The real reason Boeing's new plane crashed twice 

Emergency door flew away on 5th January this year and all 737 MAX were grounded for inspection

Makes me sad to see a great American manufacturer to go down like that. They need radical changes in the management.

@@RandomGuy9 Yeah, they’ve focused too much on short term profits

@@RandomGuy9they used to be a lot better than this. Of course, then they got infected by McDonnell Douglass and their culture.

​@RandomGuy9 Not the manufacturer only, the FAA. It's a swamp of corruption and a lustrious relationship between corporations and government.

Well yeah, true. But if Airbus hadn't built a better airplane than Boeing, then Boeing wouldn't have had to get a bigger engine, thus causing all the problems. Lol. So I can hear Boeing blaming Airbus for this.

@@trevorjameson3213 i know what you mean, but that doesnt make any sense

Yes right now hope they all get locked up

@@trevorjameson3213 if boeing does that that’s the dumbest reason i’ve ever heard

Yup

@@californiapoppy he's rich that's how :(

@@californiapoppy He was removed by the board of directors. He got 63 million in stock buybacks and pensions

They force him to resign by give him 63 mil . Those a hole worry about ceo lawsuit than all victim family lawsuit

And many corpses

That the boeing style

BRILLIANT! Best post!

🤣🤣💀💀

oh yeah, thanks to power point slides , software update can fix many things including constipation, strokes , blockages, kidney stones and many more be it an airplane or a human.

And wings coming apart mid flight. DEI baby.

😭😭😭😭

@Tatsujiro Kurogane a painful one

omfg that's a horrible vision the plane crached at 1000 klm/h they found the engine 10 meter under the ground :-O

😐 all because of the mcas... wow just wow.

@Untrepid One no mph klmph

@Untrepid One Why ? 🤔

Exactly. Very good example.

thanks so much, clever makes me smile.

"We couldn't fix your plane so we just made it beep before it falls apart..."

Nail on the head bro

TRUE

So sad. Apparently he was super smart.

Good one

Sadly that's the truth

Epic 🥲

Clever

MCash

Wait, he was on a boeing 737 max that crashed or was he lucky enough to be not on one of those? If he was tho, rip to him 🙏. Boeing should be charged so much money for everyone who died in the crashes.

My teacher lost two cousins in the Ethiopian crash. She was so broken that day when she told us. It hurt seeing her cry like that, I'm pretty sure she left early that day.

Glitch tragic... I hate it so much that people have to day because some rich people want even more money

As an Indonesian, I'm still bitter about this event. I just hate the fact that Boeing employees turned down Indonesian pilots request for more training and mock them instead. I'm crying just by watching this. The arrogance of those people. How dare

So sorry for the loss :(

Given that out of over 16,000 737s built since 1960 there’s only been 502 incidents. I wouldn’t say it’s junk.

@@marcbrady7241 Now they also fall apart.

@@epoxy1710 Not yet confirmed all the details of this. This might not be Boeings fault. Wait until we know everything before making assumptions.

@@marcbrady7241 Still a door ripped off the plane. Smells Flight 811 all over again.

​@@epoxy1710Most likely a quality control issue meaning it's not tied to specifically the 737 max.

same

😂😂

I know what this rhymes with 😂🤣

Bars

😂😂

capitalism...

Such a new concept!

BBB 👎️ (Boeing Behaving Badly )

but the free market will protect us

Competition is good,well thats what they told us.

yeah, 😥 especially the baby shoes ,

It shows how unpredictable the life is ...

It’s a loot box

especially the Hello Kitty Wallet.

Rather sad than depressing to me

who eminam ?

Seeing those toys are the most depressing things I've seen

Yes my neighbour was one of them

Aflax News i am sorry

ir i saw that i would just steal those wallets

It is, and seeing so many just proves how many significant lives were lost in that crash, it’s extremely depressing.

No, Boeing took accountability and it has done its re certification flight and passed it. Yes it was rushed but the MCAS wasn’t supposed to behave like that which was a SOFTWARE error not a human error. The other problem is a lot of those obscure Asian/African airlines don’t give their pilots as good of training as we would get in the US because they just don’t have the money to provide it.

