Johnny Depp amused as witness mocks articles written about actor | LiveNOW from FOX 

I can’t agree MORE.

Quite right. But also very useful for team Depp .....Heard`s team damaging their own image , Funny really.

Wouldn't that be like hearsay evidence? Either way, it's a ridiculous way to gather information.

@@sweettrubble4635 That’s what I am say. They objected a lot to using articles, calling it hearsay, tsk tsk

When they need to link those gossips whit an effect on someone career, it is not that weird, now, the way they are doing it is dumb

Lol right

Best comment! 🙌🏼

Not to mention they purchased the rights to air the salacious Pam and Tommy series on Disney Plus.

Boom!!!

Ikr!! And when was drugs and alcohol addiction a problem for actors/ actresses in hollywood? They make it seem like JD is the only actor with drug and alcohol problems! There are so many more and all of them get roles just fine and even wrote books and did interviews about it.

I have none of that, save a great paying job. I have no regrets.

@Valu thats not right

🤣

@@indridcold8433 That you need to say this speaks volumes to your regrets. Take better mental care of yourself.

@Valu What nation do you reside that is so draconian? I did get vaccinated. Those that chose no vaccination simply went to a different floor to work. Nobody is forced here. However, we do still have a mask protocol. Businesses can decline to conduct business with unmasked individuals. That is about as bad as it gets here. I can not believe you live in a nation that fires people for no vaccinations. It may be time to move to a more free nation. Be careful. Since you stated you got fired for not being vaccinated, you may be on some sort of government watch.

@HotDog9 lol you're funny. Thanks 4 being the reminder that odd-balls abound. 😆 😆 🤣

@HotDog9 Being just a spectator in court is the only requirement that is good for you, in particular. I hope you'll never have to be a witness or a juror in any case, in any courtroom. You're NOT equipped!!

Agreed!

@HotDog9 wow there are dum* people in the world I just read a comment from one! Hot dog can I get your autograph

@@barbaramccormack5612 agreed!

Exactly right. It's great entertainment to see how incompetent the defence is even if you hate Depp.

Exactly!

I completely agree. It's now become comical to see just how pathetic Amber's "attorneys" can get. Asking the same question 4 different ways shouldn't have cost hundreds of thousands in law school. I could do this if that's all it is! Reading trash tabloids are also a sad attempt at trying to make a point.

We ought to support the facts.

Love it how the attorney's voice went from overconfident to nervous 😂

agreed being from the uk the sun in my opinion is bs that my opinion and to use it as evidence wow ok have they got nothing else that there grasping at straws and using the sun

So next time if I ever need to go to court, I'm stopping at the news stand and grabbing a copy of each. And they are googling him and getting every article written by every journalist, new and old. Unprofessional and not. Just stupid.

You should have heard the other clips when AH’s lawyer referenced other pop culture magazines 😂

They should of used National Enquirer instead 😂

no one with the right mind would read the sun.all it's good for is mopping up spillage.

I wanted him to say "at least he didn't poop in someones bed" but he is much smarter than me and knows better. Still it woule have been epic!!!

not only gossip magazines, but also random blogs and such, which most likely is mainly opinions, and have no real facts

@@thortorin9954This man did an excellent job during his testimony stating just that: all the defense's resources are from sources that are not a legitimate source of information. One was a blog called Behind the Magic where the author even stated she just used information from another tabloid article. It's absolutely pathetic the defense is relying on these blogs and tabloids .

Really just shows their desperation at all they have

They’re trying to say his name was deflamed before she accused him of abuse

Agreed! 💯

Objection Hearsay! Wait I asked the question!

@@derrickcarbona9245 "I'LL ASK THE QUESTIONS HERE! WAIT NO DONT ANSWER!,OBJECTION, HEARSAY!"

Interrupting whenever the answer witness provides does not line up with what he wants. Even when it's completely relevant to the question asked. The lawyer is such a clown

He sounds so nervous!

