Salam guys. Ok, I see many of you getting angry about what the brother mentioned in the video. Sadly, none of you are able to point out what exactly was so wrong!?! It doesn't matter if the brother is 15 or 50 yrs old, as long as he can back up his points with proper daleel and knowledge. So stop letting your emotions get the best of you and instead try to understand what he is saying. And btw: Stop this "dont-talk-about-others-and-get-a-life"-mentality, it has no place in Islam in this general form. It is the islamic duty upon a muslim to warn his fellow muslims from people who spread ignorance and cause fitan if he can back it up with evidence. By the way: NAK is not an 'Aalim or scholar. Wa'alaykumsalam.
One of the tests for scholars in their life is that shaitan fills heart of others with vasvasa of all kinds for them this is only a sage of emaan When a person has even a little bit of knowledge and is steady fast shaitan first tries to deviate her if he fails then he tries to make sure that he does not share his knowledge he does not give dawah of he agains fails then uthe 3rd one is above mentioned may Allah protect us from the vasvasa of shaitan
Afwan jiddan but NAK does mention hadith in his lectures, u may wanna consider listen completely For me, seeing how deep his love for the book of Allah and how great his respect for prophet SAW, proving that he practiced aqeedah, needless to say
as salamu alaikum. before watching the video from what i understand he isn't qualified an never claimed to be but he has become to "popular" that people blur that line and consider him to be qualified
Nouman already explained in his lecture that he is not an expert in hadith as the subject matter is wide and will not do justice to the prophet if he interprete it wrongly. So he will consult a muhaddith who has been learning it for over 20 years as they know the context it was being delivered very well. May Allah guide us all and not be a tool of iblis to divide the umman.
Then he should shut up if he knows he is not an expert. That’s how it is everywhere, why do people feel so confident when it comes to islam to speak with no knowledge?
@@nabilakh3152 this is a dangerous comment. Is your position only alims can give dawah? The guy admits he is not an alim but he has studied various different tafaseer and is relaying them in an easy to digest form - so what's the issue. If there is an issue with the accuracy of the tafaseer then by all means critique it but just saying don't speak unless you are an alim - where in the Quran or hadith is that? Reading various tafaseer from recognised scholars, relaying them and then giving your opinion on which you most agree with is not speaking without knowledge.
@@muammar1353 all I know is that his tafaseer lectures have been invaluable to me. The views he takes are all standard and unless someone finds something he has said that is so deviant as to make it unacceptable it's just hating without reason
In all honesty i think he said he doesn't "know hadith" as a way to humbly say that he doesn't specialize in it. He does indeed know hadith but not as well as he knows for example, arabic etc. He definitely has mentioned hadith in his tafseer and has gone into context and mentioned the explanations of the salaf. He does however sometimes say some far fetched things but that is only SOME TIMES. He mostly goes into the arabic and translates for non arabic speakers. And as i said previously he does indeed mention the tafseer of the salaf etc. I think many people that critizise him haven't listened enough to his tafseer. If they have then they should see that he does indeed mention hadith and the explanations of the salaf etc.
Instead of studying the mistakes of the Ulamma and dividing the Muslim Umah, educate yourself first and let the Ulamma do their job. It is so sad if every boy who studies a couple of books criticizes!!! If you want to correct something there are better ways than this.
Instead of studying the N mistakes. Bruv, the mistakes are the things that misguide people, the lay people. So here a student of knowledge is showing that another student of knowledge made a mistake when interpreting the Quran. He is saying this religion is complete so no one should becoming with a new explanation. And so NAK made a mistake explaining the Ayah which is different from tafseer Ibn Kathir. NAK didn't look at the Ahedith that clarifies the Ayah. The point is how can one explain the Quran if one does not know the Ahedith and or that of the tafseer of the ulima.
Nouman Ali Khan is nowhere near the status of the Ulemah, please educate yourself. This individual has lied upon the Prophet Muhammad (صلى الله عليه وسلم)
Take the good and leave the bad. You people waste so much time refuting others, when do u make/find the time to better yourselves? May Allah swt guide us all, Ameen!
For the last few years I've been able to study many forms of Islam from a variety of scholars and sheikhs. my conclusion is they all preach Islam and in your life you may need guidance in different aspects now if you broadened your belief you will be open to many answers to help you. if you have a narrow minded belief then you end up in a world like Syria and Iraq.
