Тёмный

IS-2 vs PANTHER II | 122mm APHE vs Up-Armoured Panther | Armour Penetration Simulation 

SY Simulations
Подписаться 95 тыс.
Просмотров 52 тыс.
50% 1

The simulation presents the IS-2's massive 122mm APHE shell impacting the upper glacis of the Panther II, which was to feature thicker armour than the original.
The Panther II was to feature numerous upgrades, including armour, turret design, main gun*, night vision, engine, and component standardisation with the Tiger II. It however never entered service and only prototypes were produced. The original Panther's 80mm upper glacis was vulnerable to 122mm and 100mm cannons, resulting in the proposed 100mm upgrade. The 100mm upper glacis has been modelled as good quality 250BHN Rolled Homogenous Armour (RHA).
The 122mm BR-471B shell has been modelled with progressive hardening, in-line with Soviet projectiles of the era.
Amazing Thumbnail Artwork From: Warthunder

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

19 апр 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 259   
@thezig2078
@thezig2078 2 месяца назад
That's quite impressive at such short range. 122mm is no joke.
@panterka.f
@panterka.f 2 месяца назад
itd be decimated. Author doesnt take into account low quality german steel.
@thezig2078
@thezig2078 2 месяца назад
@@panterka.f did you even read what's on the screen or listen to the voice over?
@5co756
@5co756 2 месяца назад
​@@panterka.fThere was no bad quality German steel , the Russians had bad quality on their cast hulls and turrets . Always this BS about WW2 ......😅
@huyhoangtahuu9733
@huyhoangtahuu9733 2 месяца назад
​@@5co756 MF when they talk out of their ass , literally took 2m to look up tons of analysis as well as field report of German armor in mid to late war which goes extensively into how bad it was with the armor only achieving 50 - 80 % of earlier armor effectiveness due to lack of key material as well as Germany industry going to crap ( a T-34-85 only need to hit the UFP of a Panther 2 to 3 time to shatter it let alone an IS-2 ) . Mean while the Soviet actually increase their armor quality though out the war with even the CIA report on T-34-85 armor and build quality being up to US standard
@5co756
@5co756 2 месяца назад
@@huyhoangtahuu9733 A IS2 could penetrate the UFP of a Panther anyways and a T-34 won't have a chance for 3 shots . Cause he is toast after the first Panther hit , this is not a game were you bounce multiple shots with no damage . The armour plate gets worse with every hit and a mass produced T-34 was not of good quality . Casting metal can be difficult . Oh and btw the CIA was founded in 1947 , hard to show me CIA reports from 1944. 😅
@shahramtondkarmobarakie1824
@shahramtondkarmobarakie1824 2 месяца назад
bro definitely bounced on a panther II in warthunder and wanted to make sure xD
@kimjanek646
@kimjanek646 2 месяца назад
I actually shot a Panther II one time from like 100m through the front armor. However I didn’t notice it was a Panther II or I wouldn’t have aimed for the frontal armor. Can’t remember but he was probably bushed up.
@moth8224
@moth8224 2 месяца назад
​@@kimjanek646 i bet whole 1 dollar he was bushed up. Who else if not the owner of panter2
@griffy07
@griffy07 2 месяца назад
pretty sure the panther 2 in warthunder doesn't even get the better armour, they only changed the turret to add the 88 and nvd
@kimjanek646
@kimjanek646 2 месяца назад
@@griffy07 It does have the planned Panther II hull with increased armor
@griffy07
@griffy07 2 месяца назад
@@kimjanek646 itd be nice if they added the _actual_ panther 2 tho, historically accurate, so likely the G turret like at the tank museum, and returned it to the tree
@iluvpepsi69
@iluvpepsi69 2 месяца назад
I like how it makes a little X in the armor
@zainoo8298
@zainoo8298 2 месяца назад
Those are adiabatic shear bands which are formed due the stress put on the metal
@Jake_Gotthard
@Jake_Gotthard 2 месяца назад
@@zainoo8298please explain that to me like im a Golden retriever with adhd
@Fretti90
@Fretti90 2 месяца назад
Sidenote, one of the major reasons for the Panther 2 project was that the sides of the Panther 1 was vulnerable to the very common USSR Anti tank rifle. It was however solved by adding the side skirts which put the Panther 2 into a less favorable state over the Panther 1. The German army initially wanted the Panther to only have 60mm of front armor, which they deemed sufficient and to lessen the logistical footprint of the tank. The 80mm was however chosen to please higher command (IIRC) which made the tank a lot heavier than originally planned. So for the Panther 2 to have both increased side armor and increased UFP would had made logistics even worse than it already was.
@AKUJIVALDO
@AKUJIVALDO 2 месяца назад
Not really. Logistics nightmare came because of having so many types of pretty much everything(trucks, artillery, halftracks, etc.) 60mm UPF would suck balls on Panther. Adding 1/3 of UPF weight wasn't much looking at total weight of Panther.
