Is it time to BELIEVE in the Bombers and Bulldogs? The Monday Means Test - SEN 

Mate I live in Dunedin NZ, without RU-vid and SEN I'd be going to the newsagent at the railway station for an occasional Age, Herald or The Australian.

No one cares about Sydney

Sydney could win the flag by 200 points and Gerard would still have some reluctant limp admission on their success.

Best side in the AFL isn’t Victorian, and they hate it. SEN should realize there are a lot of Swans supporters in Victoria. I’m one of them. Go Bloods!

The swans should just merge with the roos ... the supporters have the same victim mentality. No one talks about us wahh wahhh

@@kokmuncher6702you’d love it still if it was the VFL and you were allowed to date your sister

He’s a walking bad take

It's not a bad take at all, plenty of teams have dominated mid-season and were raging favorites for the flag but didn't win: St Kilda 2004 West Coast 2005 Adelaide 2006 Geelong 2008 St Kilda 2009 Collingwood 2011 Hawthorn 2012 Sydney 2016 Adelaide 2017 Richmond 2018 Plenty of the season left and it would only take a few injuries to a teams gun players; suspension; dip in form etc for them to struggle come finals

I agree, I'm a Swans supporter and love them to bits but it only takes a few injuries or an opponent to go red hot like the Dogs in 2016, or the Hawks on GF day in 2014 to change things up

@@Alby911 And plenty have teams have dominated the comp from the beginning and won premierships. Brisbane, WC. You have cherry picked the data. So no conclusions can be drawn. Except King and Mr Magoos bias against Sydney.

Don’t worry, it’s not only Sydney Kingy poo poos all the time. He’s an absolute donut

Welcome to the non-Vic club supporter support group :(

It's a Victorian radio station...if you want swans tune into Sydney station

​​@@assassinrages2288Sydney radio barely talks about the Swans..in order to hear any decent AFL discussion is via listening to 1116 SEN.

As a hawk fan just kept lying under the radar

@@assassinrages2288 exactly this, nsw have their own SEN

This theatre argument is so dumb, nathan brown and montegna made it too like wtf guys

Agree

He needs to change hands…..

you can skip to last section, "Seedings". Their answer was 'no'.

@@robkirchhof133 I know that’s my point I was surprised because Gresham is on the front of the post as well as is it time to believe clearly referring to Essendon, but not in

King hates Essendon so it’s his bias showing.

That the Bumblers are second on the ladder just shows how far ahead of the competition Sydney are. Only Collingwood could maybe challenge them at this stage …

Not only did he not say that, he added "daylight" to his seedings to drop the bombers out of them😂

King would never say the Bombers could win the flag. He has a pathological hatred of Essendon which he's more readily starting to admit.

Really? I thought so live. But on replay it was a pretty clear shove in the back.

@@S3018146 didn't the guy who got pushed roll away sideways? Might have to watch it again. Still probably more grey than a 25m run.

I don’t think the north win is the point. The point is that people though Essendon would be 1-6 to start this season. The fact that they are now 7-2-1 is a talking point regardless of who they beat this week. Also, I think the fact that their % is over 100 now is part of the reason. Because they beat the giants last week and half the analysis was “hmmm…but they have a % in the 90s”.

@@goldboy150it goes to show how good these so called experts are. Opinionated flogs who change with the breeze. All about Clickbait…..

@@zingleraster9124 it’s more a confirmation bias thing, I think. The pundits thought Essendon were going to be crap. Can’t remember who said it but one of them was talking about the Suns and said they should make finals because “they play north, west coast and Essendon twice”. So when things start to look different, many will seek out evidence that proves they’re not wrong even if it’s flimsy. Essendon’s bad percentage is an example of this. On a show last week I heard “we all though collingwood had a low percentage last year” followed by “percentage is a good indicator of where the club is at” Collingwood were premiers with that low percentage - it clearly isn’t the best indicator but if it fits a narrative neatly people will use it.

