Jodi Arias Court of Appeals Hearing 

@Don Springstead have you seen the recent police cam footage of her out at a bar? It's infuriating, she literally murdered her daughter so she could go out & party & here she is going out to bars living her life. In the footage she called a police officer because another woman threw a drink at her & she said it was because the woman was dating Casey Anthony's ex who is a police officer. It makes me sick this woman isn't afraid or ashamed to be out in public

If it was in Arizona

Steve Isn't THAT the truth?!!? I wish he could have been OJ Simpson's prosecutor, as well!!

@Johnstable12 I recently finished reading his very good book, about the case. He was an excellent prosecuting attorney, working a little over 4 years on the case, working in his office, thruout many a night, alone, going without sleep or decent meals, til almost daylight, so it would be quiet, with no distractions. He stated that the reason he was tough on Arias, is because of her pathological lying, psychopathic, narcissistic, self. She could lie to anyone, without any problem, and was not nervous or displaying any anxiety with any of the interrogation, etc. He said that he had to be ready, with firing the questions at her, to outwit her, and throw her off. AND, HE WAS. I didn't know the details of why he was disbarred, but find it interesting that he would openly show any sexual innuendoes to the court reporter or blogger! Hmmm..... I do hope he sincerely repents of what he did, and can move forward with a productive lifestyle, of sincere character.

I totally agree 100% with your comment.

"she left DNA at the crime scene" Jodi' and Travis' unknown DNA were mixed together in a latent impression of her partial left palm print on a blood-stained wall but it PROVED NOTHING. The lab only tested the latent impression for blood because only blood would put Jodi with Travis at the time of his death. Lisa Perry, a forensic scientist, did a Kastle-Meyer test on the latent impression and during the trial stated: "The results were NEGATIVE." All the latent impression did was show Jodi had been in Travis' house sometime during the last two years. Heather Connor, Mesa PD latent print examiner, stated: "There is no way to date a latent impression. In other words, there was no way to determine when the latent print was left there. It could have been in 2006 or 2007. Even Martinez mentions the latent print, in his book, when he's discussing another issue: "Like latent prints, the hair's presence was not enough to tell us when it was left at the house..." "she premeditated it" As for premeditation, the bullet in Travis's cheek is different than the type of bullet in Jodi's grandfather's gun. Renting a car with her credit card is not premeditation (she wasn't hiding her car rental), nor is using gas cans to travel through the desert at night. It was something she and Darryl Brewer did whenever they traveled in the desert. Jodi dyed her hair brunette on March 20, 2008 so she wasn't trying to hide her identity in early June, 2008 like Martinez said, again not premeditation. "she admitted to it" (murder) No, she claimed she killed Travis in self-defense because he was attacking her. Self-defense is not a crime or, at least it wasn't the last time I checked (1 hour ago).

@@kenmat1 no, slicing a man's neck from ear to ear nearly decapitating him does not sound like self defense. Inviting yourself to his house if you think he could potentially be dangerous doesn't sound reasonable either. And if it was all an accident and she didn't mean to kill him why are there stab wounds to the BACK of his head, why didn't she call the police, why did she attend his funeral and call his loved ones. Why, when questioned by police did she lie, first she wasn't there at all, and then she and him were attacked by men in masks, and then yes she killed him but it was because he was attacking her. None of it makes sense, the amount of times he was stabbed and where, her throwing her camera in the washing machine. Her going and pretending she had nothing to do with it leaving his body there to rot for days. Nope!

@@kitkat9032 Dr. Kevin Horn, the medical examiner, doesn't use the term "nearly decapitated" in his autopsy. Why are you? Jodi may have been invited to Travis's place. There's no evidence if she invited herself or Travis invited her. But, of course, you are going to say she invited herself because that fits the story you want to tell. Like Juan Martinez, it's not important if it's true or not. She didn't lie when questioned by the police. She said she wasn't there. If you're being attacked, you stab as much as necessary to neutralize (police term) the attacker. One stab or 100 stabs, whatever it takes. You really think Jodi put the camera in the washer. Seriously. An experienced photographer. She explained to Det. Flores how to recover deleted photos in her interrogation so she obviously knew deleting the photos, putting the camera in the washer wasn't going to destroy the photos. Even I know that and I've never owned a camera in my life. You taken everything Martinez presented as the truth. Doesn't the fact that he withheld evidence, destroyed evidence, got Flores to perjure himself and got Dr. Horn to change the gunshot from happening first to the gunshot happening last, manipulating and destroying a blogger's marriage while seducing her and sending her to dig up dirt on Juror 17 so he could replace her with someone who would vote to kill Jodi. Doesn't all this underhanded, illegal action by Martinez cause you concern that you bought the story of a corrupt lawyer who's only goal was to win no matter what he had to do to achieve his goal.

@@kenmat1 listen I don't care who prosecutor is, I don't follow Juan Martinez like his word is gold. The fact is, she did kill a naked man in his own home, she didn't call the police afterword she tried to pretend that nothing happened. Fine the medical examiner did not say near decapitation. My point is knife wounds IN HIS BACK, my point is this man had no prior history of violence in his life, and typically if a man is violent there is a behavioral pattern that shows that. My point is that man is dead. And your going to sit here and argue with a complete stranger over how!?

You can be against Martinez narrative, you could argue all day long the things he said and did, but can you seriously tell me that ALL of the evidence against Jodi is garbage? Can you tell me why instead of calling 911 that day, she chose to conceal those events. Can you tell me if it wasn't her than who was it. Can you tell me why there's a knife wound accrossed his throat. That did happen, so can you explain how that fits the description of self defense? And one more thing, can you do it without stooping to the immature level of insulting the other person? I may not be as studied on this case as you are, and clearly we're both very passionate about our POV, but please be decent. We are still people after all.

Her lying abilities and fairy tale writing skills are impressive. If she wasn’t so blatantly self serving, dishonest, and wants to hold herself above the world, she’d be better off. The way this lawyer is trashing Mr. Martinez is just shameful. How these greedy tumors can get up and defend obvious guilty killers is despicable.

Talk about cruel and unusual treatment!

🤣😂 Word!!

As should I for having to read your comment. Haha 🤣

😂😂😂😂😂Exatly

@@sharlyt3557 Absolutely. But there still some keyboard warriors out there who thinks that this dirt bag is innocent lmao. Fortunaley this judges don't think that way

@@sharlyt3557 No problem dude. The only way she should get out of prision is to get her in a death row.

@@sharlyt3557 no. She was claiming it was self defense. The trial had to do with whether she was defending herself or if this was a calculated premeditated murder. Mind you, she had already changed her story twice before.

Why are you so pompous and arrogant? Are you pretending to be someone important or are you just a silly, little Billy?

@@kenmat1 why do you act like you haven't taken your meds

Me....

I hope not.

Well, these judges act like it's serious. Shame.

Thebeautiful11 the woman...like each one of us ...according to the constitution..is entitled to a thorough and vigorous defense And she’s getting it

Heck yeah hodi is an idiot thinks these judges wont catch this attorney in her lies she already lied about how many interviews hodi did this is a joke and juan did no sexual harrassment i love juan.

