@@akk3392 haha, for those few seconds he covers a lot and he presents it in an interesting manner. Even two hours won't be enough the whole car in depth. Definitely he has to choose what he'll leave out.
The cool thing about Bentley's too is they save the excess wood that is put into your car .So if you ever have an accident and it get's damaged, they ship the excess to match the rest.
I wanted to say that bentely copied Rolls-Royce and at Rolls-Royce you can chose what engine capacity you want and how many horse power you want . And you can make how you want(interior and exterior )there are a lot of other reasons to buy a Rolls-Royce
@@karagiannisbogdan1385 those are quite redundant things to mention, they make little difference overall. Compared to the competition rolls Royce has been falling behind for a few years now. The technology is behind their competitors, the features are lacking in comparison, and the looks are mediocre at best (the rear end is ugly). The Bentley flying spur and the Mercedes maybach options are far superior even when ignoring the price disparity, and you’ll also have enough money leftover to buy a Lamborghini Huracan for the weekends.
Always remember folks this is just an A8 with better smell and wood with a 150k added to the the price and the rolls is just a bmw 7 with the better etc and 400k added on top.bmw and vw really have these new kids with money fooled
Man you are awesome. You get all the info across in a detailed, efficient, and entertaining manner. You could probably make a 10 minute video and I’d watch the whole thing through. Keep it up man.
In a way they both work hand in hand. One gives you the quick overlook, and once the viewer bug inside us wants to know more we go search the car and doug pops up. He prob helps dougs views spike up
Ik right. These shorts are great I even watch the ones about cars I’m not even interested in, he very entertaining and the info is quick and digestible.
@@shanekuchler9569 that’s not the point. You said 220k for 25 miles of electric drive time as if that’s the only source of power it has, completely forgetting about all its features and a Bentley combustion engine in order to exaggerate your idea of its worthlessness.😹
The maintenance cost will exceed the price of the car within 7-10 years. My family unfortunately knows from experience. Even if you have $220,000 don’t buy one. Lease it.
This is my dream car. I love having this car because the gas powered flying spur consumes a lot of fuel because of the engine size. The W12 flying spur have a 15 mpg in the US/19 mpg in the UK.
I'm gonna tell you about an even better deal than this Bentley. The $5,000-$20,000 mid-00s Volkswagen Phaeton, which in itself, is a casually dressed Bentley!
@@midnight2moonlight200 we could say the same thing about the new Bentley too. Since they're literally the same car. The only difference being, having at least a quarter million dollars in your pocket to make better investments, and still have money to deal with the perceived reliability issues of the VolksBentley.
@@tony64t Nah the diffrence is that they are 500x more modern and have WARRANTY my friends + they are more comfortable and look more modern and better.
@Vlad I wouldn't say 500 times, and whatever newer technology that the new Bentley has, isn't worth $240,000! Remember, the Phaeton was VW's attempt at showing to everyone that it had indeed arrived, and was capable of building a hyper-luxurious car that would rival the best the world had to offer. Car manufacturing is a business, and they rarely make extreme changes to their platforms just for the sake of change. So, what I'm trying to tell you is that the 2022 model that you're fawning over is basically the 2005 Bentley Continental Flying Spur with subtle updates through the years. There's a saying that a fool and his money are easily parted. Don't be that guy!
@@tony64t I mean, of course you don't get a VW Phaeton instead of a Bentley. Because at the end of the day, Bentley isn't just the Car, it's also a big status that the people find very important
@@guayardo “but thorough enough” well now it sounds like he wasn’t as efficient as you initially thought which is why I questioned if you really knew what the word meant.
