Science is moving forward so fast. Every time I see a great lecture like this it blows my mind on how people are able to develop this knowledge. It makes me proud again to be part of this human race, but it is actually no wonder that so many people are stuck so far behind. But I'm so glad that Lawrence is capable of preparing and cooking a scientific meal in a way that I can not only digest it, but actually really enjoy eating it. He is my master chef of science.
+Nico van Os Yup. I love Krauss's lectures. Always so illuminating. The science is not easy to follow, but it's close enough to my understanding that I am blown away by what we are figuring out. Truly awesome.
@@TraderTimmy Yeah, me too. I'm excited about scientific discoveries. Isn't God great!!! Gravitational waves traced all the way back to the big bang! Proof gravity was created in its beginning. "In the beginning God created..." Go to my free online Bible School to study the Word of God outside of religion at walkintheanointing.com "You shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free." Jesus
I was thinking the same thing. The level science has reached is exponentially farther than most people care to find out. They have no clue what we know now
Another truly fascinating talk by Lawrence Krauss. I'll have to watch it many more times to wrap my head around some of the things that were said, but that's the beauty of learning.
I study physics everyday and every day I find new areas people could devote their lives to and not understand it fully. Physics is truly the subject that displays to you in explicit detail how stupid you really are :P
+Carl Arnold Krauss's latest book brings to bear science done by many people who have been awarded the Nobel. Many of the discoveries referred to in his book were made by Nobel winners. Many of his references are Nobel winners. We can't help but notice that creationists have never presented to scientific committees in an attempt to back-up their claims. And creationists have never, ever presented a shred of evidence for their scientific claims; therefore we can say beyond a reasonable doubt that no gods exist. Peace. Let's talk magic, right?
Very intriguing Dr. Krauss, thank you for your extraordinary insights to the ever expanding field of Cosmology. I yearn to have the opportunity to learn from you at Arizona State University one day. My deepest respect for what you do and have accomplished in your life. Hopefully, as a species, we can continue to push the frontiers of human knowledge and gain true understanding of the origins of matter and energy in our Universe and beyond.
***** I spent several years running the sound at my local Christian school's chapel services, both before and after I graduated... Which is at least ONE practical skill I learned at that school... Might be the only thing.
I REALLY ENJOY LAWRENCE AND ALTHOUGH I AGREE WITH HIS POLITICS I THINK HE SHOULD LEAVE HIS LITTLE POLITICAL COMMENTS OUT OF HIS PRESENTATIONS. IT IS BENEATH HIM.
I wonder if there might be some kind of interaction/ correlation of random frost pattern direction, to an already identified subparticle and its movement. just a random thought I had around 35 minutes into this.
26:21 mark: The bicep experiment published results that showed gravitational waves at a fraction of a moment during the big bang? What does this say about gravity itself? It was here before time or what? What does having gravity it such an early instant mean? That gravity was always here AND did create the big crunch?
Ask three questions from yourself after waking from a dream. 1. The observer of my dream was conscious or unconscious? 2. The observer of my dream was in my dream or in the universe? 3. Is the observer of my dream still conscious? If so then where? Answers of these questions will enable us to understand the beginning of time.
Gupta, how does that answer anything other than you are controlling the person who does such ridiculous things for some unknown identity(you). Why not just promise a bag of peanuts as the prize?
To know in 2022 Rick Perry was our Energy Secretary and “ controlled” Nuclear energy and weapons, to hear someone say HES MORE STUPID IN PERSON is HYSTERICAL “ NOW!”
44:20 , I remember when that semi super conductor building was cancelled... They were gonna build it down the street from my apt. Considering how my life has gone since...I wish they would've built it and created a black hole right next to my house, if you know what I mean.. ?
(Everything = Zero plus Not Zero ) .......what made it not be Zero ? does anyone know? try to explain it someone. HOW can you get Nothing from Everything and Everything from Nothing? How? does anyone know ? thanks
+Robert W So go look it up. It is not hard to find. From Google, www.livescience.com/11816-rays-reveal-snake-hidden-legx-rays-reveal-snake-hidden-leg.html. Since the illustration in the talk was made before the fossils were found, the answers seems to be, "No, they are not in the same location."
i am taking a guess. Maybe all the things we see out there in the World are maybe just all derived from "thought" so to speak the way Issac Newton said. God's thoughts ......Newton wanted to know them i think he said someplace. Because "Thought" drifts above everything else and yet, everything in the whole World is involved in Thought one way or another. i dont know i quit -- this is fun though anyway
I know Lawrence Krauss didn't post this video but if protons only have a life span of 10 to the 33 years and currently protons are on the order of 10 to the 10th years old. Then the experiment expecting to see a proton decay in container that holds 10 to the 33rd protons shouldn't yield results. Please any physicists reading this comment correct me if I'm wrong but wouldn't that experiment be akin to putting babies in a room and expecting to see one of them die of old age.