@@derrickcarbona9245 it leads to bias your honor

Exactly because any and all of the negative publicity Depp had before the op-ed was completely commonplace, run of the mill negativity or gossip to the same degree if not less than other actors of his level of fame. It gets completely lost in the noise for audiences and producers when all of his contemporaries have a similar story running about the actor doing something embarrassing in public. When an actor is accused of rape and domestic violence, it stands out as a serious matter to everyone. And it was an enormous story. I remember feeling disgusted at Depp at the time, and no longer saw him as a person but as some kind of tyrannical monster. Now that it has come to light he was being abused at home by his wife and trying to protect his abuser as people do, that his accuser was this same ex wife that used to hit him for staying out too late, that his accuser was deeply abusive and domestically violent to him, and tried to flip the script as punishment for him wanting to end the relationship: Their grounds for defamation are staggering. Flatly untrue, intentional and malicious with indescribable damages

Lol, “the nonsense man…” 😂🙌🏼

This comment, here, 100% correct! 🙄🤪

Omg I'm giggling and now full on laughing outloud about letting the nonsense man near a microphone again 🤣🤣🤣

He was chilling

Brandon, this attorney is trying to push his buttons. He sees AH team is losing, drawing at straws

I agree Brandon this was so bad nasty disgusting

​@@bec7839yes I agree with you. It was getting to the point that it wasn't working they were clasping at straws at this point jmo

Indeed, it was a joke of an examination.

Yes cheap shot

Objection, hearsay!

cheap shot

And hearsay! JD team needs to object with hearsay like they do. I'm sick of AH's team. Hearsay?

Exactly. And why aren't they objecting to this line of questioning

Well, the team reflects the defendant 🤷🏻‍♀️

I agree! Ive never seen a lawyer object to his own guestion. Laughable!

"You don't have a crystal ball, right?"

@@amymenjivar3489 😂😂 That was so stupid, honestly

Do you have experience with real-life lawyers? (note: my tone-of-voice is "sincere", not challenging.)

Railroadedspiked

Dr S was the icing on the cake pmsl!

disney started with horrific.. Walt was a freaking racist and never denied it and didn't hide it!

oh! regarding disney, don't take my word for it, look it up!

Going all the way back to Snow White and Sleeping Beauty.

@@elenalatici9568 i was thinking more the nazi propaganda stuff

Walt Disney hated Jews lol

I think the speculation is that they're assuming Heard is going to lose, so they're trying to drag his career down as far as possible, to lower the amount of money he could win from it. I.e. "He claims this much damages, but through his own actions he already damaged his career, therefore X amount is excessive for damages from her Op Ed"

She’s giving them enough rope to hang themselves.

From the Sun! Lol I used to be obsessed with the Enquirer when I was way younger but I would never ever touch The Sun. Nothing but liessss

an arrogant condescending judge with no scruples.

@@makaylahollywood3677 this isn’t a criminal trial. In civil trials, there are looser standards for what can be entered as evidence. It’s not the judge’s fault. I think she’s doing an excellent job of controlling her courtroom. Given the sheer amount of objections alone, she’s doing her job quite well.

It's not even a disney owned website!

@@joshdavies9237 none of those sources are Disney owned, it's mostly gossip magazines and some random website that every idiot can manage that have absolutely zilch credibility

Seriously lol

that he/she totally didn't write themselves 5 minutes before the trial

@@sidolanters1394 Exactly and that’s why Amber’s case is so garbage. It’s a literally a laughing stock to any lawyer. She’s gonna lose by a landslide

well he's an attorney himself, so he knew how to play the game.

@Savaial Addams "led" is the correct past tense of "to lead". Just an fyi.

@@lisahinton9682 thanks for that. I love a grammar corrector!

@@lisahinton9682 just an f.y.i. Don’t forget the periods

I'm not sure who he is..I must of missed that.

My feelings from day one! Love it! Keep on beating-up every witness- huge points for Mr. Depp's side!!! 😎

They're the only kinda people that would defend a bully like amber

Exactly, her lawyers attitude makes you think they are bullies trying to yep ppl up.

Like a coyote stuck in a trap they know it's over so they get scared and try to go on the attack in a last chance attempt to evade the inevitable end

Their acting like her. 😆🤣😂

😂

🤣😂😂😂

Right?! me too lol

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Could've made bank dawg, took that L

Yes they are

Hes a big shark lawyer in movie industry, hes very savy and the most heavy weight of all lawyers in the court room.

Really, for the price he's being paid he didn't seem too well researched on Jhonny Depp

@@ivangutowski really?? That's his point. He doesn't know everything said or thought about him (to be clear.. johnny depp)

@@ivangutowski Why he will waste his time that is expensive as hell reading stupid tabloids? Of course he knows most actors use some kind of drugs or have some kind of behavior problem.

