly be causing the volcanos erupt to block out the sun to accelerate it. The wildfires are adding onto it aswell, really is the end
Probably an Omega Variant they have waiting for the proper time.... then they can convince the people who can't think for themselves that the unvaccinated are the cause.
@@jay-d8g3v Well, they're trying to pretend that lowering global population could save the climate, although it is past the point of no return. All of the extra static generation that grounds to Earth is combining with the natural static which already exists. Volcanos are going to be constantly erupting, and until a supervolcano erupts to blot out the sun and create a new ice age, there will be heat waves and droughts and flash floods and cold snaps to compensate.
@@hunterbiden4975 oh yes they're my cousins & don't forget to write to me on Jim'll Fix It if you want to meet Bill Gates himself & get vaccinated by Bill himself.
Rich people produce MUCH MORE carbon than poor people with all their spending and jet fuel for jetting around everywhere in their airplanes !!!Their over consumption and materialistic practices etc... etc...
Absolutely! All the large corporations that have driven family/community businesses out of business are killing us - ALL the large food companies for one.
@@eileenwright3582 not to mention.. There is NO Big box stores near me that recycle. Yet they ship everything in boxes. Sell everything in their non recyclable plastic bags. Even Wal-Mart is Major contributor by selling all its items made with plastic and so forth. All these manufactured goods contribute. But we don't NEED those. Yes it's our choice to buy our products, but who provides the goods to buy? Can't those corporations (usually owned by the elites) do something? Shouldn't they also be responsible??? After all, a corporation is recognized "legally" as a person in America.
@@eeeatenat least 70% of people who took the arm candy regret it. For example my father who is dying of a previously rare almost unheard of turbo blood cancer.
@@matskusmg will you should trust your friends and family. The Billionaire I would trust less than anyone else, they are intelligent and make you think you are helping the greater good but in reality you are only spreading their narrative.
vaccines lowers the death rate. lower deathrate leads to lower birth rate. lower birth rate leads to less people. less people leads to less Co2 production.
What's happening in Texas was a planned attack. The next crisis they will manipulate and manufacture is Climate Change. Facebook will ban anyone who doesn't believe in Climate Change moving forward. Bill Gates is attempting to block the sun in order to keep the Earth more cool. Guess who owns most of the farmland now in the USA? Bill Gates They will attack your food. They will attack your medicine. They will attack your water. They will attack your vaccines. They will attack your weather. They will attack your elections. They will attack your religion. They will attack your speech. They will attack your guns. They will attack your children. And when everything fails they will nuke their own country.
@@azadymiad1793 Has your mind been nuked? Because this is the most stupid, uneducated and miserable comment I've read all day (and I've read hundreds of them)! You clearly have zero knowledge in science, no idea what climate change means and believe in the dumbest lies available. Just the first sentence: If you did ANY research on this topic - even a two minute search to find several independent sources that are free - you would (and probably do) know damn well that the only people 'planning an attack on Texas' are the republicans in power for decades who 1) didn't WANT renewable energy to replace fossil fuels (and thus wind energy was NEVER calcuted in winters) and 2) invested further in fossil fuels which are NOW the problem - because the production and transportation of these out-datet fuels was brought to a complete halt after freezing temperatures. And 3) those republicans that have all the power STILL blame others for their own mistakes. Texas has noone to blame. Except themselves and their ignorance. And I know you don't care about these facts because lies fit in your view of the world much more neatly.
Oh my god you guys are everywhere on RU-vid! Here's an advice: put down the phone, go outside, and take a deep breath. Maybe it'll help you to get into touch with the real world again.
Bill might have missed a critical factor in his equation. How about we stop destroying the rain forests, and begin regenerating the oxygen giving forests of our home?
Monsanto took farmers out of business for taxing them. Now bought by the largest chemical company from Germany. Now he has control of the medical industry who predicted the virus 🤔 not to mention tried to control the IT business before Apple. And a Harvard dropout who was accused for stealing from his colleges, then bought DOS for 50,000 that made him who he is.
