INTERSTELLAR Made Us Emotional! | First Time Watch! | Movie Reaction | Matthew McConaughey 

Probably cause she bursted into tears right there, I noticed now 😂 best space movie

@@MiKo97100isn’t that the whole point of doing a reaction?

also "It's not possible. No, it's necessary!"

Was gonna watch this video, saw this comment, decided i ain't watching it.

​@@pirateeagleofficialsame

And she has almost no connection to him.

@@kvm6 Yes, she does. Did you even watch the movie?

@@Hammer1987 she loves him sure. But he's been missing for a big part of her life, more that 80 years.

@@kvm6you missed the crux of the film. brand’s entire speech about love being able to transcend time and space - and she ended up being right. it doesn’t matter if they havent spoken in decades. it doesn’t matter if they havent seen each other since she was a child. that love held and carried on.

@@ibuprofriends yes that's why Murph immediately sends her dad away instead of letting him have a normal conversation with her and the family 🤦‍♂️.

the planet New Mexico

They a lil stupid

And Ellen Burstyn's near-last line was "Our new sun....Our new world". Implying that ALL the space stations would go through the wormhole, and All of remaining humanity would go to populate Edmunds planet. ["Pods" had no comment] XD

What. Girls can code would say either wise. Girls you didn't notice when Band moved his set onto the stage.

@@anorthositeI dont think it means that. It’s a comment talking with the assumption that Brand’s planet is the last one of humanity. If Cooper hadnt entered the tesseract (which wasnt part of the plan) Brand would be the last person in the universe so it would be “our new home”.

I agree .

The waves coming towards us.... so awesome!

It's the only movie that i have seen twice in the IMAX.

I watched this for the first time in an imax theater at the air & space museum in dc. that scene was so overpowering it brought tears to my eyes

I remember watching the docking scene in like the 3rd row of an IMAX screen as a kid, it changed my life.

📠📠📠

I know I am in the vast minority but I think Interstellar is typical movie-movie. It starts out really strong but eventually goes for hard drama, fast pace, won't let scenes and story breathe, emotional drama where love is the ultimate force in the universe. I like it but I also think it is overestimated and over hyped because of the concept and idea but not the actual story. It is for 2/3 a really good sci-fi movie with the third act throwing away the science in sci-fi. I think it's a popcorn movie for people who think they are smarter than they are (I don't mean that as an insult, I am not very smart myself).

@@Battouga You should probably read Kip Thorne's "The Science of Interstellar", where he explains how much of the movie (almost the whole movie) is either scientifically accurate, or at worst, plausible from the current scientific knowledge viewpoint. It also helps that Kip Thorne himself came up with most of the science depicted in the movie. While the last section is still more fiction than science, it is still very much in line with the currently accepted scientific body of knowledge.

@@Battouga It's hard to take you seriously when you say that 1/3 of it is a typical movie because it IS a movie. From the start, to the middle and down to the end, there's always been drama to the film. People don't watch a sci-fi movie thinking "I need the entire film to be 100% accurate to the science", this ain't a documentary or actual REAL science. What, you like the wormhole concept but you didn't like the tesseract on the 3rd act? They're both not real 😂 Also, the film runs for 2h 49m, I have no idea why you think the film was face paced or that it wasn't letting scenes and the story breathe.

@@rexarsenio9447 I understand it's hard for you to take me seriously when you didn't really comprehend what I wrote, willfully or subconsciously. Yes, I know it is a movie, that wasn't my point at all. I called it a movie-movie, a popcorn movie where things are exaggerated beyond the suspension of disbelief but it's entertaining. I didn't argue that a sci-fi movies have to be accurate to science and it's weird you are bringing it up. Like this movie is part of your personality or something and I just offended you. Very weird. The only times the movie breathes a little is when we are back on Earth, following the science team/Murphy but everything comes down to a figurative ticking clock. While in the space-plot it feels rushed because some scenes were convoluted and unnecessary. This is all just my opinion and I have no problem with people loving Interstellar but please, atleast try to be honest with why you think I am wrong instead of making up arguments. I was just disapointed by the third act and I don't agree it's this cinematic masterpiece some people hold it up to be.

Yeah exactly. I'm a space enthusiast and a big physics lover, i decided to watch this movie because of space and physics but after i finish, what i love the most is the beautiful father and daughter relationship.

@@aniqalam8231the relationship between Cooper and Murphy is my favorite part of this movie. The fact Cooper was saved and taken back to Earth/Cooper Station just moments before Murphy dies and Murphy decided and wanted Cooper to help Brand repopulate the human race is so heartbreaking and powerful at the same time. Murphy in my opinion wasn’t looking out for herself, she was looking out for humanity even in her dying moments Murphy didn’t want Cooper to stay on Cooper Station, she wanted Cooper to go help Brand even after Cooper was absent throughout Murphy’s adult and elderly years.

