Inside Alaska Airlines midair failure | Visual Timeline 

@randy1189 I feel like Alaska should have kept their older Airbus a320-200 and the new a321neo the new 737 max is a disaster only the older 737-800 is good

Ya ok 😂 I can prove your lying! Maybe use a vpn so I can’t find ur fb 🤡… now I will forward ur info to Boeing so their lawyers can contact you for spreading false information

@@exposenetworklimited4497right. Like an ex employee would come to RU-vid to file a complaint. 🤣

What "flaws" might those have been?

@@tmorelli1982 Software (sensor, calibration, wing, tail, battery, landing gear, etc) and also hardware problems. Should I go on .. ?

Yep and sometimes people drop them off the couch onto the carpet and the screen cracks. Sooo many factors, but in this case I guess it just bounced on the grass and maybe landed on its back side which spreads impact over a larger surface area. What puzzles me is how the finder managed to access the phone? Even in airplane mode surely by default the phone will auto lock after a while and require pin/biometric to access?

lol 😂😂

That was the premise of an old Mad Magazine cartoon. Lol!

😆

You win the comment section🤣🤣🤣

I’m dead 😂 ☠️

LOL!!

I'm sure you know that what you've said isn't true, but for others who may be reading, it was Alaska Airlines who downgraded the aircraft from ETOPS status, not Boeing. Also, the only reason that water was mentioned is because Alaska Airlines only has ETOPS routes over water. There are some ETOPS routes that stay over land, but not in the part of the world were Air Alaska flies.

sadly that will never happen, money has made humanity evil and stupid. 😞

Good thought…

I like your comment too

@@agentbb007 @laska907 I liked both of your comments..

Only? 😂

That makes sense. Had they been at a higher altitude, there would've been bodies flying out of that door.

That’s the definition of MIDAIR.

​@@travisinthetrunk not even close

if they weren’t mid air... were they midground?? midspace??😭

Calm down

lol, if you are reading the news this morning, check out the Airbus 319 that diverted to Tampa for door issues. If it flies, no matter who made it, at some point it will be broken.

@@Part_121but the door didn’t come off and there was a warning to pilots as well. Boeing no warning or anything, after their MCAS problem they can longer be trusted

@@meatballq6801 As far as I know, no one had officially provided the maintenance records for this aircraft's complete history since Alaska Airlines took delivery. Many airlines, I worked for 2 of them, take their brand new planes straight to a 3rd party maintenance company for modifications, before the plane makes its first revenue flight. Some of the larger airlines will park it on the ramp and do modifications themselves. This particular tail did not go into service for several days after delivery, so you can bet someone, other than Boeing, was doing some sort of work to it. The "auto-pressurization" warning lights don't necessarily mean anything. Most of the time they will get that light due to a faulty pressurization controller, of which there are 3. In all previous flights, when the auto-pressurization light came on, they were able to still pressurize the airplane and continue the flight, by having the FO control the pressure manually. A physical pressure leak should still leak, regardless of the pressurization controller doing the work, so, while the lights could be related to the door, no one would consider that when troubleshooting a brand new plane. This is why NTSB investigations take a year to complete. Nothing can be assumed.

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂how

Lol why

I don't think he unlocked it

Yeah blame women and minorities for an issue that is attributable to bad executive management from the McDonnell Douglas merger.

If you cannot find a single worker's sloppy work, or alleged sabotage with quality control, that is even worse. No sir, there is no sabotage. Everyone knows that production is rushed to meet the targets because of stock value of the company. "Our top priority is quality", my ass! Your top priority is profits.

I would prefer ABC didn’t use high school students to make their RU-vid videos but to each their

Airbus. No longer Boring!!

Fokker! ✈️

Airbus. It’s smoother, more quiet, and actually feels powerful