Johnny Depp's Lawyer Grills Amber Heard's Psychologist Over Diagnosis Procedure 

Agreed 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

I was not sure about him, but he has delivered every time.

💯💯💯

True 👍

He's more low key then sneaks in for kill

💯 those two are the superstar attorneys of this trial, but the proof will be in the end result. We'll soon see if the jury is actually capable of recognizing their brilliance, and see through the vile nature behind the defense tactics. Defamation is exceedingly difficult to prove, and has ramifications for how the first amendment is interpreted. That isn't to say that I don't believe that it JD should win, or that AH needs to go back to the trailer park she grew up in and live out the rest of her days in reclusive squalor, I just have little to no faith in the jury

@@Sharon... Lol, okay fine, perhaps I'm guilty of attributing too much anthropomorphism to the maggot. Perhaps she should crawl back into the cesspool that spawned her. Better?

I love Wayne, from the start - his manner, his tactics and as you mentioned, his cross-examinations were critical to this case. It was beautiful when he cross-examined the metadata forensic 'expert' yesterday and showed him the two photos as being created at exactly the same time, with an app that does 'sorting' and 'EDITING'..!

I love Wayne, i've been saying this for a while

I love Wayne so much. he is the man to. cross examine. the expert witnesses. he's a man of wisdom. and I like his voice.

Like someone has already said somewhere down here in the comment section, she did that on purpose, this test was for the court not for the patient, basically she did what she was paid for.

@@someoneyouknow5040 Bingo. She’s a hired gun that’s worked for Elaine’s firm many times. She’s brought in to say “she’s the victim, he’s the abuser”.

It's Bad, Dr Hughes seems Gullible & Uneducated...She Also is Rude& Talks on top of the Lawyer, She's Very Irresponsible & has a Bad Demenior..It Would Not Surprise me if she got Paid to Lie??

When I see this stuff, I feel like the medical communities need to widen their net on maintaining credibility. Work like this should result in malpractice hearings, with the potential of being publicly and officially discredited by your peers if you're demonstrated to knowingly violate ethical practices

It absolutely absurd !

Its on purpose 😂 his bumbling approach makes people waffle to "prove " how smart they are... and then goes for the kill. He is absolutely brilliant

@@jacryan2004 spot on 👌

I thought he was odd when i first seen him. Hes more low key genius where camilee is more obvious. Hes more like the one low key worming is way in for the kill

This judge is excellent!! Real old school. A real gentleman =)

That's what I'm saying!! I think he became my favorite lawyer because of how witty he is and his "mic drop" moments.

so true.

What does it say, since you seem to be the psychologist now?

She’s way too defensive

@also, maybe there nothing but liars like her

All Ambers so-called professionals are getting frustrated, they are all realizing they have been lied to by Amber and they're all stuck in her lie.

She chose not to because she wanted to skew the results to her liking

You nailed it 👍👍

Yup, blatantly implying that her experience outweighs procedures that are documented through the combined efforts of other experts throughout history of the development of this field. Crazy....

It does really a surprise coming from Heard’s legal team corps of “expert witnesses”?! Haha.

At least her acting didn't mess up her makeup. 😂

„It‘s okay your Honor, we can do it the slow way.“

EXACTLY

🙏 Thank you. As someone who is diagnosed with some things, the trust you place in your psychologist is paramount.

And not once does it say “this can be administered RETROSPECTIVELY”

As a psychology student, let me poke you a bit: is there some research that indicates memory fabrication increases as the timespan of the incident moves from 12 months ago, to 48 months ago? I.e. couldn't fabrication occur at equal amounts in both time frames? And if the tests have to be timed in order to be valid, how can a psychologist make a reliable determination after that time limit? Are there no techniques or guidelines for these scenarios?