"Juan Martinez did a brilliant job prosecuting Jodi Arias!" Susan, you're complimenting a serial sexual harasser, a man who cheated on his long-time live in girlfriend, a man who seduced a blogger not because he even liked her but he just used her to get information on Juror #17 so he could get the one holdout booted off the trial so he could kill Jodi Arias. The blogger was a married woman with a disabled child. Martinez was named as the co-respondent in her divorce. Couldn't you find some one better to admire?

@@kenmat1 I'm not aware of any of your accusations. I've been watching the trial from Denmark and all, I'm saying is, that he did a marvelous job, prosecuting Jodi Arias.

Susan Berg I don’t think he did a great job- he was aggressive even to his own witnesses and came across like a rabid dog. He also got caught up in her manipulation - a more skilled, subtle lawyer could have avoided that. She admitted she did it however - I’m not sure how the conviction can be quashed .

Don't get me wrong, Jodi Arias got exactly what she deserves and needs to stay in prison. Her personality disorders dictate that cannot be a safe member of society and her crime was heinous enough to recieve life imprisonment. However, if you look without bias, beyond this case, Juan Martinez, has a long history of misconduct in the courtroom which is on record. He also has engaged in behaviours out of the courtroom that are questionable to the morality of his character.

What she did was sheer evil. I agree this is a waste of time and money. She is PURE EVIL.

she was ready to plead guilty for 2nd-degree murder, the appeal is about being convicted for premeditated murder/

@@mmmmohmm Source? She pleaded self-defense throughout the trial. Never « guilty ».

@@hugolafhugolaf ​ @hugolafhugolaf she OFFERED the prosecutor and the family to plead for manslaughter then offered a plead for 2nd-degree murder, they refused. the family wanted nothing other than the death penalty..the point is she admitted to killing him but never by premeditated Murder..

@@mmmmohmm Thanks for the follow-up. I stand corrected.

@@hugolafhugolaf she got convicted for 1st-degree premeditated murder .. right? this is the conviction she is appealing. Saying there is no appeal chance because she admitted the kill is wrong. because the trial was not about proving her killing him.. it was about knowing why she did that?.. premeditated or crime of passion or self-defense.

That is sick.

She’s beyond cruel

It makes me happy to know that not only did the Arizona Court of Appeals uphold Jodi's conviction and sentence; but the Arizona Supreme Court and the US Supreme Court have also declined to hear Jodi's appeal.

@@michaellovely6601 Oh, cool. I hope that at some point she realises that there is no hope for her, no more courts to appeal, and that this is her life from now on. Then she will begin a millionth of the desperation that Travis's surviving relatives must be feeling, who will never get their son back.

@@LisaSimpsonRules I honestly can't help but wonder how Juan Martinez would have done if he had been the prosecutor in the trial of Travis Reinking aka the Nashville Waffle House shooter. Travis pleaded Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity to avoid being sentenced to Death Row because Tennessee is a Death Penalty state. Travis had a very long and well-documented history of mental health issues and was diagnosed with Paranoid Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, and Psychosis. Examples of his mental instability include believing that Taylor Swift was stalking and harassing him. Ultimately, the jury convicted Reinking on all charges but sentenced him to life in prison.

Martinez committed MISCONDUCT 1. Martinez withheld evidence. He said there was no emails, text messages. Nurmi had to sue him to get them. He found out there were 896 pages of text messages (See Trial Day 6) 2.Martinez seduced a trial blogger and manipulated her to "find dirt" on Juror #17 , the only juror in the sentencing trial who wouldn't vote for the death penalty. Martinez hoped the blogger could find something so Juror #17 could be kicked off jury and replaced by someone who would vote to kill Jodi. 3. Martinez made contact with Juror #3, who had been kicked off jury, and used her to find out how jurors were "leaning" toward executing Jodi. He also told her he was a "breast man" so she sent him photos of her breasts. 4. Martinez also leaked information on Juror #17 when the hung jury prompted a mistrial in death-penalty phase. Juror #17 received death threats and had to have police protection.

@Kingjewell15 Jodie? LOL

@Kingjewell15 "nearly decapitated him" Hmm, never saw that in the medical examiner's autopsy. You sound like you're working from a poorly written and cliche script.

Kingjewell15 thank you 🙏🏻 these Hodie supporters are just as evil!

@@kenmat1 but . . . . . Arias murdered her boyfriend.

No, she has already served time. We love you Jodi 💖

@@jizzahm Nice comment. Second degree murder (not what she was charged with) is 10-25years. If Juan & Bill Montgomery had charged her with 2nd degree murder or the jury had chosen 2nd degree, there is a possibility she would be free now. She's already served 11 years and a few months and been a model prisoner (with 1 non-violent penalty). Several lawyers stated Jodi was overcharged. There was a Mexican hit man who killed a guy in Arizona and cut off his head. He only got 14 years. There are many cases on "Jodi Arias Is Innocent" where they list worse murders in Arizona with killers who got much less time in prison. I think the reason Jodi was charged with 1st degree murder was because Martinez realized a beautiful woman who could end up on death row, a bloody Mormon corpse and lots of sex was going to draw a huge audience and make him famous and rich (and with his new fame, the ladies would be fighting to get to the front of the line for a sampling of Don Juan).

Publicpersona Ridiculous. And people like you come out of the woodwork saying such nonsense. Juan already was well established. He fought for Travis. He was the voice of reason and truth. He proved his case beyond a shadow of a doubt and the jurors agreed unanimously, guilty of premeditated murder. Undeniable FACT

@@ritarita9750 Sounds like a political ad. All bullshit. But, it will make Juan happy when he's washing cars and chasing the interns into the bathroom.

@@ritarita9750 Just because you don't understand it, doesn't make it nonsense. Have you noticed when I write to you I use simple words and short sentences so you can get it (hopefully).

Sounds about right.

That’s a good hypothesis. Clearly the one attorney only knew how to object. The trail would have been 10 days shorter if he didn’t keep objecting.

@@Dis2good ..Has anyone got a count on Wilma's Objection may we approach 😀

Yes

That sounds possible. I would say the same thing about the Chandler Halderson case (sentencing coming soon) were it not that the defense counsel were all older. The evidence is so ridiculously one-sided that it seemed like the defense was there to merely keep the prosecutors in line.

🤣🤣🤣 right!

I was half expecting someone to jump out of a cake. No one present will ever get that hour back.

I'm wondering if her attorney was set up to do this as part of a prank, and to their surprise she fell for it.

💀💀💀

Probably the best comment on here.

Amazing job? Lawyers who were working as TV commenters during the trial constantly criticized the little "rabid dog."

@@kenmat1 Says who you? HAHAHA!! Unsubstantiated, unfounded claim. Martinez did his job, whether you like it or not by claiming he was being criticized (which he wasn't) doesn't hold any weight. Go cry somewhere else clown.