@@felipewerner6670 Would you mind sharing his name? I must’ve missed it earlier on in the video. Was curious since he’s an expert witness.

Yep, "asked and answered" , should be used more often.

the judge has nothing to do with the lawyers and she cant reject a lawyer xd of course she cannot seem biased, thats unprofessional, she sustained just as many objections from johnnys as from ambers team so far. also johnnys team isnt objecting to almost everything so the jury can see what clowns ambers lawyers are i think

I am on JD's side here but the lawer, by pulling all the articles up, is trying to say that Amber didn't cause him millions (which she did. Those articles are bogus)

Although you are right, I think somehow its a good thing 4 Johnny Depp. Cuz it shows the damage her article has cost Johnny. Even if its on shady websites. So they wanna help Queen Turd, but instead of making her look better, its all about why Johnny started this lawsuit. His name and career were damaged because of her Miss Turd.

Badgering the witness*

Yes true, but the court is allowing it because it is relevant in terms of reputation. We all know ‘The Sun’ is shite, and doesn’t even make a profit, but people do read it, sadly, and of course, other outlets comment on it, spreading its reach even further.

@@gee_emm valid point

I agree. They are just digging their graves one shovel of crap at a time.

I thought they objected a lot. Are we watching the same video?

Team Johnny all the way 💘

totally agree

Disbarment speedrun.

Badgering a witness for not reading rag magazines. What the heck

Yes and they have been this way for the entire case.

This attorney sounds like he could be the brother of Ben Shapiro. Shallow logic, no depth or understanding.

Especially Johnny ! They can never get him rattled. "A mega pint?"😅 All of Johnny's friends and employees are like him. Cool, calm, classy and collected.

AH's attorney are like her, bullying and rude. JD's attorneys are like him, respectful and courteous.

Is this behaviour really uncommon cuz I don’t know nothing about court and attorney business.

@@nightcrawler9455 for the most part yes the way they are acting is out of behavior. It’s not unheard of for attorneys to attack and be a little unlikeable but it’s weird when it’s clear as day that they are going out of their way to attack the witness just based off of not getting the answer they want. It’s also weird and out of character to come at the characters of the witnesses left and right without it leading towards a question.

I certainly think they are not putting out great advertising for their services. I think the judge is just giving them enough rope.

I really do think it is because Heard is putting an incredible amount of pressure on them and probably also verbally abusing them. That’s what I think though!

They're probably this way cause they're grasping at straws. I'm so angry 😭😭😭

Omg this is hilarious 😅

Tnx for sharing this with us lol

Objection, no reason

I can’t find good information about it anywhere but I’m curious, I thought past trials/instances independent of the current trial weren’t allowed to be used in the jury’s judgement? So why is the lawyer able to bring up the UK trial do try to spit on depp’s face

Super mega pint heresay objection to that claim your honor

Those kinds of articles are typically printed in what you probably characterize as an “unreliable source.”

@@sallymj8957 well, I would assume a vast majority of the people consider them to be unreliable sources. As someone studying English, I have done my fair share of research on whether or not a source is reliable

That's why their evidence is lacking any foundation. The articles are literally hearsay.

Lmao he’s like “eh, I’m already there”

I love his reaction here too.. he’s like ok Watever I maybe over paid but I’ll take it . Luv it !

AND THIS IS A DOMESTIC abuse case... would if should of could of...WTH ..where is this going to prove Amber had a black eye.. etc....( I get the Disney issue..but seriously..)

J.D. is not a violent maniac. Amber Heard belongs in prison.

@@Dani-ICU-RN but this is the case for JD ... He is claiming that this article from amber brought him a major decrease in income .. so actually .. it is very important to prove or disprove if this was really the case .. and yeah the abuse is also part of all of this 🤷😅

I will start a campaign against Disney! They have parents paying hundreds a year, to "Disney's coffers" 💰, for their movies at theater's, video's, merchandise, and visits to their theme park, but they can't "give those same parents- their "Depp" movie!!! The one movie series that adults have loved, and enjoyed- thru the years! Mr. Depp is... "Irreplaceable"!