That is a simple logic forestation will decrease the effect of co2, I wonder the cunning man agenda of vaccines and uranium power won't agreeable with strict forestation rules
It was actually tough to find this clip, but after a few minutes of googling, I found an article claiming to debunk the claim that Bill Gates was advocating for population reduction. They said it was selectively edited, and taken out of context, but were courteous enough to provide a link to this video. I don't know why they would do that, since the content of the ORIGINAL UNEDITED VIDEO that THEY THEMSELVES PROVIDED completely discredits them. It's almost as if they expect the public to simply take their word for it and not even look at the evidence when presented. This is sickening.
the video isn't selectively edited, but doesn't say anything about population reduction. he literally says population will *rise* by a factor of 1.3, not fall. did you misunderstand the video?
They realize people are too dumb to see what they're openly admitting to us. It's why people can watch him say this and still think there's no way he meant what he said.
He's giving out real clues as to what their agenda really is, if you can read between the lines. Making the "rich westerners" poorer, expect many different ways to make you pay for your "privilege" but let's not mention the oIigarchs, although they litterally own almost all of the fucking planet. General microchipping is real too, ask Jacques AttaIi. The scenario is likely to be the exact worse possible one you can think of. Brace yourself cattle.
Lorenzo he wants to decrease population growth by expanding healthcare services and therefore reducing birth rates. He doesn't want to use vaccines to kill people, that is a conspiracy theory, and a pathetic one at that.
Doubtful. Unfortunate but very doubtful. Too bad these people don't have a desire to give an actual education. A spiritual factual commonsense intelligent education. It starts with a proper education and there would've been zero crisis points. But they would've lost their standing and power and control in society; So Now This!
I believe that too much power makes people insane. I think it would be the biggest step for humanity, if we could find a cure/solution for those kind of people.
Wish I had a heart to love your statement. I believe they are all psychopaths. They have no compassion. The game they are playing is just to get all the marbles.
And at the end of the lecture the sheep of many psychopaths present there got up and applauded the villain leader of all psychopaths of the planet Earth
I think power given to psychopaths is dangerous, because no sane compassionate person can be such a villain, take best scientists and others like Einstein, he was a genius and very powerful among all ppl. All villains of the all times were and are like Hitler, Stalin, Soros etc.
He's recreated himself into a God of his own liking and image. Feigning concern for the proles. "We billionaires could cut back." Hillarious, Lord Gates.
There is no way to see this other than Trying to control the growth of the population. He said we need to see how close to zero we can get in these 4 areas to stop CO2. He said we can decrease the rate of increase in population through healthcare, vaccines and other methods. How else can this be interpreted?
@@sdrawdejdivad 3rd world countries have a higher mortality rate. For that reason, their birth rate is higher than the rest because parents want to increase lineage chances. Gates wants to reduce mortality rate (ie, LESSEN DEATHS), through better healthcare, which will also decrease birth rate. Some thinking and logic is involved than just coming to fan fiction villian plots.
@@bvilleD then he needs to work on his delivery of such key and crucial points. I'm going off of what he said exactly, you have read between the lines and tried to make sense out of what he said. You would think as a man who didn't do this off the cuff, has a script written, brought fireflies and had nice graphics he would make it clear he didn't want to reduce the predicted increase of population growth by 10%. But what he said he said. You can't dispute that right? I can write out the script if you want. Are we able to agree he said what he said?
@@eeeatenthese people never directly say it. Even during lockdown, Dr Fraudtry never directly told people what to do so he couldn’t get the blame. I saw that when he said it and years later he told people he didn’t tell you to do anything. It was someone else’s idea. Tongue like a lawyer.
@@VincentVanGirth fine, i'm making him lunch tomorrow. why do you ask? some weird angle about atheists being broken people or similar asinine nonsense?
@@zachhampton3630 No need to try and defend Bill Gates. He just came out and said it. How you can possibly see that as "out of context" shows how in a deeply desperate state of denial you truly are. Amazing. That's not "out of context" that's quoting verbatim what he just said. Please...
@Babey Pop STFU dude are planet is dying and only the eduacated know this sadly everyone is too ignorant to do anything about it what hes saying is true qnd the best option for humanitys survival
@@eeeaten It's not about what I think, it's about it's wide open for anyone who is willing to see. There's an evil plot to destroy the system which many generations were build upon. The entity that was once known as the Roman Empire, (that's very much alive) that was responsible to create and enforce that old system (the current), that created the UN and dictates how almost the entire world functions, will enforce once again another transition, pretty much like it did for centuries after 300 a.d. Nothing that's happening right now is by chance. The vírus, the lockdowns, the vaccine, the passport, the subversion inside the school system, the governmental institutions, the media, the big techs, the billionaires (like Bill Gates, are just pawns), and so on and on. All of this has been orchestrated for a very long time, and now it's on its final stage. It will bring "The Great Reset" to introduce The New World Order. Whoever believes it's not happening, either is very naive or brainwashed, which makes up more than 90% of word's population. Soon it will be irrefutable, but then already too late to escape.