Follow the way of the salad dear brother do not cling to yours and your imams perspective that is flawed if it doesn't adhere to the great companions who dedicated their life to Islam. Why? Because they followed the Prophet attentively and who is better than the Prophet and more beloved to Allah than him? ? Please do not reside in the persuasion of the shatayn for verily it us the chief deceiver you deceives you about Allah and His deen. There is no such thing as take the good and leave the bad from the understanding if the greatest generation. The generation that if we preform and good action they gave preceded us in it all!! Learn about the Salaf and Islam, and May Allah the most exalted the most high guide you to paradise, my dear and beloved brother.
Nouman ali khan has studied many and many of the tafseer Kitaabs which are familiar and unfamiliar to us, his library is full of books that are written about tafseer+tadabbur of Qur’an and I don't think that the all of the books about Al Qur'an is written by the writers without researching and studying hadith. Suppose I agreed that Nak didn't study Hadith again saying suppose but he studied so many tafseer kitaabs but the point is the book writers had written the books after receiving knowledge from hadith. The crucial point is Nak doesn't make tafseer he only trains us how we should study Qur’an. Thanks
Zainab Ahmed Waalaikumsalam, the best book for used worldwide now would be tafsir ibnu katsir which has been checked by the hadith scholars. they would let you know which hadits is strong and which is weak. try to look for this tafseer. InsyaAllah..
Asalamualaikum, I wanted to ask, is it permissible for me to listen to NAKs Tafsir? Because I find his videos very effective, but after watching this I feel that what he says may be false, and I don’t want to have false ideas about the Quran. JazakAllahu Khairan
I can get an ijaza in that lool. That only means you've memorised and understood those ahadith. That doesn't mean ur qualified to give tafseer of Qur'an.
This sheikh is absolutely right,nauman Ali khan is unaware of hadith and Quran science,I had many doubts about him but now I am sure he is an ignorant and not even qualified for doing tafseer
+iLuv Chicken. But enough knowledge to make a tafseer of the Quran. He himself said that he doesn't know the Hadith which go hand in hand with interpreting the Quran. So he might have used fabricated stories here and there possibly not knowingly but that's the point people who put effort into interpreting the Quran have to have knowledge of the science of Hadith.
I think everyone knows the hadith, when Prophet(SAW) said "Convey(for me), even if it is one ayat". and I am pretty sure hadith commentators say this hadith is addressed to every Muslim. I don't recall Prophet(SAW) say, thing like people who learnt in a proper Madrasah for 7 or 8 or 20 years, only you guys go teach Quran, all other people, just don't.
but that doesnt mean go an interpret the ayat.... the word used is balligu ayah "convey ayah' .. what do you need to convey??? knowledge of tafseer or a good memory??? when you do tableegh you dont interpret... u say what u heard from the chain of narrators the way rasulullah sallallahu alaihi wasallam interpretted...
just because you say you dont have knowledge in hadith it doesn mean he doesnt know any hadith he might not have masterd every hadith but at least he knows 1 hus because i say i dont know how to read arabic that doesnt mean i dont know one or two words
But i like his lectures though😔 He isnt a major scholar but he’s definitely a good daeeya. I think the best thing to do here is to take the good and leave the bad stuff about him. But you are making sense though have to admit. A person who doesnt have knowledge in science of hadith is not qualified to teach the quran...
Taking the good and leaving the bad is a big innovation, how do you know what's good and what's bad? And if you know what's good and what's bad what's the point of listening to them? You already know what they're teaching
Where he studied is unknown and he says aqeedah doesn't matter he clearly doesn't have enough knowledge to take from him and sh fawzan said its obligatory to research the people you take Islamic information from
@@naimulhaque41 I have never listened to NAK. But I have an honest question about this statement, if taking the good and abandoning the evil is an innovation, then do we take from the scholars even if they make an error or can they make no errors?
@@mohammedxiii when we talk about this principle, we are referring from taking good from scholars with DIFFERENT and DEVIANT methodologies. Any scholar from Ahl Al-Sunnah wa Al-Jama’ah can be taken off of so long as his errors are simple errors, not errors in matters of aqeedah or something serious.
lol. What pointless chatter. Of course he is qualified. He's studied Arabic and the Quran for over a decade with reputable scholars. What have you done? Oh, and when he speaks about the quran, I don't fall asleep.
