John Landis on 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY

Подписаться 57 тыс.

Просмотров 107 тыс.

50% 1

Many a baby boomer’s most treasured recollections of the 1960s include one or more altered-state viewings of Stanley Kubrick and Arthur C. Clarke’s game-changing science fiction film, which combined extraordinary, state-of-the-art special effects with a metaphysical meditation on life, death and rebirth played out in Super Panavision 70. Douglas Trumbull’s groundbreaking visual effects remain as convincing as any found 45 years later in Alfonso Cuaron’s equally awe-inspiring Gravity. Many sci fi fans approached 2001 with skepticism since it was touted as the pinnacle of the genre, only to become lifelong devotees. It would be interesting to contrast Martin Balsam’s rejected performance as the voice of the computer HAL with that of Douglas Rain, who was hired to be less “emotional” than Balsam.
As always, you can find more commentary, more reviews, more podcasts, and more deep-dives into the films you don't know you love yet over on the Trailers From Hell mothership:
www.trailersfromhell.com
What's that podcast, you ask? Why, it's THE MOVIES THAT MADE ME, where you can join Oscar-nominated screenwriter Josh Olson and TFH Fearless Leader Joe Dante in conversation with filmmakers, comedians, and all-around interesting people about the movies that made them who they are. Check it out now, and please subscribe wherever podcasts can be found.
Apple Podcasts: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
Spotify: spotify.trailersfromhell.com
Libsyn: podcast.trailersfromhell.com
Google Play: googleplay.trailersfromhell.com
RSS: goo.gl/3faeG7

Кино

Опубликовано:

8 мар 2014

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 172

@MrRyanreese 10 лет назад

Great to hear Landis talk about such an achievement in filmmaking. Every word he says is absolutely right...

@richardscally694 Год назад

This film is a monumental step in Film Making, it is and always will be one of Kubrick's masterpieces. What a legacy he has left.

@stefanwert3795 3 месяца назад

he's a child murderer

@delona6485 7 лет назад

The best and most imaginative movie ever made. I saw it in the American Cultural Center in Kabul in 1979. I was nine years old. You can imagine the impact it had on me. I had seen nothing like it before, or since.

@Diamonddavej 5 лет назад

Found this about the American Cultural Center in Kabul, that opened in 1977 and closed in 1980, the year the Soviets invaded... "The Soviets built this enormous marble cultural palace about a quarter of a kilometer from both of the two universities right on the bus route from the polytechnic and the Kabul University in the town. That place was empty. They built it in ’77 or so. I remember the Soviet cultural counselor at that time invited me out for tea because he saw that our little bungalow was just stuffed with students and ministry people and newspaper people and all the people we really wanted in our so-called “target audience.” They came and saw the programs. They were watching what we were doing. They came to our movies. The whole Chinese embassy one night came to see “The Old Man in the Sea.” It was one of the best things I ever did. That was closer to ’79, of course." adst.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Afghanistan-1.pdf

@davros76 2 года назад

I first watched this about 30 years ago when very young and just didn't get it, as was probably expecting some sort of action. Watched it again recently and couldn't stop thinking about it for weeks afterwards. It's a complete masterpiece.

@mxbishop Год назад

The experience of this film has never been duplicated. In most space-faring epics, the characters are at each other's throats, as though they have never worked together before, and have absolutely no intention of doing so while in space. This was the first movie to depict astronauts acting as professionals, solving problems, staying calm and cool - like they were trained to do. The other thing that this movie has is a generous sense of the unknown - which permeates the whole film. I can't remember if it was Kubrick or Clarke who said that the idea of the picture was not to highlight how the universe is stranger than we know - but rather, that it is far stranger than we _can_ know. I thought that was rather brilliant. With that explanation, this movie all makes sense to me.

@chuckanziulewicz9926 2 года назад

I saw this movie at the drive-in with my parents, during the summer of 1968, when I was all of nine years old. It completely changed my Universe.

@plasticweapon Год назад

you beat me out by a year.

@markmiller6844 10 месяцев назад

Same

@jamesd2128 5 лет назад

Unlike virtually every other SF movie made since 2001, Kubrick's masterpiece captured the eerie silence of space, and made it absolutely awesome to behold.

@sachaput 10 лет назад

One of the all-time greatest SF films ever made. Among my Top Five favorites.