You seriously dont have the mental capacity to understand what he just said. Increasinng vaccine efficiency will result in more lives SAVED, thus perants will have less kids as their kids arnt dying out.
The goal is to reduce the CO2 emissions per unit of energy we produce, not to strip the earth of CO2. Plus, plant life existed from way before human civilization and industries, so 'not' producing CO2 when producing our energy isn't going to affect plant life in a negative way. They can survive without our emissions from power plants. Also, they need CO2 only during the day for photosynthesis. Plants are also constantly respiring aerobically which requires oxygen.
Harder to breath though. Ppm increases are bad for your brain. Anyone can test this. Get a CO2 monitor, seal yourself in a closed space. Watch how your mind falters as CO2 increases b
@@dawndavid4973 Well, It's Quite Obvious That he Surely Thinks he Is!!! 😠 Just Wait Until he Meets The Only Creator, Almighty GOD, Face to Face & What he's Done To The Population w/his Tainted & Evil Vaccines!!!
@@missbee7745 I'm always wondering ... What does it take for someone to become so delusional? Just a constant stream of conspiracy videos served by RU-vid, or some cruel life event you're having difficulty coping with? I hope for you it's just the first.
@@missbee7745 2nd? Well this is a first but actually thank you for saying that. I get really angry when I see all of these 'woke' people but I guess I forget about the real suffering sometimes.
POPULATION REDUCTION ... 1 -- poor, undeveloped economies and its families have larger families (MORE people) 2 -- rich, developed economies and its families have smaller families (LESS people) 3 -- if you can make "poor, undeveloped economies" ... more like ... "rich, developed economies" then the population will have a total of LESS people, maybe 10-15% less people (which is population reduction) 4 -- poor, undeveloped economies can be "rich-like" if they have access to technology and other advancements -- or what makes "rich, developed economies" rich, rich-like .
Exactly. He doesn't know what he's talking about. To illustrate that point further: He speaks of humanity attempting to get our (Earth's) CO2 level to ZERO. CO2 is the food for all life. It is plant food. CO2 has nothing whatsoever to do with Global Warming, and there is no Global Warming. Even if there were, it would not, and could not, be caused by human activity. If we got CO2 to ZERO, all life would cease to exist. All plants and therefore all animals (including humans) would die. Earth's atmosphere is currently at about 400 to 415 parts per million. And that is barely enough to sustain life. If it gets much lower, the entire world would be in peril. Essentially all Earth scientists worth their salt, who have any real knowledge or understanding of/on the subject agree with this fact.
@@Sovereign_Citizen_LEO please learn English first. He speaks of CO2 production not CO2. He's speaking of reducing CO2 PRODUCTION to zero, not CO2. You literally can't get to zero CO2.
@@Sovereign_Citizen_LEO that's a far jumpin assumptions. He is saying a goal/wish is to drop man made power production CO2 level to zero. You will still have fires burning creating natural CO2. Volcanos. People and animals breathing. The earth does a great job in balancing out our CO2 exhales with trees/plants. But the earth isn't coping with the massive amounts of man made CO2 being put into the environment every year. And your 400ppm is really high. The world has been averaging 220ppm for the past hundreds of thousands of years from what I'm seeing in the chart. And hasn't been over 300ppm for hundreds of years before the industrial revolution.
We are not free to choose, we are forced to follow their rules no matter what we do. I se only one solution and that is leave and create a paralell society of our own. But where can we go? Problem is the majority of the population is blind middles sheep that follow all orders blindly, that is why only solution is to leave...
Anti Life as in Anti life for Non-whites because he was poisoning the Indian and African people behind the scenes. He also bought alot of Farmlands and when someone asked him in a Reddit, he said "Well it is my personal choice on what I wanted to do with my money" with no real reason behind it and this is suspicious to me because I think he wants to enslave people by poisoning them just enough so that they are dependant on his Vaccines.
