They do ,did you hear about next season they going to put the game currency in the battlepass and they making some ways or credits to help us get skins faster also nerfed roadhog and that other dps yeh they do care 🙂 what else they want them to do more then that plus events
@@Star-py8zlnah since they made the game f2p it just kinda became skilless. One the ranking system is the worst ranking system of any competitive game in existence. Even the devs came out and said it’s a bad system and they never changed it. How you going to have a system that doesn’t tell you if you are losing or gaining SR ? Nerfing road hog was dumb, he wasn’t the problem, Kiriko was, devs don’t know how to balance. They also “ reworked “ Soujourn and she became stronger lmao. When Jeff was head of the dev team game was much smoother, didn’t have everything behind a paywall, and they genuinely cared about the community.
@@fab9207valorant is better than CS lol if you’re talking over game quality. Because it’s so much newer and aspects that weren’t in CS are in it. But in terms of gameplay still prolly CSGO
@@nicestfilms22 Valo's movement is just really bad. It feels slow and sticky. But the main thing that makes CSGO far superior is just the sounds. The crispy smooth sounds just makes it so much more rewarding to shoot and hit heads.
@@Gerkan23 As a game, Overwatch, which is a successor to TF2 in alot of ways is better and skillful than valorant can ever dream of. The team composition that drastically alters the gameplay, the crazy plays you can do etc. Now if we factor in the support the devs pit into the game, valorant is better. Still at the end of the day, Valorant is a mid game carried by the qol features.
@@Gerkan23 Valorant is a fps game to its core meaning as long as you are tuned with traditional fps fundementals, you will do decntly well. Overwatch is a mix of a MOBA and fps menaing you also have to factor in resource management much more than Valorant. By design, it is much more complex than Valorant will ever be. It also has a tank, dps, support distiction. The reason why I said it in that tone is you, having essentilaly no experience and knowledge of Overwatch, said that it was wrong to have Overwatch above Valorant. Now would I ever fault you for liking Valorant more than Overwatch? No, never. Everyone like different things and Valorant is a decent game. Are you wrong for saying Valorant requires more skill than Overwatch? 100% yes becaus you seem to lack basic knowledge about video games.
I mean he is not lying, valorant is slow unlike csgo that its fast, just play csgo and you can feel the difference in gameplay, i played csgo for 5 years but recently im not playing it anymore because im currently playing valorant with my friends, i still play csgo time to time but just playing valorant is slow compared to csgos gun play
@@needstoast one of his reasons was that valorant is slow. It’s a tactical shooter of course it’s going to be slow compared to overwatch. That’s not really a good reason.
@@Ex3ox Val is a rip off of cs but cs feels faster. Valorant isn’t just a slow shooter, if feels slow as a tactical shooter too. It feels like the slowest game on the market honestly.
@@brown9671 its not a rip off though val has ults agents with different abilities satisfying kills and a much more harder but funner shooter game to learn just because you dont like slowed paced shooters doesn’t mean anyone else wouldnt either.
@@tylerxic3241 val is based off cs like 90%. and sure theres ults and abilities, but honestly theres only like 4 types of abilities in val which are just csgo smokes, flashes. val has movement abilites that cs doesnt but cs has bhop and surf. val IS a rip off you cant debate it, not even heavy inspiration, like riot intentionally was trying to make csgo2: hero shooter edition.
“Content is everything, its nice to play a game where it feels like the devs actually care about the community” totally not blizzard that killed ow1 by not updating for 3 years and screwed up the release of ow2 and made literally everyone mad
They didnt say which is a better shooter, they were comparing 2 games on the level of fun…and you can compare even red dead rdemption to need for speed for the fun you get from the games
@@FireDarkNinja the problem with that is because the feeling is not the game, it’s then. In years when valorant is a game and the people who grew up with it will say the same damn thing
Plus the main reason is nostalgia, he said it himself that hes playing cs for most of this life which means no matter what, it’s gonna have a special place in his heart
@@Harry_D0 And in my opinion that's 100% ok. Games provoke a certain feeling in us and sometimes those opinions are biased and inseparable from our minds. It will continue to happen and that's fine by me.
Overwatch's core gameplay is one of the most fun gameplay out there, the problem is just that blizzard abandoned it, hopefully overwatch 2 is supported.
@@holymotherofchicken Wasn't a dev issue. Leaks said basically Blizzard Execs were responsible for the thing. They didn't give the devs enough time or resources to actually get the game done because they realized the pve wouldn't be long time profit.