@@kenmat1 get a life. Jodi is not coming out anytime soon

@@dfvrsvcvvrsrvvw7329 Would you consider 2025 soon?

@@kenmat1 nah. On the other hand 2100 sounds better. (:

This lady is crazy just like Jodi.....

Jim Brown I don’t think she would kill again. I truly think she would absolutely follow the law to the T. However considering she is a succubus from the pit of hell she needs to stay where she is.

Jim Brown we can disagree as much as we want, at the end of the day she has the right to a fair trial like every other person that is accused of a crime. Misconduct by prosecutors is unfortunately an epidemic, that stems from an addiction to winning at all costs. This unethical (and illegal behavior can no longer be ignored).

Unfortunately but true. I believe Travis will be resurrected to the earth again. Jesus died so those sleeping in death before him and after him will be resurrected. The righteous to life and the unrighteous to judgement, listen and live under God’s Kingdom disobey than you are not given a second chance gone forever.

I think Jodi took the wrap for someone , like her ex or someone who caught Travis by surprise. Like his own that he recognized and truated that was creeping.

Appeal judge : miss attorney you don't have problems with your memory do you 😂😂

Lol

😂😂😂

Good one 😂

i personally think that with the shitty case she got, she did the best she could. theres not a whole lot to work with, thats jodi's fault not the defense's

you are a lawyer then?

@@jemandjemand2362 yes- but there’s a billion lawyers in the world / they just happened to be some of the dumbest in this video

It's called "free speech," First Amendment

@@kenmat1 You need psychological help

Oh yes he did!!! NURMI MENTION THIS TO THE JUDGE CUZ NURMI WITNESSES THIS OUTSIDE THE COURT HOUSE WITH THE MEDIA....WHY DON'T YOU GO BACK TO THE TRIAL YOURSELF ....LOOK IT UP!!!! MARTINEZ QUICKLY STRAIGHTENED UP ON WHAT HE WAS DOING!!!! LOOK IT UP IT WAS TOWARDS THE MIDDLE ALMOST TO THE END OF THE TRIAL!!!! COME ON LOOK IT UP YOURSELF I AIN'T A LIAR!!!

@@soulpowerful You must be a psych doctor if you can make that diagnosis. What are your hours?

@@hildapompa4236 "I AIN'T A LIAR!!!" R2.

she couldn't even tell herself if she mentioned two or three.. 🙄🙄

@@kokoskokso she is in a “fog” , the fog came rolling in. 🤪

Sounds like one of my essays during crunch time.

I know right?

@@aleshaford2968 LOL! Yes, all the Jodi fiends are affected by The Fog.

I mean u couldn't say it any better!!!

Or it’s your first job 😂 what a first case 🤣

Everybody’s money spends the same. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

@@kelliegrase4658 U r nuts if u think she was not given a fair trial.

​@@kelliegrase4658 u crazy

Don't worry. She's not going anywhere.

Yes, he did a great job too! This is about as crazy as Jodi Arias herself

Jennifer Willmott, one of Jodi's lawyers (I'm telling you who she is because you obviously didn't watch the trial) put her professional reputation on the line by saying: Jodi didn't lie DURING the trial but she did lie BEFORE the trial (when she wasn't under oath). But, we have to remember Juan lied all through the trial except when he was "misconducting like rabid dog" and taking a blogger into a hall closet outside the courtroom. Hmmn, wonder what he was doing in there.

@@DMichelle5 admires a serial sexual harasser. OK, lets mark this date as the last time Donna's reputation was intact.

Publicpersona I recently learned that prosecutors are legally allowed to LIE. Look up Ryan shoot I can't remember his last name he was wrongly convicted of murder sent to prison for 10 years. He was driving home after leaving a college class got pulled over and it took 10 years for him to be free.

Thank you for your comment about the judges not taking Jodi's appeal seriously. We're collecting and sending all of these comments to the Maricopa County Attorney's Office in case her appeal fails. It will show the judge's were prejudice against Jodi. Please ask your friends to write more comments about the judges laughing at Jodi's appeal. Each one will help. Thanks, guys. You're the best.

@@kenmat1 You're very welcome. 😂 And her appeal is a waste. She will never get out of prison. And in my humble opinion, they should have fried the witch. 🤷‍♀️ Now, please screenshot THAT and send it to Maricopa County. 😊

Publicpersona oh man oh man you sir/mam are clearly an attention seeking individual that doesn’t base their assertions on facts, morals, actions taken by Jodi, admission to murder by Jodi, and the pathological and sociopathic mechanisms she went about after to hide the truth of what she did caring only for her own future. But sure, let’s get passed all of that and the overkill of Travis because of angry warranted comments on RU-vid or misconduct during a trial (if there even was any), because those things outweigh in any shape or form the actions Jodi did. If this is truly what you believe, then I truly feel bad for your loved ones, family, and kids that this is the moral compass you have for murderous sociopaths. If you seek attention, perhaps do it in a productive and worthwhile fashion instead of supporting a disgraceful vial murderer:).

@@freddy0064 "an attention seeking individual that doesn’t base their assertions on facts" I base everything I write on facts. I deconstruct the so-called "evidence," piece by piece, slowly and methodically. But, I have to give credit to hundreds of other people I have talked to in the 7 years I've studied this case. Many others have examined this case and shared their thoughts and beliefs with me and others. "admission to murder by Jodi" That short statement alone tells me you know nothing about this case, Freddy dear. Jodi has never admitted to any crime... period. She made a plea of "self-defense." She claimed Travis was attacking her and she had to kill him to save her life. And, only she knows the truth of that statement. And, even she may not know for sure. Martinez doesn't know if it was murder or self-defense (he added 2and 2 and came up with 5), Nurmi doesn't know, either. And, you, Freddy, definitely do not know. And, BTW, I don't know, either. "sociopathic mechanisms" Please explain how her 'mechanisms' (whatever that means) could be 'sociopathic,' since Jodi has never been diagnosed as a sociopath or a psychopath and you're obviously not in any position to diagnose her. "the overkill of Travis" A person fighting for his/her life fights until the attacker is "neutralized," as the police like to say. Only ONE wound was definitely fatal; another was potentially fatal unless there was immediate medical attention, the gun shot was not fatal since it didn't enter the brain. The other wounds were non-fatal wounds. The only people that use the term "overkill" are Jodi-haters and the uneducated. Dr. Horn, the medical examiner, never used that term. "the actions Jodi did" What proof do you have of "the actions Jodi did?" Maybe, she wasn't even there. Did you ever think that was a possibility? There is ABSOLUTELY NO PROOF JODI WAS WITH TRAVIS WHEN HE DIED. The photos taken with the *MAGIC CAMERA only showed Jodi was in Travis's house up until about 1:50PM on "June 4, 2008," ALMOST 4 HOURS BEFORE TRAVIS'S DEATH although we have no official time of death because Dr. Horn knew better than give a time of death. He wasn't willing to lie for Juan Martinez again. Even Martinez, in his ghost-written "book," wrote that Jodi could have left Travis's house after the nude photos were finished being taken around 1:50pm. *The magic camera that stamped date and times on some of the recovered photos when Travis's camera didn't have the capacity/capability to place date/time on photos. "vial murderer" Surely, you mean vile, not vial, uneducated Freddy.