@tedarcher9120
@tedarcher9120 2 месяца назад
60-70mm would have been optimal, but not a big weight saver. Panther is so heavy because it is super tall
@alexsv1938
@alexsv1938 2 месяца назад
I think the weight issue would have been solved as it was supposed to use the Tiger 2 transmission, though I think the prototype still utilized the Panther I transmission. (The Germans really wanted semiautomatic/automatic transmissions - like on the early Panzer 3s and Tiger 1/2s)
@Fretti90
@Fretti90 2 месяца назад
@@alexsv1938 I didnt mean in how it would drive. I mean how it would be transported to the battlefield. Most tanks were either transported by rail or trailer. Higher weight means that fewer bridges and transport trucks that could transport the tank to where it was needed.
@ThatZenoGuy
@ThatZenoGuy 2 месяца назад
Increasing the armor from 60 to 80mm only increased the tank's weight by like 600 kilograms. Hardly 'a lot heavier'.
@Mr_Unavailable
@Mr_Unavailable 2 месяца назад
US T34 prototype 120mm AP vs King Tiger UFP at close range next?
@raketny_hvost
@raketny_hvost 2 месяца назад
Double that
@user-tv7fg7wt2d
@user-tv7fg7wt2d 2 месяца назад
nah, 152mm early design APFSDS
@justuseodysee7348
@justuseodysee7348 2 месяца назад
"assuming good quality armor" They were full of optimism
@czwarty7878
@czwarty7878 2 месяца назад
Not really, the "bad quality of german armor" is a myth that doesn't want to die. Everybody repeats it like a dogma yet you somehow will never see a primary source for that. It's source is from british report assuming degradation of german armor due to lack of manganese but they didn't take into consideration the germans already had different armored steel composition. The quality differences are also never given in relation to other countries varying quality. All nations had varying quality of armor and AP shells but only german is discussed while assuming other vehicles retain same quality of armor. It's simply not true, it's reality of mass production during war that quality control is not retained in constant.
@griban4564
@griban4564 2 месяца назад
​@@czwarty7878нет, немецкая броня в конце войны действительно стала плохо подходить под свои прямые обязанности. Когда у них стал заканчиваться легирующий молибден, придающий броне вязкость, они стали добавлять марганец, что в свою очередь сделало немецкую броню чрезвычайно хрупкой
@rubiepie
@rubiepie 2 месяца назад
​@@czwarty7878 no the bad armor is true however it's late in the war.
@czwarty7878
@czwarty7878 2 месяца назад
@@rubiepie You're once again the person who repeats this yet provides zero arguments or sources to support the claim
@somethingoriginal390
@somethingoriginal390 2 месяца назад
​@@czwarty7878Soviet reports on basically all German tanks captured after 1942 have a note about armor cracks.
@oskar6661
@oskar6661 2 месяца назад
The key there is "assuming good quality armour". By the end of the war, German armour was really poor due to lacking several key elements needed to make it.
@5co756
@5co756 2 месяца назад
This is just BS , any proof for that myth ?
@KP-viking88
@KP-viking88 2 месяца назад
@@5co756 look at the dozens and dozens of pics/vids of cracked armour on Panthers and such like. Or read the reports written by several nations or experts on the poor or inconsistent quality of mid to late WW2 German armour production. There's literally tons of proof out there
@Dreachon
@Dreachon 2 месяца назад
@@KP-viking88 There is also literal proof of the armour working well as a Panther resisted multiple hits from the 90mm of the M26 and a Tiger II hull performing well against the 105mm that would have one on both the T28 and T29 and this is stuff that ot tested back at the US, stop with the cherry picking of pop-history historians who want to push a narrative. Nearly all of those Panthers with cracke armour got shot multiple times, that is what is going to happen and happened to other tanks as well. You think a Sherman or a T-34 is goin to look better after getting a dozen shots?
@KP-viking88
@KP-viking88 2 месяца назад
@@Dreachon take off your fanboy glasses and read it again. German armour production was inconsistent, which means sometimes it was decent quality and others is wasn't. Ill believe reports and articles written and published by experts in their fields over your narrative or hurt feelings.
@Dreachon
@Dreachon 2 месяца назад
@@KP-viking88 So rather than make a proepr aegument and present soruces you instead to go an label me as a fanboy. Guess that says enough, an the quite limited extent of your knowledge on this subject. Don't go and mention experts when for you that just means copying what some random person in a YT video says.