@@bernlin2000 Oh, great question! From what I learned, each time (I mean EACH TIME) you recall a memory, there is a chance for memory fabrication. This is why stories that are told from years ago should be taken with a grain of salt; if the brain attempts to recreate the event that occurred, there is a likely chance that something will be missed (or omitted), or likely exaggerated. Memory fabrication can occur at any given time; as a psychologist, our goals are to collect data with the least amount of bias and fabrication. Therefore, our tests are set at specific time increments to BEST eliminate these potentials. Of course, each time someone has to recall an event, we (with a grain of salt) attempt to believe our clients. For example: if I were to tell someone how my day went yesterday, I might hit the highlights, but omit the factor that I went to the store. Not that 'going to the store' was an important factor, but it shows how the brain can easily forget or twist information when its pulled back from memory. Sorry for the lecture paragraph, but hope this helps! Feel free to poke me anytime, lol

Because she has been put to testimony which she doesn't want to come out as a bad psycholgist

Right

I 💯% agree with you there. A know it all or so she thinks!

​@@anurag1893 it still makes her look a bit ridiculous not directly answering half the questions asked

@@anurag1893 She is an actual Quack who gives diagnoses that are convenient for money

Exactly. It's ridiculous that she gave AH a potential candidate to feign or malinger a list of symptoms of PTSD and just asking her now rate the degree of intensity and frequency. (That's almost like assuming she had PTSD beforehand)

For someone who is board certified.. this is bad for her credentials. I prefer Doctor Curry

Wasnt a choice once she’s appeared to defend amber she can get questioned by depps lot

@also, maybe more experience doesn’t mean more qualified.

Well said 👏

Yes! He is the secret weapon... sounding confused and bumbling.. and then NAILING everything!! Jujitsu!!

Dr. Hughes’ testimony totally destroyed her career. Don’t think she’s going to get anymore paid testimonials after this. She helped Amber lose.

Bravo to the entire team, well oiled machine of truth finders.

@@valerieg369 agreed ! She’s just as cocky and unlikable as AH. She’s clearly bias too.

You made me laugh. I would make this comparison in a slightly different way. Attack dogs, yes. Amber's dogs appear to have rabies and follow no logical course, sometimes even chasing their own tail. Mr. Dennison is the german shepherd that will go after someone's throat to protect his family.

@@madganser 🤣🤣

She's been asked to testify by Depp's side as it is now their chance to take everything she said before apart - she is not there out of her own free will.

They seem to be as dillsional as AH is.

They have to i think

They don't seem to have any other choices.

the audacity to resurface after being proved to be incredibly unprofessional in front of everyone

She did fill it in, they are just showing what the blank document looks like

Facts

@@Ponce17 The lawyer and she herself literally say she didn't fill in the blanks

@@Ponce17 Those were the actual documents, not filled in correctly. If you look at the very bottom of the boxes you can see her score is circled, but, without the check boxes we have no idea how she reached that score. The next doctor to read those documents will only see the final circled score and have no idea how she arrived there. That's not medicine.

"it was a collaborative effort" = she got some grunt to enter the data

That’s really funny, I like it and I like it the fact you mentioned the source

Heard waited until all her divorce settlement money installments were paid and then wrote her Op-ed as one final knife in Depp's back, which, backfired on her spectacularly...lmfao! And don't forget how Heard says everyone is lying under Oath in a Court of Law on the witness stand, up to and including the Police. You can't make this stuff up...W○W!

This is brilliant 😂😂

😂😂🤪

Brilliant 🤣🤣🤣

Link plz

dennison with his receipts 😂 we can only stan

If only Dennison went God Mode like Camille

👁👄👁 lol

Teacher : Did you do your homework? Dr. Hugues : Yes Teacher : Lets me see them Dr. Hugues : .............. a bird stole my paper...

@@Camuska 😂😂😂😭😭-

She can’t prescribe meds thankfully.

@River Thank you for the correction! 👍

Amber and her whole legal team are arrogant....birds of a feather always flock together

@@river8760 but she can testify in court for DV cases and probably sent many innocent men to jail...

Possible none. Her services is a court "expert". She probably is affordable too but not competent.

Yes honestly she surely is delusional to think nobody is seeing this. Either that or she's so narcasistic she believes she can do as she pleases as every other person is below her and thick !!

Yes, smirking and looking so smug watching someone who tried to help her being humiliated like this.

Her smirking drives me nuts.

It's a sign of contempt.

So trapped in her head that reality is a foreign concept

💯 straws

Yes she has the perma b**** grin face going or maybe the poker b**** face too that could be combination of both LOL

Absolutely right! Her nastiness comes from being exposed and now the world knows just how incompetent she is.

