The Nord Stream pipeline mystery uncovered 

For me as well. Is there any agency more closely identified with honesty and transparency?

He was too busy with diversity training. Sure.

Yeah. The "I've been in DEI meetings all morning" was a nice touch.

Yeah exactly, came to the comments to make this point... it sounds so ridiculous, how does he say it with a straight face.

​@@finkofinkofinko he couldn't, that's why the DEI reference! Throw information around and make noise around the lie!

Same.

How did you work it out so quickly tho? Which evidence and line of reasoning?

​@@zetristan4525 that he didn't answer Freddies question about evidence

@@sistermary Yes, when there's no distinction between the story and a story that could have been 99% creative fiction, every source and almost every participant unnamed, it is no better than a coverup story.

@@zetristan4525 Funny you should ask that. I spoke to a bloke down the pub and he told me it was three blind mice who placed the charges. Apparently they were working on their own and had no official permission from mother goose however, she did wink at them twice and we all know what that means.

Thanks. Jesus Freddy must be hard up for content these days?

@@itsdeclan7733 it’s disappointing when Bojan mentioned the Dutch intel report he didn’t ask “have you seen the report?” Not direct evidence but that’s definitely a compelling route for investigation. I guess not though

Don’t worry a senior CIA agent told him they don’t do this sort of thing anymore it’s ok that’s all you need

@@Nothing._- it’s very telling when directly asked for evidence his response was “well even if I did no one would believe it because they are all biased” implying he is uniquely unbiased. When people say this they are just oblivious to their biases which leads to compromised thinking and research. I imagine that might be why Freddy was so softball because it’s likely Bojan would have just stormed off if pressed. Listening to the whole thing it’s hard to believe anyone could find this convincing, especially after the amusing exchange over the little flag.

Thank you. You saved me an hour!🙏

I presume CIA were completely oblivious to the uprising attempt in Venezuela 2019 which senator Chis Murphy openly described as "we tried to construct a kind of coup" speaking to state official Elliot Abrams.

Yep, the CIA is too busy taking diversity training.

What bad things have they done since then, in your opinion?

​ Xinjiang. Bangladesh. Venezuela. Pakistan. Bolivia. They are quite active lately....

@@Jocky8807 What did they do in each of these places?

Yep, like the Kursk situation

💯

No they won't throw Zelensky where he belongs. They will continue the sacrifice Ukranians tho. Zelensky is part of that special group .

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-OS4O8rGRLf8.htmlsi=j-MBPCSPkZTPPYoH

he didn't you Russian bot

@@skdfdjkdfjkd WASHINGTON, Feb 7 (Reuters) - U.S. President Joe Biden on Monday warned, opens new tab that if Russia invades Ukraine there would be no Nord Stream 2, but did not specify how he would go about ensuring the controversial pipeline would not be used. Speaking at a joint news conference with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, Biden said, "If Russia invades... again, then there will be longer Nord Stream 2. We will bring an end to it." When asked how he would do that, he responded, "I promise you we will be able to do it."

@fronabulaz63, before the special military operation started. To start was just the crossing of the border of Oekraïne. It took several months, but the results are good.

@@skdfdjkdfjkd its is more likely that you are the bot here ; )

Biden: If Russia invades Ukraine, there will be no Nord Stream 2. Bojan: Quick, look over there!!

Exactly!!

And don't forget a guy from the CIA told him they don't do that sort of thing. What more evidence do you need?

@@Economics21st well, lets see. Sweden closed down their investigation with a comment that they dont have the legal basis to take it further. So Sweden and Denmark concluded that a crime have been committed, in their economic territorium, but they dont the jurisdiction to do anything about it. The area is a Nato navel training site

​@@isabelmelladojensen9043& you can be quiet sure it's also a Russian undersea warfare training area, dating back to Soviet times.. Their main base for research & operations in undersea warfare is located over in Kaliningrad..😉

Your comment is beyond insulting in its lack of specificity, never mind the idea that nonsense has been criminalized.

@@gandydancer9710 "never mind the idea that nonsense has been criminalised". So funny. Made my morning.

And you have receipts to back up your extremely informative statement, do you? Mooron

@@gandydancer9710 the guy completely dodged the question regarding the evidence he has; what else more specific do you need?

"Full scale". He said this mantra twice in the first 20 minutes. If he hasn't figured out that there was no full scale invasion after two and a half years, I think his ability to research is as low as his ability to critically think. He should write fairytales about orcs attacking democracy. Picture books.

