Interview with Dennis Meadows on "Limits to Growth" 

Thank you! We are happy that we had the opportunity to talk with Mr. Meadows and that his answers can still be an eye opener!

I don't think you understood what he is saying. He wants to depopulate the globe by deindustrialization.

There is only one way to live debt forgiveness it worked for three thousand years every 5 years all debt because debt grows 5x faster than everything else and 85percent was taxes that were made up and did not need to be payed or even were jus- tified?

What bits don’t you agree with?

"but I'm not going to identify what I imagine is a specific problem, and then present my anal-ysis of that problem along with verifiable evidence, and then reveal my superior solution"

This quote is fake. Schwab never said this.

@@entropicaBS. It’s on their web site. The original quote was “By 2030, you will own nothing, you will have no privacy and you will be happy.” This has been archived. They recently changed it to “By 2030, you will own nothing and you will be happy” Somehow…

@@skepticsr_usIt was just a *hypothetical* essay by Ida Auken, not a description of the future: In 2016, Auken published an essay originally titled "Welcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better", later retitled "Here's how life could change in my city by the year 2030", on the WEF's official web site. It described life in an unnamed city in which the narrator does not own a car, a house, any appliances, or any clothes, and instead relies on shared services for all of his daily needs. Auken later added an author's note to the story responding to critics, stating that it is not her "utopia or dream of the future", and that she intended for the essay to start discussions about technological development.

@@entropica "A hypothetical essay" on the WEF' web site? More like a blueprint that people are now rejecting en masse, which is why they removed it --but we have the screenshot.

@@skepticsr_us It doesn’t make any sense to put it on the WEF‘s official website if it was their true goal. Only as a thought experiment, probably one of several hypothesis for the future.

You are absolutely right. This type of people should be banned.😅

In a way her interventions reinforce the points he is making...like the gloomy outlook part she mentions and he responds, "that is a point of view" (what you consider gloomy).

What do you mean?

Where?

@@poppygoldensunThe OP was sarcastic.

Why?

@@GregorPQ u feel his thesis is wrong or impractical?

@@vidaripollenAccording to Al Gore, we’d be 100 feet under water by now. But the billionaires keep buying property barely above sea level…