@@Reidhirsch You must be a Boeing employee with the way you attribute blame away from Boeing

Jordan Wong I’m not and I’m not saying that it wasn’t their fault and they could’ve done a lot more testing but the majority of plane crashes happen in countries with less money because of the lack of training that they give their employees. Look it up if you don’t believe me.

@@RIPped I don't think he worded his statement properly, but he's not entirely wrong. Boeing undoubtedly takes a majority of the blame here for over selling a product which in turn took the lives of so many people. However there are proper procedures in place for virtually any situation or system failure, including the MCAS. A properly trained pilot needs to know exactly what to do in case of an MCAS failure and all the other pilots that experienced and complained about it, managed to fly their planes without any real danger to the plane or lives on board.

Part of the problem was that since Boeing had promised a delivery date and minimal pilot training, they did not push for more training on the MCAS, and kept it secret for the most part. Other research also shows that test pilots on simulators in the Seattle location were pushing for more R&D, as they we encountering similar issues when initially testing the MAX. But HQ in Chicago either didn’t get the message, or didn’t care. This was an institutional failure by Boeing, caused primarily by the need to keep market share.

Flew on fly Dubai’s 737 max and I was so scared

Exactly. Pure greed… what other problems might this airplane family have, rather not find out the deadly way.

There's still a very simple off switch though

@@RazvanMaioru Not when the feature is badly documented, you are under stress and every millisecond counts. It means one more thing to diagnose and rule out.

@@Avengerie it's the same trim cutoff switch as on previous models. You use it in the same circumstances (trim runaway), it's in the same place, it's the same switch, it takes the same amount of time to use it (the expected time it would take pilots to notice a failure, diagnose it and then use this switch is 3 seconds), and the same amount of time is required. The same memory checklist applies. How is this a worse design in any way? Or "one more thing to diagnose and rule out"?

@@RazvanMaioru Do you work for Boeing PR? Two pilots had a lot more than 3 seconds to figure this out and didn't.

@@lixloon Then they shouldn't have their type rating, if they can't properly fly that plane.

sad to hear that

Sad bruh

may Allah bless ure family and your beloved ones.. I'm sorry for this loss

greed and big corporations are truly evil and repulsive

which one? the Lion Air one or the Ethopian one?

there is truth in it though pilots in the us are told about the mcas which would work if pilots used it correctly by just not over countering it however airlines choose not to tell their pilots boeing did inform airlines and it was up to them whether to provide additional,training or inform at least to the pilots,in these 3rd world countries they didnt bother telling

This.

@@spidercubed9718 Yes, but this wasn't junk. It was incredibly important

im thinking about the satanic mandela effect moving the turbine to the front of the wing instead of underneath

Yep, scandalous. But that's going to bite them sorely in the ba**s as a consequence.

The pilots were told about it, just not trained properly by their respective airlines. It was a chain of events that led to the crashes, not just the MCAS.

@@BloatedBumbleBee to kill over 300 people in 5 months

Yeah, seeing that Hello Kitty bag made me tear up.

That was creepy

ya that's what got me too the most, it's so tragic and the people responsible so far just get away with putting all those people in danger and causing their deaths

@@ava.and.jasper Not a lawyer in the whole of the 7 kingdoms is going to get them out of this one.

@@ava.and.jasper The people in the commercial aircraft industry are not pushing things under the rug to save money. The safety culture there is the best in the world, from engineers to flight crews everybody is focused on getting the job done every time and upgrading aircraft and procedures before tragedy strikes. The pilots of these two crashed aircraft had the training to react to this problem, but problems almost never happen during flight and pilots are sometimes caught off guard. (it's a strange side effect of being part of the safest industry). And yes, there was an unforeseen problem with the MCAS system and the manufacture was working on a solution before the first crash. It is safe to fly and getting safer all the time.

haha Ford Pinto go brrrrrr

Thats what every company does

@@TheGreatCooLite yeah and after that they can lose everything to their competitors.

You should live in Cuba for a few weeks.

@@johnames6430 the truth is hard to handle isn't it?

Couldn't agree more. Just to make a few more dollar. :(

Keep in mind that for an American company, non-Americans are not people. Or at least not important people. That's why the USA didn't even want to ground this plane.