Publicpersona Hah! Spelled one word incorrectly and I’m uneducated ? This is a waste of time for me and everyone else talking to you. Using “haters” makes you sound fairly uneducated by the way. Also I know professionally the wounds very well. She shot him in the head/face (fatal), slit the throat ear to ear (fatal), stabbed him various times which causes blood loss compounding to death (fatal). My dear child you are very uneducated in the medical field. People can die from one stab wound/ gunshot let alone all of those compounding together is overkill beyond belief. Also there is video depicting her stating she did kill him. The fact that she did it from self defense was disproven by her various lies to cover it up, her beyond overkill methods, her changing the story many times, leaving a voicemail after all of that on his phone to meet up, and having a reason to do it because he was taking another person on vacation after dumping her as she was psychotically upset about it CLEARLY. Again your moral compass is very skewed, I feel for those close to you. Perhaps you can relate to something in this case clouding your judgement, in any case though goodluck on being very disappointed as she will die in prison. Also when having a debate with someone it’s best to point out disputing facts rather than correct someone’s spelling and insulting them. That makes you seem unconfident and insecure about your beliefs regarding this case as it doesn’t pertain to the situation at hand at all.

Why don't you write her complete statement? What Jodi actually said was: "I do remember the moment that the knife went into Travis' throat and he was conscious. He was still trying to attack me. It was I who was trying to get away, not Travis, and I finally did. I never wanted it to be that way, judge." I'm sure everyone (with an IQ over 60, my apologies if that excludes some of you) knew Travis' throat had been cut when he was alive. It would be unusual and pointless to cut a man's throat if he was dead. The only people making a big deal of Jodi's statement is the haters because they don't know the whole statement and therefore don't understand Jodi is making a final plea for a lesser sentence by saying she never wanted to kill Travis but he was attacking her and she had no choice. She's allowed to make that statement. It was still America in 2015.

@@kimmysplayhouse Her memory was "clouded in a fog" during her original trial, TWO YEARS EARLIER. Willmott claimed Jodi's memory, for many issues, was returning and she had remembered the throat cut long before she made her statement on April 15, 2015. It's OK though. You just made a small mistake. I don't expect you to be able remember everything.

@@kimmysplayhouse No, she was telling Judge Stephens that she didn't want to kill Travis but she had no choice because he was still attacking her. She was pleading with the judge to not give her life in prison without any chance of getting out. But, Judge Stephens was an elected judge and knew there were thousands & thousands of Jodi-haters who would vote her out of office if she showed Jodi any mercy. So, Stephens saved her career and sentenced Jodi to die in prison. A girl's got to protect her ass and her country club membership. But, kimmybbbyeah, you can tell your way if it helps you to justify your hateful rantings about Jodi.

@@kimmysplayhouse It's useless for you to hate Jodi or me. Jodi isn't aware of your rantings and I don't care. So, waste all the time you want. Maybe, you'll impress some of your hate buddies. They're easily impressed, e.g. little Juan Martinez.

@@kimmysplayhouse You seem to have a comprehension problem. I was obviously writing about your hate buddies , i.e., "They're easily impressed, e.g. little Juan Martinez." Get it?

DISGRACEFUL

They better not have to... This rabid beast deserves to rot. Can't believe it didn't get the death penalty

As one of his sisters said..... she murdered him all over again during the last trial. But yeah you’re right - it’s horrible for his family. She shouldn’t be given the time of day...... she won’t ever get released.... so obvious what she did - she’s the devil; extremely dangerous and doesn’t have any remorse. Doesn’t deserve anything aside from what she’s got and where she is.

And Jodi never deserved to be used for sex... Travis sounded very dodgy on that phone sex tape... We love you Jodi 💖

Maybe they won't have to. If "double jeopardy" is applied, there won't be another trial and Jodi will be home before Xmas.

Spot on!!! 💯

I agree. The woman should just let it be

Jealous that Juan wiped the floor with them using nothing but facts provided by the actions of JA

The appeals process is very important, especially for heinous crimes like this, because once the sentence is upheld, she is done.

@@treyb2919 I know you are right. Sometimes, I just get annoyed at the obvious, while forgetting it's the whole system that balances justice out.

👍

He won't get another chance to mentally abuse women and humiliate them, while trying to act all religious.

grave digger Yes Travis does not get a second chance I agree. However this appeal is about due process. As an American we have the right as written in the constitution if charged with the crime to receive due process. As an attorney was Martinez unethical ? He absolutely was, doesn’t change the fact that shes a murder.

Lisa Benge In due respect, you are ignorant of the facts.

Lisa Benge Jodi had a fair trial even though she was an obstinate lying witness.

@@SuzLa1 big yikes. She should have broken up w/ him. Not have sex with him (because she was obsessed) stabbed him on the back dozens of times, almost decapitared him and then shot him.

I totally agree

A media circus that she did her part to create, even to the point of jumping in the center ring

I don't think they will put Jodi through another trial because there won't be enough evidence to convict her. 1. Nude photos putting Jodi in TA's house on June 4, 2008 and the theft of a .25 caliber gun from Jodi's grandparent's place (where Jodi was living) may be thrown out before next trial. The photos were tampered with by unknown person(s) while in police possession (i.e., someone marked time & date on some photos before giving TA's camera containing Duo Memory Stick to Detective Michael Melendez, the forensic computer specialist . Martinez never validated the stolen gun with Jodi's grandparents but instead used "hearsay evidence" by having a police officer testify to the theft of the gun. This was an appeal issue. Both of Jodi's grandparents are now deceased. 2. No blood DNA evidence. No bloody palm print. Biological material from TA & JA mixed together on latent palm print was NOT BLOOD (Lisa Perry, MPD lab). Plus, Heather Connor, Mesa PD latent print examiner, stated: "There is no way to date a latent impression." TA's blood on JA's hair in TA's house was meaningless b/c Jodi was in TA's house many times and her hair could have been left at any time. 3. No eye witnesses. 4. No weapons recovered. 5. Jodi never dyed her hair brunette to disguise herself at TA's house. She dyed her hair brunette on March 20, 2008 (2.5 months before TA was killed). She darkened her brunette hair in early June, 2008 b/c she was meeting up with Ryan Burns (a potential new "boyfriend"). 6. She had gas cans b/c she was traveling through the desert at night alone. It was a common practice she & her former boyfriend, Darryl, had used. BTW, she did return the "gas" can at Walmart's but it was a blue kerosene can, not a red gasoline can and couldn't have been used at a gas station (illegal to put gas in a kerosene can b/c of danger). Google Jodi's Walmart receipt and see what come up. 7. She turned off her phone while driving in the middle of the night. Turning off a phone, when not using it, was a recommended practice in 2008 b/c of the quality of the batteries in those days. 8. She rented a car using her credit card. Obviously, if she was on a "covert" mission to kill someone she wouldn't use a credit card with her name on it. . 9. Jodi claims in her law suit against Kirk Nurmi that it was his idea to plead self-defense. So, her saying she killed Travis in self-defense will not be introduced in a new trial that "starts from scratch." She'll probably plead "Not Guillty" and not testify. WHAT EVIDENCE DOES THAT LEAVE FOR A NEW TRIAL?