Daicos (N) is a STAR......

They arnt being critics because there's less discussion on him. I think people have accepted now he's a freak and just have to deal with it now 🙂 (non Collingwood supporter here)

They can. But they won’t

Your delusional 😂, they have had a dream draw , only decent team they beat GWS there heads weren’t in the game because of the cam McCarthy tragedy

Kingy said at the end of the saints bit "The other mob are pretty good Freo" then it cut away :(

Melbourne radio station. Listeners don't want to hear about interstate clubs.

Maybe listen to SEN in Perth or Triple M in perth

2012🤦

The past is never a clear indicator of how a team will finish the season; certainly when your example is 2012. It's like saying Carlton will win the GF because they made Prelim last year. They might but who really knows

@@Alby911dead right. I’m sick of these dinosaurs who think the world never changes & we are on a constant cycle of rinse & repeat. Flat earthers…..

Well he had little to no influence

Who cares about the swans or GWS for that matter.

You're here complaining about Melbourne radio station not talking about interstate sides. Get a life.

Yes this pair of hopeless has beens have several issues

That’s because the Magpies are going to swoop and win back to back premierships

Melbourne radio station. Listeners don't want to hear about interstate clubs.

@@JCStorm76 Keep dreaming.

@@thomes7318Doesn’t matter , give credit where credits due . Its AFL mate not vfl

Because they are currently second on the ladder.

@@petermcculloch4933 Relatively soft draw after 10 rounds. Look at their percentage. Also look at their injury list. Port won 13 in a row last year and faded, ended up with a top4 finish but were knocked out in straight sets - just like Melbourne. I know the media want something to talk about each week, but they should keep some perspective. I say the same thing about the Swans. Too early to tell what they will do in finals. Bombers have done well to rack up some wins so far which will help them make finals. They did the same thing last year and fell away in the final few rounds, missing finals.

@@petermcculloch4933 That won't last.....

Melbourne radio station. No listener wants to hear about interstate teams.

I've tried, honestly this year I've tried. But one's only interested in teams he used to coach and the other is a total Flog. You figure out which is which.

@@timfirth977 "Team X played poorly against Swans." These are the headlines I saw after watching South Melbourne play. Nothing has changed. Never will I think.

That’s because the Magpies are going to swoop in September and win back to back premierships

@@JCStorm76 Rumour has it that elephants have learnt to fly.

@@Rick-da-scale I’ll be back in September to remind you of this comment section

So you think they will at least make the GF. But not really interesting to be talked about. That is some logic champ.

This is also our best season since 1945 , a lot to talk about then rather just winning a GF 👍🏾

So What. You've got an opinion, Swans do well etc etc. The're not on their lonesome there that's what finals is all about, every team either drops out or wins the flag. Dogs are playing Swans on Thurs night, what will happen you think?

Your bit about Sydney is one of the worst takes I've seen. By your logic they shouldn't be talking about Melbourne when they go well (successive straight sets September exits), Carlton (haven't made a Grand Final in 25 years) or the Dogs (never finished Top 4 under Bevo), Essendon (how many days now?) etc. because they've not closed the deal in recent seasons. They say that they're talking about the teams that look like the real deal right now. If they had any integrity around that idea they'd spend a lot more time on what Sydney are doing than they have. I'm a Dogs fan but they carried on way too much about us smashing a struggling GWS side than they should have, at the expense of a team who are miles ahead of the pack. And you can't tell me that they can't find much to say. When Melbourne were undefeated this time a couple of years ago I swear they spent 10 minutes waxing lyrical about their strategies, their training, their group togetherness or anything they could find. Last season it was Collingwood and their group, their veterans, the Daicos boys, their situation training etc.

Melbourne radio station. Listeners don't want to hear about interstate clubs.

Bombers have the hardest rated 2nd half of the season. What are you on about?

Essendon had to travel interstate 4 times out of the first 8 rounds, but keep telling us more, superstar...