@tommeakin1732
@tommeakin1732 2 месяца назад
Could you throw the 32 pdr's APCBC at this target next? I know that round buttered the Panther's front plate at extreme ranges, and I know it's APDS round could go through the front plate of a Tiger 2 (so no point trying that against the Panther 2) - but the APCBC against the Panther 2's front plate might be an interesting middle ground Broadly speaking, I just want more 32 pdr lol
@jimmcneal5292
@jimmcneal5292 2 месяца назад
Also would be interesting to see 32 pdr's APDS vs IS 3 And yeah, I want more 32pdr too, amazing gun, don't know why they didn't use it
@realspeed1944
@realspeed1944 2 месяца назад
Beautiful!
@user-fr5gj4cz3y
@user-fr5gj4cz3y 2 месяца назад
Nice video! Can you make a video of a Panther's II armour (100mm 55 @ good quality) against a 90mm m26 canon at 500m ? It will be very good.
@Grigoriymicro
@Grigoriymicro 2 месяца назад
As always cool video. Id liked to see something about modern HEAT shells if it possible.
@IonPerseus
@IonPerseus 2 месяца назад
Not possible, HEATs are difficult to simulate
@BOEING--mh6xm
@BOEING--mh6xm 2 месяца назад
Could you possibly do more simulations with the ISU-152-1 and 2?
@AbhinavKumar-mk4ib
@AbhinavKumar-mk4ib 2 месяца назад
Impressive and keep it up. Are u suing LS-DYNA for simulation??
@difenol5750
@difenol5750 8 дней назад
Quite a controversial simulation. On November 21, 1943, when the D-25T gun was tested, the penetrations were complete, the projectile entered the armor completely. The Panther's top armor plate could be penetrated from a distance of 2,000 meters. Jagged penetrations larger than the caliber of the gun were accompanied by spalling and cracking of the armor plate. The first hit in the turret completely tore the plate off the tank. The second hit tore the turret off its shoulder strap and moved it back.
@roland06710
@roland06710 2 месяца назад
Nice video! Could you tell me the simulator you are using ?
@Jake_Gotthard
@Jake_Gotthard 2 месяца назад
How do you make these simulations?
@nuclearfrog306
@nuclearfrog306 2 месяца назад
I much prefer the sims with a witness plate. it does a great job highlighting any tiny pieces of spalling, or lack thereof
@traydr-1609
@traydr-1609 2 месяца назад
Энергия снаряда у 122 мм пушки ис 2 была такой огромной, что когда в кубинке привезли трофейный тигр 2 и выстрелили в влд, у него лопнули сварные швы удерживающие влд
@LORDFERROK100
@LORDFERROK100 2 месяца назад
Which software do you use? LS-DYNA?
@brodymalone4734
@brodymalone4734 2 месяца назад
You should do HEAT vs slat armor
@simonp1165
@simonp1165 2 месяца назад
Thought it would pen, impressive
@jansenart0
@jansenart0 2 месяца назад
Can you make a hypothetical modernized projectile with 1940s tech? I guess they had tungsten back in the day, what would an APFSDS look like if the Sherman had one?
@Jukkaimaru
@Jukkaimaru 2 месяца назад
I'd be curious to see 500 meter range simulations of 76mm M62 APCBC and M93 HVAP hitting as square-on as plausible against a Panther turret front.
@tubopanderson8106
@tubopanderson8106 2 месяца назад
can you make a video where you put an efp from say a tow2b up against a t72 roof fitted with kontakt 5 or relikt?
@-Ryan_Gasoline-
@-Ryan_Gasoline- 2 месяца назад
Imagine if it was APHEBC
@cybernetic_crocodile8462
@cybernetic_crocodile8462 2 месяца назад
Could you make a simulation of 6 Pounder Mark 9 shell vs T-34 upper front plate at around 700 meters?
@enteristic
@enteristic 26 дней назад
how do you make these types of simulations?
@holik6232
@holik6232 2 месяца назад
The simulations are great. I would like to see shooting at a T-26E from a German 37 mm cannon, would 30+15 armor be able to stop the projectile?
@mcldark7169
@mcldark7169 2 месяца назад
What would a round of t29 be like impacting like is2 did to panther 2?
@2nolhta
@2nolhta 2 месяца назад
At what point the HE part exploded? Inside or outside the hole?
@TheCaesar88
@TheCaesar88 2 месяца назад
Incredible, it is only 200m, in real combat we could assume fight would take place on longer distances
@thetonk2173
@thetonk2173 2 месяца назад
Can you do a simulation on the FV4005 vs a t34-85 upper front plate?
@mrmason2342
@mrmason2342 2 месяца назад
Make more HEAT simulations!
@HMIN765
@HMIN765 2 месяца назад
I feel like if the explosive mass was included, it might have gone through because is had so much he filler sometimes even a non pen could destroy a tank
@abaj006
@abaj006 2 месяца назад
Seems likely there would be some degree of spelling. Perhaps a witness sheet could be added to investigate further.