@@LtDan-rk4si I saw Interstellar when it came out and I can't tell you what a cerebral experience it was. If we are talking about some of my favorites Nolan movie moments paired up with awesome soundtracks, then: 1) The Dark Knight ending with Gary Oldman narration and soundtrack by the wizard Hans Zimmer 2) Oppenheimer imagining and wondering about the scientific discoveries in the environment around us paired up with "Can you Hear the Music" soundtrack is another favorite of mine now And many more...

Hans Zimmer is the GOAT

This and Arrival are the most incredible sci-fi movies about being a parent.

So true. I re-watched this movie this Tuesday after having just dropped my daughter off for her freshman year of University this past weekend. The messages he gets from his kids when the 23 years elapsed had extra impact for me. I was weeping like a baby.

@@Cars_and_Games That was bad timing! :) Give yourself at least a couple months after dropping your kid off before watching this movie.

THIS. The people who rip this movie just didn’t understand the point. The science is (weirdly) irrelevant.

@@iRunfastXC People who rip on the science of the movie just don't understand the science lmao; it checks out pretty much across the board. The only place where it gets questionable is the Tesseract, but that's a non-issue because we have no idea what happens in the singularity... Physicists even hypothesize it leads to a higher dimension, which is exactly what happens in the film.

😢😢😢

i just wanted to give her a hug. i have a daughter and i was crying too. Powerful movie.

If only they stayed true to science and showed spaghettification too.

@@kvm6 its sci-“fi” remember not just “sci”

​​​@@kvm6Incorrect, you haven't actually looked into it apparently, just going off of a half full set of information. Gargantua (the black hole) would not spaghettify you right away--as even without the intervention of the film's 5th dimensional humans (which is who kept Cooper safe when he ejected in the black hole)--he would not be "spaghettified" in Gargantua, due to it being so ridiculously large, as well as a "gentle singularity". This means the black hole is so big, and it is rotating so fast, that it is at a high enough velocity to NOT cause spaghettification. In a standard black hole you would be correct, but the kind that Gargantua is would not cause that to happen. Gargantua is so massively huge that the change from "not bent" at the event horizon to the "very bent" matter at the singularity is very gradual, so it would not lead to instant spaghettification. However if it wasn't for the 5th dimensional beings keeping him safe and guiding him to their tesseract. obviously Cooper would have eventually been destroyed due to the aheer tidal forces, as he continued into the black hole. But the sheer size and velocity of it would prevent it for a relatively long time, so you would definitely have plenty of time to have an existential crisis before you are infinitely crushed lol

@@KrazzeeKane With you starting soo strongly in your reply, I wished it was satisfactory... Coop falls in quite far. If he's fallen past Photon sphere (which we see happening) he can't make it out of the black hole with any physics help. Not only that, black holes aren't worm holes. The closest would be showing a White hole (theorized to exist mathematically) which pops him out near Saturn in end. In my version of the movie, Coop would have sent the message to Murph and then just died.

This doesn't seem to be 100% right. Logic itself should tell you this doesn't track: "they didn’t expect as this weird halo effect around it. The VFX team thought it was a bug so they sent it to Kip and he both confirmed that that’s what it would look like". How could they confirm it to be accurate if the image was so surprising? Wouldn't it require further study if the results were unanticipated? The effect I believe you are describing is gravitational lensing, and an "Einstein Ring" (the halo) which is an old concept (first anticipated by Einstein in 1912). More important though, are "caustics" (a concept in optics) caused by a rotating black hole, sometimes called "creases" in spacetime created by the black hole's spin. This is not entirely new, either. The Interstellar paper references an earlier paper in 1994 by Blanford and Rauch, along with other papers in 2008 and 2010. The main difference is no one had placed a camera near to a black hole in their simulations/renders. From the Interstellar paper: "These papers' caustics are relevant for a source near the black hole and an observer far away, on Earth-in effect, on the black hole's 'celestial sphere' at radius $r=\infty $. In our paper, by contrast, we are interested in light sources that are usually on the celestial sphere and an observer or camera near the black hole. For this reversed case, we shall discuss the relevant caustics in sections 3.3 and 3.4. This case has been little studied, as it is of primarily cultural interest ('everyone' wants to know what it would look like to live near a black hole, but nobody expects to make such observations in his or her lifetime), and of science-fiction interest." It is an interesting case, but perhaps not so much to astrophysicists. I doubt it was as "unexpected" as you claim, and it is of little use, as we can't get close enough to confirm anything predicted by simulations. The biggest contribution was the software used to produce these images: "Our ray-bundle techniques were crucial for achieving IMAX-quality smoothness without flickering; and they differ from physicists' image-generation techniques (which generally rely on individual light rays rather than ray bundles), and also differ from techniques previously used in the film industry's CGI community." Indeed, Kip Thorne seems to care about this more-so than any "discoveries" made using the film's technology: "Has working in films helped your own research? Kip S. Thorne: In small ways but not major ways... Oliver James, who is the chief scientist at Double Negative, and I worked out this new method to do it which was necessary because you could not get the high resolution smooth images that were required for this science fiction movie in any other way. But the methods that we devised are now being used by astrophysicists as part of their visualization of simulations... So there is a feedback in that sense but I think beyond that the direction of the feeding is largely from the science into the film and through that to a popular culture."