I wonder how much money Amber payed her for this

Exactly especially as the years go by you experience other relationships etc. How can she just attribute these “claims” to JD ? What about past childhood trauma or past relationship experiences & trauma was any of this addressed.

Redundancy prevents data loss. I'm a lowly truck driver and I use MULTIPLE copies of the exact same: bills of lading, payment receipts, invoices, "truck" receipts. My wife is a lawyer and, Jesus Christ, talk about paperwork....

yes, absolutely true. Being MD and medical expert I can only confirm that you are absolutely right 👌🏻

Superfluous redundancy.

IT'S $ $ $ MY DEAR !!!

No, she means, quite literally, the entire 88 page analysis would be attached to this diagnostic. Clearly, that box is not going to contain 88 pages of material, nor could you expect a psychologist to condense that much material down to a single box on a single page. People (and the lawyer) are nagging on a non-issue, with the sole aim to portray the psychologist as "sloppy" or unprofessional.

All of society is built on fakery. "Fake it till you make it" is basically Humanities bread and butter method of going about daily life.

She also trains others in how to give expert testimony. Whomp Whomp.

I’ve had it happen to me. Too many of these “Drs” around now.

Sadly lots of doctors are like her

I hope she's not a mother to boys.

Because she is a fool. The same with the first time, where she needed a break to read her notes, because she forgot them.

She should be investigated because she is unfit and dangerous.

Yes test are not reliable if not fresh in the mind.

She’s not licensed.

@@ddozstudio4295 I just looked her up (after seeing your comment) and she shows as licensed on the ABPP website, but her name didn't come up at all when I searched the NY licensing lookup for psychologists. Weird.

Dr Curry has been on point with EVERYTHING!!

@@lo_hi I know the juror interviewed said they didn’t factor in any of the experts and only followed the evidence. But you gotta believe that Curry planted a ton of seeds in their minds the way she accurately predicted how Amber would react on the stand.

@@skylerfelix7609 yea…agreed

Most of her witnesses seem to get irritated easily, probably because Depp’s team sees through their lies so easily and know how to question them. Her witnesses have all come across so unprofessional, aggressive, and rude, I hope the jury has noticed the stark differences between the testimonies from each side.

just look at her face, she looks so angry all the time!!!! Jeez

She looks like a typical man hater

She's an arrogant quack

@@creamerasant she and every other witness that her team put at the witness stand

Psychologist have the same personalities as the rest of the general population.

@@NP-zs5ui they are trained in professional behavior. They are not supposed to show emotion . I am in the field.

@@hello15848 I've encountered some psychologists both at school and in my line of work that have been hostile and rude. They might be "cerebral, uninvolved, and logical" in certain settings, but they're certainly not like that in all situations.

@@NP-zs5ui um in their professional role they are trained to be one way. Outside of their profession they will behave differently.

@@NP-zs5ui you don’t think a psychologist should be cerebral, uninvolved and logical in a court setting? Dr Hughes behaved completely inappropriately and if I were a patient of hers I would be rethinking and trying to find someone else

camille did quite good on cross with that finger doctor guy, but i agree, dennison did quite well, psychologists are far more difficult to cross examine and yet dennison made it so easy

Yeah I’m seeking his help FIRST if I ever need a lawyer.

They’re on the same team. Don’t pit Dennison and Camille against each other because outsiders complement one or the other. Each had amazing roles in an serious challenge!

I’d you’re used to how smart people typically disingenuously push their point, it’s not that hard. This isn’t to downplay Dennison as he also has to break things apart according to legal boundaries and make the critique contextually sensible to a jury.

All he had to do in this clip was get her to admit that the instructions repeatedly say within the past year.

Coz they were

hahahahaha

What pain are u talking about or u mean the pain she inflicted to Johnny 😂

LOL

Ah the american class system on display..lol

Right??? Like why does she think this is possibly In her favor rn…

Narcissists tend to lack social awareness and tend to perceive situations as how they would like them to play out as opposed to how they actually are playing out. So it's quite possible she thinks this psychologist is providing sound arguments as to why AH is right. Which would explain her smirking 😏

Because she believe she is winning right now. She is so delusional and out of this world she thinks that we believe her because she is a weak, scarred, vulnerable princess when the fact is majority of people are capable of thinking logically and connect the dots of evidence to gain conclusion of what is happening and who is telling the truth.