@Putter_WoT_Blitz
@Putter_WoT_Blitz 2 месяца назад
122s versus giga panther
@BigBoss-tn6fn
@BigBoss-tn6fn Месяц назад
Could you do a British or american late war cannon vs the E-50 armor? Which would be 150mm @ 60° so about 300mm Los.
@loftr8174
@loftr8174 2 месяца назад
Does anyone know if this could be simulated in real time e.g. in a video game engine?
@resurgam_b7
@resurgam_b7 2 месяца назад
Ah yes, 100 mullimitters of armor defeats a 122 mullimitter shell. The voice over is nice, but sometimes it does sound pretty goofy 😂
@evansmillan8868
@evansmillan8868 2 месяца назад
100 millimeters of armor inclined at 55° degrees results in about 150/160 mm of effective armor. Furthermore, not all 120mm~ cannons have the same performance. Compare the Jagtiger's PaK 44 to the IS-2's D-25.
@BesoffenerIslamist
@BesoffenerIslamist 2 месяца назад
MILLIMETER
@ztashed6366
@ztashed6366 2 месяца назад
​@@evansmillan8868not 155-160. Around 190-200mm of effective armor
@evansmillan8868
@evansmillan8868 2 месяца назад
@@ztashed6366 The effective armor value is calculated by multiplying the armor thickness by the angle of inclination and adding this result to the armor value at a right angle. If 50-55 degrees of inclination doubled the thickness then the Tiger II would have at least 300mm protecting the driver
@ztashed6366
@ztashed6366 2 месяца назад
@@evansmillan8868 tiger ufp 50°, not 55°. Its a huge difference
@bensmith7536
@bensmith7536 2 месяца назад
the AI has trouble with millumommemter.
@user-vp8pd1in6m
@user-vp8pd1in6m 2 месяца назад
pls t34 with 85mm gun vs 140mm shell m48 patton
@conradandrew825
@conradandrew825 2 месяца назад
Milimmitters, lol
@SanctusBacchus
@SanctusBacchus 2 месяца назад
Dude that was so fcking annoying lol. I don't understand why people can't just record themselves for 1 minute and resort to these dumb AI voices.
@Jamaicangodzilla
@Jamaicangodzilla 2 месяца назад
What program plsss
@HanSolo__
@HanSolo__ 2 месяца назад
Ansys
@tankstriker6634
@tankstriker6634 2 месяца назад
looked like there was minimal spalling despite the armor breaking apart. No doubt though, (if assuming the armor was the poor quality, which it likely would have been, given the time the panther 2 design was considered), the armor would have been penned, and potentially even at a further distance would had been shattered or worse.
@beanhavok2287
@beanhavok2287 2 месяца назад
I got to see the Panther II at the Patton Museum at Ft. Knox. Now that they killed my boy(Patton Museum) I'm not sure where it's at now.
@STHV_
@STHV_ 2 месяца назад
Fort Moore, Georgia (previously Fort Benning) They occasionally have public open days.
@garyslayton8340
@garyslayton8340 2 месяца назад
The only remaing pather 2 prototype is whats left of a turret Sitting in the storage wearhouse at bovingtong The engine deck was hit directly by a 155mm artillerly shell during the battle of berlin And threw the turret several meters They repainted it the best they could but there isnt a whole lot left
@gheetza14
@gheetza14 2 месяца назад
everything you said is wrong, that's impressive
@idontlikecommunists9677
@idontlikecommunists9677 Месяц назад
What was bro smoking when he thought this up😂
@garyslayton8340
@garyslayton8340 Месяц назад
@@idontlikecommunists9677 it was the panther F not the panther 2
@idontlikecommunists9677
@idontlikecommunists9677 Месяц назад
@@garyslayton8340 yeah and the Schmalturm at Bovington wasn't mounted on any tank and it never saw combat, it was used as a range target after the war lmao
@4T3hM4kr0n
@4T3hM4kr0n 2 месяца назад
holy shit, very little spall too!
@khaelamensha3624
@khaelamensha3624 2 месяца назад
Yep but no explosives effects... If the shell detonate, I think spalling increased a bit... A deadly bit
@petterderter6354
@petterderter6354 2 месяца назад
Don’t say the Lords name in vain
@khaelamensha3624
@khaelamensha3624 2 месяца назад
@@petterderter6354 Lords, you are polytheist ? And the expression was made to avoid invoquing the name of the lord. Classic in a lot of European languages. Holyblue and so 9n (well translated from French...)