Random Gaming that’s not true at all. The post war baby boom happened because there was peace and a culture that still valued children. Vaccines don’t factor in to population growth rate at all. Neither does healthcare. In the 50s women had 5+ kids knowing they would all make it to adulthood. No one in America during the postwar baby boom thought “I’m going to have 5 kids because some are going to die”. They thought “I’m going to have 5 kids and they’re all going to be fine.” In Africa people don’t die like they used to and they still average 7 children per woman. It’s predicted Africa’s population will double by 2050. India is about to pass China for the largest population in the world. Their growth is not slowing down even with their healthcare getting better every year. If “healthcare/vaccines” were responsible for slowdowns then populations would not increase because as healthcare gets better, birth rates would get lower. What really happens is the birth rates stays the same as less people die which causes populations to increase then after many years it decreases because of cultural changes. The reason “the west” has low birth rates is because of cultural reasons. Birth control, feminism, materialism, media pressures and anti-religion indoctrination etc. have caused a culture where children are not valued or are deemed “too expensive”, to fester. People value their own happiness over the idea of having a big family. Before calling people stupid or evil maybe you should investigate the real causes of things before acting like you know everything.
PrimePal no it doesn’t. Thet is a lie that is told and people believe it because they think all humans are the same. Humans are similar but not the same. There’s a reason Orthodox Jews have a ton of kids but secular ones don’t, they both partake in modern healthcare and don’t need kids as “insurance” but one group has a ton of kids and the other group doesn’t. Do your own research. Birth rates are mostly cultural.
Random Gaming it’s not just “western culture”. A better term would be “modern culture” or modernity. You can find the same birth rates in South Korea, Japan and Singapore even though they’re not “Western Countries”. Secularism, birth control, Hollywood, abortion, materialism, consumerism and no religion = a civilization with low birth rates.
@@4uafunguy It's pretty blatant now, yeah,a lot of human lemmings going over the cliff in "vaccine" centers,critical thinking pretty much banished from mainstream media airwaves.I used to wonder in my younger days how people could fall for/follow Hitler.I don't do that anymore
@@bubbastill2040 They supposedly have special camps and gas and guillotines ready to detain and kill people too. I guess history really does repeat itself. Nothing new under the sun.
the dude is basically talking about how to reduce carbon emmissions all the while developing sustainable energy and this idiot here says he's evil? *facepalm Oh if by any chance you are one of those imbeciles that has low comprehension, lowering by 10 to 15 percent refers to reducing the percentage increase from 6.8 to 9 billion population and not fucking decreasing the 6.8 billion by 10 to 15 percent. Birth control is different from murdering if you atleast have the mental capacity to think for yourself.
Interesting that as of Nov. 2022, UK data suggests that excess deaths are now roughly 15% above what would normally be excepted. I guess he did a "Great Job" on those vaccines to reduce the P part of the equation.
Gravel T Listen very closely in this video Bill Gates talks about Population control and Vaccines. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-fbYNhEaBZeI.html
@@joepublic3933 It's a problem that bill gaytes wants to reduce the number of people in the world by 10-15%. That's more than any communist regime has ever killed. Around a billion people
He's referring to the value of Co2, not the human population. If Bill Gates wanted to reduce the population he could have let India and Africa get slowly wiped out by Polio. So dumb...
@@AllenBethea yet there are massive declines in cases of polio in the parts of the world that the Gates Foundation acted aggressively to curb the spread of the disease due to that vaccination. Complete fake news anti vaccination idiocy.
They say nitrogen from plants are also killing the planet so plan is no plants and no people = geoengineering so create issues in environment and use the same methods to fix it no joke looks like someone failed in science whoever thinks this is a good idea
4:35 he says it in plain sight and not one person in the audience sighs or sounds offended “The world today has 6.8 billion people, that’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, healthcare, reproductive health services, We could lower that by about 10 or 15%.”
