Inside Meta’s Reality Labs: Hands-On With the Future of Metaverse 

You mean mind control. There is a reason why meta is failing so badly.

When has Zuck ever been sensitive to criticism. He happens to be right about the potential of mixed reality, because he's not completely stupid, but he sucks as a person. He should take criticism more seriously.

We need Steve Jobs.

Coming soon

These are lizards and aliens 😂

Says a socialist?

Yeah this whole this is stupid

probably alot sooner than that

@@kninja1434 dystopian future.

that's pretty realistic and accurate, considering over 40.000 deaths caused by faulty human driving i'd vote for autonomous driving only.

lol in 5 years

People think they spend the 10 billion a year on horizons world when in reality it's tech development.

Kinda cool for fisher price age groupz!! Like wtf is that bs even needed or for the itony FB grabs users info yet is fn clueless on what its users need want this cartoonish crap is cringe and its a $18 billion project znd counting wtf!

@@ezragonzalez8936 This is development at it's finest. If you're not interested by this and unable to see future possibilities, you're just dumb.

@CantWait happier than Meta stockholders! Lol 80% in 8 months has marky mark used his own billions as a side project like spacex no one would care its godam awful. Wait his avatar now has cgi legs and looks more human than in real life!! Lol good grief! But cheers from Park City Utah!

@@ezragonzalez8936 meta will be worth at least 15x more the stock price 10 years from now 10 years ago they bought Instagram 10 years before that they didn’t even exist Give them 10 years.. Mark will take over again Facebook is a social media company, and they aren’t the first but they became the biggest. Facebook was also made before the iPhone, despite most people’s usage of Facebook coming from iPhone or at least smart phone. They are just doing the same thing again.. Building the social media platforms that will become the place to interact with people online. It’s only valuable if the hardware becomes 2nd nature to people in the future. This time around instead of waiting for another company to build the iPhone and for Facebook to just be software on some other company’s hardware, they are deciding to build their own version of the iPhone to house their next Facebook on

yeah there's a lot of haters, but most are uneducated.

billions of dollars for this............ I say ridiculous

@@2faf3dafafd It took billions of dollars of investment to create the phone you type on. R&D into new technology takes massive amounts of capital whether you like it or not.

@@nafis_rk so you are comparing this with iPhone? Lol

same. Now I see the vision of the Metaverse being somewhat realistic, but it takes a lot of times still. and money for research and development. Investors dont like that

hahahahaha

Why?

To play amazing games, why else

@@scottrose8417 why not?

You can do that with paper and your hands this adds nothing. Are you guys smoking meth? Finding ways to turn a $10 job into a $10,000,000 one

@@user-account-not-found tf are talking about

You can already do that with any phone and polycam

@@goatpepperherbaltea7895 needs lots of cleanup?

it's not how you do urban planning. What you do is to sketch buildings and all stuff in 3D design software and have them displayed all together.

Holographic Meatloaf! My favorite!

Sooo a picture lik most menus already have

good idea!

@@TheTmackin So when someone sets a plate of food in front of you, does it like exactly like a picture to you? Do you only have 1 working eye my dude? I don't think you get it.

@@WigganNuG If the food is so unremarkable that it needs a VR experience to entice people to eat it, maybe you should eat in a restaurant that chose to invest its capital in skilled chefs and quality ovens. The problem with companies like Facebook is that they think they have something of value to offer *every* business.

it's fascinating the tools we have use of now. Exciting stuff

obvious bot is obvious

They are going all in on this. If they succeed then they will succeed big time!

@@CB-rv2lj not a bot, probably just Indian.

just imagine homebuyers being able to scan all the possible furniture in an empty house while they do the tour.

This has been around for over a decade. Most of the furniture you buy online already has a 3D model to be downloaded for free and added to architectural projects.

@@misteriocraftgames Totally agree with you on that,rendering 3d models in pictures. i meant in real time visits.

Like metaverse lol?

@@ryansmithc it's just an experiment. Look at NFT's value now. haha

That's Steve Jobs. He's gone now, Apple is just an empty shell now

It is not going to

It won’t

It won’t

This is all garbage lol.

That about sums it all up. Meta is definitely misunderstood

❤️✌🏾🦅💯😳🤔 The Holy Spirit works better. It cuts right through BS, and everything hidden. Great device if used for the betterment of people not, for any other reason. Prayerfully, it’s safe for everybody even our love ones. Thanks for sharing. God bless you❤️✌🏾🦅

Every time! And it is like two minute papers say. "Don't look at where we are now. Always look two papers down the line".

How is that a remotly decent user experience compared to whats already here ? 😂 I can already use ZERO hands and say.... "hey ***, send, .... your txt .... to mom". How's a wrist band that tracks microreactions more pleasant to use than just typing? You'll have to employ your cognitive/neurological movement focus while watching that virtual display anyway, so wheather you "type" into thin air while looking at a virtual display or typing on a flat surface while looking at that surface, it doesn't really give you more capability - it just sounds futuristic, but very limited usecase really. I can see how this is relevant to people who are paralized in their fingers but not their wrist. my guess would be that that is less than a fraction of a permille of people alive.