mrjones422 That would be correct if the lifespan of a proton (among other quantum effects) worked on discrete measurements. However, quantum effects work as probabilities. Meaning the AVERAGE proton will decay in 10^33 years, but if you have 10^33 of them, there is a decent chance that at least one will decay within a decade or so. In your analogy, it would be like at least one of the babies dying (of any cause) within a while. There are anomalies, and yes, the AVERAGE baby will live much longer but there still is a chance of one dying, and we can study that baby's death to learn more about death as a process. Very grim analogy haha.
drezell47 Thanks for the response. I think I get what you're saying. Sorry for the grim baby analogy. I used it in such a way as to say that a baby cannot die of "old age" when a baby. Of coarse it could always die of other reasons but not of old age. I guess the phrasing would make more sense to me if it was said that protons decay at a rate of one out of 10^33 protons per year as opposed to the average proton will decay in 10^33 years. Since we are around 10^10 years of existence for the proton that's why I compared decay to a human life span. Intuitively to me it seems to be so many magnitudes of time apart that the experiment would be akin to saying the average human life span is 75 years. So if we put 75 babies in a room (10^10) we would expect to see one of them die of "old age" (decay) because a humans average life span is 75 years (10^33). I'm sure I'm way off on this but that's just how it seems to me.
No problem about the analogy :) I think a better analogy would be if there were 10^33 sided dice (those would be massive though!), and rolling a "1" on a die would mean it dies. In a large enough room where 10^33 of these 10^33 sided dice could reside and be rolled, odds are that one of them would land on a 1 at least. Statistically, it's not the same as how quantum mechanics works with probabilities, but it gets the job done as far as the analogy needs to go. The *average* proton will decay in 10^33 years. That means that some will decay in 10^66 years, and some will decay in 10^1=10 years. Most will decay in the middle range, but there will still be measurable decays besides that. This large room that contains all those atoms would *eventually* have at least one proton decay, and 10 years is a reasonable amount of time to wait. I hope this helps :)
Evidence for God is very specific to the individual, and each person obtain an evidence which is not the same to one another. The beginning of time is a beautiful nonsense. Most of physicists, more than 100 years are defending Einstein's theory of gravity. because it is a well established theory that was indoctrinated to believe. They had not realized that in fact the theory was not scientifically correct. Actually, the first test of general relativity was error. Start more info on RU-vid: New evidence has been found: General relativity was totally wrong.
GSA New Physics > Imagine how screwed up science would be if everyone had their 'own' versions of evidence. Thankfully, in science everyone has to submit to the same evidence, and so science actually makes progress (unlike religion). Krauss says he gets half a dozen emails every day claiming that Einstein and all of modern physics is wrong. Amazing how many wannabe Einsteins are out there. I take it you are one of them.
1400 years ago universe expanding is already written in holy Quran...Quran 51:47........SAHIH INTERNATIONAL And the heaven We constructed with strength, and indeed, We are [its] EXPANDER.
Dear Larry: Thought experiment: PhD Theses have been written Defeating the Born Gay Hypothesis. Perhaps You Hypothesize Exactly Why, and Who was responsible for that. The kids will really Enjoy Hearing it from You!!! 💡😁🧐🤓✅💥💥💥🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 It’s like pulling teeth.... Hahahaha
PROOF OF EXISTENCE OF ALMIGHTY ALLAH The Almighty Allah Challanges the Mankind in Holy Qur'an : Blessed is He in Whose hand is Dominion and He over all things Hath Power - He Who created Death and Life, He Who created seven heavens one above another; Thou canst see no fault (want of proportion) in Rahman's creation So turn thy vision again Seest thou any flaw ? Then look again and again, thy sight will return unto thee weakend and made dim. ( Again turn thy vision a second time ; thy vision will come back to the dull and disconfited, in state of wom.)". (Qur'an,67:3,4) Explanations:- The seven heavens are arranged in layers one above another. This verse indicates to the multiverse. There are seven skies only, not infinite numbers of universe. In mathematical or scientific terms,any claim which is not supported by experiments can not be an acceptable proposition. Existence of Almighty Allah is proved by ' intelligent design , based on the infinite complexity of the myriad life forms which surround us and of which we ourselves are part. Intelligent design argue that to say that such complexity couldn't arise out of random chance. It is impossible. Almighty Allah -- the Originator of the heavens and the earth! " بديع السموات والأرض " ( ,2:117 ,Qur'an) challenged the Mankind if they have power to penetrate (all) regions of the heavens and the earth, then penetrate(them). The universe is so vast and stretches beyond our ken , that our eyes aided with the most powerful telescopes will confess themselves defeated in trying to penetrate to the ultimate mystries . The universe is expanding faster than light speed. The universe is much larger that we can see it or go beyond. It is becoming bigger and bigger. Can NASA, ESA and all other space research agencies of the world all altogether accept this challenge of Almighty Allah? If not, they have no justification to deny the existence of Almighty Allah relying on theirs very little knowledge of the universe. In the above mentioned Qur'anic verse, We are asked to observe , study and research the universe carefully and deeply. and as minutely as our powers will allow with the aid of scientific machines and most advanced telescopes. We shall find no defect in Allah's handicraft. It is over our own powers that we shall fìnd fail to go beyond a certain compass. DR.MOHAMMAD LAEEQUE NADVI Ph.D. (Arabic Lit.) Director Amena Institute of Islamic Studies & Analysis A Global & Universal Research Institute, Kolkata nadvilaeeque@gmail.com
All you Abrahamic religionists are evolutions of Hindu, Zoroastrianism and Mediterranean mythology. The holy looks are content and religion is your hobby.