You are right, can't cut corners. The airlines hired pilots that I would never hired when I was the chief pilot of an airline. Those guys should never been in the cockpits.

Too right -challenger shuttle accident 85 another onev

@@charliebrown6161From what I can tell, It's not that the pilot's did a poor job, it's that they weren't alerted of the software

Are they that terrible!?

The latest is a quality problem. I don't think that's really better at all, but it's something.

They should’ve known about a runaway stab tho. It’s very similar and they trained for it

Actually the vast majority of industry professionals still place the majority of the blame on the pilots. As Jay Jay said, this failure is very similar to runaway trim which has been around for a very long time. The lion air report glosses over some terrifying mistakes made by that crew

@@chrisbowpiloto The Ethiopian crew followed the runaway stabilizer checklist... and still crashed.

@@cityuser well they did half of it, and then undid it... That does not count as "doing the procedure" in this industry

@@James-jx3ro I’m not saying Boeing is innocent. I’m just saying the pilots also had a role in the accidents.

Hey, that's actually pretty good

Fact bro

So many people died bc someone didn't say the new feature they put in their plane

nice Ctrl V

Another Boeing just went down today🤐

Even though that’s a completely different issue?

@@marcbrady7241 it's still Boeing and FAA rushing to clear them off to fly again

@@marcbrady7241still dangerous tho

💯 💯

thats why the board is playing musical chairs no one want to fly in it

You kidding? I'd fly it today as long as the crew was properly certified as they would have been if these were American-based airlines. These crashes were caused by pilot error. At worst, the MCAS issue should have been a mild inconvenience and easily dealt with by exiting procedures for runaway trim regardless of the system responsible for it. But the pilots didn't handle the situation correctly and hundreds of people died as a result.

@@icemachine79 The pilots weren't allowed to. The computer has more span than the yoke, therefore, can override any input from the pilots. It was later proven, that even switching the system "off" wasn't enough to restore full control to the pilot, since, switching it off is a software command, rather than a hard transfer switch. Any error in software, or hardware malfunction, and the pilots cannot regain control. It's not like the "auto-pilot" in a Cessna, or Piper, though it should be!

@@vincentrobinette1507 None of what you said is accurate as demonstrated by the safe landing of the SAME Lion Air plane that encountered the SAME problem but luckily had a much more competent crew in charge on that particular flight. All they had to do was follow the runaway trim checklist to deactivate the electric trim system (which automatically disabled all MCAS commands) and manage their airspeed correctly in order to operate the trim manually. Unfortunately, after the plane landed safely and was checked in for repairs, Lion Air's maintenance staff failed to fix the faulty AoA sensor and illegally returned the plane to flight status. The next crew to pilot the plane then failed to follow the proper checklist for runaway trim which eventually resulted in a crash. The Ethiopian Airlines crew failed to throttle back at any point during the flight (lack of basic airmanship b/c co-pilot only had 200 hours in ANY cockpit) which made it almost impossible to manually trim the aircraft. The captain followed the proper checklist but his co-pilot was totally useless leaving him oversaturated with tasks. Lion Air and Ethiopian Airlines are the companies that should be held to account for these deaths, not Boeing.

Huge American Companies can bet anything for money

Trump: "planes are just TOO complicated nowadays, it's NOT Boeing's fault"......

Low time inexperienced 3rd world pilots crashed....never happened in America. Truth is its not MCAS its alt capture on the autopilot.

Yes and the American pilots didn’t crash. 2 Stab Trim to Off.

The UnknownSG: This is my uninformed hot take on the situation. Me: Sigh.

Nice

Great. So what you're doing except playing video games whole day and night?

@@SychoSamNPC life is better than whatever you do!!

Good. Their stuff doesn't fly.

Captain Jack Aubrey of the Royal Navy You’d be surprised what pilots can pull off to save passengers especially when crash landing. Terrifying? Yes. Survival? Actually somewhat likely (given the circumstances in which the plane crashes/lands).

Yeah it must be just impending doom with those g forces as the plane dived

@@firestorm8268 you don't actually experience any noticeable Gs in a linear dive. G forces are most experienced when entering and pulling out of a dive via the change in acceleration.