as many already stated here, he believes that by reducing mortality at a younger age (also just general contraception if you want to include 'reproductive health series') families will not have as many children, thereby, reducing population growth, hence, new vaccines, better health care, etc. Of course, it would've been EXTREMELY helpful for him to have mentioned that detail instead of having listeners to dig for its origins, if bill gates is guilty of anything here, its underestimating how much people know
only way that makes sense is if he means poison vaccines and shut down healthcare these would be a great job at reducing the population after that he will reinvent the gas chamber Gates must have a Hitler complex
"A surprising but critical fact we learned was that reducing the number of deaths actually reduces population growth. (...) Contrary to the Malthusian view that population will grow to the limit of however many kids can be fed, in fact parents choose to have enough kids to give them a high chance that several will survive to support them as they grow old. As the number of kids who survive to adulthood goes up, parents can achieve this goal without having as many children." - Annual Letter 2009, Gates Foundation
He explained that in poor countries, parents tend to have more babies because they consider that as dependant resources in the future. But the issue is in poor countries, there are poor conditions of living, poor hygiene, and lots of diseases which infect large number of kids and end up dying. Most parents have between 4-6 kids due lack of education. This will make it harder for the parents to afford and provide for these kids that many die of poverty. So by vaccines and educating on controlling birth rate, parents in poor countries have less kids but healthy. This is what he meant. But of course a guy who scored 1590/1600 on an SAT test is not going to simplify the equation. Also most people who attended the TEd Talk that day might have a background and already filled in on the details after.
@@sizzlean9459 no, it's zero. as in he does not say he would like to kill anyone. in fact he says the population is expected to rise to 1.3x the current population. you have misunderstood.
@@punnymoney3692 he wants to reduce population growth. He’s talking about projections of the future population and how providing third world countries with better healthcare and living conditions can reduce birth rates in those countries because families will be less inclined to have more children
"If we do a really good job on new vaccines, ...we could lower [population growth] by perhaps 10%-15%. But there we will see an increase of 1.3." The Population would increase due to better Health Care an so on. Don't cut it as you like...
Everyone on earth makes their own choices. As so many of us have rejected God and His wisdom, we don't know who we should turn to to make us live in peace and happy. But it's never too late and you can make this choice yourself. God loves us and He knows each one of us. He wants to save us but will never violate our freewill. May you open your heart to Him. Blessings
I know. Isn’t it amazing how dumbed down people are, how mind-controlled they are. Your friends look at you and say, “What do you know? We will follow Kill Gate’s lead ‘cause after all, he gave us Microsoft “
There's enough food to feed the world three times over, we have a distribution problem There's enough renewable energy available to power the planet, 40000 times over Seems like markets are the problem not the solution.
harleydanger123 Distribution problem, I agree, but there isn't enough food to feed the world three times over. There's barely enough for current numbers and there won't be enough if demographic expansion continues. Note that not every kind of food can be produced on any kind of soil, let alone "cultivating" deserts or mountains. Also, converting too much land into arable land would severely destabilize some ecosystems, some in an irreversible manner [at least short-term]; deforestation is not even an option, let alone a viable one. We need demographic stabilization, and we need it ASAP - no killings involved, just responsible reproduction. You're right about the renewable energy though. A solar field the size of Switzerland could provide for the entire planet.
depescaun We currently waste 1/3 of food production, so with without changing a thing except distribution we can feed >10 billion tomorrow, when you factor in what's being produced and how, we can quite easily double that. Markets are the problem.
Quality over quantity. Food is far from the only issue that affects living standards. 10 billion people will never be able to live decent lives on the long term, let alone 20 billion. The planet has fragile ecosystems to be preserved, some people get greedy etc. It's basically a utopia: reality simply doesn't work like SimCity [by solely managing markets].
depescaun If you factor in the meat / animal protein production in then it prob. is. Food to meat conversion is rediculusly bad. Pigs with 6:1 of cows/beef with like 8:1 seem already bad but then you go to chicken which are more like 25:1. Then look at "farmed" fish, feed mostly by wild captured, small fish hacked up to fish-food. Here we are talking >30:1 conversion rates. So yeah, if we could reduce the animal protein intake substantialy we would not only be able to feed everybody but get rid of one of the biggest climate gas emission sourses. Look it up, there are great sources on the world clima section of the united nation. Animal "production" CO2 emission is estimated to be the greatest factor on climate gas by far... Intresting paper from the fao (united nation food & agricultural org.): www.fao.org/docrep/018/i3437e/i3437e.pdf united nation overview on the impact of meat on global climat: www.unep.org/pdf/unep-geas_oct_2012.pdf
Oh absolutely. Meat takes up a lot of energy&water to produce. It's not that it should be banned - it's just that it should be more moderately consumed, also for health purposes. Win-Win situation
I sure hope you aren't saying that seriously over one badly worded and badly explained part of his equation. Did you happen to notice which way the arrow over the P is facing? It's up, indicating that population is, and will continue to rise. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1670537 www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22077806 Please read, then you will understand what he was saying.