@@AnikethBanditbh it’s all Bobby’s idea who did this repeatedly so the ow team would get so much hate while Bobby is basically protected from all the hate nah that didn’t work out he got exposed
S-tier for tf2 plz. Survived without major updates for 1000+ days, successfully fought back against the Bot Invasion, stayed alive for more than 13 years, etc.
S-tier for you and a lot of hardcore fans but definitely more of a cult classic these days than universally loved. it's not going to be at that level for everyone.
@@Karr1711 valorant lost a lot of players when ow2 released. i've been playing val since june 2021 with ~800 hours and $200 spent but overwatch has just been infinitely more captivating
@@puretestoster1 thats fine. everyone got his own taste. i just think it`s stupid to say stuff like "ow is infinetly more fun", acting like it`s objective when it`s obvisiously not.
I love people who are playing all competetive games for like 10 hours, they dont learn mechanics of the games, but they are doing tier list and talking like experts.
I was gonna say some shit like "what are they on ? smh" until I realised the place they gave to Fortnite and CoD so I don't even want trying to argue with psychopaths
CoD is great tho. Fortnite not so much but CoD is a classic for a reason. Great gameplay, great story. Val is meh on both. Still my most played game but I can see it’s faults clearly.
Sorry but overwatch is infinitely more interesting than valo. Overwatch's variety is unmatched. Every hero feels very different, they have very different abilities and weapons like swords/bows, accurate snipers, cryo cannons, healing/damage boosting staves, wall climbing, wall riding, and a lot more. Most valo characters just have a smoke with minor tweaks, a movement ability, a grenade, one ability that actually feels unique and the exact same weapon mechanics
Fr these boomers clearly have strong opinions about games, glasses guy is getting real emotion about a game he doesn’t play. Calling valorant slow is only something a hater of the game would say. Someone is just a little upset about another games success
@@bhawkis5755 Valorant is extremely slow. Just like CSGO. Your job (very vaguely said) is to either hold a position for minutes on end or push that position via smokes, flashes and different tactics. Both the attacked and the deffender need to spend unfun resources like flashes and smokes, that damage/stun/blind the opponent so they can take or deffend the 1 point you want. Thats not fast. Thats extremely slow. Atleast compared to Overwatch or lets say Call of Duty. Can you sprint in Valorant? No. Can you dash/slide in Valorant? I think only the dagger girl can do that. And if we are talking straight up from POV of who did more for gaming, Overwatch or Valorant its not even a question. Overwatch, TF2 and CSGO is literally the only reason Valorant exists.
@@kikirix184 yes…but Valorant isn’t slow unless your duelists are ass…you should be executing onto site really quickly and getting the bomb planted before the enemy team knows what hit them. Post plant is slower…but Valorant is not a slow game.
Yeah, the balance system and shitty teammates really ruin the tactical aspect of valorant. You can only really hope to be strategic and tactical starting from high plat or high diamond, depending on your personal expectation of tactical
Amen. I'm playing rn but honestly i'll stop soon and just watch Ascension and League because i'll be busy and rather watch and have fun, than play and suffer for an ounce of fun of the latter.
It comes to the point where there always be that one player who take the game too seriously even rage and blaming teammates in an UNRATED or SPIKE RUSH MATCH! I play the game mostly just for fun now, but these kind of players ruin it for everyone.
@@Bootymuncher23 yeah i mean as a former cs player i know how easy valorant is as a game, i just never found ow to have harder fundamentals than cs/val but then again i never was a hardcore ow gamer so idk
It does when u reach plat, diamond, gm, and top500 ranks Like high ranks on ow are pretty skilled since u need strategy and teamwork to win While in valorant I can do whatever tf u want even solo the entire game yea u can work as a team but u can solo the entire match and win which most of my teammates in valo think they are the next tenz lol they aren’t they stupid
I normally like listening to Dimitri’s takes but this one is odd. What does “slow and stodgy” even mean in this context? Is it because Val is not this robotically and unnatural smooth CS movement he is accustomed to?
As a CS player who played and watched a bit of Val, it mostly comes down to the pace of the game and the meta. I know Val is still “somewhat new” and haven’t had enough time to add in enough new characters to truly diversify the meta. It just that most teams just play the same strats and characters that it feels just “slow and stodgy.” Like, you already know how most round will likely end if you played it long enough and know the game very well. In CS, yeah we have most teams using same strat setup, but there will often be times where the unexpected happens. Such as C9 winning the 2018 Boston Major, Outsiders winning the this years Rio Major, Astralis changing the overall meta of the game from late 2018 (iirc), and so on. This is just my opinion but CS doesn’t give you a ceiling cap, and let’s you be the beast that you made yourself into. While Val just feels like it capped a lot of player potential based on the character/role they are playing. Where a support player may have a moment where they can pop off to a level unseen in the game, if they had the right tools during that game/round. But ultimately got their potential restrained due to the role they are playing and the limited tools they have.