@AnthonySmith-ty7ij 7 лет назад

A true sci-fi masterpiece. This help launched the great space movies from Star Wars to most recently The Martian. Hal is really the star of this picture. I love the Dawn of Man sequence with apes looking at the monolith.

@DCHurlford1 2 года назад

Brilliant shot with the ape throwing up the bone then cutting to the spaceship.

@theeverydaychallenge 7 лет назад

When you're in the right mood and put on Space Odyssey it's a total experience of a film. Still my favorite after many years, glad to see so much love for the big ideas and grand scope of this flick on RU-vid.

@jennifersman7990 5 лет назад

The Everyday Challenge Yes, it’s a movie you need to see on a good HD TV, dark room, zero interruptions. Still hoping to watch it that way one day

@jimmyl324 7 лет назад

What a great movie.

@NachshonYosef 6 месяцев назад

I saw this for the first time tonight (and in 70mm!). I nearly fell out of my seat when I heard the line, "See you next Wednesday."

@patricktaylor2733 5 лет назад

A genuine cinematic masterpiece that looks positively stunning in 4K! Supposedly this is the film that made Tom Hanks want to be an actor.

@jamesfrench7299 2 года назад

While I don't care for Tom Hanks and his ilk's pinko political beliefs, I like his work and how his roles have evolved into very serious stuff from his Bosom Buddies days. I have more respect for him if that's true regarding 2001.

@jerseyforhawks 2 года назад

Unimaginative, huh? Ah, a no on that. This movie could be released in 2022 , and it would be fine. Timeless and perfect.

@Skusioh 6 лет назад

I cannot believe this movie is from 1968.. the special effects are mind blowing (for the time)

@jamesfrench7299 2 года назад

A lot was invented during the production. It's not just the effects, it's the production style like the font used for the credits that just didn't look typical 1960s. Much more like the 1980s.

@TPOrchestra 5 лет назад

The totally forgotten "Oliver" won the Best Picture Oscar in 1969. The incredibly influential "2001" wasn't even nominated in the category.

@jennifersman7990 5 лет назад

Well, wait a sec, to be fair the Academy was still largely populated by older people who didn’t understand a lot of the new breed of filmmakers/actors and still loved musicals. In the case of 2001 the actors kinda took a backseat to the visual effects which did win in their categories, and I believe Kubrick WAS nominated for best director.

@LPCLASSICAL 3 года назад

Oliver is not forgotten - it still is a delight for many.

@madahad9 9 лет назад

Pauline Kael's dismissal of 2001 just proves how short sighted some critics can be. They should al be avoided and treated with contempt. I have never been bored by a Stanley Kubrick film until Eyes Wide Shut when one my second viewing I kept nodding off but 2001 mesmerizes me. It is probably Kubrick's most hopeful film. One of the thrills of my life was meeting Keir Dullea when he appeared for a 2001 Q & A at the theater I work at and actually got to speak to him one on one. I rarely gush and was floating about three feet in the air meeting someone who worked with Kubrick and especially on such an iconic film. He looked exactly as he appeared in 2010, very nice, and autographed a 2001 book for me which is a cherished piece of my Kubrick collection. I wish I had written down a few questions instead of babbling like an idiot. I wanted to throw out my theory about the Star Child and the way its hands were (in my observation) in a Hindu gesture of greeting and peace. The novel's ending of it detonating obiting nuclear satelites could be interpreted as a good thing or a bad thing. I prefer the film's ambiguous ending that has no implication of violence. Or my theory how Kubrick literally beats the acting out of the actors so no one outshines the themes he is presenting. His characters can be a bit unreal at times but it is all to serve the film's theme.

@jesseakaike1488 9 лет назад

GREG FREEMAN Right on. U speak love and truth.

@TheJnatch 8 лет назад

+Christopher Winters true, plus she had a vendetta against Kubrick, she was afraid of coming across as an elitist critic and feared liking Kubrick would turn some people off, hence her obsession with John Carpenter

@BradHollowniczky 5 лет назад

The only critic I really like is Mark Kermode. He doesn't seem to have an agenda and he's always willing to engage with opinions counter to his own. He's also championed a lot of films so called serious critics have dismissed out of hand. I don't always agree with him but I respect him and his genuine passion for cinema.