RussianKid, me too. Welcome. It's gonna be a hard ride, but vaccines have so many poisons in them. Of course, the CDC says otherwise. The CDC is also funded by bigPharma!
Yes it could sound that way..... unless of course you listen to the end of it, where he says that it's the last one, C, that has to be close to zero. Hence the title of the talk. Go on, it's less than two minutes later, you can make the effort and listen!
What he’s saying is that better healthcare will make parents have less of a reason to have so many children. Before we had medicine today people had way more children (anywhere from 2 to 7 or more) because they knew not all of them would survive because of all the diseases that didn’t have vaccines at the time. Now with even better medicine parents will have only 1-2 children because they know they will be safe. Vaccines don’t depopulate like you want to think he’s saying; they slow down the POPULATION GROWTH RATE. Either you have a below average intelligence to be able to comprehend information, or you are pretending he is evil just so you can stick with your rubbish conspiracy theories in an attempt to feel important or special.
If he's so evil why is the entire talk about bettering humanity? He's so rich if he wanted to do evil he doesn't need to go talk about it. Rationality, context and logic is important people. This is a man with a lot on his mind, don't hang on to a single sentence but look at the entire picture.
@@eeeaten At minute 3:55 he starts talking about population and other things to set the context and some seconds later he says "First we've got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's headed up to 9 billion. if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care and reproductive health services, we could...." and listen to the 6 words that come after that 😡😡😡😡
@@tommisaki4396 yes, you have simply misunderstood. he's saying we can bring the _maximum projected_ population down by improving the lives of the world's poorest people, lowering the birth rate and slowing the population increase. he says the population is still expected to _rise_ by a factor of 1.3x, not fall. do you understand?
+IIIIIIII I like how you think those clothes are worth thirty bucks. Yes, he's wearing a shirt. No, not all shirts costs the same. That shirt he's wearing it's probably worth more than your entire wardrobe.
+IIIIIIII That is the difference between you and the richest man in the world. He cares about the more important things in life like health care, education, freedom and not the materialistic bullshit.
lol, i have to laugh at some of these responses. i said what i did because i admire the fact that he doesn't care about wearing anything fancy or expensive. i guess sarcasm isn't always obvious on the internet.
It is like that: they say things, right to the face of people, of the earth, but blinded we fail to recognize, react, change the course of things.....and when it happens, when all go wrong (for the majority of people/beings) they proudly claim that we were never lied to in the first place, that we agreed (charmed, tricked, unwillingly, forced, hypnotized, etc) ....
ITS ALL UP TO YOU TO HAVE MORE CHILDREN THE BIRTHRATE HAS BEEN GOING DOWN IN AMERICA SINCE THE 1940;S AND THE BIRTHRATE OF ALL COUNTRIES ARE NOW IN DECLINE, AS PEOPLES HEALTH IMPROVES, THEY GET JOBS BETTER JOBS, AND MAKE MORE MONEY, NOW THEY WANT, BETTER HOUSES, NEW CARS, FANCY VACATIONS, BUT, THEY WANT LESS CHIDREN, THEY CAN NOT AFFORD TO HAVE BOTH, THE AVERAGE BIRTHS RIGHT NOW IN THE USA IS ONLY 1.6 PER WOMEN, /FAMILY, THAT IS NOT ENOUGH TO CONTINUE ANY CULTURES, THIS IS HAPPENING ALL OVER THE WORLD, (EXCEPT AFRICA) AND IS NOW A THREAT TO THE ECONOMIES AROUND THE WORLD, WHICH IS NOT ENOUGH PEOPLE TO WORK IN ALL THE JOBS, FACTORIES, HOTELS, RESURANTS, ETC, AND THIS AFFECTS TAX REVENUE TO PAY FOR ALL THE RETIRED PEOPLE THAT NOW EXIST IN THE USA AND AROUND THE WORLD, IF IT WAS NOT FOR ALL THE REFFUEGS COMING HERE FROM ALL OVER, AMERICA WOULD BE IN REAL TROUBLE, RIGHT