No he isn't, he isn't qualified he stated that himself and made it clear, so you haven't been listening to him attentively, he has already explained that he briefly studied under a Pakistani teacher when he was in America, and he clarified he hasn't studied in a institution I advise you to re-watch all his videos to find that piece of information, also he rejects Hadith (Munkir ul Hadith) as in one of the videos he ridicules the scholars for debating over a issue in Hadith, he is in no position to criticise but like you he has a opinion, if he hasn't invested time looking at the Hadith, he goes by his own interpretations, people who are eloquent speakers attract people like you who can't distinguish truth from falsehood, you run by emotional statement, he doesn't know Arabic so don't speak as if you know what you're talking about.
Just look at all of the divisive comments made here. This video and those similar, do little more than attempt to divide the ummah even further. It makes me wonder if there is some force behind these videos whose sole purpose is to keep the believers disunited.
Iblis is celebrating when a scholar attacking another scholar. So what has he done to correct Nouman personally instead of reveiling his aib publicly in a lecture? May Allah protect us from being the tool of Iblis to divide the ummah.
Go to Darpdf, In the Deviated Sects category there is a book, by one of the scholars of Ahlussunna dealing with Q n A s on deviated paths and sects, Rahimakallahu
This isn't dividing the ummah. This is clarifying truth from falsehood. Like imam ahmed Ibn hanbal stood against hasan al qarabisee who was at it's peak in knowledge. Still imam ahmed Ibn hanbal warned against him & told people not to take ilm from him
Abu Taymiyyah is a strong student of knowledge. NAK is a da'ee. Neither are scholars but the Haqq is with Abu Taymiyyah, and he has the greater knowledge between the two. And Allah knows best.
Naseeha is good, but you speak my mind. Do it privately, directly in person. This is a private class though, but being published for public will create more chaos than good. NAK's Quranic Arabic course is my favorite, at least he made me understand the shortcuts to it from a different angle. Alhamdulillah. I am sure NAK is studying & learning as he admitted learning for him never stops. Not all of us have the chance to study in an Arabic uni, therefore it is great that NAK & many other Ustadz have provided easy classes for beginners.
you people I dont understand you. I dont know if you have the prophet every day on the phone or if you've received a certificate from Allah that you've crossed the sirat. this religion has a broad usool, there are many interpretations for many of the rulings in islam, why dont you stick to yours and leave others in what they are convinced to, instead of dividing the Umma. you are pigs carrying your own ignorance.
Umm, dividing the Ummah, bruhhhh. Is this person dividing the Ummah and when was the last time we were united. 10 years 100 years, when exactly. what unity are you referring to. Because Almost 100 years ago we had the last Khalifate the now Turks but were we united, really. They couldn't even protect the borders the west invading thus country and that country. So what is this unity you speak so fondly of. 😒
+LeadersNotFollowers thats exactly my point, there have been different views in islamic theology and history, it is very hard to find an issue in which the ummah has not disagreed upon... if you beleive in one understanding stick to that, and leave others in their own.
If someone commits a sin in public they have to be advised in public. NAK misinterpreted the Quran and didn't use authentic Ahedith to justify his interpretation. Islam was complete a long time ago, so someone can not come 1400 later with a new interpretation that Ibnu Kathir and Ibn Abass did have. one must understand how to bring the Hadith into the Quran authentic Ahedith not fabricated stories. He knows Arabic but he himself said he does know Hadith and umm Hadith studies and Quranic studies go hand in hand. We have in this deen to correct one another, that's why Allah favored us over the previous Ummahs because we enjoy in the good and forbid the evil. One can get way with misinformation, point blank period.
***** . Because he stated that multiple times in his videos, that he didn't study the sciences of Ahedith. He said it himself, I didn't. And to make tafseer without the knowledge of the sciences of Ahedith is just touch and go. The sciences of Ahedith and the Arabic language go hand in hand unless you are going verbatim of tafseer Ibnu Kathir... There is a video of him using a fabricated story about the companions and plenty of students of knowledge made clarification on that video of his, to the point that the mufti of Saudi and the head of Madina University was called and asked about this ' hedith' that bro NAK used, turns out its not a true story and now these people he was lecture to don't know that story had nothing to do with Islam. It was a story about how one of the companions got jealous from his wife and during salat he started to poke her. This was misinformation at its finest.