@4T3hM4kr0n
@4T3hM4kr0n 2 месяца назад
@@petterderter6354 don't care
@4T3hM4kr0n
@4T3hM4kr0n 2 месяца назад
@@khaelamensha3624 it wouldn't detonate, as the detonator tend to get destroyed by the round crushing itself against the armor. Even if it did the explosion would be out the rear of the shell, not detonating the whole thing. (at 0:16 look at how small the cavity is for the explosives)
@Fisherer2
@Fisherer2 2 месяца назад
Can we see 380mm sturmmorser(sturmtiger) vs human skin
@Eric-kn4yn
@Eric-kn4yn 2 месяца назад
Is utube accurate
@kimjanek646
@kimjanek646 2 месяца назад
Why 200m though? Seems unnecessary close 😄
@herbivorethecarnivore8447
@herbivorethecarnivore8447 2 месяца назад
King Tiger VS weird AI voice
@AHbIKTOMbI
@AHbIKTOMbI 2 месяца назад
Насколько мне известно - Пантера-2 это попытка создать Основной боевой танк. Среднее между Королевским тигром и Пантерой-1. Унификация и т.п
@alajouer6374
@alajouer6374 2 месяца назад
Если честно, мне тоже кажется, что это был шаг в сторону создания ОБТ. Но скорее она слишком уж габаритная для развед. функций
@SEN5AI
@SEN5AI 2 месяца назад
Если бы этот танк поставили на производство, всем был бы конец
@aerostake
@aerostake Месяц назад
wow impressive 6.3 is-2 doesn’t pen 7.0 panther, shame everything else does
@ingilizmandasntercihedelim6030
@ingilizmandasntercihedelim6030 2 месяца назад
Almanyanın tek yapması gereken Tiger 1 yapmak yerine panter lerin ön zırhına 20 mm daha zırh ekleyip IS 2 atışlarından korunmak idi
@ingilizmandasntercihedelim6030
@ingilizmandasntercihedelim6030 2 месяца назад
Neyin boşunü yapıyon panter 2 üretmek gibi bir maliyete girmek yerine kılasik panter G serisinden devam etmek en doğru olanıdır panterler 80 mm lik RHA çelik zırhı ile bir T34 85 atışında koruna bilirler ama tiger 1 H tank ları 102 mm lik RHA zırhı ile bu atışlardan korunamazlar bunun nedeni açı dır panterlerin 80mm lik zırhına 55 derece açı velirir ve bu şekilde zırhın etkili kalınlığı 130mm olur ve ayrıca mühimatın normalizasyonu düşer ve daha az çelik deler fakat tiger lar tüm bunlardan yoksun aciz tanklardır bunu kursk gibi bir çok tank muharebesinde gördük adam ol ayağını denk al
@ingilizmandasntercihedelim6030
@ingilizmandasntercihedelim6030 2 месяца назад
​​@hansgettheflammenwerfer5647 bi daha boş etme
@ingilizmandasntercihedelim6030
@ingilizmandasntercihedelim6030 2 месяца назад
Sormak istediğin soru varsa alayım canım dostum ;)
@ingilizmandasntercihedelim6030
@ingilizmandasntercihedelim6030 Месяц назад
Evet bı noktada haklısın insan gördüğü her tankın kinetik ve kimyasal zırh direncine kadar bilmesı insanı yoruyo ama artık tanklar benim bir parçam oldu (ve birde ben 13 deyil 16 yaşındayım)
@ingilizmandasntercihedelim6030
@ingilizmandasntercihedelim6030 Месяц назад
​@hansgettheflammenwerfer5647ve birde moral için sagol
@vladimirpriobskyi3210
@vladimirpriobskyi3210 Месяц назад
А в Вар Тандер такой снаряд с такого расстояния спокойно прошивал вторую пантеру🤔🤔🤔
@TinyBearTim
@TinyBearTim Месяц назад
This isn’t how a panther 2 looks
@discordtian32
@discordtian32 2 месяца назад
Lol 122mm hitting 100mm in 200m and not penetrating is so hilarious
@stephenallen4635
@stephenallen4635 2 месяца назад
muh'limiter 🤠
@Big1_
@Big1_ 2 месяца назад
200m of distance.... yes yes... And the next distance would be taking a Beer at 2m of distance... Put realist combat distance 500-700-900m, not 200 meters.
@Rider-lo9vt
@Rider-lo9vt 2 месяца назад
The driver or radioman is dead
@vedbor
@vedbor 2 месяца назад
wasnt 122mm BR shell prone to cracking and breaking thus reducing penetration drastically?
@shahramtondkarmobarakie1824
@shahramtondkarmobarakie1824 2 месяца назад
not all variants just the 471B and 471A the 471D had improved quality which ironically made it perform worse against angles than the lower quality "softer" 471-B
@TheBigExclusive
@TheBigExclusive 2 месяца назад
How well would Germany have done in the Eastern Front if they had this Panther II tanks as their original Panther tank? Seems like the original Panther was a good design riddled with mechanical issues that took a long time to eventually fix.