@@Skyried exactly. It would be the opposite of G force if the plane was depending rapidly people might even lift out if their seats and feel like there's no gravity and your whole stomach feels like it's going to come out of your mouth. Probably one of the most terrifying feelings in the world that's the whole "thrill" of roller costers

Decending

Same. Those people were terrified the entire time because I guarentee everyone of them knew that it was not normal. Boeing needs to compensate every single surviving family for what they did to them and their loved ones by cutting corners.

The only mistake on the graph is that they did not show numbers for the altitude

@@mikellbart2185 Yes I agree with you. This chart should have included the aircrafts altitude for better/clearer reference.

@@dave6429 The plane remained around 2,000 to 3,000 feet in the air i believe, as it failed to ever reach its designated altitude for that part of the flight, and the was plane traveling unusually fast according to the control tower, so you can only imagine the terrible amount of anxiety the passengers were experiencing :/

pretty sure people knew after the first few rollorcoaster drops

The FAA is in Boeing's pocket as well as the US government. That's the real problem.

Welcome to the US...where corporations write our bills and make our laws.

As long as you're a large multinational company. If you're a single individual or a small mom and pop company you'll get the book thrown at you. There are different sets of rules based on your net value.

The CEO at least got fired :/

Yet a Brazilian maintenance guy went to jail for forgetting to take duct tape off a sensor when servicing a plane.

It's a story that's happened again and again throughout history

same as airbus

@@myusername3689 well a few thousand people died of famine but socialism is good

i never liked boeing and here they are doing this its sad. no hat though i still have respect for boeing. This is a reason why the a320 is better.

it's called a war

great comparison.

but chernobyl was human error

@@NickyD Half the story only. But you're actually half right: - The top engineer was only trained to coal plants. - And the Reactor 4 was actually faulty.

@@NickyD and they hid it from the rest of the world.

The chernobyl is good example When emergency stop switch didn't working because of cost issue

U stupidp

You mean below the wing?

@@lowbudgetname2745 stupidp

This happens quite often, the problem is they say it is the same when it isn't. Imagine you are riding a bike and then all of a sudden they change the size of one of the wheel and say it is still the same bike.

Yup! I think the engineers were just eating up burgers..

Yeah it sad man

And how should that work? Yeah obviously it is a thing you should wish for but unfortunately very unrealistic. For one in such cases usually not one person is guilty, but many people just a little bit, but usually no one enough that he can be held accountible. And even if it would be the case that someone has a high enough degree of accountabilty for this, it is hard to prove if not even impossible to find out. Just look at the "simple" question is the FAA guilty for not properly validate the plane for flying or is Boeing responsible because they did not test enough for themselfes? Is the engineer the bad guy even if he honestly believed that the MCAS would be a good system or the guy who decided that now further training is necessary? Obviously nothing we can answer here, but it isn't very likely that such question can be conclusively answered by an investigation committee.

@@lal12 uhhhh, ever heard of lawsuits?

​@@yourlocalramen1660 sure. But it is not likely that a criminal case will ever be filed. There will be a (or multiple) civil lawsuit against Boeing which certainly will be successfull. But even if a single person will be accused getting certain proof that this person was aware of all the problems and clearly decided to ignore them. This will be mostly impossible. For one there are multiple circumstances which lead to the accidents, not just the technical flaws in the 737 Max. Then there are many different technical design faults which lead to the accident. Then it was mostly certified by the FAA and all changes that were not recertified do not formally require a recertification. And the FAA has issues in itself for one their conflicting functions (controlling and promote the aeronautic industry), also recent law changes lead to a more or less the self certification by the airplane manufacturer. So I doubt there is even a person or a group of people which can be singled out to be liable in some way. But even if you can find some, will be very hard to prove that in a criminal case. They would have to interview hundreds of people, which probably neither want to incriminate them selves or their coworkers. I don't say that there definitely aren't people which could be clearly be viewed as guilty from an ethical/morally standpoint. Especially if they put money before people's safety, but again this not really something that can be brought before a criminal court.

If not in Earth, they will get justice in the Judgement Day

Well said.

This V12 1600 hp engine didn't fit under the hood in this camper van, so we just put it loosely right behind the driver, and made sure you could only give maximum thrust, and it fit nicely

Well, it didn’t really work....

S. S. Cookies I know.

The designer of the 737 MAX is a black man.