Publicpersona There won’t be a new trial, because the previous trial was good enough. If nutcases like you who uses selective facts is all Jodi has, then she’s in trouble lol.

@@hiddensong5180 OK, show me the non-selective facts that would put her in prison. I'll be waiting right here.

😂😂

And she looks like she has left the coat hanger in the jacket.

Hahahahaha she needs to get knikkers that fit, her arse was too big for the ones she had on OR her trousers were too small

looks like she's wearing a nappy under her pants.

Tell me about it! Terrible

I know this sounds silly- but please elaborate. Just to be aware in life & these types.

Ruple Thaker to give you an idea - an interviewer once asked her point blank - is the public safe when you are out? And her answer was ‘yes, if they don’t abuse me and threaten my life’. We all know from the evidence Travis was no threat to Jodi when she killed him. So in her twisted mind she still feels justified in killing him because her feelings were hurt by him. When she was sentenced she said she remembers slitting his throat - when all trial long she has these ‘memory gaps’. Dr deMarte said its uncommon for that memory gap to occur the way she described (such a huge chunk of time just gone)- and now we know those memories are not gone. All of that goes to show just how convicted she is in her lies. She can even manipulate herself into believing she is justified in doing what she did with little remorse. She is dangerous because she has no remorse, feels justified in comitting her crime and has never told the truth about why she did what she did.

@@LoveLaw Excellent answer and great insight!

Never allowed to appeal? Do you think this is North Korea?

@@slyjokerg I think she has the right to appeal, everyone does under our constitution. I just personally think she is a shitty person to keep fighting this when she knows damn well she slaughtered that man for nothing. She is continuing to put his family through hell.

Tina Genesee I agree. But kudos to her for being brave enough to stand in front of these judges and saying JA was not treated fairly takes a lot of courage

JA trial cost Arizona over $3million and she is not treated fairly? Give me a break!

@@pinkbubblegum423 This hearing comes across like a law school exercise:

Jody manipulated this poor lawyer to speak in her behalf. Can you imagine having to do this..

Pink Poodle it does but Jody was treated more then fair..

I'm rooting for Jodi! I don't like Doogie Howsers actions.Jodi was on a mission to eliminate douchebags.I hear she was headed to Kanye's house when she was arrested.

@@JohnnyLaps lol you must be 12 years old 😌 it’s okay, ask mom and dad for some attention

​@@chesnay1222judging by your reply and writing style I'm five years older then you.

and to make it worse, she planned this well in advance then acted like it was self defence ...the juror who would not give her the DP was/is an idiot and a liar he stated he would id it was deemed ..but later it was proven he was against the DP

Yes but it was self defence, he was flicking water at her from the shower!

@@Arckivio well i am surprised she didn't through that into her defense she threw in everything else

@@maryannenizio4816 It ain't over til it's over & this ain't ever gonna give up!!! It'll be in her next appeal that he water boarded her with a shower head!!!

Mary Anne Nizio she did! She said that’s why he attacked her, she got his camera wet taking pictures of him in the shower. Like we can’t tell from the photos she already had him at gun point in the shower. She is so ugly, inside and out.

Every time she spoke - I was a bit dissapointed when she stopped. Some people just have that affect on people. She is soooooo in the right job!😁

Agreed just one complaint at the moment is when she talks about the honestly of the jury she defined it with that’s how we have always did it. Not changing something merrily because it’s been a tradition is wrong

The “lady judge” wth

Well said and so true! Thanks for sharing..

I like her!

You to

Juan Martinez would have been awesome if he was the prosecutor in the trial of Casey Anthony and he would have been gotten her sentenced to death. I wonder how Juan would have been if he was the prosecutor in the trial of James Holmes. He is the perpetrator of the shooting at the Century 16 Movie Theater in Aurora, CO in July of 2012. This was the worst mass shooting spree in the Denver metro area since the 1999 shooting at Columbine High School in Littleton. James pleaded Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity to avoid being sentenced to death for his crime because Colorado was still a Death Penalty state in 2012. Ultimately, the courts rejected James' insanity defense but did not sentence him to death. Instead the jury sentenced James to twelve life sentences plus seventy years. Those who disagree with James' insanity defense tend to cite his rather meticulous planning of the shooting and also rigging his apartment with numerous boobytrap explosive devices; which would indicate that James was not insane and knew his actions were wrong. Those who agree that James has a history of mental health issues will cite the numerous therapy sessions with his psychiatrist Dr. Lynne Fenton.

Sherry Dalton INDEED.

Don't hate her because she's beautiful. You obviously don't know being a psychopath isn't a choice. It's a condition related to genetic makeup and upbringing. Also, Jodi has never been diagnosed as a psychopath except by uneducated haters without medical degrees. If you're trying to make friends by hating Jodi, you're probably succeeding. I'm sure lots of haters like you. You'll fit right in.

Publicpersona Aka a crazy persons response. Clearly out of touch with reality here

@@carmenlinnea8751 Out of touch with realty? Hey, I'm not the that thinks Jodi is guilty, you are.

@ilesos "takes it in the ass" "You're a bit uptight, are you? Do guys/girls fall asleep when they go to bed with you? You're probably a "missionary position only" kind of boring lay.

I'm grateful that the Arizona Court of Appeals and the Arizona Supreme Court declined to hear Jodi's appeal because it would have worsened the emotional distress of Travis' family. If Jodi's conviction had been overturned and she was set free; she would be opening herself up to civil litigation by Travis' family and would have to pay the cost of Travis' funeral expenses as they had to be the ones that picked out a casket and flowers as well as set a date for the memorial service.

IKR???? Scrambling for sure.Didn't have any case law to refer to by number which is what the judges are looking for. She was all "Well, I don't have the exact case in front of me about 'Donnelly' but that's an example." Puleeesseee. Makes her look like a first grader trying to give a high school graduation speech.

Stabby? How appropriate ....lol

Lol this male judge is almost laughing at this bc ...yes it’s a joke. Poor Jody! Not. Waahh...I can tell his face is saying... I’m NOT buying this..

Lmao "no stabby" 😂😂😂

Stabby Arias 😂

I wondered they were positiv about her appeal, I've thought they would deny.

faithful one : Why waste tax-payers monies? How could you defend a cold-blooded killer! Shame on you!!!

She hasn't made a public statement since her sentencing in 2015.

@@cynthiaarons9373 ..Im confused , how am I defending her????

@@cynthiaarons9373 ..I think in my comment I'm saying she doesn't deserve a New trial!!! I would Never defend a Murderer!!!!!!

faithful one : Ok, my apologies! Glad to hear that you are not defending Jodi Arias.