@@yasoru I was thinking the same thing especially how she(AH) just testified that she doesn’t “laugh, smirk or make side jokes.”

Kinky what's even stranger is you wanting what is wrong. Look at Depp, you find him smirking through out the proceedings cute ? The man was not sober for most part of his time with Amber. That has been established. Living with an addict is traumatic. He dumped all the sweet women in his life. He's a woman user and abuser.

I think its greed and not incompetence.

Everyone competent in this field is going to be disturbed by this woman’s behaviour. She is a mess.

@@river8760 More like BLACKLIST her.

@@YYC403NOYP that too!

I’m wondering if the board will be notified because she’s not being ethical with her assessments under oath as well

And 3min earlier she stated that Dr Curry should read the manual. Lol that backfired very quickly

Are the Lawyers, Judges exactly follow what is written on the rule books. Don't the create and use Principles, doctorines as and when required to give a different meaning to the rules. An expert is expected to apply his mind in their diagnosis.C But to decide about AH nothing is required. It is just apparent.. A kid will tell it who she is!

@@rajkann1971 law and psychology are completely different.. hard to understand what you’re trying to say in your first part

@@cubencis exactly.. But both need cognitive analysis, application of techniques and interpretation of the results. So, an expert cannot always be expected to adhere to the rule book blindly. They have to apply their skill and knowledge to arrive at their opinion. For example the reference to 'Past year' ..need not be taken as to The immediately preceding previous year of 365 days. I felt a little bit of arrogance in the argument between Psycologist and the Advocate. Both were sticking to the idea that their Stand is absolutely correct.

@@rajkann1971 Dr. Hughs decided she could make up her own time frame. I think that invalidates her use of the tool. Suppose something has happened to Amber during the time period the test is intended to measure but the doctor has already decided she will twist what ever answers she gets to fit the time period she wants? Two, three, even four years ago. The manual seems pretty clear that is not the way the test should be used.

I agree. He really scrutinise the documents

They weren't difficult for him. There would have been days of preparation with his own expert witnesses, not only on their individual specialties, but on whether there was any strategy adopted by the opposition in how all their experts presented. Clearly there wasn't. But the appalling quality of Heard's experts does suggest that her legal team were hard pressed to find sufficiently impressive exerts. Personally I wouldn't have taken Heard's case for any fee, so shallow were her grounds.

Haha

Lol I know right!

“HAMMER OF JUSTICE” that’s a good analogy!! 👍🏼

If Bruce Wayne is Batman then Wayne Dennison has to be the Batman in the law field

She's a psychologist. She has a PhD, not an MD

@@avgchz9444 RU-vid's full of smart asses

@@avgchz9444 still doesn’t deserve to be called a dr. She completely lied in court

@@avgchz9444 you still sometimes call them doctors

@@beepboop4016 Yes, PhD stands for “doctor of philosophy” but it would be impossible to revoke her medical license because she doesn’t have one

Yep, 100% Absolutely awful, same as last time.

😂

Or in my head 😂

Perfect analogy!

You hit it right on the money!!!

You hit it right on the money!!!

Maybe decent witnesses for Amber Heard simply don't exist and therefore the lawyers can do nothing

cos the good ones are not a sell out

They did quite decent at crossing tho. Especially spotting the weakness of Mr baina, they noticed the expert didn't include the Likes and shares. That's what lawyers do, finding a crack or a chink of the armor.

That's all she's got...lol

@@rini6847 so true

💯

Id say it is just as if not more common to have manipulative women like Amber Heard than abusive men.

Actually in the context of divorce with children a lot of men with personality disorders similar to AH’s get away with false claims that their STBX or ex is abusive or incompetent . Very common especially with stay at home moms who don’t have their own money to fight back and who often unilaterally tasked with the care of the children in spite of the father’s alleged concerns. It is actually a huge problem with the US family courts.