NOW THERE ARE OVER 11 MILLION JOBS GOING BEGGING, AND WITH THE PANDEMIC, OVER 800 THOUSAND PEOPLE NOW DEAD, I AM SURE A LOT OF THEM WORKED, SO EXPECT IN THE FUTURE, A LOT OF GREEN WORK PERMITS AND SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS WILL BE GIVEN TO ALL THE PEOPLE COMING ACROSS THE BOARDER SO THAT THEY CAN WORK AND PAY TAXES, ( THIS IS WHY GERMANY LET IN OVER 1 MILLION MUSLIMS INTO THEIR COUNTRY, TO FILL ALL THE FACTORIES THAT NEED PEOPLE) ITALY IS NOW BEGGING FOR PEOPLE TO COME LIVE THERE AND HAVE CHILDREN AND ARE GIVIING AWAY HOUSES IF YOU COME THERE TO LIVE, (WITH CONDITIONS OF COURSE) S0 GET READY FOR MAJOR CHANGES COMING. AND THEY ARE ALREADY HERE,
2:54 Game (The Problem) 3:52 Set (The Formula) Where it gets cringy: 4:19 Match 4:33 The Solution 4:41 Solving P 4:55 S “These are great things.” & “It’s a great thing that this number goes up.” So every P needs to get S 5:44 E “Is not going up” 6:09 “Fertilizer (farming) and Air travel (transportation), improvements are far less...” 6:36 C is his Focus 7:09 “We need energy miracles” The ugly shortest way (that feels suggested in the underbelly) to get it to Zero in the shortest time is reducing P, the formula helps to set the suggestion, because S, E and C are all depended of P. If P goes down, everything goes down. So his big focus is the solution with C, but he does have a solution for declining P with 10-15% 4:41
@Anya Klin Uranium 238 reactors are actually pretty cool. 😁 Oh no, an anti-vaxxer is calling me a nuclear physicist! How embarrassing 😂 ROFL Don't tell me you hate nuclear power too Karen 🤣 ROFL
@@georgesears2916 How about you go sign up for a test subject for his Covid vaccine as well as update your vaccines to all of the one's that are given to newborns now? You'll probably end up living in a long term care facility having someone feeding you and changing your diapers, but hey, vaccines save lives!
@@galleryred23 uh... no he says P is expected to rise by a factor of 1.3 he spends most of the talk on how to reduce C (carbon dioxide produced via human energy use). i hope that clears it up!
@@dogzrule4every1 yes masks are doing nothing to stop viruses, however, they are a health hazard people will develop bacterial pneumonia among other things.
@@giseliapereira5914 I’ve found nothing about what your claiming. On the contrary I’ve never found evidence to support that masks do in fact help prevent the spread of disease. It will not protect you from breathing in other people’s breath but it stops your germs/viruses from escaping. After all, surgeons and the like have been wearing masks for years and I don’t see people coming out of surgery with illness.
"If you confess with your mouth 'Jesus is Lord' and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the grave, you will be saved" Romans 10:9 Call on the Name of Jesus today! 🙏
Lisa M. 1 Cor. 15:1-4 - Jesus NEVER claimed to be Lord! The jews accused him of that, killed him, and then wrote a book called the bible. Jesus has nothing to do with the bible. Jesus was a man sent by god. Just like Adam and moses. Doesnt make them god either!
@@CosmicEpiphany pfff... My Paladin can resurrect hundreds of people a day. Think about running a BG and only healing once, you would get reported for inactivity or botting.
So I came here to see the full context of what he was saying about vaccines and yup it's what everyone thought. Population reduction through vaccines 🧐🧐
Nope. CO2 = P x S x E x C P= people S= services per person E= energy per service C = carbon dioxide per unit energy The last one, C, must come down to zero because all the others will increase, even if you slow down the rate of increase. Hence the title of the talk. No mention of population reduction anywhere. Population at date of talk: 6.8 billion. Population today = 7.8 billion. Where's the reduction in population? He mentions a reduction in the rate of increase, through better living conditions, meaning people choose to have less children. Is that what you're getting mixed up with?