😂 made me lol!

She sure was!!! It made me feel bad for her because it was quite obvious she was trying to grasp at any straws she could. Shes hired to defend her with no choice, I'm assuming she's state appointed.

D_Gurl_ bec. I find it really encouraging that you felt bad for her. You are spot on. 👏👏👏 I think you are right about being court assigned. Jodi Arias must be one of the most hated women in America. It’s a thankless task!

I catch her voice shaking quit a bit she’s nervous

liz impey right alongside Casey Anthony and Nichol K.

Can you please give her one of these🖕 from Tom in Australia. Thanks🙏

Hahaaahahaah!!! This made my day 😂🙌🏽💋

Have you ever seen the list of phone calls she makes? Movie and TV people, book publishers, etc. Maybe, she should tell you what she did that day while you were writing nasty comments about people.

@@kenmat1 WTF?

@@peternovak5327 Brilliant comment, Pete. I'd like to have you on my debating team.

Killing is not necessarily a crime.

Publicpersona And? Point? How did you do in school?

@@ritarita9750 Point is: Killing is not necessarily a crime...when it's done in self-defense. If I told you how I did in school (or, schools), you wouldn't believe me. So, I won't tell you.

@BabeRuthCouldnt Call That Wow! So a person has to give the intruder a chance to injure or kill them before he/she can take action. Sometime the law is stupid.

@@kenmat1 Did that involve quite a lot of schools for some reason which we couldn't possibly guess? Were you 'moved on' a fair bit?

Exactly!! Thank you!

I don't quite understand why you added.....maybe. tounge in cheek? To show how to manipulate? To cover yourself? Give you an out if someone disagrees?

100%!! I haven’t read his book but I saw a comment somewhere from someone who had and the book states that he had to remain firm with her and point out how she would twist words and also so she wouldn’t have any control or ability to spin her narrative to the jury.

Her lawyer was just as rough and rude, disgusting woman.

Also it's best not to keep stringing someone along when you don't love them, and you know they do, either. Does that justify what she did? No - but it's just nasty to do what he did, and one never knows what kind of reaction one might get.

Because of the DO she has a right to change the courts mind. I think she is granted 3 appeals

Voracious Reader the man used and abused Jodi Arias for a very long time and talked all sorts of bs to build up her hopes that they had the possibility of a future together ...it’s called “running game” She figured it out. What transpired the last day they were together we will never know However the outcome was Jodi murdered him in a rage of revenge & jealousy The moral to the story is three fold 1 don’t mess with people’s emotions. 2. Say what you mean & mean what you say 3. You can never really know a person ...handle with care !

@@RK-su4hs no.... you are so wrong. Arias dogged hin ruthlessly. She would not leave him alone even after they broke up. She moved to his his area.... after they broke up. She kept tempting his weakness, against his beliefs. She is the definition of a psychopath.

DrXFoXx whatever she “did” dude ran game on her , got her hooked up and mixed up Scum bag And the woman lost it and sliced him up Violent nut case No “victims” here 2 adults who made very bad choices Him. Then her

Ernesto Suarez 🤣 lmao

!. Martinez withheld evidence. He said there was no emails, text messages. Nurmi had to sue him to get them. Found out there were 896 pages of text messages (See Trial Day 6) 2. Seduced a trial blogger and manipulated her to "find dirt" on Juror #17 , the only juror in the sentencing trial who wouldn't vote for the death penalty. Martinez hoped the blogger could find something so Juror #17 could be kicked off jury and replaced by someone who would vote to kill Jodi. 3. Made contact with Juror #3 who had been kicked off jury and used her to find out how jurors were "leaning" toward executing Jodi. 4. He also leaked information on Juror #17 when the hung jury prompted a mistrial in death-penalty phase. Juror #17 received death threats and had to have police protection.

That is his job.

I'm sure your're joking or your IQ just dipped below 50. Either way, it's one of the most stupid remarks on this site.

@@kenmat1 That was obviously a joke.

Stabby 😂😂😂

Too right 👍

Yeah! Evidence cannot lie

Stabby Arias ..... ha ha ha ha.

He had to approach her in a certain way , she loves to ramble and be centre of attention. He only wanted to expose the truth from her which is why he didn’t give her much time to respond and she still twisted his words

The defense attorney could have made her appeal simple. make - briefly - a reasonable point of law argument and sat down. Not obviously attacking the prosecutors behavior which was in and of itself a dead give away of how desperate she was. A certain loss. She could have met the letter of the law without embaressing herself futher and completely destroying what was left of her career. It wasn't required to come up with multiple childish, not thought out , foolish to the point she had to be aware how much of a fool she was making of herself arguments. The law doesn't require multiple appeal points. One would have satisfied the law. Make the appeal, accept the judges decision and sit down. End of story. Couldn't be accused of not representing her client completely, legally. if you want an example... Watch the appeal of the obviously tired, knew he was beaten before the trial begain because his client had confessed, sad, embaressed attorney of that nutjob Anthony Toldt. that attorney leagelly represented his murderous client without destroying his career. At any time she could/should have stopped digging that hole. At any point she had met her legal duty of making an appeal for her client. There is Nothing in our laws which requires an attorney bury her career any more than she already had. To continue arguing nonsense was appalling and jaw dropping to watch. I seriously question that woman's intelligence. Watch the Anthony toldt trial

Lol...yes she's very shaky in her speaking

lol

Martinez withheld evidence that only was discovered during the sentencing trial after Jodi had already been convicted. Martinez got Detective Flores and Dr. Horn to change their testimony to the gun shot came last after they had been saying the gun shot was first for more than 3 years. Martinez had to have the gun shot last so it would appear Alexander was alert & conscious during his killing. That way Martinez could bring an "excessive cruely" factor into play and get the possibility of a death penalty. Martinez told the jury Jodi stole her grandfather's gun when there was no proof she did and he entered "hearsay evidence" by having a cop testify about the stolen gun instead of having the grandfather testify about the gun. Police stated there had been a bunch of gun thefts in the area around that time. But, you can support a crooked prosecutor and make jokes. It's only a woman's life and future on the line.