Likely

yeah like seriously, all those rioting on the streets around the world for one black man. here 300 more souls and people just pretend to care. People can say that's only because he represent a race or movement something.... well that could be US on those planes! they represent us, no matter who we are

@@aoinatasha1313 Also the same for environment and climate change. People be like "Oh no, we need to act quickly" while in reality they're throwing their Cheetos bag on the side of the road while looking at their phone

- Stalin.

@@aoinatasha1313 i

Now a lot more in crash 3

737 max is safely flying again

@@likebotting784 shut up

@@AvishekTravels no u

@The secular humanist so in any moment some 787 or 737 max could just burst in flames like swissair 111?

@@thisaccounthasbeensuspended i dont know much about the issue, but maybe. Or it could lose power to important areas

not at all it doesnt even talk about the fact only the right side was showing bad data and had the pilot and FO cross checked there instruments they would seen this the ETH flight the Captain had only ~1500 hours TOTAL and FO just north of 500 in the US you need 1500 hours TOTAL time JUST get a FO job small airline the cause of the crash was inexperience

@@Elios0000 spoken like a true pilot, what did you fly? Your Ford Fiesta?

Elios0000 that’s in the Ethiopian airlines case. The captain in flight 610 is a veteran pilot with almost 8000 flight hours, and the FO has around 5000. They have no idea MCAS even existed. Also. MCAS takes data from the left side(captain’s data). Knowing the sensors disagree also wouldn’t have helped. Considering.. you know the problem is with the MCAS automatically trimming their aircraft down.

my heart sunk when i saw the plane sink :(

@@robroilen4441 you working for boeings pr department? Tell them to focus on testing and the pr will look at after itself

I mean... Millions of lives were lost for similar reasons.

I'd say capitalism was the overall cause, but* you won't believe me ( - _ -)

100 million died because some wanted to ban profits

Nope their lives where lost because pilots weren't trained by the airline.

This reminds me of the DC-10 story. They were rushing the plane and it had fatal consequences

Yeah that's why the planed crashed.

are they serious ? they have the lives of hundreds of passengers and pilots get trained with a tablet !!! oh my gosh !!! I hope Boeing trial will get live broadcast , so that their responsibility will get revealed to the face of the world

That’s a bit misleading, they had 2 additional hours of training for the max but they have months of training for the 737. Really Boeing should’ve just trusted pilots to know how to nose down.

@@Powderlover1 www.theairlinepilots.com/forumarchive/b737/b737memoryitems.php#i Those are just the memory items. Although pilots are supposed to know that (thus the name: "MEMORY items") in this case they did NOT. Even if they know the memory items but haven't practiced it in the simulator they are not properly trained. I'm sure any pilot would agree. Knowing how to do something and training to be able to do it in a crisis are two very different thing. Note the final item on the list: *STABILIZER TRIM WHEEL - GRASP and HOLD* You go ahead and try that.

@@tunkunrunk I think we can all agree they weren't trained properly. In the us idk how it works but in Europe it's generally the airlines which trains pilots afaik.

That's hard... 💔

My condolences...

I want to see consequences for the responsible

Liar

@@collinoverby68 how do you know

It wasn’t this one

But boeing's plane has crashed. You can check

@@Learner_being I didn’t say it didn’t, it was a 737 but not this model

@@_gav__ ok right

Your comment tells me you know near to nothing about this subject and probably should do more research.

Catalina i sorry what

he means the plane was too low to the ground for the new engine therefore couldn't get enough lift so they developed a software that pilots were not properly trained about

@@chateaupig826 Actually, the engines were too large, placed further forward on the wing for this reason, and actually created lift. Not a large amount of lift mind, the aircraft wasn't unstable.. but in order to ensure NG pilots can have the same common type rating on the Max, MCAS was used to slightly counter the front lift created by the engines, purely to make the aircraft feel like an NG.

chateau pig thanks

Exactly

*and no american dead* _sigh_

I heard some 737 max pilot complain to nasa anonymous

If they had been flown by U.S. based airlines, this never would have happened. These were both foreign carriers.