@plasticweapon 2 года назад

@@BradHollowniczky exorcist obsessed curmudgeon mark kermode doesn't have an agenda?

@aliensoup2420 Месяц назад

Regarding your "theory" of the Star Child's hands...you are overthinking. The hand position is a direct imitation of the 1965 Life Magazine cover image of an 18 week fetus. Unless you believe a fetus has some knowledge of Hindu gestures.

@tomservo5347 Год назад

I fell in love with this movie after reading the book. Aside from changing a few minor things like Jupiter instead of Saturn and the moon rover (too difficult technically so they made it fly) it's a movie and book that makes you feel different after watching/reading. Kubrick and Clarke have taken you on your own personal odyssey and whether you realize it or not your mind has expanded.

@leclue22 10 лет назад

Someone should do a video blog on "Movie Critics from Hell" with all the stupid things that movie critics have said over the years about movies that turned out to be classics.

@DCHurlford1 7 лет назад

Or the opposite, film critics who proclaim a film to be an epic when it's actually boring (the recent sci-fi film Arrival springs to mind).

@DCHurlford1 6 лет назад

Although I think the director may have redeemed himself with the new Blade Runner movie (going by initial reviews). In fairness I thought Sicario (with Emily Blunt) was a good film.

@DCHurlford1 6 лет назад

I caught both at the pictures. Arrival just doesn't do it for me but I did think BR 2049 was an excellent sequel.

@garrybaldy327 4 года назад

@@degsbabe That's Lean's fault for being so sensitive to criticism. He even threw his toys out of his pram when Spielberg gave him some well-meaning, but gentle, criticism during the editing stage of A Passage To India.

@garrybaldy327 4 года назад

Arrival was magical. Blade Runner 2049 was disappointing. Sicario was a directorial masterpiece.

@jacobadams5924 3 года назад

I saw it for first time on TNT network in 1990! I was just ten. Even off TV, it was an unforgettable experience, like nothing I've encountered.

@rsvp9146 2 года назад

Im of the same age. TNT played a lot of really good movies when I was growing up. Turned me on to all kinds of different and unique films..

@maxthepupp 3 года назад

I love when Landis unabashedly praises something😁

@ewaf88 10 лет назад

I can just imagine Alex North picking up his phone and HAL saying 'This film is too important to allow your score to jeopardize it'.

@jamesfrench7299 2 года назад

One like for this? What's wrong with people?

@ewaf88 2 года назад

@@jamesfrench7299 I'd forgotten all about my comment. 7 years - goodness.

@nameprivate2194 Год назад

Hm, I wonder if Kael said _2001: A Space Odyssey_ is "unimaginative" because it has plenty of perfectly good Science in it.

@mrmoon1482 Год назад

One of my favourite films

@skivvy9yo 9 лет назад

Masters and Doctoral thesis have been written on this film. Nuff said Ms. Kael!

@nathanforester5993 4 года назад

Ever since I heard the line 'See you next Wednesday' pop up in a few of his movies i've wondered if it was a real movie since he has it as a fake movie title within a movie, and it turns out that it's a reference to 2001.

@jerryrichardson2799 Год назад

Another great TFH for a great movie, and a serious and pensive one from Landis.

@augustgreig9420 7 лет назад

A lot of people like to talk about how hippies would go see this and take LSD so they could ooh and ahh at the visuals of Jupiter and Beyond. But the truth is, with or without psychedelics, when approached with the right frame of mind, this film can have profound spiritual meaning.

@walterfechter8080 2 года назад

As soon as first heard of "Dark Side of The Moon" LP in 1973, I immediately thought of some dialog early-on in this film, "Moon, American, Floyd..." spoken by Heywood Floyd (William Sylvester).

@SirSmoldham 8 лет назад

I FINALLY GET IT!

@TheZombiejohn75 10 лет назад

Landis for president.

@marcuswalker2722 8 лет назад

yep

@plasticweapon 2 года назад

why?!

@DWNicolo 10 лет назад

It was and still is a helluva game changer.

@LPCLASSICAL 3 года назад

Alex North sountrack? Would love to hear it. But really - the opening space sequence without Also Sprach Zarathustra?

@thork6974 Год назад

There's a tribute recording of it from the late 1990s, conducted by Jerry Goldsmith. It's interesting in that it hits many of the same beats as the Strauss selections-- not quite 'soundalike' territory, but close. Also, North repurposed much of it in his score for DRAGONSLAYER in 1981.

