That card radiates "mood af at three in the morning while the neighbors are being obnoxiously loud and you gave up trying to get them to shut up" energy
@@Shaman5EUSK *Laughs in ABC-Dragon Buster* If they detach a material from my main XYZ Champion Sargas then they'll get punished for it. I kinda feel bad for average XYZ focused decks like Exosister and Galaxy-Eyes cause they just get thrashed right out of the gate
I wouldn't sweat it- the Ashen archetype is going to be the expensive archetype of the set. "Gobblin' Deez XYZs" (My name for them thus far- still labbing better names.) shouldn't be /too/ terrible.
Dude seriously what is going on? This is like, legit broken English. Also on second viewing I just noticed they even messed up Crazy Beast. It’s supposed to be “Goblins’ Crazy Beast” because it is plural possessive. It is the Crazy Beast of the Goblins (plural) but the apostrophe is “Goblin’s” which means it is the Crazy Beast of one singular Goblin.
@@atrwktsthe "goblin's" shows possession... its a Crazy Beast that belongs to the goblins. It does not make it singular if it said "A goblin's crazy beast" it would be singular. "The goblin's crazy beast" would be more accurate of what they should say but even without "the" its implied it belongs to the faction of the goblins. Since you dont say "goblins's"
@@corbinkendall6330Goblins’ is the correct way to write “Goblins’s”, which is how it was written in the fanslation, which makes way more sense, but here, it is written as “Goblin’s”, meaning it is the Crazy Beast of one singular Goblin. Which Goblin? Gabonga? Unless, like another commenter said, this is all some big meta joke because “goblins no speak good”.
By far my favourite archetype in phantom knightmare and the names are just hilarious. However, like others have said no doubt the price of these will be through the roof especially if the main boss xyz is a generic that is non destruction suck.
Not sure it would synergize too well. Yeah, Tri Brigade is a good plug-and-play engine, but it’s Link focused when this deck is XYZ and Anti-XYZ focused. However, it would probably be pretty fun to playtest.
People will be giving these away probably. The deck needs to play against xyz decks to be good (because you don't want to detach your own materials) and there aren't any in the meta besides severely weakened purrely
Noir: I'm unaffected, so my materials are safe. I think -we have a good matchup- Konami: IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT YOU THINK Noir: Meow plz don't play Goblin Bikers While Noir is indeed unaffected by *activated* card effects, this protection doesn't apply to its materials just like how Xyz Encore deals with it.
@@ImSumGuy mostly rogue burn so the goblin can detach cards from xyz cards on the other side of the field there’s one xyz card that if there’s no cards to be detach the player with this card takes 3000 dmg per turn
Goblin core on Kongs cards $127 usd. As much as I wanna play it I can’t now. I’ve been getting cards surrounding this archetypes months in advance. But now I cant play it. Bullcrap.
Wait exactly 2 weeks after the set releases....By then prices will come down and will stabilize after that launch hype settles down and meta sheeps get their new Fire Support
God, their monster names are just word salad. Boom Mach? Mean Merciless? What even is this? Dugg Charger sounds like just some guy, which is kinda great.