@@douglasjessop I don't know if I would say that. I honestly don't have any idea what the ratio would be, but manipulative women like Heard are common enough for sure...

@@dijonjohn1011 still 62 percent being false allegations from regarding domestic violence is an even lower number bc men virtually don't ever and i mean ever report domestic violence. Typically in the cases where the man ends up dead are when those signs appear.

In this case, burnt.

Extra crispy, and then put Amica cream on them.

😂😂

AH got her people from outta the woodwork

Yes. Her and her movie booking "expert" with dark hair. All the same. Old mops..probably slept with her

Same as AH

I agree, she comes off very hostile

It’s so funny that her psychologist and psychiatrist come across extremely poorly, this woman is so hostile and aggressive and her psychiatrist was straight up psychotic. Dr. Curry was outstanding, so professional, prepared, and clearly very well at what she does. Depp’s psychiatrist Richard Shaw was excellent too, he was calm, professional, very well educated, and presented himself flawlessly.

She is a lot like AH, all of her "experts" are highly unprofessional and extremely unethical

The way she even drinks that water is annoying AF !

even in a clinical setting you have to follow the instructions or you can't use it for diagnosis. i work in clinical trials and if we found out that sites were using validated questionnaires incorrectly, we'd have to scrap all their data

@@sallycooper7677 I understand how it SHOULD be done in a clinical setting, which for the record I mean clinical in the confines of a private practice, not in any sort of clinical trial. When you’re doing it for your own records people don’t always do all of the steps, some don’t do a proper assessment at all. If she knew she was bringing it to court she needed to actually do it by the book not how she does it in her office. That was the point of my comment.

I don't know why, but I have a feeling this Dr. Hugues does not like men - period!

And has been all week.

She’s once again smirking, something she vehemently denied she did.

She likes to be in the center of atention, and she likes to fight, to be in court is her dream!

@@luisaritosa9700 histrionic personality disorder. dr.curry....ding ding ding 🔔🔔🔔🔔🔔

@@gladitude9 and the moment she get into that witness box,she starts to cry instantly or i should say try to.

Exactly... I hope the jury notices that

Some people were slagging his approach the other day but I have liked both his humour and his dogged approach. He's a legal Columbo!

Yea, it’s the ones that sneak up from beneath that are the most dangerous! And he’s one of those lawyers. That’s more scary than lawyers that immediately strike and go for offense, in my opinion.

Exactly

I think her claiming there as a campaign against her was the last thing she could think of when it was clear that her and her witnesses had no adequate evidence. She sees Johnny’s witnesses defending him so well (probably because they’re telling the truth and respect him) and just decides they’ve been paid and set up to speak badly about her 🙄 I hope it’s been crystal clear to the jury what kind of monster this woman is and what a fool she’s made of herself.

Besides she brought this whole thing on herself! She ruined his reputation on purpose for gain and now her evil plan is backfiring so now she's crying! Please 🙄

Mommy dearest .

This was related to Whitney saying on the stand allegedly johnny saying one time putting one of their dog in oven . I think Amber exaggerates things and uses words to her benefit like twisting them just like the comment about kate moss during her testimony. I have seen her do that. She copies people. She copies words of others and twist to her story to be made Believable..

She makes me feel uncomfortable and I'm looking through a TV scream the real her has shown it's true colours

Like a snake.

Justice League? 👀

Easier when you're honest.

@@diegomv90 aquamannnnnnnn

True!

Seriously Dr Curry nailed it. High functioning manipulator can try to fake the checklist.

@@pamelasheridan2178 I really had a good laugh when Dr Curry explained one of the tests is used to detect malignering, in which she scored really way to high. I just pictured Amber ticking away blissfully unaware she was being tested for lying 🤦🏼‍♀️😄

My opinion is tat she thinks she's acting cool like Jhonny, but she looks like a maniac...

Exactly, her “career” is beyond OVER

She might win the case tho. She threw a tantrum in front of the jury, crying and saying people are sending death threats and threatening to microwave her baby.

And then has the cheek to state (whilst fake crying) that she isn't sat there laughing, looking smug etc etc ... Yet she's doing it whilst this incompetent woman is on the stand.

@@JellyBaby33 that was hilarious. There was SO much smirking today in particular lmao!