@@malted1961 Disney has always sucked, just look at how they treaded their comic artist for many years. From the 30s up until the 90s, the artists weren't allowed to sign their work and they were forced to sign it with "Walt Disney" instead. And they never got credit and just peanuts for their work. Look up Don Rosa's story (his "epilogue"), he explains the problems with Disney in detail.

@@ambzerambzer8800 he doesnt sue for an article.. he sues Amber heard this time

Amber Heard is being sued for her part in putting together the first article which had Johnny's name and to some extent the "abuse" she suffered. However the article was edited the next day to exclude key details but the damage was already done. These lawyers are aware of this and have been trying desperately to get the witnesses to recognize that second article as fact rather than it's initial release.

In a very minor way the article reading makes sense, since Johnny is suing for an article that was written about him, not only due to the untruth in it but due to the fact it damaged his reputation. And I guess it could be questioned why he didn’t sue the rest (though he did have a lawsuit with one or some) And question why the other articles didn’t damage his rep etc Idk just minorly I get it, but not really 😂 I wish the lawyer explained his reasoning for reading the titles the other day.

@@ambzerambzer8800 Yea, but the issue is that Hollywood doesn’t care about eccentric behaviour like drugs or alcohol or being difficult in sets. Heck, look at Christian Bale. The man was crazy in Terminator Salvation set, but no one would stop hiring him for work because of it. BUT, the me too stuff is what gets you thrown under the bus.

It’s pretty clear what they’re angling for. They are trying to convey that her oped was no more or less observant of Johnnys alleged behavior than hers. They’re trying to equivocate his eccentricities to his alleged abuse which we know is absurd but it’s about angling to a jury. In other words, they’re trying the “Everyone’s hates Johnny, so is her op-ed so bad?” Except domestic abuse is not drug use. It’s a completely different and far worse problem as it involves abuse of another person other than yourself. But they want to equivocate and conflate the two. It’s obvious why many lawyers wouldn’t want to take Heards case because this is a very flimsy farcical stance All the witnesses see through this and go right back to “Domestic abuse is more severe and egregious than Johnny’s self inflicted drug abuse”. That is why this case seems so ridiculous because it is.

I hope he got help for his addiction eventually and is doing better.

Yes yes yes,all addicts are diffrent,bcs some of them have psycoligcal problems(sorry engl),and it is very very important how are you raised as a child,the company with you our,the pearson from inside you are, etc..

Perfectly said !

Never interrupt an opponent while they're making mistakes.

Yep, they are allowing them to dig their own grave lol

@@m.m2701 Johnny lawyers may as well just take a nap

They hearsay them self

It's like saying "as long as a person is down, it's totally OK to kick them."

Not like they have a better option for this loser case of theirs haha.

They have to do that though. For a guilty ruling for Amber, there has to be a lie, and it defamed him. So they argue its the truth and it didnt defame him. Even if the first one is only partially true, for the system the Op-ed had to have impact for it to be defamation.

His reputation was bad because of her 2016 false accusations

Agree with you. They are like: Amber didn't ruin his reputation nor arruined his carreer cuz Johnny himself did it.

I haven't even watched all of them maybe 1 and 2 not my cuppa. BUT. I know damn sure I wouldn even BOTHER lmaooo if they attenpted to replace him. All I remember of the movies IS JD.

In fact. Ima go watch them again. All of them

I am sick of all lawyers in general.

@Grandson Of Cherve haha can understand that... Sometimes they just milk it for too damn long

@@nohandle474 I loved JD in the Pirates movies. If they make another and replace him, I will not watch it. It just wouldn't be the same without him.

And then he says, "any company would want a box office hit that made 800 million dollars 😏". Lol

It's just nearly a billion dollars. I mean, It was a failure, right?

I can’t wait for Amber’s testimony. It’ll be like an SNL skit.

I would have added that alot sequels typically make less money than their predecessors, so Pirates 5's box office decline was not altogether unexpected.

This one made me giggle snort because the lawyer thought he was just going to say it made less but then he threw out the amount. I doubt there is any franchise, aside from Harry Potter that made that much in the 5th installment.

Ikr!!👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

I disagree with that, sorry. I hope Johnny wins, but the lawyer was good in this case.