100%. And judging by the mainstream media's reaction to both stories, it's clear, which one is fake: One story they were trying to hide and ignore, and now they all talk about this? It's a bad joke. Also specialists said that the operation was very complex and I doubt Ukraine has the expertise to execute such a mission. Also let's remember how first they blamed Russia for destroying their own pipeline. Ludicrous. Who still believes these media?

yeah, how easy does it sounds, if scuba divers can do this, god bless all the under water infra structures around the world. Hersh's report sounds more logical. this is bull crap. how come CIA is not involved, ukraine will never carry out a mission like this without crazy joe's approval.

The yacht operation plausibly did happen. I would do the same to deflect attention from my covert highly technical operation, so wouldn't the CIA?

Better be prepared. God sake I considered this channel a bit better than The Sun.

Brilliant!

@@WizardVal So what, exactly, is unplausible about this? (It would be technically very easy to do.)

@@ThatBoomerDude56 Dude, what did I say here? Is this a discussion about the theories that could be plausible? It was as usually one of the theories. Why would you make sensational claims that are not supported by evidence? All this story about meetings in Kyiv who was there? Who recorded those guys? Etc etc etc. Is it plausible that Ukrainians blown that pipeline? Yes. Is it possible that US government knew about it? Yes most likely follow the money. But we have no evidences so… no point in discussing the alternative versions.

@@ThatBoomerDude56 It would absolutely not be very easy to do. In fact, from the pitching deck of that tiny sailboat? Deep in the North Sea? You're kidding, right?

Seymour Hersh, Baltops 22 excercise makes MUCH more sense. AND the mainstream media did not report on that story, while now, this story here they share it all over the Internet. Ukraine war is lost, I guess, and they try to blame Ukraine for what the US did to the German infrastructure. In a similar fashion the secret services are publishing wrong stories each year about 9/11 and the Kennedy assassination to divert attention from the true stories. It's a common tactic to confuse critiques and to hide their own traces of crime.

And Sweden and Denmark..

😂

​@@janhemmer8181...... COLLABORATORS.

Exactly. But it was a rogue group or so the story goes. How convenient. And actually truth is that it was the US of A. Which means Nato should evoke article 5 against the US of A. I'm not holding my breath.

@@Nobody-df4is Got some proof that it was the US? I'm still waiting for some as all I've seen is wishful conjecture without actual evidence.

​​@@Nobody-df4is In the case of 9/11 it was also a "rogue group", didn't stop us from invading a sovereign country to eliminate them.

Hersh is full of it as well.

The true story has to contain words that are immediately blocked by an algorithm. So I don't even try anymore. But this story about Ukrainian divers from a small sailing boat is an insult to your viewers.

@bassandtrebleclef Joe b said they,would blow it up, I believe him.

@@janhemmer8181 lol - it MUST be either the CIA or Mossad, right? hahaha

@@bassandtrebleclefHersh is “full of it” Please give me an example of what he’s lied about.

This new "revelation" is a total waste of time. Nobody blows up Nord Stream without the approval of the Overlord. If it was really a bunch of jokers who blew up Nord Stream, Denmark and Sweden would have arrested them. Instead, these 2 countries ended their investigations, and said that disclosure of their findings would be against their national interest. They are afraid of a bunch of jokers? Anyway, Joe Biden said Nord Stream would be ended if Russia invaded Ukraine, and Russia invaded Ukraine.

😅 big...!

WSJ = CIA mouthpiece

Yes. The instigator and profiteers. And we pay for it. Well done to the toffs for attending the best schools, acquiring privileged positions and leading us into another nightmare.

Obviously!

"Why do you think the US didn't do it?" "The CIA told me" 🤣

With or without German knowledge ?

@@eoinoconnell185 With.

It is a joke. Ukraine has no coldwater maritime expertise to do it.

@@hittitecharioteer sure, they are now just passing the "heated swimming pool" level - it would take them 20 yrs to dive in cold water .. LOL

Not even this "Journalist" hopefully

I don't know a thing about modern explosives. But I very much presume there's an explosive equivalent to 500kg of TNT that is much much smaller and lighter. But yeah. This story stinks to high heaven.

@@markbryant4641 I don't think you can simply drop whatever amount of explosives to a depth of 80 meters. So you would have to have hundreds of meters of steel cables to withstand the sea drag and attach them to the sea bed and to a boat that would probably had to be anchored really tight as well, so the team could then place the explosives in the exact place of where the pipelines are. The USA military would not have to be necessarily involved in it but some rogue group in Nato would have.