@@rpals5412 you wont send (using speaking) secret chats in public

@@jamie3226 not sure if you read the entire comment, but I was making a comparison between typing on your phone screen versus. doing micro reactions with you hand/wrist while watching a virtual screen on a AR headset. Which to me seems more complicated than useful, I just don't see any real use case for this. That's all

@@rpals5412 I mean, you were mixing comparisons, actually. Idk about the keyboard and palm idea, but it's pretty obvious that if someone can nail intuitive text input on a device like this with a comfortable wearable display that it will be mega-useful. It's not any one capability or any single instance of a few saved seconds slightly greater comfort individually, it's all of those capabilities and instances of saved time and comfort put together--all day everyday. It will add up, a lot. I remember before I got a smartphone it seemed only a little useful--after all, I could take my laptop places, right? Except my laptop didn't have internet, except my laptop had to be sitting on a surface to be used, except my laptop required wearing a backpack, except my laptop couldn't be put on a dash or bike handlebars for directions, except it was difficult to use my laptop remotely comfortably in bed or on a sofa, except I couldn't walk around playing a podcast or music with my laptop stowed in my pocket. The leap to wearable computing is similar--it's not that you can't do most of the same things with the old tech, it's that you can do them much better with the new form factor/interface. And some things you wouldn't have done before because they were too unwieldy or slow, you can easily do now. Examples: 1) You're biking. It's winter. You're wearing thick gloves. Instead of stopping your bike, taking off your gloves, entering your phone's PIN, and opening up your media player to switch your music playlist, you make a couple micro-gestures without even lifting your hand from the handlebar. 2) You're walking through a university on your way to your next class. You have an important and kind of embarrassing text you need to send, but you also don't have time to stop and pull your phone out, and you need to watch where you're going. So instead you type out your text with imperceptible chorded "taps" as you're walking, on a small, semi-transparent virtual display that takes up a lot less of your vision than staring down at your phone would. The "taps" don't even have to be against a surface, and your arms can swing with your gait as they normally would--the taps are just little twitches of movement intention. 3) You're hitting it off with someone at a party, but it's about time to leave. Instead of breaking gaze and awkwardly fumbling with one another's phones to exchange numbers, you say your goodbyes gracefully while making a few quick micro-gestures to pop up a contact sharing request on their virtual display. 4) literally, not getting upper cross, cubital tunnel, and carpal tunnel from the repetitive stress and position-locking of touchscreens and keyboards 5) all the time you'll save in a year not pulling out your phone every time you need to do anything digital (5 seconds 30 times a day is 15 hours a year) 6) not having your device screens and input visible to the world around you 7) not having to wash chicken wing sauce or engine grease or whatever off your hands just to skip backward in the movie you're watching or the podcast you're listening to 8) pausing, rewinding, and skipping forward on a youtube first aid or construction video while your hands are occupied helping someone in need or fitting parts together 9) quickly googling product reviews or normal prices or multi-level marketing schemes or LinkedIn profiles, etc. without even revealing you're doing so when it seems like someone is trying to con you 10) not dropping your phone face-down on the sidewalk every 2 years 11) dialing an emergency service or trusted person while you're being held at gunpoint etc., etc.

@@justtiredthings Really appreciate the long message :) Either your are a Meta employee or shareholder 😂 - or just the most dedicated youtube commentor....... hmmmm ;) I see your point(s). And I already solve most of these usecases with ------ assistant. Voice commands gets you very far, and they are getting even better with support for reading notifications and even replying to them (and soon we are getting chatGPT with it). I am not saying that this is the final uber most perfect interface. I'd imagine direct brain activity reading would be more powerful and convenient. However it seems like meta is stuck somehwere inbetween, in a useless void. They are demoing a wristband that detects micro muscle nerual activity and uses that as device input - however, it's just a fake/staged demo - and these kinds of demos for the exact same thing have existed for a decade on kickstarter.... Meta aren't any further than a conceptual demo reallly. But nevertheless, my point is still that this idea of doing micro muscle hand gestures to control a interface in your head set display is just rediculous at this point in time... No ones is gonna want to do that, that is my absolute set in stone belif. I'm sure that's gonna change - 15 years from now, when this headset fits inside a contact lens, and the micro gesture reading comes directly from your brain and not from your toes and fingers movement. But meta's bet on this inbetween phase is just hilarious to me. The board members in meta's ability to ignore criticism and to be stubbon about an idea even though all sharehodlers are sellling and exiting, is not just arrogant, it's dangerours - and it might be their fall. I could be wrong obviously, but I don't think I am. And if I am, I will absolutly admint it, and give HUGE credits to Meta for being stubbon when everyone else was laughin and booing. Time will show 🙂

Yeah love it

\they are already called called Meta platforms..

I had motion sickness too when I started using VR, but it went away after a week or so. Just use it a little bit at a time and let yourself adjust. Once you're comfortable, VR is awesome.

One bottleneck is computing power and the other is battery. I am not sure with battery development but computing power will continue to increase and requires less power. No one can tell how fast technology will progress in the future.

Not great

No one ever used megaphones to communicate that was never even their purpose. Wtf

To do what? I didn't see a particular use case for healthcare personnel that should otherwise be focused on providing immediate care for the patients who are present and in need

No, we don't

@@JDubbs07 In the future they want to use this technology to train surgeons for high risk surgery for instance.

That will be determined by the gap it bridges. Once everyone helps to 4d scan the world around them, then we will have a true meta verse

People said the same about the internet and here we are... we can't live without it. Just have to give them time.

Exactly!… no one is taking the time to research exactly what Meta is doing.

Exactly! Finally I see a commenter with a vision :)

It is worst for mental health plus will make us all slaves to the technology. I’m stunned that people are so naive and support it

You could also add something that throws rotten tomatoes at someone who is detected as bullying singling out an individual on the service and if they get enough rotten tomatoes they get kicked out of the discussion.

why?

@@letspetpuppies Imagine you don't have a mouse on our desk in the future and just a small wrist band.

billion dollar company

Nope, Project Soil was just very basic full body motion sensing, not hand gesture sensing