@fanboydee 10 лет назад

I loved you in The Tenth Victim, Marcello.

@Springbok314 Год назад

“Will you stop, Dave?”

@AwesomelyAwsome 10 лет назад

Remind me why people speak so highly of Pauline Kael?

@danielh9252 9 лет назад

Fear. Critics back then held immense clout, they were like the Catholic church. What she had against this film, I have no idea. Maybe sour grapes or a too radical shift from the old way of making movies. Just an opinion.

@AwesomelyAwsome 9 лет назад

Works for me, now if only her fanboys would shut the hell up.

@madahad9 9 лет назад

She did write a rave review of Last Tango In Paris when others were condeming it as porn. She missed the boat on 2001 totally. I never heard if she re-evaluated the film later on though or if she stuck to her initial review. Critics are idiots for the most part. Thankfully their power and influence is diminishing.

@AwesomelyAwsome 9 лет назад

GREG FREEMAN I doubt she did, I've heard she never watched the same movie twice.

@JerrySaraviaCinema1895 8 лет назад

+GREG FREEMAN I doubt she ever revisited 2001 - she had a disdain for Kubrick's films post-Dr. Strangelove.

@kamuelalee 3 года назад

Why did people pay attention to Pauline Kael? The woman didn't know about movies.

@leclue22 10 лет назад

"See you next Wednesday, John!"

@Wills_Duffy 10 лет назад

There is this and everything else:

@luissegovia8205 7 лет назад

hello ...im federico fellini and i love this movie

@XFLexiconMatt Год назад

Pauline Kael's was monumentally off the mark. Some of her taste in films is weird, she praised "Last Tango In Paris" which bored me to tears when I saw it. Kael had some bias about Kubrick.

@kevinrhea7332 3 года назад

Not necessarily promoting certain chemical help because that would be irresponsible but after watching this movie for years it did take some for me to finally and completely “get it” recently, in what I felt like was it’s proper scope, the history and future of mankind

@buckaroobanzai7063 3 года назад

The best part, Kubrick didn’t get a single child or actor killed while filming his movie. Unlike some people...

@danwroy 4 года назад

Can't be said enough that these Landis contributions are essential

@aliensoup2420 Месяц назад

Pauline Kael was subconsciously projecting and actually describing herself.

@madahad9 2 года назад

I'd love to see the deleted scenes Kubrick removed after a test screening. I wouldn't want it restored back into the film as some sort of "director's cut" but as a bonus feature for some future release of the film. But I seriously doubt that will ever happen. I imagine the footage is stored away in the same area as the deleted ending of The Shining. We'll never see it.

@aliensoup2420 Месяц назад

Kubrick was in a habit of destroying unused materials so they could not be used in such a manner. He also destroyed the models and props from the movie.

@conradpoos2859 5 лет назад

I completely forgot Reginald Perrin was in this.

@antonytye3484 2 года назад

That's not Perrin, that's Rigsby 😜

@Georgieastra Год назад

@@antonytye3484 I didn't get where I am today without recognising Reggie Perrin!

@snakeyman5560 6 лет назад

How do you kill a vampire? - John Landis Uhm... Stake to the heart, holy cross, garlic. - Max Landis NO! You can kill a vampire however you want because they don't exist. - John Landis

@wondersteven 2 года назад

I first saw 2001 in Cinerama.

@aljackson127 6 лет назад

The Sam Goody story about the music is just goshing on Landis's part. The music for 2001 is quite a story in itself but it premiered in New York with exactly what one sees today. Not sure why Landis wanted to pull our legs about this, even if this is a thing he does.

@jonathanw1019 Год назад

Yeah, I can't for the life of me figure that out, seeing as Kubrick gave North most of what ended up being the score as temp music to work from, and is documented asking North to make the score more like the classical he had selected. The idea that he'd walk across the street and randomly come across both Strauss's, Katchaturian and Ligeti of all people is nonsense.

@monkeySkeptic 6 лет назад

If you ever have a chance to see this film played with live music, *go*.

@Coffeemaker740 10 лет назад

Hi i'm macielo mashtroianni

@sawlfo 6 лет назад

Luca Sebastiani why does he say that? Is it a joke?

@maxxdelarge6609 3 года назад

Why does Mr. Landis say he's Marcello Mastroiani?