"Why is the sky blue"? Can you or anyone else answer or have answered that simple question correctly? The correct answered is not a illutsion it is reality in Physics.
There is no time before the creation of time and there is no absolute measure of time or distance in the universe so there is no way to determine the age of the universe.
"there is no way to determine the age of the universe" I understood that pretty clearly and it's crap, bullshit, stupid, whatever you want to call it. Take some lessons in physics. You want to sound wise but i can assure you it sounds pretty stupid
We can, in fact, measure OUR CURRENT INSTANCE of our universe. Once the fabric of time began to exist, it became measurable. Perhaps you mean that we can't measure that which is outside our universe (if such exists)?
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth and yet paradoxically/as a contradiction Genesis then immediately says that the earth was void and without shape and darkness was over the surface of the deep. The fact is that Genesis was talking of a flooded, totally submerged world, originally inhabited by Satan and his evil/fallen angels, which God had destroyed by water. Remember Jesus said he saw Satan fall down to earth like lightning. Please note that the earth and the water were not created within the six days of creation. Here are what were created from the first day to the sixth day: light, firmament, vegetation, sun, moon, stars, living creatures and man. Genesis 1:9 And God said " Let the water under the sky be gathered in one place and let dry ground appear." Nobody knows exactly how long the solid ground and the water had originally existed before God made the earth a habitable place again but this time for mankind. Unlike Noah's flood that original flood was totally devastating leaving nothing in its path.
@@ozowen5961 Research never stops. Although we are familiar with everything around us on earth we still study plants, animals, people, physics and the environment. I cannot guarantee at all that there was indeed a universal flood before the global flood that the bible describes in great details. I borrowed the idea of the universal flood from somebody else.
@@nickrioz Wide difference between reality and fiction. These things are hidden from the wise and the learned but have been revealed to the simple minded. God who is greater than all has committed himself to love, to save and do good to the inferior human race.
@@rexrambo7686 There's more evidence for God than for evolution. In our darkest hour God in the person of Jesus Christ stepped into space and time. There's micro but not macro evolution. Only God can make anything out of nothing.
Definition of science: "the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behaviour of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment". Yet Krauss continues to claim how the big bang came about as though its fact. It can only be theory. Was he there? A strong theory perhaps but not fact. His attitude and approach to teaching is tiresome. Enough for me now ...and I usually find him interesting.
Lol. I hate that too. He probably stopped, as The Left ate him in the #metoo movement. It was a huge mess for him. Usually I find that funny (the left destroying other leftists) , but I do like him.
He was probably just mad since conservatives always lie so much. Look at the comment above. Krauss got associated with Epstein and his stock plummeted. I heard about sex stuff rumors from him too but "the left" didn't do shit he did everything to himself dingus.
www.amazon.de/Schaums-Outline-Modern-Physics-Outlines/dp/0070248303/277-9489135-6104038?ie=UTF8&*Version*=1&*entries*=0 work through the chapters concerning special and general relativity and come back to talk
+Sebastian M. Address the issues. There is no absolute measure of time or distance in the universe. You can't say how old or how big the universe is. You can't use expanded time as a valid measure of historical time because it was no time.
I like to talk about physics with people that have some basic knowledge. We have all known time is relative since Einstein don't pretend to sound well informed.
It's aabout 14billion years. I don't know how old you fancy yourself to be in your delusional world but i'd suggest you start by counting the years since you were born
57 minutes to clarify what you know in the first seconds ; God isn't helping enough so we need to discredit him!!...??... Krauss is such a bitter loser!! God gives him infinite freedom and this is the repay he gets!!...