@@DumDumPost nah I got like 2.5k hours in cs and prob 1k in val at this point and I feel it's the complete opposite. Especially at higher ranks. CS feels so much of the exact same. Same strats, smokes and positions. You can pretty much predict how rounds will go. Slow defaults into executes in the last 30 seconds. Yawn. That's the reason why Val is more fun to me now. There's an extra element of abilities to add an extra element of unpredictability and an extra chance to outplay someone
@@samuelscott25 I feel like you didn’t get what I was saying. I already stated that both games will follow a certain meta and the same executes. Regardless of which comp shooter you play, there will also be certain meta and execution, you would do repeatedly and it will feel the same. The issue comes down to the pacing and overall ability of the team (and the players themselves) to execute all of their skills. In CS, there is pretty much no skill ceiling for the game. Or another way of putting it, there is no in-game shackle put on the player. You want to be an entry fragger but also a support player? Go ahead. Be an AWPer and an IGL? I don’t see any problems with that. You want to take on multiple roles, such as AWPing, entrying, and IGL? Go at it, brother. Even if someone can reach that ceiling, it is pretty damn high. You'll always be lacking something in a specific area. And all the tools to make you a better player are always available for you to practice with. This also equates to higher chances of unpredictability happening in tournaments (and better viewership numbers). On the other hand in Val, they already cap your skill ceiling to a certain degree (as it currently stands). Or simply put, the game actively puts shackles on players. Forcing them to dedicate themselves to specific roles/characters and does not allow flexibility of trying anything else mid-game/mid-tournament, decreasing the overall chances of unpredictability. And the characters themselves have specific and limited tools to work with. What’s more is if Riot doesn’t make sure each of their characters is well-balanced enough, it just becomes the same old boring mess. With the meta, character selection, and execution almost being the exact same or similar thing. Causing predictability to go up when you know which characters are being played. The only thing left that remains unpredictable is what new characters Riot is going to add, the tools that the character has, the balancing Riot is going to do, and how broken they are when actually being played in tournaments. With limited tools and restraints placed on players, it becomes pretty 'slow and stodgy' as you can guess which characters are going to get played, how they are going to be played, and waiting to see who will mess up first. Right now, Val has the benefit of still being new, still being developed, and having the feeling that the game still has more content to come (which it does, but could change in the future). Even though it is a hero-based competitive tact shooter, there are still some flaws in Val gameplay that can't be easily overlooked. Thus, why I said what I said. Edit: if you want me to clarify it further, let me know. I’m currently studying game design and right now I’m studying the part of influencing player’s decisions making. Edit 2: I should also note that update for CS takes centuries to happen until Val came in. Really thankful that Riot made Val. With competition from Riot, we will also see updates on map pool in CS and possibly new stuff happening in CS.
@@DumDumPost roles don’t limit what you can or can’t do tho. IGLs have played all roles, including duelist, and many players have dedicated themselves to being able to play every role at a tier 1 level, which is extremely hard. We also had people OP on characters besides Jett and chamber and made it work in pro play. And the game is extremely unpredictable. It is really really hard to read the enemy team’s consistently, and to overcome this pros will mainly rely on their ability to adapt through protocols and by understanding how a specific team likes to play (anti stratting). There are always “meta comps” but there are tons of variations that will switch up the play style and there are always teams who try something new and innovate or change the meta. There are also teams that just straight up switch their team comp to throw off anti strats. Also in Valorant there is no dominant region like there is in cs. In csgo Europe basically wins everything but in Val in only 2 years of competition has had numerous wins from both Europe and NA plus a win for the Brazilians. Other regions that would be considered minor regions like South Korea, SEA, and LATAM regularly place in the top 4.
It's easy to tell what's happening in Valorant because they sit still for 1 minute then use all their abilities in the span of 30 seconds and then it resets
Been playing valorant since it released and honestly every content creator is the same, they have to fight God himself to find an idea that isn’t clips
As a person who played many years of CS-Go, and watched few of their videos, I’m glad these people don’t do any content with valorant, they have no clue what they talking about in their reviews and you just can’t get your time back wasted on these ppl that think they good at analyzing esports.