@seductive_fishstick8961
@seductive_fishstick8961 2 месяца назад
It would have performed even worse then the original panther. it would have been less mobile and the mechanical issues would have gotten even worse then they already were do to the wait increase. The panther is WAY over hyped. Its mechanical issues where also never fixed, they definitely got better and a few did get fixed, but the Issues with the final drive were never fixed. Also it was a living hell to repair, with problems that would take allied or soviet tank crews maybe 20-30 minutes to fix, the same issue would take hours or even days to fix for German crews. and some bigger issues that would take allied or soviets a few days to repair in the field the Germans simply couldn't. often time having to send panthers all the way back to the factory's to be fixed because it was easier and often faster then trying to fix them in the field.
@Prometheus19853
@Prometheus19853 2 месяца назад
@@seductive_fishstick8961 There is literally no mechanical issue on a tank that takes "maybe 20-30m to fix" and least of all on Allied tanks. The mechanical reliability and ease of maintenance of Allied tanks is what's vastly over-hyped, what actually happened was the tank was dropped at a depot and they just grabbed another one. Their actual advantage was that they didn't require as much field infrastructure to replace things like transmissions and roadwheels, not that they could be banged with a wrench a few times and magically fixed.
@skdKitsune
@skdKitsune 2 месяца назад
@@seductive_fishstick8961 It would actually have been better. Mobility would be way better, since it used the tiger 2 engine and transmission, along with the final drive, roadwheels and tracks. So better for logistics, less prone to final drive failure, more armor, more mobility, since the engine would have produced slightly better forward speed and significantly increased reverse speed. From 4 km/h to at least 15 km/h. Also, every mechanical "failure" from the early Panther D version was fixed by late 1944. The only thing left to fix was the final drive that was simply designed for a way lighter tank.
@momentum8131
@momentum8131 2 месяца назад
İts still cracked
@Shadicals
@Shadicals 2 месяца назад
SOMEONE SEND THIS TO GAIJIN!
@TheOrdomalleus666
@TheOrdomalleus666 2 месяца назад
Ah yes, more War Thunder L-posting to check it that other bloke really could pen me...
@King.Leonidas
@King.Leonidas 2 месяца назад
if germany had the Panther 2 by the time of Barbarossa
@oz314
@oz314 2 месяца назад
Meaningless
@10.huynhphathuy8
@10.huynhphathuy8 2 месяца назад
Yes, all 3 paintings of them
@King.Leonidas
@King.Leonidas 2 месяца назад
​@@oz314 nahh. first fielded in France then in quantity during Barbarossa.
@seductive_fishstick8961
@seductive_fishstick8961 2 месяца назад
if the USSR had IS-2 by the time of Barbarossa
@thiagorodrigues5211
@thiagorodrigues5211 2 месяца назад
If Soviets had the IS-2 by the time... so many ifs though.
@duckman5891
@duckman5891 2 месяца назад
I like cheese 🧀 👍
@thezig2078
@thezig2078 2 месяца назад
I like James May
@DuelJ007
@DuelJ007 2 месяца назад
I would like to humbly request simulating a 75mm carbide drill bit being fired out of a sherman.
@t10god
@t10god 2 месяца назад
The cracking inside would likely be ejecting very fast micro-spall that is injuring the driver regardless. The concussive force of the 122mm is also likely causing the crew to bail out of the vehicle. Can't really armor your tank well enough to survive being hit by a 122 mm AP shell from the IS-2, it is likely to cause all manner of chaos no matter if it penetrates or not
@Anti_Everything
@Anti_Everything 2 месяца назад
Panter 2 never existed
@Mr_Zloben
@Mr_Zloben 2 месяца назад
Уверен, в симуляции 100мм снаряд Т-54 не сможет пробить Шеридан. Зато 50BMG пройдет навылет ИС-7
@Degist
@Degist 2 месяца назад
Delete account vatnik
@Turbo_Gainer
@Turbo_Gainer 2 месяца назад
I wish they didnt remove panther II and they should give it back
@Daddo22
@Daddo22 2 месяца назад
If you mean Warthunder, the "Panther II" that is there is a correct Panther II hull combined with Schmallturm turret (which only started development after the Panther II project was cancelled, to improve the existing Panther I and can be seen on Panther F), 8.8 cm KwK 43 gun barrel and gun breech from standard Panther's 7.5 cm gun, because the gun breech KwK 43 wouldn't even fit into that turret let alone be possible to load it... Similarly, the WT representation oth the IRL napkin design of Tiger II with 10.5 cm gun incorporates the napkin notes of 2 piece ammunition and 2 loaders, but in a very unrealistic way, since the front loader in the WT design is basically useless and IRL the loaders would be positioned on the opposite sides of gun breech (like in M103) and the commander would sit on the other side of the gun from the gunner as there would be not enough room for 3 crewmen in a row on the same side of the turret.