@@pippiecarr9378 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ bruh

@@pippiecarr9378 how is reading a bunch of sleazy headlines good? Witness already made it clear that Hollywood will tolerate any bad press to make $800 million per film, EXCEPT a cloud of sexual or domestic abuse.

He's not sleazy. He's a moron. A sleaze usually is manipulative and must be somewhat intelligent.

You should

Me too. The US law system is totally uncivilised. Even in civil cases. Th whole jury system is responsible fo that. No professionals and for that case a very rude and ruduculous atmosphere. This would not be possible in continental europe.

The defence is drowning ... grasping at straws.

I would Object Hearsay!! to AH lawyer. In Mr JD defence

I am not surprised because they are doing their jobs. But you can see how hard they have to reach to try and defend her.

He IS a self righteous jerk

He is a jerk!

Blame the Judge, She is makin a mockery out of her courtroom, for allowing this farse

The restraint from Depps lawyers is impressive, they could have objected successfully a lot more but instead chose to let Amber's lawyer destroy his own credibility

Lawyers take on the personality of their client!

Yes, it's excellent isn't it? Will be annoying the he'll out of the jury. Let it roll....

I heard Elon musk got them for her and paid for them lmao 🤣

They are just like her she attracted people who are the same as she is and have no morals

I think she knows that winning this is not possible, so she's hoping she can blame shitty lawyers and attempt some sort of damage control after the trial is over

Well said and great observation! I agree, one of her many, many downfalls was her inability to hide her facial expressions and body language! Many elements to which helped bring her down!

Are you just figuring that out ? She needed him to open doors for her, and then she needed him to keep them open. She needed control. Not a nice person to live with.

Anything written and/or spoken where public can read it is very important because the public judgement can either make or ruin someone's reputation. The elements of the law is what matters.

Exactly! Tabloids and Gossip are irrelevant in Hollywood scene (as the expert was trying to explain). It's like AH's lawyers aren't aware of the term "all publicity is good publicity", except when it comes to thing related to the Me Too movement.

Hearsay would have been much more believable.

I believe her team has scripts. Lol definitely low budget paid actors. Especially if she paid her assistant $25/hr 😂

yeah, this is brutal.. same with miss curry, she was so good on stand

And let’s not forget the guy that vapes and drives lol

It's because he does this for a living

Not his first rodeo. That why he's paid $1K an hour.

He's a LAWYER

It annoyed me because when he would basically say no - regardless that everything he responded too sounded like heresy- the lawyer acted like he got the answer he was hoping for. The whole thing was weird.

Well, the man still went ahead and answered in the end despite being told to say yes or no

If you notice, when the lawyers approach the bar he smiles at the jury meaning they catch on to the ridiculousness of the defense's arguments

Heard’s team mirrors her abusive personality disorder. Watch Depo’s team…they speak calmly and aren’t combative with their words or overly aggressive. Depp’s team mirrors his personality. I think it’s clear that Am Er Heard is the abuser in this case and her team is just all psychopaths on all the witnesses.

@@kimberlybecker9560 You are spot on!! Anyone else would have a problem with their attorney's acting like that, knowing it reflected on them especially in a public opinion forum...but she seems to get off on it!

In some cases is interesting asking just YES or NO answers. In this case, feels like "PLEASE DON'T RUIN MY CASE SAYING MORE THAN 1 WORD, K THANKS"

It's not illegal to be rude.

The judge is biased. She wants AH to win. She lets her Team ask the most ridiculous questions and overrules objections. As soon as JD‘s Team asks a serious question, she sustains

Because they're all the same "community"

She wants to hear where this argument is heading the court needs to be privy to the relevant input

Bought n paid for, amber team member. Forgone conclusion amber wins. Not lawful but actual bs going on. Unprofessional in extremis.

He did say that the Sun has naked women on page 3, so therefor shouldn't be taken seriously, more or less :)

I don't read any newspapers never have and I've got by fine to 79 years old 😊

Well said x

Well said x

Well said

I agree

Where were the objections? Rumour ... i think ... i heard ... I was yelling objection from my armchair!!!!🤣 Johnny's lawyers must have decided to let AH's team dig their own graves.