@@Hapotecario. Thanks, Hapo. Appreciated.

Unless you are a pro Putin troll ask yourself what's so difficult about attaching explosives to a pipe 80 meters underwater given that you have money for the diving equipment, the boat, the explosives and the people who know how to dive and manipulate explosives. You don't need CIA/Mossad for that. You don't even need a state's power for that. This is not about stealing the H bomb secrets.

Exactly.

Well Biden did say he'd destroy the pipeline. I guess Sikorsky knew something we all know. At least the narrative has moved from Russia doing it, Which if true would be the equivalent to the US blowing up the Hover damn to help Ukraine. i.e makes zero sense to destroy your own infrastructure.

Yeah, and Biden said there would be no more North Stream. AND on the story by Seymour Hersh no mainstream media was reporting, while now everyone is talking about it. It's clear which story is true and which one is false.

Because Biden told us all what was going to happen, and then they did it.

because USA payed for the boat, alcohol and best chinese pirotechnics

This clown undermines his own credibility every third response

did u even watch the video?

Not a chance! They would have asked the UN council first!!😂😂😂

Plus: How were they able to sail up and down, anchor at mid sea, do their operation, in one of the most surveilled areas in the world?

you don't need decompression chamber for 100 meters depth. decompression stops are enough

That's absolutely not what I have been given to understand ​@@dancroitoru364

@@dancroitoru364True, but it takes like 3 to 5 hours and you cannot dive again for a couple of days. Not sure how feasible that is in the cold waters of the Baltic

@@dfaltin So? Experienced professional divers can do that without a problem. There's nothing out of ordinary there. They worked in shifts leaving a day or two between the two dives as this guy said.

She is a spook.

🤣

Ginger and Marie Anne didn't even have to use scuba diving gear. It was a free dive.

It is absolutely Impossible. This , people can not understand. I am scared.

Pipeline is from Norway to Poland. Pretty much destroyed the economy of Germany. But other than that you are correct.

Sure! Recall the role of Norway and its divers in the Gulf of Tonkin incident. Yes, we have been fooled about Norway' good intentions all these years. Sad, how they throw away the postive capital that have accumulated worldwide as do-goodies and peacemakers. But sadly, it was all a scam. Now they sell natural gas at four times the price to Europe! Not so bad after all.

Unfortunately I listened to the end...and heard nothing at all plausible.

That was the ship from which the underwater drone exercise close to Bornholm was held in june 2022 during Baltops22. It lingered in the region for friendly visits to the Baltic republics, Finland and Poland. Days before the explosions it could be seen on Shipfinder to lay close to the Swedish coast. The day after the Nordstream explosions it turned off its AIS Southwest of Cornwall.

​@@janhemmer8181Confirmé?

Why would Biden publicly say they would put an end to the pipeline if they planned on blowing it up, wouldn't that obviously draw suspicion ?

Do you have any links that I could read about this? It sounds very interesting

@@NC-dw3tk the contract for the Excel energy was run about 18 months ago, along with the contract, Finland will received 120million for renting their offshore facility. With regards to the buildup, it all started with Poland taking Russia to the European court as the spot price for LNG on the stock exchange dropped below the russian contract price over 5 years, I remember was €250 per 1000 M2 liters, the EU court found for Poland, and Russia agreed to follow the stock market price, but as the proxy war started in Ukraine, the stock price went up to over €1100 per 1000m2 liter thus the European countries couldn't pay. Oh along with Norway opening up their new LNG pipeline to Europe a month after Nord stream 2 was blown up. Biden even said he was going to stop it. These stories are all a smoke screen, follow the money, as to who would benefit from Nord stream 2, it certainly wasn't the European's. Even trump in 2016 told the Europeans they had to buy US LNG or he would cut NATO spending. It's all open source if you look in the right place. N.B do people not release how long it takes to build new LNG tankers, new LNG storage facilities and LNG pipeline that run hundreds of miles, this war was planned years ago by the US.

PL also benefitted. The LNG terminal at Swinoujscie would have higher demand for its capacity.

​@@davydacounsellor gas isn't traded on a stock market exchange. It's traded on a commodities market.

Yeah for sure. The mantra. Well, half the mantra. Where was the "unprovoked"?

Agreed. Comment sections are getting weird no matter what channel or platform.