NDT is a terrible scientist.

​@@bedinoryup

@@bedinor he's captivating though and he had a point with the quote OP mentioned.

Prospects of keeping Earth liveable is a pretty lame ambition imo. We're much better than that. We should work on making the galaxy liveable.

​@@oheddis it? Earth is becoming dangerous slowly but surely

Absolutely agree! My favorite movie, by far. Experienced it seven times in the cinema, five of them in IMAX. A trully once in a lifetime experience.

Just thinking about "not possible, its necessary " scene combined with the magical bgm gives me goosebumps. So powerful.

the poem also stuck with me for a long time

not even close

@@denizardainah its definitely one of the best movies ever made

@@denizardaivery very very very very close

Is my favourite movie of all time and i've seen A LOT of movies

Bullshit logic. That your body will age differently on different planets. NONSENSE

Kip Thorne, physicist, adviser tried to keep much science in this movie.

Movies don't need to be totally realistic fully as long as it makes sense for the movie plot. That is what the movie did well, only thing I don't like that much is the 5th dimensional thing that happened, but that is the way how the daughter got the information + Matthew's character should have died to bring realistic ending and he was hailed as hero for bringing the information to his daughter. Just my own small opinion. Still love this version too.

What do you mean? It's an incredibly realistic movie. There are only a tiny number of visuals that are dramatized, like what it would look like coming through a wormhole, but other than that this movie is like 99% scientifically accurate. My only gripe with this movie is why they ever decided to go to Miller's planet in the first place. A planet with such extreme time dilation would be an absolute no-go, regardless if it got a thumbs up from Miller.

@@thamor4746 I didn't like the 5th dimension part on my first viewing but it's really grown on me since then. I do think it makes sense that beings who have evolved to harness gravity to the point where they experience time as a physical dimension might be able to craft something like that for Coop to allow him to communicate with the past. Heck, why not?

​@ohedd yah idk what they are talking about. I'm an engineering unit in college and both all of my physics professors love this movie and often use it as examples. The way they get artifical gravity in space, how a the gravity of a black hole can mess with time, to the 3D rendering of the black hole which was created by legit physicists. They hate how they explain newton's law tho.

Arrival is my favorite movie ever, though Interstellar is close. As a parent to young kids, my God, it breaks me every time.

​@@Steelburghinterstellar >>>>>>>>>

Same they hit differently.

I just saw this movie and it's by far my favorite I totally got to see it in theaters

If the wave planet was a bit farther out from that black hole they probably could've survived there

Not a day, but probably a week.1 hour=7 years, 1minute = 7/60, 1 sec =7/360years ; (7×365)/360 ~7 days.

Yeah she was on Nolan’s ass 😂 and her outbursts of emotion were hilarious. More Kristen plz!

A lot of the foreshadowing is pretty obvious

It's a tesseract unfolded

Yes, perfect explanation ❤ I wonder if it's a time-loop, and we always reached back to help ourselves. Lol like, time never really changed, we deus ex machinated ourselves always. The wormhole existing proved we survived. It's like an exercise in free will vs prophecy, kinda.❤

time cannot bend backwards, also what theory are you referring to when you mention 5 dimensional spacetime?

@@max1392 I think that's the "fi" in the "scifi" part of the plot. This was a fictional story, after all.

That was the bulk or hyperspace? Being the 5th dimension? Basically a dimension that is impossible for the current gen to access but basically the 3 and 4 dimension operate on top of it. Crazy to think about

Yes way, it was our 1st time. This & Tenet were the only Christopher Nolan films I have ever not seen. I also don’t really remember Inception (2010) I need to rewatch it

​@@andrewgordon7662 Loved your reaction

Yea I was thinking that, obviously it's just the planets rotation that causes day/night cycles, I don't know how the human circadian rhythm would adapt to that, would probably have to be artificial ways to do it.

Perhaps in 10000 years lol

they most probably already watched this movie

Be extra shocked then.... it's not their first time

Thank you for the super! We'll look into this!

​@@KashgariIt definitely wasn't meh.

​@@leemcqueen500yeah Nolan's movies are meant to be watched on IMAX.

in IMAX