Inside ILM: The Making of The Creator 

Yet, if Sora would have made this, most people wouldn't even care.

At first, I was flabbergasted by Sora and its impact killing the need for video artists and VFX artists overnight but when you watch the result of the prompts, it still shows how the artists still have a place because SORA can't produce a movie with specific shots being edited together from different angles in specific lighting settings, basically the difference between a birthday party shot by your mom unedited and a party scene from The Godfather being carefully edited by an artist revieweing every single shots to build a specific sequences. The videos that are currently generated by SORA are so devoid of any artistry showcased in this BTS whatsoever, you still need artists with a sense of vision, style and framing a narrative through image movements and editing so the beholder can feel something genuine emotions out of it that isn't just "WOW, That fake thing looks so real" for 30 seconds then just forgets about it. Can Sora actually produce a whole narrative movie with a script, digital actors and edit it all altogether like it came from the vision of a singular director and cinematographer? That's the difference with producing a single AI frame like Midjourney for concept art stills but engineer a whole movie in prompts without a single artist supervising the result and edit it in a coherent human form? I don't think so...yet.

They did have tracking markers. They had black dots on the side of the faces of the actors. What they said was they had minimal tracking. Ultimately this is genius work from ILM and the team.

I don't think the candid shots had any tracking data.@@ODHunte

Naturally occurring trackers in the texture of the ground, the wood of buildings etc are totally fine for use as tracking markers these days. Anything that doesn't move around in the wind. Even easily accessible software such as adobe after effects has been able to this kind of tracking for 15+ years. For tracking of the heads, a tool such as KeenTools GeoTracker would get you pretty close without markers.

@@ODHunte On some main characters, yes, but quite a lot of the "extras" were comped on without tracking markers iirc. It's very exciting for the future of VFX if this is what's possible now.

Please forward that message (and this video) to the Marvel crew 😅

B- is generous 😂

🤖🤖🤖

Robotic camera with dolly?

🦾🦾🦾

🦾🦾🦾

Imo it made it look more believable. I really can't stand that clean digital look so many movies have these days..

I can tell you they added it in post. It wasn't from shooting on the FX9, they actually used the FX3 with a couple old Kowa anamorphic lenses. I've shot on 2 FX3's since they came out and I've never had noise issues unless I strayed way off the base ISO's when they were new to me.

They shot majority of the movie with the FX3 while the FX9 only utilized when they were shooting in The Volume

Ah ok, thanks for clarifying!@@NoshannaJJ

@@jeremy_woods in a talk for ShotDeck they mentioned shooting a lot in ISO 12800 especially because they liked the grain