Dmitri has talked about Valrlorant in the past when the game was still under a year old, and let's just say, it didn't have the impact the org hoped for. And ever since, he's been biting his tongue a lot because he keeps getting his teeth kicked in every time he tries to talk about it. It actually shocked me that he'd talk about Valorant in that way when he's been called out and corrected in the past, but hey, controversy brings consumers, so I can see why they keep the guy around even though he's so disliked.
The more skillful part sent me. Val and overwatch are two vastly different games but the skill ceiling in Val is much higher do to the individual impact you can have on a game. OW is more about constantly changing and adapting your heroes in certain situations which is why you have more compositions in overwatch. The problem I have with the game is that it’s flat out not balanced, and some agents are far more limited in comparison to others. Where as in Valorant, no matter what, the better players will always win despite team comp because literally the skill difference is far more noticeable from low elo to high. A lot of things and mechanics are very streamlined in OW.
@@IronMan-jj2fd the ez to master part feels very misleading. Because it really depends on the type of player you are. There’s so many different tempos to Valorant and timing is probably the most important quality in both games. OW is FAR more predictable tho and it’s way easier to see why you’re losing or winning. In Val the most minute things could give you the advantage and it’s far more unpredictable on how the flow of the match can turn. Even if you’re down 12-1 in Val you still have a chance to win. In OW that rarely happens because the tempo of the game is fairly consistent in almost every elo.
@@CanadianKomodo that’s definitely not true. I do agree though that team comp has a bigger role in OW but that’s where all the skill is. You can jump around and move so freely in overwatch while be completely accurate the whole time (some heroes don’t even require much aim) but in Val it’s far focused on gun play and spray control. You have to strafe in between your shots. There’s the rare instances of run and gun but even that has counter play to it. Overwatch has a very linear and easy to follow tempo where’s Val’s timings are usually pretty varied due to the nature of its rounds system.
@@bagasadityanugroho3055 i mean... Shroud, a legend of cs:go and very good at valorant being stuck in gold says something... why??? Because ow is a multifaceted team-based oriented game, it's not just pointing at heads and click
@@bagasadityanugroho3055 u doesn't read anything and still can't admit that val is so generic n replaceable, but ok, you want to be stupid and keep giving yourself the autolike? Ok 🗿
@@deadersurvival4716 you buggin if you think riot dont listen to the valo community...they just wont do certain thnigs like add workshop or replay system which sucks...other then that the fix bugs lightning fast , update agent abilities which till now have been met with universal praise...
@@rafsanmahdin885 my dude, they don't even fix bugs or listen to their community in their biggest IP of League, and in most cases, add more without fixing anything. While I may have been joking, that doesn't mean I wasn't right.
@@yuyah7413 I mean, your life is sad and we laugh at that. Dry sarcastic humor ain't gotta be funny. It's just gotta be painfully true to people who are capable of being the punchline.
Even tho I have invested lots of time to playing Valorant (even some money) and I really enjoyed the game, my problem with it is the lack of new content. You see games like Overwatch with the community Workshop you have INFINITE possibilities and ideas, you can't get bored of that, but Valorant just added Swifplay like 2 years late lmao, Riot has some serious work to do to keep up right now
I personally believe Valorant is a WAY more interesting watch than Overwatch for a reason he mentioned: Valorant is a very deliberate game. So watching what people do and knowing that what they're doing is absolutely intentional is a really big draw for me as someone that wants to improve at the game.
Its like the difference between watching a pro and amateur fighting game player. Val, you know that they are very intentional in their game play. OW feels like an amateur player that most of the time spams but gets a lucky play. This is how I see both games when I watch them
It’s the same with ow you just don’t understand overwatch, but ow gets the bonus factor of high action pov, seeing the best do what they do is like an art form. But valorant is 100% a better to watch esport even if you know overwatch in and out. Valorant is so methodical it’s kinda boring to me tho. Sort of like basketball vs football (American) which so you like more.
Youre mom is. Valo is like a ph now. Only BS happens there. Csgo is for real man 👍 Csgo: toxic community which prepares you for real world Valo: get a kill and ill say uWu, TOTAL BS
That’s so odd that he said he’d rather watch OW but play Valo, because I feel the opposite lmao. Showing someone clips from OWL they get so confused because bullets and ability effects just fill the screen. You understand what’s happening while you’re playing but watching someone else is difficult sometimes. Valorant on the other hand, I think is much easier to watch because there’s not so much clutter and the fights are more precise, less chaotic.