Publicpersona If that was the case why was Dr Horn and Detective Flores not charged with perjury and Juan with witness tampering. Detective said on the witness stand it was his misunderstanding of Dr Horns reporting. It happens, an honest mistake. Before Jodi stabbed Travis, he never left the shower stall.He was sitting down at 5:30:30 PM in the shower stall when Jodi stabbed him in the heart. Travis was able to get himself over to the sink and cough up blood while she continued to stab him. Are you saying she stabbed him in the chest and shot him in the head while he was sitting in the shower stall? The evidence do not support that. If this is true, Travis would not be able to walk to the sink that alone stand at the sink with such a head injury. You are not presenting the facts. The evidence prove that the gunshot was last. For one the shell casing landed on blood, not covered with blood. If he was shot first the shell casing would not land on blood but on a clean floor. Any blood thereafter would cover it Let’s consider the incident of the stolen DVD player. Jodi gave the stolen DVD PLAYER to Darryl and drove off with the remote control still in her car. She was in possession of the stolen DVD in order to give it to Darryl. You get it? Think. How did she come into possession of the stolen DVD. One way, she stole it or had an accomplice steal it for her. Use common sense and logic if you have any. Juan asked her about it being in her car and how it got there. Epic moment watching Jodi try to explain this boo boo. She was almost lost for words but manage to give a lame excuse. Juan busted her. She tried to wiggle out of it. It was an EPIC bust. It was crystal clear to the jury that Jodi is guilty of stealing both grandpa’s gun and DVD Player. Probability 100% Jodi used her grandfather’s gun to put a bullet in Travis head. The shell casing at the crime scene matched the ammo at Jodi’s grandfather’s home. Busted again. Another fact, she told Detective Flores on June 9, 2008 that Travis did not own a gun. Then years later, after she was arrested, Jodi changes her story and now say that Travis did own a gun. Really? Why did she lie the first time saying that Travis DID NOT OWN A GUN. I suppose at the time, 2008, Jodi did not know that she was going to be arrested for Travis’ murder, henceforth, would need a plea. Later, like 2 years later, she pleads Self Defense. Now Travis owns a gun as needed for her self defense to work. It’s nothing but lies only to prove it was not premeditated murder.

@@ritarita9750 I know Horn & Flores committed perjury the same way you know Travis was sitting down in the shower when he was stabbed. Travis standing at the sink and being stabbed 9 times in the back and not trying to get away from the knife was one of Martinez's most dopey lies. No one would stand there and allow themselves to be stabbed 9 times. It's crazy. He'd have to be shot in the head to act that way. I don't know where he was stabbed or shot. No one does. The judge before Stephens read a report saying the stab in the chest was second to last and the throat cut last. "Jodi incriminated herself when she gave the stolen DVD PLAYER to Darryl and drove off with the remote control still in her car." That's not true. The DVD player would link her to the break-in and theft of the .25 caliber gun.. No one knows who stole the gf''s gun. Jodi was never charged. The .25 caliber shell casing was the same caliber of gun. But, the gun at the gf's home had steel jacketed, hollow-point bullets in it, different from the bullet in Travis's cheek. The only reason Jodi might have told Flores that Travis didn't own a gun was to protect his memory/reputation. After all, it was a tiny, little, girly (no offense) gun while his friends were going to the shooting range with AK-15's.

Thank you. That I will not forget.

Caroline Filby hahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!

Lori D his misconduct had nothing with him putting her away. Maybe she’ll get a new trial and get death this time.

@@nearlythenewswithvicki9289 that would be nice because that's what she deserves.

Lori D p

Her own lawyer stated in the closing argument that he didn’t like her. I think he shot in the foot any chance of appeal with that alone. I mean, what defense attorney tells the jury he doesn’t like his client?

100% correct, also sticking tax payers 💰 with useless arguments.

@First Last I know she's in prison since I mentioned it. When I said, "under the jail" I wasn't speaking literally.

Sorry, you can't speak for others. Just your own pitiful self. Begone, harridan.

I agree! Evil Jodi.

Publicpersona you be gone, supporter of evil!

@@HopefulInterventions you have serious issues. Delusional and pathetic. Fact is, Martinez commuted misconduct. No matter what someone has done, everyone has a right for a fair trial. That's litteraly the law. You don't change it just because someone is evil. That's the law. So go educate yourself instead of writing pathetic comments.

@@wioi huh!?!? The trial was EFFECTIVELY FAIR! having a prosecutor engaging in misconduct AND a fair trial are not mutually exclusive

Unfair persecution of Mr Martinez

Martinez was not just aggressive with Arias but simply unprofessional....the courts and the attorneys should be NON-emotional. There may be MANY emotional aspects of a case, but people who are working in the court system SHOULD behave according to the law and not emotionally. When Martinez questioned the man who Arias went to see after she killed Alexander, his tone was so gentle, almost fake, and the man had a terrible or faulty memory. Listen to the unending attacks Martinez made towards Arias about her memory. And do a little research on Martinez being DISBARRED, and why. Did he just engage in misconduct during the Arias trial? Doubtful. There is NO justification for killing Alexander, but he was no angel in his treatment of Arias and probably other women. Check out the book, Women Who Kill. Women who kill are treated VERY differently from men who kill. They are demonized in this way that has NOT changed for hundreds if not thousands of years or whenever the earliest court systems have been used in human societies.

@@boudica5353 hey jodi, how's prison life going?

@Bram Stoker 😂😂😜

I thought the same thing!!! He keeps smiling and laughing

He was crackin a smile the whole time she was talking

Matthew Potts lmao 🤣

Could you guys write some more of these comments about the judge(s) laughing and not taking Jodi's appeal seriously. We want to send them to the Maricopa County Attorney's Office. Thanks. guys.

No more "judges are laughing" comments? That's a shame.

You know, god will judge you for death penalties and else. 😉

We don't know exactly what happened that precipitated Jodi to kill Travis, so no the death penalty is not appropriate in this case, if it ever is appropriate for the State to kill its citizens.

oOIII.M.IIIOo Just like Gods judging Jodi for stabbing Travis 27 times, slitting his throat and shooting him all because he didn’t want her🤦🏻‍♀️

Martinez committed MISCONDUCT 1. Martinez withheld evidence. He said there was no emails, text messages. Nurmi had to sue him to get them. He found out there were 896 pages of text messages (See Trial Day 6) 2.Martinez seduced a trial blogger and manipulated her to "find dirt" on Juror #17 , the only juror in the sentencing trial who wouldn't vote for the death penalty. Martinez hoped the blogger could find something so Juror #17 could be kicked off jury and replaced by someone who would vote to kill Jodi. 3. Martinez made contact with Juror #3, who had been kicked off jury, and used her to find out how jurors were "leaning" toward executing Jodi. He also told her he was a "breast man" so she sent him photos of her breasts. 4. Martinez also leaked information on Juror #17 when the hung jury prompted a mistrial in death-penalty phase. Juror #17 received death threats and had to have police protection.

@@kenmat1 proof?

@@laura2381 If you were following the trial, you would know this information. You can look it up. It's online. 2, 3, & 4 are the issues he's going to court for. Easy to find.

@@kenmat1 yeah, I just wanted to see the source you personally used. You seemed more knowledgeable than a Google search.

Publicpersona snd what about Jodi’s lies that Travis was a pedophile. Doesn’t that count.

Mabe she should get married to OJ Simpson

An indication of a really evil person. What other objective but to further upset The family,etc ... facilitate loved ones envisioning this. What an evil woman!

There should be a new trial

@Amber Hatfield she is really not attractive and the stress of the last couple of years has left her a 3 at best

Shes doing what she got paid to do she is asking for a retrial. So she can be refound guilty.

...as he washed cars (or some other embarrassing job he was demoted into) for the state. Juan is probably crying as we laugh at him. Juan: "Waaaa, they won't let me kill any car thieves." Sob.