@Turbo_Gainer
@Turbo_Gainer 2 месяца назад
@@Daddo22 I know everything but it shouldnt be blocked from playerbase its not Event vehicle wich u can buy
@cheekibreeki4638
@cheekibreeki4638 2 месяца назад
The in game Panther II is more real than some of the other crap they have in game, no idea why the removed it.
@Daddo22
@Daddo22 2 месяца назад
@@cheekibreeki4638for example?
@graemepennell
@graemepennell 2 месяца назад
Remove the computer voice... PLEAS...
@Fretti90
@Fretti90 2 месяца назад
I honestly like the voiceover.
@Bruno-cb5gk
@Bruno-cb5gk 2 месяца назад
there's a mute button right there
@WelcomeToDERPLAND
@WelcomeToDERPLAND 2 месяца назад
I mean, you could just mute the video to return it to the silence that it normally is without the voice over.
@panterka.f
@panterka.f 2 месяца назад
2 things: -low quality german steel -kinetic shock
@discordtian32
@discordtian32 2 месяца назад
What are you yapping about German have the best armor quality in ww2 only lacking essential material in late war German have known to produce such a greate alloys for tank armor mixing it with manganese and meldynom alloy
@ODS17-18
@ODS17-18 2 месяца назад
4 views and 11 likes... Hmmm
@puipuixproduction
@puipuixproduction 2 месяца назад
*A bunch of false stuff*
@skdKitsune
@skdKitsune 2 месяца назад
Panther 2 hull, engine and tracks did exist. The germans just never mounted a turret on it. It even still exists to this day.
@puipuixproduction
@puipuixproduction 2 месяца назад
@@skdKitsune it's a bunch of different projects none called panther 2.
@skdKitsune
@skdKitsune 2 месяца назад
@@puipuixproduction no, it's one project without a turret proposal.
@puipuixproduction
@puipuixproduction 2 месяца назад
@@skdKitsune yeah my bad, I checked again the source I had in mind and a bunch of info got mixed in my memory. o7
@senpalma
@senpalma 2 месяца назад
Panther II is a paper project
@STHV_
@STHV_ 2 месяца назад
The prototype hull was built and still exists. It's currently housed at Fort Moore in the US fitted with an erroneous Ausf G turret to make it look more complete.
@AKUJIVALDO
@AKUJIVALDO 2 месяца назад
LOL Why be silent, when you can speak and remove all the doubts. And Panther II was and is a real thing. It is in some American museum but with standard Panther G's turret.
@senpalma
@senpalma 2 месяца назад
​@@STHV_ prototype was with 80mm armor, because it was a laboratory on tracks for testing a new chassis, but hull is ordinary panther
@STHV_
@STHV_ 2 месяца назад
@@senpalma Nope, not even close. The hull is completely different from a standard Panther, the entire hull is longer for example. The plates of the hull are full thickness the upper glacis is 100mm thick and the sides are 60mm. The hull was built exactly to design spec with the only difference being that the vehicle is made of mild steel not hardened armour plate steel just like most German initial prototypes. You are confusing it with the V1 Panther prototype that was used to test various Panther II components before the Panther II hull was built.
@skdKitsune
@skdKitsune 2 месяца назад
@@senpalma yapping some very uninformed shite here, bruv
@ARDEN440i
@ARDEN440i 2 месяца назад
Most of the time, the IS-2 fired HE, which would've knocked out or at least immobilised any German armour it fired at anyway.
@King.Leonidas
@King.Leonidas 2 месяца назад
it depends on the plate
@barbarapitenthusiast7103
@barbarapitenthusiast7103 2 месяца назад
​@@King.Leonidas it doesnt, even a non pen would at least blow the crews eardrums
@seductive_fishstick8961
@seductive_fishstick8961 2 месяца назад
@@King.Leonidas not really, 122mm HE was able cause Tiger-1 UFP to fail and collapse. Also even if you are shooting at like a Maus or something the sound created by the explosion would still stun the crew at lest for a moment
@kimjanek646
@kimjanek646 2 месяца назад
@@barbarapitenthusiast7103Nope
@barbarapitenthusiast7103
@barbarapitenthusiast7103 2 месяца назад
@@kimjanek646 "no guys, a 122mm HE Shell blowing up on a german tank would defenetly not cause any harm to the crew, trust me bro." You are somewhat correct, as in the 122mm would reform the armor and likely shatter it, especialy considering late war german steel quality .
@user-tb8bq1vv4f
@user-tb8bq1vv4f 2 месяца назад
Вы издеваетесь? Ис-2 проламывал пантеру со всех сторон на любой дистанции боя. А тут 200 м😂😂😂. По результатам официальных испытаний задокументированных, ис-2 с дистанции 500 м пробел пантеру насквозь, то есть снаряд пробив лобовую плиту вынес ещё и кормовую. Интернет в помощь тем кто верит в эту симуляцию. Есть фотографии и отчёты.😂😂😂😂😂
@blackowl9417
@blackowl9417 2 месяца назад
Ну давате покажите мне фото хотябы полностью собранной пантеры 2.
