Never use, employ, or utter any word, expression or locution that cannot be expressed, said, or spoken in at least, at a minimum or no less than three, triple or trinary ways, manners, and means.
This bloke sounds like he's reading an essay that was super short of the word limit so decided to add a bunch of unnecessary padding in to get the word count up to the minimum.
since when did the UK miss her? God am I missing out of something here? it was like new years eve and Christmas day combined when the milk snatcher died.
Nice and Creative Videos， This is really my favorite channle.:). I really glad to see your post and your world was so brilliant. 🌴🌴🌴 excellent and Much appreciated!!🌴🌴🌴 🌴🌴🌴 🌴🌴🌴 🌴🌴🌴 from: Thatcher Town Graham
She didn’t want “the poor being richer by making the rich poorer” and therefore made England richer, by making Scotland and Wales and the Irish Appendix poorer.
Wow - British people will do absolutely anything but look the problem in the face - stop dividing yourself on arbitrary lines, be it accent, race or borders, she made the rich richer and the poor poorer. This obsession with being the worst hit is maddening - oo oo the Isle of Mann suffered more! Maybe she was just many old men's business interest? The English people en masse were not helped at all by this corpse
What the witch deserved I think. How can you respect someone when you know that they know their policies are killing people, destroying communities, and slashing the incomes of the poorest to boost the profits of her Party donors and Yank mates? That’s not respectable - patriotism insists on disrespect for such a dreadful record
I’ll never forget the reaction of my parents and grandparents when she died. Couldn’t understand why people just so so happy, ecstatically jubilant even, that someone had died - now I’m older and see the cost of water, electricity, gas and all the resources once owned by the people of this country being sold back to us for the profit nameless shareholders, and all the poverty, pain, and stress people live in under her dog eat dog model. It’s a bit less mysterious now
@@mattybrunolucaszeneresalas9072 so to grossly oversimplify it, she was a bitch, like more respectable as a person than the last few we have had but a complete bitch who damaged the majority of the country.
It's known as the Test Roll. Every new peer signs it after their writ of summons and letters patent are read aloud by the Reading Clerk and they recite the Oath of Allegiance.
Oh my goodness...enough baloney for the arrival of the Queen. We were only missing the fanfare and the Red Dragon Pursuivant walking backwards and holding his wand.
She sometimes claimed this to support a policy. But the evil old woman loved it when such pomp and ceremony enhanced her being the centre of attention.
@@mattybrunolucaszeneresalas9072 No, she didn’t think apartheid was necessary and was ‘an enemy of apartheid’ according to Nelson Mandela. The problem was she resisted joining other commonwealth nations in sanctioning apartheid South Africa because she didn’t want to take the economic hit of loss of trade and also she disliked the socialist ideology of the ANC. So she was definitely in the wrong, but I don’t think it’s right to say she thought apartheid was necessary, rather something was willing to tolerate. Her husband, Dennis, was much more pro-Apartheid South Africa though.
@@locoHAWAIIANkane for the new and much shorter introduction compare with Baroness Shaista Gohir's entranc in june 2022 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-TvOGhOljlUE.html still fancy but streamlined
@Dim and what did she do that was so bad? She really is your English version of trump, do you know what the country was like before she took over? Unions had ruined the country, there was nothing left to live for, she rebuilt us, save the Falklands from argentine tyranny yet you spiteful shower of shits still hate her for it
In 2009, I sat in the Lords gallery to watch a House of Lords debate. The Lords Chamber was filled with ghastly old Tory waxworks you thought were long dead. During the debate, Baroness Thatcher was escorted in assisted by other peers as her helpers. She clearly didn't know where she was or whether it was Wednesday or Christmas. I seethed inwardly with rage that my taxes were still supporting the payment of a daily attendance allowance to someone who did so much economic and societal damage to the UK through the policies she advocated.
I prefer this rather than elected crowns. If you have many presidents, you provide them with pensions even if they are not in the office anymore. Unlike the monarch, they foot their own bill.
She had more go in her than other male prime ministers especially Over the falklands sorting out reagan something eden failed to do In 1956 over suez with eisenhower!
How disgusting wishing a woman who rebuilt the economy, became the first female prime minister, broke every gender stereotype thrown at her, you sexist pig!
@@dietrichrosiers8184 - Yet he'll die just like his mom did. God doesn't save anyone. To everything, there is a season. Repeating that mindless slogan doesn't change matters.
@@pwbmd Of course not. However, it reinforces an emotional element that cannot be achieved with a purely streamlined, rationalised sense of government. I am staunchly convinced that the traditions and procedures honoured by the British Parliamentary system are one that are, in the end, effective. Centuries of history are enveloped in one entire system of government - a system that is democracy personified. Let's not always have this urge to throw away what is old - if it isn't broken, don't fix it. And therefore, with one voice of consent of heart and tongue, we say: God Save the King!
@@pwbmd Let's see which democracy falters first, hm? That of the United States of Civil War, or the United Kingdom? I believe the answer to that is as objectively clear as it can be.
What? Whose year? She was counting the years using the date of her coronation? Oh, the vanity! Other people might say ‘In the year of Our Lord’, but now this. Oh, well… who cares anyway.
Queen Elizabeth was investing Baroness Thatcher by the power of her monarchy. Therefore, she uses the dates of her regency, which is totally appropriate. If it is of any comfort to you, the Queen was also head of the Anglican Church of England. Having made the effort to comment, I assume that you actually care.
@@karenburrows9184 Yeah? And by whose authority did this queen reign? Her own maybe… What’s in a comment, anyway? But seriously, she may have been the head of the Anglican Church of England as her son is now, but how did this come to be? Was it not through an act of, hmm, let’s say, Not England’s chief saint?
Almost every country has their version of the "House of Lords" in their political structure. Not every country has free elections, which Britain has; and which makes it a democracy.
The UK is the world's oldest continuously functioning liberal democracy. The fact that the country has an unelected House of Lords, constitutional monarch, and an Anglican Church, doesn't affect its status as a representative democracy. The primacy of the House of Commons, the constitutional right to vote, popular referendums, and the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty makes it a democratic nation. The UK as a country is far from perfect, but it's a model of democracy. The US and other democracies have a nearly identical system of government and law because they were once part of the British Empire.
The House of Lords is mainly an appointed chamber these days. The aristocracy is a tiny voice that has to beg to be heard. Germany has an appointed upper chamber and so does Canada. Ireland, France and the Netherlands isn`t exactly democratic either. The difference with the UK however is that the directly elected chamber, that being the House of Commons can override all decisions made by the appointed one using the Parliament Act. I hope this clears up your confusion.
It's a shame how the House of Lords was changed. It should have stayed the same. All those Brits who think they can make important decisions by democracy should respect the aristocracy, as not to them, they wouldn't have a Parliament
@@deutschermichel5807 Oliver Cromwell wasn`t a member of the aristocracy and he executed a king to begin the path to true parliamentary democracy. The English Bill of Rights was mainly the work of John Locke who was also a commoner. We owe the aristocracy nothing.
@@justonecornetto80 I wish japan should have this kind of system in japan the parliement known as the diet and has two political houses the house of peers represents the aristocracy and house of the representives represents the common people however the house of peers was replaced by house of councillors a elected assembly that enact new laws and policies similar to that of the senate or Congress I wish that the house of peers should restored and the aristocracy would gained back their titles and privileges as nobles and aristocrats and the privy Council of japan would restored too however all this changes happened because of the American scumbags who place a constitution that forced to japan to followed all this pacifist bs