Johnny's lawyers "give them enough rope ......." am sure you get the gist @@Noogsie_47245

That guy is a joke as a lawyer. Stupid, stupid, questions.

it's because they were talking about johnny depp's reputation at the time, so they were bringing up the stories from newspapers/magazines to sort of show what his reputation was. i agree that it is stupid, especially when they keep asking about different articles and the witness is like "i havent read it, but i'll accept what you say as the truth", seems like a waste of time lol but it makes sense why they couldnt object to the majority of this line of questioning

Because rumours can destroy Johnny's career as much as Amber hearts lies can. So if the press lies or does rumour articals that end up making Disney fire him before the op Ed then they can say the op Ed didn't do the harm the press tabloid rumours did the harm.

It felt to me that this lawyer lost the plot and didn't know how to get back on track. He was lost. He lost me anyway.

I hate amberˋs laywers for their respectless behaviour.

Are you for real?

Hello from sweden

Anger Turd's team are disgustingly unprofessional 🇦🇺

I've been saying that from day one that this judge has no control over the courtroom that she's very biased towards Amber heard's team. Her attorneys act like her they all must have borderline personality disorder and they're definitely narcissistic!!

I thought I was the only one thinking that judge was biassed to AH's team.

And from Armenia

It's even more insane considering that all of these articles are valid references, yet a direct conversation with someone is hearsay. How is an article not hearsay? Especially these tabloid trash pieces

Johnny won't work with Disney because they turned their back on him... he said he won't work with them

It's not disrespect, and if I'm being 1000% unbiased, it's because the lawyer doesn't want to let him articulate his point in context, because he knows that his VERY tedious and reaching questions are actually the opposite of reality, but he words them and speaks them in a way where he believes they are true, and to say the opposite is incorrect or heresay or speculation lol

@@shroud4269 That's disrespect lmao. Trying to make a person out to be incompetent, a liar, etc is disrespectful.

🌹🕊️

@@r.h.3084 except in court where it’s acceptable lol

The lawyer is countering that the reason Depp is cancelled is because of Amber. For doing that he is pointing out that Depp has had bad press for a while, so you can't prove Amber is the responsible. It's actually a good tactic.

Cause at the end of the day, it's not a secret and it never was. Depp himself would tell people and never shied away from the fact that he did do all those things. He never tried to portray himself as a "holier than thou" saint that didn't abuse substances. It's nothing new so when you hear "Depp does a mega line of crack on the back of his yatch" almost everyone's reaction would be like "k" cause it's nothing we've never heard before. And better yet, everyone knew but still loved him cause he has done so much to help others and give back to people and the world that the simple fact he abuses substances doesn't make people forget all the good hes done. Obviously there's people who do see him as a monster or whatever due to the fact he uses drugs and drinks but the majority of the people couldn't care less about Depps substance abuse cause he's shown us time and time again, that his addictions aren't the only thing to Johnny Depp.

Using drugs is alot more socially accepted then before. and that acceptance is rapidly spreading every day. Many other witnesses testify that Johnny's use impacted only him, and he pretty much never acted out against others. The article mentioned was someone messing with him. They're doing Johnny's team a favor helping shape his reputation better than their lawyers could.

AH lawyers are doing exactly what they wanted to get. Depp looks like a drug addict, drunk, abuser and money hungry. This is the third gf/wife he’s sued and also his past managers and management. Depp is a train wreck.

His drug and alcohol abuse is his own. Trial is not about that. I don’t think the jurors believe he was physically abusing her. Her lawyers have failed badly so far.

@Victor B so do I.agree

AH is one suitcase away from being Sarah Boone

Sounds like the lawyer is rambling.

I agree 100%! It was a joke!

Isn't it ironic how an OP ED from the Washington Post is just an opinion piece and can't be under the purview of defamation accorfing to her defemse team, yet they are quoting tabloids as evidence in court that Depps reputation was allegedly demonstrably destroyed before the WaPo OP ED was published? Do they not realize that the entire country is embarrassed by their incompetence? Unbelievable.

Dan Wooton is a slime that follows a twisted a political agenda. His libellous article is the only tool the Defendant has at her disposal

I have wondered about this as well. I think her intention might be to be overcautious, to minimize appeals if this does not go in Amber's favor, but just speculation.

He held his ground😆

The judge has just given up at this point, she does nothing

I like the witnesses NFG attitude to it

The judge is as stupid as Amber Heard. Maybe its strategy bc the JURY needs to hear how ridiculous they all sound. Will be interesting to see how she plays when Amber TURD takes the stand.