@user-tb8bq1vv4f
@user-tb8bq1vv4f 2 месяца назад
@@blackowl9417 А причём тут вторая пантера? Я про симуляцию как таковую, то есть 20 мм брони превращали её в неуязвимую? Не смешите мои тапочки. А то вы превращались в одного из комментаторов, который написал из разряда а вот если бы...
@BesoffenerIslamist
@BesoffenerIslamist 2 месяца назад
The WHOLE video is about the panther 2 while you are barking about panther 1...too much vodka I guess.
@blackowl9417
@blackowl9417 2 месяца назад
@@user-tb8bq1vv4f а притом что симуляция сздесь про пантер 2 , а вы говорите про пробой пантеры обычной с сомнительным качеством брони , так то самое главное это качество брони например броня фердинанта и пантеры в конце 44 года совершенно разные например потому что качество стали разное.И еще ис 2 с егг орудиеми снарядами не отличаються выской пробивной силой но облодают огромной энергией поэтому и пролом и происходит , а вот даже увеличение брони на 20 мм способно увеличить стойкость , пантеры к снарядам , ибо немецкие инженеры явно не просто так увеличвали влд , когда бр 365 в влд обычную пантеру не пробивал.
@blackowl9417
@blackowl9417 2 месяца назад
@@user-tb8bq1vv4f ну вы пишите про первую , а потом говорите про симуляцию с другой пантерой , где логика? Я в НИИ Стали не работаю насколько достоверна эта симуляция незнаю , но предполгаю она не достоверна ибо непонятно опять же какая там сталь у них в тесте.Это очень тонкая тематика.
@mymumdroppedmeinthewomb367
@mymumdroppedmeinthewomb367 2 месяца назад
These are the war thunder leaks we need
@user-qf4yu8kt2g
@user-qf4yu8kt2g 2 месяца назад
С времени 0:20 в видео показано изображение 122-мм снарядов после взаимодействия с броней под углом 55 градусов. Эта фрагмент фотографии из этого отчета со страницы 057: cloud?mail?ru public j6A7 BU51JeYeD 8734 038 Из отчета можно понять, что это снаряды после следующих опытов: 1)страница 071, опыт №4 : плита толщиной 119,24 мм твердостью 300HB (диаметр отпечатка 3,5 мм) под углом 55 градусов. Ударная скорость 796 м/с. Результат: вмятина 230х155 мм глубиной 60 мм. С тыльной стороны наметился выход пробки на 3/4 окружности со сдвигом до 15 мм. Головная часть снаряда сработалась по второй локализатор. Длина оставшейся части снадяда равна 175 мм. 2)страница 072, опыт №7 : плита толщиной 119,24 мм твердостью 300HB (диаметр отпечатка 3,5 мм) под углом 53 градусов. Ударная скорость 805 м/с. Результат: пробоина с размерами входа 300х170 мм, отверстия 110х60 мм и выхода 150х130 мм. Головная часть снаряда сработалась по второй локализатор. Длина оставшейся части снадяда равна 180 мм. В этом же отчете можно найти и результаты стрельбы по плите толщиной 120,3 мм твердостью 250HB под углом 55 градусов с ударными скоростями 793-825 м/с (страницы 90-91, опыты 1-6). Результат: плита не была пробита. Хочу рекомендовать сначала повторить в симуляции опыты из этого отчета, что бы проверить правильность моделирования советских снарядов с локализаторами в Вашей симуляции.
@MrCrazybadbastard
@MrCrazybadbastard 2 месяца назад
Gayjin need to fix their shitty game 😅
@nuclearfrog306
@nuclearfrog306 2 месяца назад
I much prefer the sims with a witness plate. it does a great job highlighting any tiny pieces of spalling, or lack thereof
@stephenallen4635
@stephenallen4635 2 месяца назад
from that shot theres garaunteed to be spalling
Далее
WAR THUNDER: T-44-100 VS Panther II (WHO WILL WIN?)
5:06
Редакция. News: 124-я неделя
52:01
Просмотров 1,8 млн
Lasagna Soup @Lionfield
00:35
Просмотров 10 млн
that's a lot of damage💀
5:05
Просмотров 108 тыс.
Inside the Easy Eight Sherman Tank
18:43
Просмотров 786 тыс.
How the Titanic Was Found
22:19
Просмотров 444 тыс.
Tiger 1 vs M4A3E8 [MPG]
2:08
Просмотров 11 тыс.
The ISU-152 aka Tiger Tank nemesis
7:32
Просмотров 475 тыс.
Why Protecting Tanks is Getting Much More Difficult
12:36
Подключил AirPods к Xbox
0:45
Просмотров 22 тыс.