It takes up to 3x less CO2 to manufacture an infrared system than a heat pump system

Подписаться 1,5 тыс.

50% 1

The UK Government has committed to decarbonising the electricity grid by 2023, so in the future running an electric heating system should be 100% CO2 free.
Herschel Infrared's Comfort panel uses up to 3x less CO2 to manufacture (the "embodied carbon") than an equivalent heat pump system.
By choosing Herschel Infrared you will be adding less embodied carbon from the manufacturing process to the environment than a heat pump. If powered by renewable energy with zero carbon, there is no "operational" carbon produced from running the heating system.
Herschel Comfort panels are the most sustainable infrared panels on the market. Production powered by 100% renewable energy tariff, 100% recyclable packaging, and Made in Britain using locally sourced materials. Herschel Infrared, the easiest and smartest route to Net Zero.
Find out more about infrared heating on our website: www.herschel-i...
#infraredheating #decarbonising #sustainableheating #cleanenergy #madeinbritain
_________________
FOLLOW HERSCHEL
LINKEDIN: / herschel-infrared-heaters
INSTAGRAM: / herschel_infrared
TWITTER: / herschel_ir
PINTEREST: www.pinterest....
FACEBOOK: / herschel.ir

Опубликовано:

1 окт 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 11

@andyca15 2 месяца назад

...because unlike radiative heating from IR panels which are up to 100% efficient, a properly installed modern heat pump is 300-500% efficient. If you get an average install 400% efficiency, and require about the average heating over a year of 10,000kWh @ 22p/kwh: - Radiative heating using IR would cost £2,200 - A heat Pump would cost £550 Your IR panels have a use case, but don't pretend they aren't 4x less efficient to run than a properly installed HP system.

@Simon-dm8zv 2 месяца назад

Terribly bad commercial. The answer is obviously because heat pumps are MANY TIMES more efficient.

@blzahz7633 2 месяца назад

That's nice and all, but doesn't a heat pump also have the ability to cool the place during the summer and such? Just wondering how does an IR panel perform that function.

@Harve6988 2 месяца назад

Not on the UK government's grant it doesn't. If you're gonna pay for it yourself then fair play.

@arnaud9465 Месяц назад

Hello everyone Everyone who explains in comments that the heat pump is 3x more efficient. Have you ever looked at what SCOP is? The colder it is, the more your 400% becomes lower than 150%, precisely when the heat pump needs to work the most.

@arnaud9465 Месяц назад

Have you ever looked at the life cycle of a heat pump? Between the production of its electronic cards and the highly harmful gas inside, there is no chance that the heat pump is an ecological solution.

@arnaud9465 Месяц назад

Finally it's overpriced with a lifespan of 10 years max

@Gijs-t7p 2 месяца назад

If it TAKES less CO2 to manufacture an infrared system then it is obviously inferior. The problem here is that you probably mean it "produces" less CO2 during the manufacturing of bla bla bla. But you didn't say that, you state the opposite, which makes your product bad for the environment. Not to mention production is just a tiny part of a products CO2 footprint, the origin of the energy you use to run the system is much more important and makes the initial production footprint irrelevant in almost 100% of real cases.

@arnaud9465 Месяц назад

"Not to mention production is just a tiny part of a products CO2 footprint," ? Do you know how the electronic cards making up all heat pumps are built? Do you know the complete life cycle of a heat pump and an IR radiator?

@Gijs-t7p Месяц назад

@@arnaud9465 Yes, thank you.