Is the LEFT Willing to Sacrifice the Poor to Save the Planet? w/ Jordan Peterson 

You're correct!! I make a lot of money without relying on the government. Investing in stocks and digital currencies is beneficial at this moment.

Thanks for the advice! I'm new to financial planning and wasn't sure where to start. Any tips on finding a reliable financial adviser or resource to guide beginners?

As a beginner, it's essential for you to have a mentor that is verified by finra and SEC to keep you accountable. I'm guided by a widely known financial consultant Stacey Macken

Stacey demonstrates an excellent understanding of market trends, making well informed decisions that leads to consistent profit

I remember giving her my first savings $20000 and she opened a brokerage account for me it turned out to be the best thing that ever happened to me.

Amen

No, it’s about who’s right and who’s wrong. Those who follow and those who are free thinkers.

Yes. Both left and right have been compliant in what's happening. The globalists are not political except in the sense of corrupting both left and right as a way of controlling us.

Yes, but in the final analysis it is about truth versus untruth. Evil/untruth have no existence in itself.

"I did my part by having you stop using resources."

Neither are the middle class, ironic that they posture so much and say "Wow its so bad that poor people suffer" while going about their lives consuming like a mindless zombie.

OMG OMG YES!!! That is so... childish. Can you science aliterates please come up with some other silly saying?

@@scottekoontz Climate cult.

@@sebastianrodriguez8692 I don't think the deniers are in a climate cult, but since they are easily sucked into tin-foil ideas and conspiracies that may be an OK term. I prefer to call them 'science aliterates' since they have access to info but refuse to read it.

Bro really spelled illiterate wrong

It's not just the climate. It's the whole of the environment including biodiversity preservation/ flourishing etc. - BUT (I believe ?) the climate is focused upon because of its ability to get ppl's attn as they otherwise may not care enough about the rest. (Ie loss of species of plants, insects, animals etc. - altho this does obvs affect our food chain! Tho perhaps even that isn't enough for the masses..?) it's all interconnected tho (as obvs the loss of rainforests affects both diversity of species AND the balance of carbon situ - esp. when land is cleared to make room for cattle farms etc. which makes things worse because of the methane emissions from cattle etc which all contributes too..) this is my understanding (more or less). But focussing on a single issue , which is only the tip of the iceberg (like Catholics with abortion sometimes I feel) can skew the whole thing.. there is SO MUCH more.. which anyone is free to look into for themselves.. "seek & you will find" ✌️🌿🙏🌈🤗 The truth is out there. Somewhere between total acceptance (of the 'party line') & total denial (ie dismissing it as just a 'climate cult'... ) 🌟💫✌️✨

I don't recall St. Pius X (or any Pope) ever saying climate change wasn't real 🤔

😱

If Peterson thinks like a Catholic, why does he flatly contradict the papal magisterium going back to St John Paul II with his political talking points?

but i think he is now. Rumors have been surfacing that he’s seriously exploring conversion to Christianity. And his chosen denomination is the Catholics. But, I dunno if the rumors are true.

@@nozrepThat is really exciting and I’m not surprised. Jordan did a great interview with Bishop Barron and Father Mike Schmitz a few weeks ago. This would be so wonderful ❤

I would say he has more of the wisdom of the christian gnostics.

From what I understand small modular reactors (SMR) powered by thorium seem like a great idea. Liquid fluoride thorium reactors are a type of reactor that can be made into an SMR which might be the best solution.

it’s not out?

Don’t confuse confidence with snobbery. Matt has realized the fulfillment of Christs teaching. I hope you do too some day

Goodwill.

He should have online merchandise. 👍

I think one of the major arguments against UBI is the fact that it may cause prices to go up and then the UBI won't be enough anymore, not to mention the amount of control that it could possibly allow over the people who are dependent on it. And not all poor people are poor due to uncontrollable circumstances. Some of them are poor because they don't make good decisions (financially or otherwise) so even with UBI some people will still be poor. Productivity might decrease due to people choosing not to work, which means goods and services as well as infrastructure could become less reliable. Also as a side note I believe the idea of Universal Basic Income is that it would be given to all people regardless of financial status otherwise it would essentially just be a form of welfare. In which case it may disproportionately benefit the wealthy as they would not be dependent on it and instead it could just be extra income. UBI would undoubtedly disincentivize a lot of people from working, though the ones who did continue to work would likely benefit significantly. I'm not an expert or particularly well read on the subject so these are just some loose points that I've heard in the passing. I personally don't know how good or bad UBI would actually be.

When it comes to the topic of this conversation/segment - green/left environmental policies - that concern makes sense. Could you elaborate what's the problem that you seems to have with this segment ?

@@HoradrimBR twice JP berated Pope Francis elsewhere and at one time he said the pope is a baal worshiper. Acting tough I presume. I know for certain he never read Laudato si.

@@ladislausvmap St. Malachy & nostrudamus did say to be warry of this pope or the one that replaces him wouldn't suprise me if he did worship beal 1 of 6 6 being legion

@@kor-cv9uz Nostradumas did not prophecy anything it is just people reading into what he wrote or thought about. If God loses faith in his promise then it is not God. If your prophercy goes against God then it is not a prophecy it's just thoughts. The Holy Spirit protects the church to the end of time, that is what God said not a fake prophet.

​@@kor-cv9uzas if Nostradamus was infallible 😂😂😂 what will it take for you to finally open your eyes and realize that the Prophecy of St. Malachi is a forgery that wasn't created by him?

So what? He made the money it wouldn’t exist without him

​@@chickentoucher55I'm pretty sure the Federal Reserve created it

We are at the highest atmospheric CO2 concentration in 14M years. Gods, please save us from the boastful science aliterates.