@danielleking1171 7 лет назад

amazing film dont get the acid trip ending but the effects stand up well

@jamesfrench7299 2 года назад

If not the flight crew's outfits!

@Deepurplerain 2 года назад

Pauline Kael is against modernism or what?,her dislking of Orson Welles and now this.. We still love her though..

@captaincinema5066 5 лет назад

The much better trailer that I think has a significantly more powerful effect is the "B" trailer that was released by National Screen Service at the end of 1969. While the version here is from the Cinerama simulation BluRay, it was released in standard letterboxed for flat (non-anamorphic) trailer packs, without that Cinerama curve. The reason I like it so much more than any of the "talkie" versions is because like the film itself, this trailer is pure visual with no hokie voiceover which is frivolous anyway -- I mean, how can a trailer hope to explain 2001 in a a few minutes worth of hype dialogue? Here the spectacular imagery with just the Strause music under does more to make an audience want to see the film than any ad copy ever could. Here -- see if you don't agree -- this is the better 2001 trailer: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-zWURhn5xQFk.html BTW, I know for sure that this trailer was released for the first run engagements of the film at the end of 1969 in the 35mm format; I can't say for sure that it also was made available in 70mm -- I know for absolute certainty about the 35mm release because I ran the trailer in 35mm the first time I booked the film in our theatre (still have the trailer print).

@MrKylePopovich 8 лет назад

This is totally wrong. The editor actually used classical music as a guiding track. When Kubrick went into the edit he fell in love and dismissed any other music.

@janetcraft 8 лет назад

You are correct, MrKylePopovich. I read somewhere that when Stanley and the crew watched parts of the edited, (rough) cuts, there was no music until the editor inserted The Blue Danube in certain scenes. That got Stanley interested and therefore he dropped Alex North's original soundtrack and replaced it with his own choice. The story goes, as you can imagine, Alex was not a happy man.

@MrKylePopovich 8 лет назад

Poor Alex :( I heard report that he didn't EVEN KNOW they changed it, and found out THE NIGHT of the screening while he was sitting in the audience. Low blow Kubrick.

@janetcraft 8 лет назад

Stanley had a habit of "pulling the wool over your eyes" at a sudden moment or in time. It seems to me it was either doing it his way or leave the set.

@aljackson127 7 лет назад

This is the story I know too.

@aljackson127 7 лет назад

Alex did get paid.

@cha5 4 года назад

Reginald Perrin in outer space.

@antonytye3484 2 года назад

Rigsby in a Rocket

@matthayward7889 4 года назад

Every word John landis says on TFH is pure gold

@plasticweapon 7 месяцев назад

shit isn't gold.

@davidfrost2819 4 года назад

British film too

@mikehebert6721 4 года назад

Saw this in IMAX last summer. The only way to see and understand what they were going for.

@jcf20010 3 года назад

The original Cinerama showing can't be beat. That's the way I saw it when it first came out.

@diddymuck 3 года назад

a spacecraft capable of traveling to an outer planet constructed from scratch in a matter of days or at most months? what process of engineering is able to move a populated, earth environment-laden ship to Jupiter in just a few weeks? That's nearly 300 million to 600 million miles depending on orbit position. What did it use for fuel? Aladdin's magic lamp? Unimaginative? YBYSA!

@hifijohn 8 лет назад

hi marcello

@jamesbrice6619 Год назад

Monumentally unimaginative? WTF Pauline!?!?!

@psawisumut5507 3 года назад

Red astronaut be like : shhhh there's Impostors among us

@thegoodjinn8065 7 лет назад

rigsby............

@fredflintstone7943 4 года назад

Landis felt this film needed a helicopter decapitation or 3....

@Psalm1101 Год назад

Well not really no space stations just buses put together no shuttles there gone

@Daavhimself 6 лет назад

Landis was probably one of the critics who hated on this when it came out, then changed his opinion like a sycophant

@jamesfrench7299 2 года назад

You might be onto something. Just the way he was speaking was like he was just parroting the praisers because it's now widely regarded as a great film. It sounded kind of shallow.

@plasticweapon 2 года назад

@@jamesfrench7299 landis is more than a little shallow.

@Shadowman4710 2 года назад

The evidence for that is?