The thing about overwatch is it’s so damn unique no game has been able to replicate the same feel and flow in the gameplay and the ones that tried either feel clunky or lower quality
In term of game design, OW is a better game. OW was made for fun. Valorant is a decent, healthy game (strong foundation). Valorant was born with competitive mindset. So, depend on what aspect are we rank them on.
Mmmm… okay so I don’t really agree. And I’ve played both games religiously. I see the appeal in both games. I just personally wouldn’t put Overwatch over Valorant. Overwatch is a fun game yes. I just feel like Valorant is better in more ways than Overwatch.
i think if u strip away the qol and the more reliable dev involvement in val overwatch is definitely the more fun + interesting higher skill cap game. its a shame blizz is a small indie company 😢
Nah he's just correct. Said nice things about valorant but it's in no way compared to overwatch and when it comes to competing csgo dunks on valorant. I dont even like csgo either and I like valorant lmao.
True, plays and lineups are cool to watch and at this time valorant was still yeah a bir choppy but fun if you let it and actually fast paced. So theres no time to look at stuff unless your quick with it. No offense to anyone :3
@Kiyoung. It's not an opinion, though. Riot no longer makes games that are meant to be fun. They make algorithms that dish out dopamine hits to keep you playing a shit game that you only started playing because your favorite streamer got paid to say, "It's good guys" so they can charge you $160 for the color blue and now you can't stop playing because of the sunk cost fallacy 🤡
Overwatch is only good if you’re playing with a 5 stack of competent players against a non sweaty team, in my opinion, valorant allows for much goofier tactics to work instead of the meta which I prefer
no this is so wrong it makes me question if you ever played ow. you can get away with more bs in ow than in val cause of how much you have to tryhard in val compared to ow.
i like to play valorant as a warmup and play overwatch, it gets my brain going and starts setting me up to yell slurs when I die to a moira bhopping while holding right click
Once Overwatch becomes balanced, then Overwatch outmatches Valorant in terms of Fun. But at the moment Valorant is way more balanced than Overwatch making Valorant better.
I never got to play OW pre bap and brig release but from what I've seen and heard, the golden age of OW was one of the highest peaks in gaming. Even when I did start playing I knew everything was scuffed in high ranks but being low rank no one knew what they were doing and all the pixel and ability effects made it all seem fun.
@@Lucas-ro6zf Then you didn't play Overwatch enough. Valorant is just so slow and Overwatch is confusing for new and semi-experienced players. Overwatch has much much more team based aspect to it where Valorant is more about egotistic values.
"Like developers actually gave a shit" did not age well for Overwatch 💀 Edit: And CoD, tf2, apex. Really most AAA game companies dont care about satisfying their consumers anymore. Of course there are exceptions. The dev team of the souls games (and thus elden ring) and gearbox (developer of Borderlands) and the devopers of Horizon and God of war they all care about money too, but they REALLY want to deliver a game that really validates that Triple A pricetag. Honourable mention: Deep rock galactic. The chance of anyone that worked for that masterpiece sees this comment is slim. But you lot are the absolutely biggest chads of developers out there. Keep doing what you do best and deliver that satisfying game. For rock and stone comrades.
Bro I hate this guy who said abt valorant, it's totally opposite. Ow is harder in terms of team while valorant is more harder in terms of individual skill. Combining ultimate in valo is piece of cake while ow2 is very hard. So imo they both different to compare
Ow is significantly harder than valorant in terms of "skill". Movement is much crazier in ow and there is a lot of y axis aiming. Valorant shines more in terms of strategy, and thinking
Nah that’s copium. Valorant you hold angles and is 90% cross hair placement. Any game like OW or Apex where every enemy character has Jett movement and more makes tracking and aiming at high pace more difficult. Mechanically OW is a harder game than valorant.
"When it comes to watching it, id rather be playing it." He just sums up what makes a game good. Also, Valorant is not csgo and vice versa. To act as if theyre the same is braindead
" its nice to play a game where it feels like the devs actually give a shit " Valorant: literally updates the game almost once every 2 weeks Overwatch: decides to get rid of Overwatch 1 after not updating Overwatch 1 for 3 years making players mad about their loot boxes being opened in Overwatch 2
So true, valorant has balance reworks that invent new more open metas every other week. While overwatch created brigiette who might actually be the most busted character in videogame history as she single handedly annihilated one of the most popular competitive video games off the face of the earth for numerous years... but yeah sure ig blizz gives a shit lol
Well tbh for a person with a low powered laptop VALORANT is the only game i can genuinely play properly. I would love to play other games but you see i just can't
@@WsG82 csgo is a more difficult game from the ground up. Momentum based movement, less randomized spray patterns. Everyone can do the same thing. You dont have inherent advantages just by choosing the right character. riots so smart they added a character who doesnt even need to participate in the economy fully.