@@NamelessRider You just assume American Airlines and American pilots are the safest. Have you ever heard of Qantas? Have you ever heard of Air New Zealand? Have you ever heard of Lufthansa? Have you ever heard of Singapore Airlines? Have you ever heard over Eva Air? These are all foreign airlines, particularly the last 2 being from non-western countries

Yes it’s luck for Boeing bc if any of those planes did crash in the US Boeing is very likely to bankrupt or suffer a greater loss

@Jake Johnson Uh... they don't make anywhere near that many models.

It won't be that easy. People forget until they don't...

ToO bIg To fAiL

Thanos dies to Thor before the opening credits, but he has already destroyed the stones. The rest of the movie centers around using the Quantum Universe to retrieve the stones from the past timeline. Natasha and Clint go to retrieve the soul stone, with Clint sacrificing Natasha to access it. Stark builds a gauntlet to wield the retrieved infinity stones to reverse the snap. Banner has become Hulk permanently, but retains his intelligence and memories as Professor Hulk. Captain America fights Captain America in the Quantum Universe Captain America in the other universe wields the Mjolnir and shield, but Thor still has the Stormbreaker Other universe Captain America wears the old comic suit

@@laughingoctopus8556 Broooooo!!!! Who are you?

Then you should watch more widely.

@@DrG65199 Perhaps this is not the best ever, but what's wrong with this video?

@@DrG65199 which videos do you recommend?

@@Coffeebean1985 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-HBqDcUqJ5_Q.html He's a pilot and goes through the accident report in detail explaining most things. His other videos also keep you abreast with current developments in the matter.

@@Coffeebean1985 i give this general advice: if you won't trust Fox because (duh) of the obvious ideological bias, then be aware vox also has a bias, because it has a specific world view. Everyone does. So on a story about plane crashes, maybe you should seek out actual professionals in that field who are aware of the complexities governing the industry, instead of a 6 minute summary by persons who did research on a topical issue to get views as a part of their business model and magically has formed an opinion. Or don't. And continue the polarization plaguing our societies. The choice is yours.

How is it strange? Concordes were scrapped because of the fuel expenses, not just because of a crash.

Ivo Martins count me in

If it’s Boeing I’m taking the bus

To be honest, now whenever I book a domestic flight I ensure that it's not a Boeing.

their anthem: flo-rida "it's going down for real"

That, unfortunately is not a suitable ultimate approach that repects the true needs of the whole industry and humanity. We need both Airbus and Boeing as they help to keep each other from becoming dangerous global monopolies. This, and more are socio-economic necessities that befall all humanity in our times. However, that also is far from adequate control of the industry. Ultimately the needs and ardour of the adequyacy are much greater than that, and so I refer you to my paste-posted comment here as of Feb 23, 2020 for the morte extensive details.

It is, and they should be, but honestly do you think they will be held liable? Things will be settled out of court (for an ungodly sum of money), and then it's back to business as usual.

@@gfimadcat That is just how the US deals with stuff like this

Americans..

@@Martin0202M Precisely, see WW2.vietnam etc

I totally agree with you

Well no, you're argument completely fails because we have extremely strict regulations and this still happened. Maybe in a world without regulations, it wouldn't have happened.

@@David-ud9ju Are you really that dumb ?

@@tomsriver2838 David is partly right - in an true open market there would be no protection for the airplane manufacturers either, they would have been fully open to be sued into the ground by airlines and passengers. We lack this today.

David because whenever there is a single loophole in regulations companies are not abusing that loophole to the absolute legal extend - and often beyond that... They don’t care about anything asides from making as much money as possible. That’s why we need regulations - to keep their raging hunger for money under control.

@@David-ud9ju the FAA did not have the money to conduct safety checks according to the regulations and had to rely on Boeing for that.

WHY

Lion air and Ethiopian airlines: "Oh look a penny!"

Why would you make me laugh about something like this.

Change that 737 max into MCAS please

you know this is funny

If they placed the MAX’s engine below, the engine would scrape the runway before even flying.

Indeed. As an aviation major, a lot of the regulations made by the FAA aren't created until a life is taken.