@richardmurphy9006 10 лет назад

Just a total Mindfuck

@johnhanley7214 6 лет назад

too bad it was never released as I-MAX

@GA-1st Год назад

"Unimaginative"? LOL! Kael was a great writer and when she didn't go low, a great critic. But when she got it wrong, she got it really WRONG!

@teeniebeenie8774 7 лет назад

my least fave of the reviewers...

@christophermirkovich7290 3 года назад

I only understand parts of this film due to Rob Ager

@diddymuck 7 лет назад

a gigantic door the size of the whole installation that opens up like a sliced pie to let in a craft with 4 people??? Ever hear of energy and air conservation?

@plasticweapon 2 года назад

no.

@taroman7100 5 лет назад

What's with this guy. I've listened to quite a few of his reviews. Either he goes into some depth or he just says stupid things.

@williamk3702 6 лет назад

All due respect to all concerned, I don't like this trailer - for maybe the most ridiculously anal reason ever - that logo - No! Adding depth stinks of hyperbole and is unacceptable. Flat text is all that is required. Like, simply '2OOI: A SPACE ODYSSEY', stark and unforgiving as an epitaph, you know, 'Take it or leave it. I'm not going anywhere', it would seem to say. 'You'll be back. They always come back'

@patricktaylor2733 Месяц назад

Pauline Kael is the most overrated film critic of all time.

@aurahyel4700 9 лет назад

Ku'prick' was an arsehole. A genius, yes; a gentleman, no. He didn't have the courtesy to inform Alex North, who composed an original score, that his music had been replaced by classical music.

@tanookilord 10 лет назад

I haven't seen the entire movie, simply because it's so damn boring and put me to sleep. One of the most overrated movies of all time that seems to get a pass because of its visuals and because Kubrick is trying to show off some grand "themes" and "ideas" that are woefully executed in my opinion.

@dreamquesttv 10 лет назад

Honestly, as much as I love the bulk of Kubrick's films, I'm inclined to agree; even noting it's influence, even admiring it on a technical level, it's boring as shit. I'm almost convinced that people who overtly praise this movie were either stoned out of their minds when they saw it, or are pretentious film-school shitheads that have NEVER seen it, but put their own spins on positive reviews that they're read on it, so as not to look like a complete fucking idiot when questioned about it. But hey, to each his own.

@johannes914 10 лет назад

I guess you tried to watch it on TV... Won't work. This movie has been tailored for the big ... no... the huge screen. It's all about the experience.

@hyrdrogenalpha 10 лет назад

I saw this at a Cinerama theater which was unbelievable when it came out. TV kills it to a point!

@tanookilord 10 лет назад

ewaf88 Yes, clearly one cannot have a differing opinion about something. Hurrrrrr. . And I may find 90% of Phantom Menace pretty terrible, but I'll take that over 2001 any day.

@dreamquesttv 10 лет назад

ewaf88 That's what I get for trying to debate with a fucking rugby player. I DON'T LIKE THE FUCKING MOVIE, OK GUY? It's fucking Transformers for film snobs; a bunch of pretty colors and NOTHING ELSE! When you take away all the pretentious "profundities" and you strip it down to the bare essentials, what do you have left? A touching, heart-warming story of a sentient, mass murdering computer and his battle of wits with two blocks of wood played by Kier Dullea and Gary Lockwood. That's three fucking hours long. You can jizz your pants over this overblown piece of tripe all you want. I WON'T. Just that simple. By the way, if Kubrick were still alive, you wouldn't be writing him letters. Because he wouldn't give a shit about you. Kinda like me right now. Or this movie. In fact, I'll do you one BETTER: 2010? By Peter Hyams? FAR SUPERIOR TO THIS! There. If THAT won't make you take your own life, NOTHING will.

@diddymuck 7 лет назад

it IS monumentally unimaginative. the core story is the old hat theme of a computer taking over people. that concept was outdated when they used it for the 1957 flick The Invisible Boy. Outside the makeup for the primitives and the Pam Am flight, this was dull, absurd in concept, and at the end completely goofy. And these days, outdated...no more soviet union, no colony on the moon (for dirt and rocks research?), no commercial flights into space (a multi-million flight for, what? a total capacity of 40 people???), and no Pan Am!

@diddymuck 3 года назад

@APM AM explain your remark, Stitch.

@plasticweapon 2 года назад

who cares?