Oh, come off it! When he interviewed Jeffrey Sachs about the Sy Hersh story that gave a convincing account of how the US and the Norwegians were responsible Freddie's conclusion was deeply skeptical. His conclusion to this episode was that this guy might have discovered the truthy truth that disproved Hersh's much more plausible story. He was hugely skeptical when he shouldn't have been, and now he isn't where he should be.

He is just human…

It’s his show, and his guest. It’s his job to push back on bs

​@@JoeBeThere You totally missed the point and why aren't you using your real name and your full name? Sachs wasn't spreading the bs. This Macedonian journo was. Freddie was hugely skeptical where he shouldn't have been and he wasn't where he should have been. As a Brit there were also things that he might have pursued but didn't. Right after the explosions Liz Truss sent a message to Anthony Blinken, the US Secretary of State, asking "Is it done?" This fits easily into the Hersh narrative. There may well have been some British involvement in the US-Norwegian effort he describes. It is completely inconsistent with this Macedonian guy's story. Freddie didn't do his job.

And PL would happily help.

@@abatesnz The thing that everybody has to remember is this, this was an act of war

but that would explain anything, wouldn't it?

@@dancroitoru364 The US stands to benefit the most, and the CIA routinely carries out similar covert operations. The WSJ is not a credible publication, especially not the opinion column this guy is from, they are political and have been caught more than once fabricating "evidence" to support a narrative.

Occam's razor? A small daring team from Ukraine doing it is simpler still

@@lighthousesaunders7242 Come on, realistically. The "six stooges on a boat" story is as plausible as aliens.

@@mojojojo1529 but it's just diving 80 meters and attaching explosive to a pipe. it's not like designing the implosion mechanism of a plutonium bomb dude.

You need to hear exactly how stupid and gulible you'd have to be for this story to be true in your reality.

A glimpse into madness, a precautionary tale of the effects of too much coolaid

@@allydea as opposed to how intelligent and sophisticated you are if you believe that anything you don't approve of is caused by either Mossad or CIA lol

Can u plz tell the name of physicist from Switzerland?

Fairy tales are based on reality.

I do not know why. Anyone who believes that a mini nuke was used clearly loves fairy tales. Small nuclear weapons are very difficult to make and the international consequences of being caught with one let alone using one would be extreme. This statement is so ludicrous I have to seriously consider you are knowingly posting lies.

Oh dear, mini nukes and nobody noticed...

Ukraine... not really. They are better off with Germany working at full capacity producing military equipment. The US has nothing to loose.

@@adelatorremothelet With Nord Streams 1 and 2 running at full capacity there would not be any need for the old Soviet pipeline that runs through Ukraine. If that would happen Ukraine would lose a lot. Poland was mad at that project too because directing all gas to Germany would remove Poland from the picture of redistributing gas through Europe, and it will lose money too. So, definitely Ukraine was the very much interested party in the blow up act. So to speak ("Law & Order"), "had a motive". Did it have "the means and opportunity" - still need to be proved. As It is known the divers that Germany accused in the blowing up did have experience to dive for 30 meters, and pipeline is 80 meters deep. So extra equipment would be needed. That is why Seymour M. Hersh insists that it was done by USA. Current Ukrainian officials are known for the habit of harassing people who help them, so causing problem for Germany would not be an obstacle if they would be able to do it.

@gregdvorkin If the German economy stagnates, Ukraine can receive less money and equipment from Germany. Your line of thought is correct during peace time, but not during war time : you want your alied factories outproducing your enemy. Money is irrelevant if you don't get the military equipment. The other matter is that Joe b is recorded besides Scholz stating that nord stream would be destroyed if Russia invaded Ukraine. He probably noticed 2 seconds too late he should not have let out that piece of information.

​@@gregdvorkin Money doesn't win wars, Wars are won with soldiers , resources, supply chains and logistics lines. And of course sabotaging your allies infrastructure is not a military goal. It was probably part of a plan to stagnate Europe's economy and gain a quick victory. The first part did work , the second part didn't.

😅big one!

That part was the funniest.

Sure I can't rule out Ukraine, nobody can. But BaltOps NATO Naval exercises were being conducted at the right time to pull this off. Seymour Hersh's SubStack article just perfectly explains everything and nobody has brought forward anything credible to debunk him.

​@@SubvertTheStateI appreciate that summary

Story is as old as the deletion of the Nord Stream. They just released a report to indulge that comedian.

I think Freddie sounded consistently skeptical. This narrative seems pretty thin to me, and Freddie reacts as if it sounds pretty thin to him, too, but he lets the guest have his say.