He was specifically asked to teach the Muslims here, some lady asked when he was lecturing, and his response to the lady was Aqeedh is not that important and that's how all of this began, a long sides using a fabricated story to justify a Quranic ayah. These were the straw that broke the camel's back. Basically.
I am aware of the whole episode and his response. The lady asked him why he wasn't teaching from a specific Islamic book. The point he was trying to make was that, in the beginning of our journey of seeking knowledge, the Qur'an should always be our foundation from which all other knowledge is based from, then we can branch into more scholarly works on specific subjects in Islam (like kitab at-tawheed for example). I think the clip your talking about is where he said something like asking "where is Allah azzawajal" is not important, in which I agree that was a bit of a blunder (along with the poke hadith), however we all make mistakes and we should overlook this because of all the goodness he has done for our Ummah.
Yes it was a major blunder on his part. How do you know he knows its fake? Did you speak with him? There are plenty of ulama in the ummah today spreading false ahadith unknowingly. No student of knowledge is immune from mistakes. Rather than to assume he is intentionally spreading falsehood, learn from his mistake, correct him if possible, and make dua for him. The good he does far out weights his mistakes and we ask Allah azzawajal to rectify our affairs. Ameen.
Noman Ali Khan and and there are others in his category may not have decades of learning in Islamic sciences are certainly they are not aware of the fine points of Islamic knowledge, but they have proven much more helpful than all of the other religious scholars combined all over the Muslim world that mostly spend time on secterianism. Seeing as things are I would have have become an exMuslim at a point in my life seeing the extent of insanity that exists in this secterianism but alhamdulillah I did not. I found Nomal Ali Khan much later but a lot of other speakers early in my life that portrayed Islam how it needs to be in this age, they are still true to the Islamic faith and its spirit but inline with the needs of this age.
+Yueeiuyoo I agree.before N.A.K, i never want to associate myself with muslim people. Before listening to him,yusha evans and few others, i thought muslim were full of uneducated,backward,rigid,ignorance,uninteresting group of people who blindly follow religion without any critical thinking,like a sheep.I used to be embarrased to be a muslim because i can't relate to anything to what my local imams or ustadh preached.Almost gave up on Islam.N.AK was the one who inspired me to learn more about quran ( with Allah's will).Yes, you are right,he has done more than my local imams,ustadhs or families , in bringing me back to Islam.
THIS IS HIS HELP... i advice you to go through these videos . insha Allah it will benefit you. See when people donot have aqeedah what they become just by reading qur'aan and interpreting it according to their desires and wishes and not according to sunnah of the prophet. 1.NAK's fake pokieman hadith ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-x649t47ZAZQ.html 2. NAK lied about a sahaba changing the word of Qur'aan ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-cSYsplD2EO4.html 3. NAK says Umar RA threw stones on his wife ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ZGQvfx3NiIk.html
This video is dangerous. Is the position only alims can give dawah? Noman admits he is not an alim but he has studied various different tafaseer and is relaying them in an easy to digest form - so what's the issue. If there is an issue with the accuracy of the tafaseer then by all means critique it but just saying don't speak unless you are an alim - where in the Quran or hadith is that? Reading various tafaseer from recognised scholars, relaying them and then giving your opinion on which you most agree with is not speaking without knowledge. I would have an issue with a random coming up with new tafaseer that has never been thought of before and is completely contrary to Islamic principles but otherwise there is no problem.
What a fool you are! Stop your hate speech. I remembered Nouman Ali Khan explained One ayah of the Quran about 6 words long using only AHadith that took about 30 mins to explain. You are not only backbiting you are slandering.
+Mohamed Ali Late in the game. First of all it is not a game to speak ill about scholars. Second, no I am not late you were probably in your diapers when I was studying the Deen and attending Islamic gatherings.
***** I never gave you my resume. You stated I am "late in the game" and I responded. His Aqeedah on what? Aqeedah is a vast topic. Aqeedah could means what he believes in his heart. Generally his Aqeedah is on Ahlul Sunnah wal Jumm'ah. What specifics are you speaking of?