@James Darmor Could someone help little Jimmy Daaaa rmor, he's lost his comprehension. It's round and marked with "JD," weighs about a pound and a bit shriveled from lack of use.

@James Darmor "retarded" is a politically incorrect word and you're certainly not "genuine." Hateful opinions are meaningless here. FACTS and EVIDENCE run this show.

​@@kenmat1 Well, obviously, you have some sort of gripe against Prosecutor Martinez. In that case, what about this specific case and this specific case alone made you displeased with the reached verdict and Martinez's behavior? I admit, yes, Martinez was forceful and blunt during the trial but certainly nothing I'd call "misconduct" and "abusive" as I've been hearing. Professional, yet strict, I'd call it. Additionally, the court adequately proved Arias' guilt in the trial. Hearing portions of the proceedings and reading the case at large, there was no way it was "self-defense" as she claimed. I mean, really? Stabbed several times, shot in the head, throat slit, and then body left to rot at the crime scene until found days later? Too many things that paved the way to her guilt. But, who knows? I may be missing something. So, I repeat: What about this specific case and this specific case alone made you displeased with the reached verdict and Martinez's behavior?

Publicpersona Be serious. It is temporary until all is settled. Don’t you know this? Educate yourself. You lack sophistication.

The judges are happy they can correct a terrible injustice committed by Juan Martinez, the corrupt little shyster and harasser of many, many women.

Publicpersona You sure tried hard to comment on literally every comment thread to defend Jodi, but the appeal was still denied and she will forever be in locked in her cage.

Shes not looking to get out she wants a retrial..and these are all the circumstances that are not ethical and u wiykdnt want any lawyer using them agaunst anyone especially if u were guilty..he wanted to make a show and spectacle if himself.

I think that sometimes it ok to do a review after maybe 20 years and do a retrial. Maybe this was a 2:d degree and she covered her tracks afterwards. Sometimes people deserve a 2:d chanse if a psychiatrist can say that the individual is no longer a threat to society.

Yes, he was much more confident. The appellate attorney for the defense has 18 years experience, but she sure didn't show it. I wonder how it affects her performance, knowing Arias is stone cold guilty?

He's an ambitious little twerp who will walk over bodies to get to the top.

Publicpersona you again

@@TheBishop12 He's batshit CRAZY 😲

Can tell he’s watch Legally Blonde a couple times

He hated her.

He isn't an attorney anymore either. If I remember correctly he got realky sick possibly cancer he lost tons of weight regained his health and his sanity he had lost from dealing with her. That was an interesting interview. Didn't she try to sue him?

@@nataliejune84 he was stripped of his law license for writing his BOOK on JA . He says he doesn't regret writing it or loosing his license. He said he knows the case and dealing with the are We and JA gave him cancer . He sounded pretty good.

@@cocochannel8932 Wow Thank you for that. I suppose it was unethical for him to write that book. Even if he didn't give out specifics, would speaking about her character or lack there of be violating attorney client privilege? I would guess yes. This just made me think if she wanted to appeal why didn't she do it on the basis of infective council (is that what they call it) ? Or has she already tried that route? Well everything happens for a reason I'm glad he is healthy and happy. He was a public defender wasn't he? I should remember I was born and raised here in Phoenix and followed the case very closely. I suppose thats what happens when going through your own life's drama and trauma. Your brain basically removes useless information to make room for important life changing lessons. 😊

If 6 foot 4, 250 pounds Nurmi couldn't control a 5 foot, 6 inch, 120 pound woman, shouldn't the trial have been canceled?

Hahahha...yes. what is her argument?

Her argument sounds so stupid and not based on any facts or evidence, she sounds like such an idiot 🙄

JM proved JA and her witnesses were lying and incompetent! The end

@@Jl-ou4jt The Procecutor Martinez committed misconduct during the trial. That is a proven fact. He got sued also. If you open your ears it's very clear what she is saying. Martinez works on Car theft cases now....

Lol 🤪

Do you love Juan Martinez? You sound like you do, so could you make a small donation to him? He was disbarred and can't get a job. For $250, he'll send you his autograph. Yes, that's quite a bit for an autograph, but remember, he used to be somebody.

@@kenmat1 You sound bitter hahaha!! Let me guess, you were part of the Jodi Arias fan club of half wits who believe she's innocent. You can take shots at Juan Martínez til' kingdom come for all I care. The man did his job and got a conviction on that murderous, self-centered, narcissistic egomaniac, who was repeatedly caught in her own web of lies. Perhaps you should send her a letter proclaiming your love for her. After all, she lives for all the attention she could get. I bet she'd love to tell you what she'd like to do to you!! Stay salty assclown!! 🤣👌🏻

@@KingDevilCharger Calm down, Jay. I didn't mean to hit a nerve. I was just passing on some information that you didn't seem to know. Jeez, you look at some people sideways, and they flip out. You know what's going to happen now, Jay? You're going on the list. That's right, THE LIST. Oh, remember to contact your boyfriend, Juan. He's very lonely.

@@kenmat1 I get it, you're ULTRA sensitive about your Jodi lady love LOL!! Letters just aren't good enough? Try some breathing exercises or a holistic approach and see how that works for you. No need to let your frustrations out on YT posts lol!! After all, you can go visit her and see if they'll let you and stabby share a cell together. Being the only woman you have a real chance with, I'm sure they'll make an exception for you. Good luck & I wish you a speedy & successful recovery LOL!

@@KingDevilCharger Can't you be clever or funny? Anything but what are. Tiresome, boring and pitiful. I preferred the haters from 2013-2014 who were lowlifes (like you) but their hate had some originality. You're dismissed.

For real lol

I find it disrespectful. Aren't they supposed to be non biased ?

@@Pix3l_Pr1ncess yes, but they also heavily study a case before an appeals case. Arias had overwhelming evidence against her. I would be laughing at the defense's argument.

Yes! It’s AWESOME!!

Love it 😀

Mario Lopez they have to appeal to the law. But the judges are like “Not a chance in Hell Jodi.”

Are you writing from North Korea?

@@TheCrossPearls Don't bet on it. A lot of things are going on "behind the scene."

​@@TheCrossPearls .........people are over her and her sick..deceitful, desperate attention-seeking attempts to get out of her cage.......lwop is NOT justice for Travis or his loved ones, it is also NOT a proper punishment that airyASS deserves....... let's just get this over with once and for all and give her what she does deserve and that is the death penalty, not tomorrow TODAY

Mario you have absolutely nothing to be scared about ! she thought she hit the jackpot when she got lwop but what she failed to understand is that inmates do not like liars and monsters like airyASS, she has received two written death threats and one right to her ugly hideous face,,,the thing about the inmates is they do not have to have a trial or go by any rules or laws, most of them have life sentences so to carry out what they have promised to do to her, is not something she has any say over, she really should have stfu put on huge disgusting granny panties with stripes on them and kept quiet but she is too arrognt and narcissistic, she could not now the inmates just like the entire rest of the world want her to get the death penalty.