Certain industries... yes. All? not so much. But flying and transportation definitely needs one of the most regs

@@patrickflores1714 It was Trump interference in the FAA

So blame the president of the US for crashes In other countries? FAA shouldn’t be rushing their inspections over one person on the FAA not whomever was “interfering”

@@logansenkier8036 The Boeing 737 MAX certification granted under cronies appointed by Trump ,Daniel Elwell . He even just an acting administrator . Imagine 3 years into his presidency the FAA top management filled by an acting administrator . What did Trump says , appointing acting Cabinet heads grants "more flexibility" . We all know what this is all about, to served his interest . Until Boeing 737 max crash , he know he f**ked up . After the crash which destroyed Boeing and FAA reputation then the FAA finally get the permanent member .

"Pay extra to not die as easily as you would with the regular package due to a system we installed but didn't tell you about"

@@Chris-rg6nm not almost, it Is Criminal

Wow, I didn't know about that, but yes as Harjeenvan said, something so critical shouldn't have been optional. And worryingly the fact those upgrades existed means people knew a failure like this could happen.. Very concerning that they went ahead anyway and didn't even mention mcas in the training material.

@@robroilen4441 Nah, according to the 737 Max 8 design, they are expendable, as are the passengers...

i think all the B737 Max have a second AoA-sensor, but the MCAS only used one of them because the sensors are connected to different flight computers. Now there was an update so both sensors are used. The option package showed the live-data from the sensor on the screen in the cockpit. But don't quote me on this, i'm not sure.

Nor did they have an issue when they installed the larger more powerful CFM engines in the 1980s. Hard to believe it's the same company

@@AB-mw8oz was that change on the very late 80s ? Cause i remember those old cigar shaped like engines ( which i do not know the name , probably not even general electric, maybe rolls royce ? I don't know ) 737s still had back in the mid/late 80s ...i used to fly those planes a lot...so it seems those engines were good enough and were righfully designed for its structure but i guess greed came along on this one hard. I understand engineering needs to evolve for the sake of evolution itself and the enviroment but the impression we get is boeing has been pretty greedy about this one in particular

Fac du

@Dan Krohn the pilots weren't even taught how to turn it off. Cant exactly blame them for lacking knowledge they were explicitly not given.

@Dan Krohn You cant blame them, They dont have knowledge of the MCAS System. Even they tried their best at the given situation

@Dan Krohn I didnt say that they made no mistake I am saying it is a factor but main problem is MCAS AND Ethiopian airlines is still under investigation (Wikipedia)

At the minute of 12, the MCAS decided to take control of the plane completely. It locked the wheel and pilots cannot do anything to prevent the plane from crashing

Not a direct 737 max issue though - if it's a quality control issue it could be basically any boeing plane

@@Browne7100 The Indonesian one wasn’t a MAX and is no way Boeing’s fault.

@@Cal90208 yep it was 737-500, also he could be referring to the old lion air crash one.

@@nicksmith1-t5z I am not being greedy I am stating facts. That aircraft had been flying for over thirty years. Obviously it was due to maintenance, weather, or human error. Do some research before you make assumptions like that

@@dava_arvarabi Possibly yeah

@@nicksmith1-t5z The recent crash was an old 737, doesn't have an mcas

I mean, they're going to get away with it.

No, the Lion Air mechanics who cleared an unairworthy plane for flight and the Ethiopian Airlines who hired a first officer with only 200 hours' flying time and allowed him to fly passengers on a plane he didn't know how to operate should go to prison.

icemachine79 You obviously don’t know the specifics. Next, please.

@@icemachine79 dude Boeing literally said it was their fault did you even watch the video

@@bodystomp5302 I figured you wouldn't reply. Somewhere inside that tiny brain of yours you know I'm right.

Herman A last time I check mass slaughter is a crime

Shakeel Ullah not safety just training

@@williamwatkins1996 aka money

marcostj01 no money needed all they had to do was tell the pilots hey this is new blah blah blah no big deal though

yeah thats mass wreckless homicide actually.

also if one of those two airplanes that crashed was American it would be a whole other story.

The 737 involved in the crash in China was a 737 800 and not a 737 max, therefore it didn’t have MCAS

A bit of hammer action and it'll look good as new.

A lil bit of bynamic balancing and a fresh paint job and it's good as new

I'm sure with the right software update to mcats it will be fine

It´s still an engine. Just not working.

@@bowlchamps37 Spot on! My thoughts exactly.