***** not ignoring asking for clarification. What point are you trying to prove? Get to your point please. I don't know on the specifics you speak of. You can listen to and not listen to whoever you want. peace
+Mohamed Ali Akhi, to be honest with you. To learn aqeedah, you go to scholars that specialise in aqeedah. I would rather listen to shaykh Ahmed jibril.
+Mohamed Ali To you there's Hikmah in slandering scholars. Ustadh Nouman does not specialize in AHadith. On the other hand, he has, by his own accounts, studied the Quran in depth for over a decade. There is a science of Quran called Balagha. That is his specialty. He is qualified to speak about the Quran. If you keep going back to this "secret" Aqeedah reference then you are the one with no Hikmah. What is the definition of Aqeedah to you?
The problem with the Ummah now is, we have too many people like you guys, thinks only people with QUALIFICATION have the right to talk. While from the time of Prophet(SAW) till the end of Islamic Golden age, people used to teach each other, what they have learnt from scholars or scholarly books, whether they themselves are scholars or not does NOT matter. As long as they don't make up their own stuff
these kind of talks are egotastic, thinking only my way of understanding is right and then hide your egotastic way by saying I follow the salafs. there's always going to be opinions and difference .follow the basic rules stop ridiculing,slandering
True, not ALL of them are sahih. You also have hasan, da'eef and fabricated. Then there are mutawatir, mawqoof etc. Do your research on hadith from the scholars and their books. It will become clear to you which to follow and which not. BarakAllahu feek.
if one doesnt use authentic hadith to explain ayats and uses their own interpretation as tafser of linguistics of quran than NO. they are not fit to teach. people in the west fall into a trap when it comes to elegant speakers
+jinndot -- The importance of Nouman Ali Khan comes in his knowledge and expertise in the linguistic, etymological and grammatical explanation of the Quran. Only the Salafi-Wahhaabi school of thought has impressed on the unreasonable muslims that no other approach is correct except theirs. I have not found anything of disbelief in Nouman Ali Khan's explanation of the Quran. Matter of fact, I have benifitted more from his talks more than all Neo-Salafis combined. So far as I know, they have yet to match his positive productivity in Daawaah.
You have lost your mind one cannot teach tafseer without knowing the sciences of Hadith. Because Hadith explain the Quranic verses. You in love with BrNAK. Stop insulting people and listen, one cannot be a so called"Quran expert" if they don't have knowledge of Hadith. Quranic studies and Hadith studies go hand in hand. One without the other.
+LeadersNotFollowers --- Assalamu alaikum. Seriously, Sister, what is with you Salafis and this insatiable obsession to refute anything and anyone you don't like? So much that you don't even realize what a tremendous tribulation you are to the Ummah today. What makes you think ONLY you are right and everyone else is wrong? Did you notice your incontrollable drive to counter almost every comment on this page? All these good Muslims; Nouman Ali Khan, Yasir Qadhi, Yusuf Estes, Imran Hosein, etc, whose reputations you Salafis have sought to tarnish over the years have done just as well if not incomparably better in the Daawaah. Sister, nobody is telling you Hadith is unimportant in tafsir. To say so is delusional. What is equally delusional is the dismissal of linguistic and etymological tafsir. Plus do you know how many bogus hadiths are out there? Just look at their flagrant contradiction of the Quran, regardless of how they are graded or who graded them. I do hope one day you Salafis are able to snap out of this arrogant, divisive, self-righteous mindset. By the way, I'm of Salafi leaning, I just detest the labelling other than being a Proud Muslim who believes in Allah, His Angels, His Books and His Messengers. And I sincerely invite you to that Islam.
Soul Inexile . Does NAK know which are fabricated or not. Because there is clear video evidence of him stating something about the Sahabas and everyone and their mom went around asking any scholar of this story. If an individual is in the wrong it's our Islamic duty to correct them. This religion was complete no body can come and add or subtract even if it's BrNAK, or Hosein....
Do you understand what I'm saying bruv? innit. Manz been to saudi like a couple of times learnt arabic and that and manz think i can refute sheikhs that been doing it for decades - y3nee, verily - na3m. Braaap!
He is talking about a mistake that Br NAK made about a specific ayah in the Quran where NAK didn't interpret the verse correctly and also he multiple times dismissed the idea of Aqeedh when people asked him. He said I don't know Aqeedh which is every important to say the least.