@@kandilynn214 she kinda seems like she just wants to hear all the juicy details. Can't blame her thats what we're all here to do.

Amber heard abysmal attorneys can only work so much based on her lies and manipulation.

One quivery lisp at a time 😩

He is they are making me sick to the stomach..... Maybe she Amber needs to get a Life Coach or go on some retreat to find some peace and happiness

"Literally digging his own grave" ?? I wish people would use the word literally correctly !

@@piperuk5366 you didn’t see the shovel?

I believe it's a tactic, I believe that she allows this to happen because essentially the line of thinking is "If you want to treat the witnesses hostile on national tv then go ahead because it's most likely going to backfire on you." People see this and of course see how rude and disrespectful the lawyers are and if you look at comments that's exactly what's happening. Also I believe that Johnny's team is allowing it to happen for the same reason. It would be my guess that if this wasn't on tv then she wouldn't allow this type of crap to happen. Idk though but it's the only logical reason I can think of outside of the judge being "bought" or incompetent.

@@wesleydominguez9781 I'm glad this Is being aired on TV now eveyone can see the real shitty people that they are

@@wesleydominguez9781 Indeed, the Judge playing Pontius Pilatus: ego sum a sanguine iusti huius vos videriti

There is a thing called redirect and the judge knows this.

@@wesleydominguez9781 I agree . I think she’s letting them metaphorically hang themselves

It shouldn't be allowed. But it should go in Johnny's favor showing how baseless this case is.

His uno reverse respone however "if you say that exists, then im gonna take your word for it"

Well said! ❤

No

Nah it's the guy who objected himself.

To be fair they do look fairly similar lol

Me, too movement have a big impact here, I guessed.

Apparently he losed because the lawsuit was against the sun and about wether the sun knew it was false. So pretty much the outcome just meant: Amber Heard was good enough at lying that the Sun didn't publish the article with malice. The sun is the one that won, Amber Heard won nothing

The Sun newspaper is part of the establishment, it often works with the government in a mutually beneficial manner, you help me and I’ll help you. It also has connections to the security services. It was arranged by higher powers for Depp to lose as a favour for the Sun and the Sun would one day repay the favour.

@@carolemp14 Objection speculation

She was sleeping with the judge. Of course this is speculation but maybe her attorneys can present this comment in court😂

facts

They don't draw the line though

There you go! He could have had a repeat press button and repeat this line many times!

He sure did!

This witness is being harassed by the attorney cross examination

So true!!!!

I can't stand this judge!!! And Turd's lawyers are a joke!

She's doing her job. No matter personal opinion. She is being professional. She has to be impartial. You seem like someone who can't comprehend this because you are too invested. I want johnny to win and believe amber heard is a manipulative skank but the judge can't do anything about this she has to let things preside. That's why she is a judge and we are not.

@@markredford84Mark Datimbecile you are the last person to speak on comprehension, darling. What I said was based on her ACTIONS!! She is allowing Amber’s team to use TABLOIDS, badger witnesses and cut them off, as well as let them spend long periods of time looking for paperwork or trying to get things in order. THAT is what I was speaking on. Read baby, read and stop trying to read me.

​@@markredford84 I agree

They've been lame/not enjoyable w/out him. I can't even really remember the order of the ones w/out in them. The storylines w/out Johnny slip my mind as well.

@@dreaclark2262 I concur 💯%

If Johnny Depp is an over paid actor, it's probably because he is one of the best actors. If he is the best, then I wouldn't say he was overpaid. It was probably well deserved. I will not watch any Pirates of the Caribbean, unless Johnny Depp is Jack Sparrow in the movie.

Absolutely!! Without Johnny, it might as well be an entire other movie and not PotC.

Pirates without Johnny? Aren't there better ways to piss away a hundred million dollars?

I'm sorry, but those were all proper questions, correct?

No that’s how cross examination works

It's allowed because the "correct?" can be answered with a negative, as in "no, not correct" Attorneys use it all the time. But it definitely got old here with hearing it 8363628362829 times in the span of 20 minuts

His double negative questions the other day were double annoying, like “Do you deny you weren’t there” Huh? 🤔😐

Yes, they've been doing that all the time. Asserting narrative talking points into the minds of the jury, just using the magic word at the end "correct".