@@mashur4880 It's not more difficult at all because the ceiling for a casual player ain't that high. Same maps , same nades , same peeks. Momentum based movement ? You mean the same counterstrafe that you do in valorant(i know you don't have to) or the bunnyhops which are not that consistent on cs:go compared to 1.6. More characters = diversity in games which lead to fun teamplays and weird combos. To each his own at the end of the day.
@@WsG82 i think youre confusing floor and ceiling. As casual players never get close to any skill ceiling. They have a skill floor. Valorants skill floor is much lower. The counterstrafing in csgo is a skill that is required to make it out of nova. In valorant you let go of movement keys, thats the quickest way to stop your movement and be 100% accurate. You can watch professional players in both games take fights very differently. Valorant allows many more mistakes because of the abilities that compensate for poor positioning. In csgo, you have two options. Commit to the fight, or go somewhere else. You cant tap a or d to take corners like a snail in csgo. You can in valorant. That makes the games skill floor lower. Alongside the lack of needed map knowledge as the first four maps valorant released were hallways and boxes made of paper. Higher randomized sprays, a flat economy, characters that dont even need to participate in said economy. A power curve to characters because balancing hero shooters is impossible. Easier to use weapons, ie sheriff/marshall. (The csgo counterparts dont get nearly the same value)
@@slayzet4293he said CSGO is more fun than valorant, it's a tier list of the most fun games according to them. Why are you all valorant players so pressed?
@@alexandervillar7742 im replying to someone, not to the video. When did Chris said anything about which game is more fun than other? He is stating his own opinion and im replying with my own opinion.
that extra content is the reason i get headaches from playing it. the extra stuff gets boring real quick and id rather have reliable mechanics than it.
@@baremangus3576 please, tell me what other shooter game is more complex and tactical than Valorant that the devs care about, cus clearly there’s plenty out there from what I can take from your comment
@@circle7489 Damn brutha I’ve played that but here I was waiting for a whole list of at least 4 games. Honestly, they’re both heavily skilled base and imo, r6 is definitely more tactical but not more complex than Valorant.
I love valorant and tbh I think it takes way more skill than overwatch at least at a ranked level if you make mistakes you get punished very quickly and in ow you have more flexibility in what you can do and how you can position you can whiff more than 2 bullets without dying instantly in ow I don’t hate ow or think it’s bad but I do think that there is way more room for error
Overwatch only has a few skill based heroes, while the other 9/10 of the cast gets value simply by picking the character. Valorant is more mechanically intensive than those 9/10 characters, but not the 1/10 ones.
true but also thats what makes it boring. in ow the characters are all extremely different while in val the characters are different but not as much. you can succeed with any character while in ow the gameplay is funner cause of how diff the characters are.
Factually untrue, the only character that always gets value by being picked, and that is actually good, is probably just Roadhog. Everyone else is either situational, too bad to get value from unless you're God or opponents aren't bad themselves, or is gimmicky and becomes pretty bad if played around. Then there's the characters that require game awareness, good/character specific aiming, matchup knowledge, techs etc.
@@brando440 I also think Overwatch is more fun because like I said, it is mechanically easier for most characters and has a more loose, arcade feel. Valorant is a more competitive game (at least it used to be) because every player is held to the same standard when facing other opponents
@@eggwuheggwuheggwuh tell me what's wrong about any of my statements? You one of those who think Roadhog=not good bc he's not a dive tank or something? Mind giving some examples of characters that get value just for being picked, and that don't require character specific aiming/movement or are just gimmicks?
I find that when I play valorant there is never a rushing round. I've never played a round where we rush the site. And I think it's because the game is designed to punish any form of aggression. And I think that's what they mean by it being a slow game. At least in CS:GO you'll have rounds where you rush the site and actually have hope of taking it. Instead of being bombarded by annoying abilities and completely shut down.
@@evvis8191have you watched any competitive valorant games? Nobody rushes. I mean absolutely nobody. Why? The game heavily favors positioning over everything and the maps are made for a slower pace. In CSGO the game has a faster movement and lacks abilities which means you can get places faster as a team and as a solo. So yes, you can rush in valorant but it's probably the worse strategy.