@@scottekoontz your point is? CO2 levels were 400 ppmpv 14-20 million years ago. The average yearly temperature was much colder during the ice age too, was it not? Did you know 540 million years ago the CO2 levels were around 7,000 ppmpv, higher than they are today? The average yearly temperatures was around 70° F. There were trees growing as far north as arctic circles. How's that a bad thing? Today, measuring the CO2 in the atmosphere outside my home it's 425 ppmpv. Simply pointing out the levels are 25 parts higher today than they were 14 million years ago means nothing to me. You make it sound like it's a bad thing. Yet 540 million years ago the CO2 levels in the atmosphere were more than 7,000 ppmpv. Plus humans weren't around 540 million years ago to blame. Someone please explain to me how an increase in 25 parts per million per volume of CO2 in the atmosphere over 14 million years makes this point valid? How (science aliterates) I mean illiterate are you? Aliterates is not even a word in any English dictionary. Talk about a pot calling kettle black.

@scottekoontz Apparently, we listen to different scientists. There is no crisis. We have plenty of time to adapt. The day Barak Obama decided not to fund climate studies that did not support the preferred climate narrative proved to me that the political class and not scientists were running the show. That's the day I stopped listening to them. Climate change is natural. The Earth has gone through many changes, none of which were caused by humans. We don't need to kill ourselves to save the planet. It's not going anywhere.

@@ronaldkemp3952 *aliterate Learn this word, stop back... aliterate who cannot be bothered to look up a simple word. Talk about an aliterate owning himself.

@@ronaldkemp3952 "Someone please explain to me how an increase in 25 parts per million per volume of CO2 in the atmosphere over 14 million years makes this point valid?" 50% increase since the 1800s. Golly, that's not a problem.

First minute..

👑 Long live the first comment!

I suppose to spend time not working for money, and continuing to bring guest's on and trying to bring the message of the Gospel to people would mean he needs to have money to support a wife and family and sometimes I think helps financially to bring people to the show. Don't all RU-vid or in many cases other social media platforms people use to get out their message ask for support to be able to continue the work ?

Who’s saving the planet though? You? Me? The world powers?

@@AnneMB955 Not my point- my point is that from the left’s perspective- if your choice is to not “save” the planet and everyone dies, OR, take measures to save the planet but create great hardships for the poor but at least humanity lives, you’re going to choose the latter. And not because you hate the poor, but because it was regrettably the only solution you could come up with. (I don’t think it will come to that anyway. I think we will come up with other solutions)

He’s been clear that it’s the latter.

@@Diallelus But he says that leftists purported goals are helping the poor and oppressed. Does Peterson think they’re lying about these goals then?

@ah59817 Back when I was a young person, Democrats were always talking about helping the poor and disadvantaged. No longer.

@@ah59817 “Socialists don’t care about the poor. They just hate the rich.” - Jordan Peterson

@@Diallelus So yes, he does think they’re lying? Idk if you know many socialists, but that isn’t what they would tell you is their motivations

you are wrong.. clearly you have an "agenda" behind.. I live in UE and I have friends in Germany also.. Shut down nuclear power when Russia (or USA) blown the gas pipe that provided cheap gas, it was very stupid and intecionally harmfull to germany.. Germany was only the "motor" of UE and a very well industrialized country, because of cheap energy.. when you took that away, the only path to Germany is down now!! and I worked on wind field (in germany also), I know very well the impacts that this technology has on the environment and how EXPENSIVE is.. and besides, you need a HUGE wind farms to provide the same has a nuclear plant.. renewables energy are NOT the way, as you think it is, to "go green".. don´t try to make everybody stupid here, not everybody is sleeping

renewables couldn't never accommodate for a country like Germany you guys were warned that this green energy thing was only making you guys dependent on Russian, now you energy is expensive, you are depended on russia energy, yours effort of redusing the polution was meaningless because of China and India and you dont have nuclear power

Rather than ad hominems and red herrings, maybe it would be more useful to explain why you think he is wrong in his analysis. Cheers!

@@eddiehagood5316 my father and I worked in the toxic gas analysis industry, certified instruments with the US EPA. I also conducted research in soil pollution. The fact is even if you have a safe truck based reactor, you still need to safely transport fuel and waste. Remember the half life of nuclear fuel is in decades and sometimes centuries. Where is the waste going to go where it cannot be a danger? And even safe reactors fail, look at the lab in California, Three Mile Island, and Chernobyl. The facts are I have much more experience then him, I also have a college degree in life sciences. Chemistry, Physics, Biology, Anatomy, and more.

@@stevengoldstein114 of course there is serious care that must be taken with nuclear. Considering that the US currently has 54 active nuclear power plants and your examples of failure go back decades point to a pretty solid success rate.

@@eddiehagood5316 Your information is out of context. The fact is many reactors are decommissioned because they are becoming unsafe. The number of operating U.S. nuclear reactors peaked at 112, and their combined net summer electricity generation capacity was 99,624 megawatts. The number of operating reactors declined to 104 in 1998 and remained there through 2013. The number declined to 92 operating reactors in 2022. Total U.S. nuclear net summer electricity generation capacity peaked in 2012 at about 102,000 MW and declined to 94,765 MW in 2022. The facts are there are no proven designs for portable reactors, and there is not proven safety of dealing with the nuclear fuel and waste. Correct?

@@stevengoldstein114 as someone with no dog in this race, looking at the stats of how closely regulated they are… it does feel even more safe than I had thought. Knowing that some get safely decommissioned before they reach an unsafe status is fairly reassuring.