Imagine having invented one of the best technologies only to be eliminated and have it abused exactly how you warned not to use it to instigate tyranny.
@@Kazilikaya Lol everyone in modern science has stolen ideas or taken others and made new ideas off of them. Get out of here You hear of Robert Gallow?
Fauci and the Gates/Clinton foundations had him killed of because they knew he would not let his PCR test control the masses. I DO NOT CONSENT TO BE A PART OF YOUR SOCIAL EXPERIMENTAL VACCINE!
Exactly, then to rub in it his face, they use the PCR test he created for their nefarious agenda to which he has emphatically stated should not be used to isolate/illness (CV19), because it CAN'T! Ironic, he "passed" right before this all happened(Event 201) and now the world would not hear the truth about the test because God knows people only believe what the mainstream news and their so called "scientists" have to say.
@@Pfirtzer hehe, I get what you mean but nah ... hes got the big picture now and most def at "rest". Up in that other dimension. If hed still ben around I think he wouldve been pretty pissed off though. LOL
I would have given a lot to meet this intellectual giant in person. He is extremely authentic. As a process engineer I perfectly understand what he meant, when he said, always believe in your theories unless you have disproved them on your own. To many people above me have told me my ideas won’t work out, until I just did it and proved them wrong.
This is probably THE MOST IMPORTANT video clip on YT. Kary died in the summer of 2019 from pneumonia (which is a little starnge indeed). But we should never forget about him and his thoughts. His spirit is alive and so is he in this world ruled by creepy stories and misinformation. ❤
If he were alive today, he would have say, again, not to use the PCR test for diagnosis of infectious disease. Like for global warming warming and/or climate change, remember: "it is easier to fool people than to prove them they have been fooled" (Mark Twain). RIP, Kary you were a real genius.
@@ol9956 Alas ... Big Pharma tells its captured politicians, don't worry about the fine print. Just go ahead and roll out mass vaccinations and lockdowns.
He was right about global warming at the time, there was no global warming until the 80s, but since then the temperature has really been on the rise, in a very linear way. The question is of course, is someone provoking the temperature change since then, or is it natural??
The most natural speaker I've ever seen on a Ted Talk. R.I.P. sir. Shame what they are pulling with your PCR test. Wow, and a great personality; " frogs have aspiration of space travel" 😂We get stuck w Faustus the Fraud.
RIP Kary… thank you for being such an inspiration… as a scientist I never thought I’d see the death of our discipline. But here we are. Will do my best to pass on your excitement and approach. A challenge but worth it.
I get depressed and tears roll down when I hear him, the same feelings I have for my late father. He really cared and was devoid of the temptations of money. How on earth can we honor him and talk about him more.
We do need to honor and talk of him more however there are the powers that be who don't want us to. Why wouldn't the Nobel Laureate for his PCR invention be mentioned when it is being used daily during a worldwide pandemic the earth hasn't seen for a century?
THIS IS AMAZING 🤩 Next time someone asks me, "Who would you like to spend time with? The person can either be alive or dead." Hands down, KARY MFFF MULLISSSS.
I've been thinking the same thing since late 2020 when I stumbled upon a great (and long) article about him and interview, dead or alive he's been my "wish I could talk with the guy" answer, what an amazing man. If he hadn't died the year before, he'd never have let any of what happened with pcr happen, too, and he could explain best why it shouldn't be used in the way it was.
we really need to be as free with expanding our vision, our minds and our toolsets as he was. but this isn't just, a unique way of thinking, i mean, he's not unique. he's on drugs. the lsd he's taken over his life, is a huge tool in his achievements. personally, if i have a unique problem at hand i always find great impressions by what lsd causes me to realize when i dose up and approach my challenges lsd is a tool, and he knew exactly how to leverage it. we could all learn from approaching it the same way
@Zoe K. interestingly, I found out this guy thru David Icke. I then learnt about Koch's postulates thru Andy Kaufman...and Tom Cowan, who explained the PCR test. I looked up PCR and Kary Mullis interviews. He was a whistle-blower. Notice he died in August 2019...just before the Covid crisis. Notice that the pcr test is locking us down asymptomatically. When he was alive, he was arguing about bogus diagnosis being made using his test.
I saw him speak at Saint Anselm College I believe 2014 or 2015. He fully explained PCR and how he and his colleagues came up with it. Amazing speaker with a ton of passion and a true lover of the methods of science.
Why is RU-vid adding the link to the Wikipedia article on AIDS and not the link to the Wikipedia article about Karry Mullis? Dr. Mullis is Nobel Laureate in Chemistry. He has developed the PCR, a method that is used in many areas, including: it is the basis for DNA analysis in the field of crime science.
That insultingly patronising link has now changed to climate change. I assume from this that it’s the next battleground where we’re to be told what to think, complete with blanket suppression of anyone who disagrees with ‘the consensus’. People need to remember that it’s often the renegades, the outliers - like the wonderful Kary Mullis- who are at the leading edge of progress. The orthodoxy is usually chasing more worldly goals, like a promotion, a pay rise, or (cough) rampant corruption.
Dr Mullis, I was raised in La Jolla , never learned to surf though, but certainly such a beautiful environment has helped u to increase ur wisdom and witt! Congratulations!
Kary Mullis was s great talker about the huge scientific mistake of HIV leading to Aids theory, also many professional people have also talked out including Neville Hodgkinson, Joan Shenton, Thabo Mbeki , John Lauritsen, David Crowe, Michael Callen, Mark Conlan, Peter Deusberg, Professor Gordon Stewart, Dr Claus Kohnlein, Dr David Rasnick, Dr Christian Fiala & Dr Stefan Lanka & many more, they should be listened to
It's my understanding the HIV was created to kill people. It's was the weapon towards hate crime against gay people. Condom manufacturers probably had shares in it. AIDS was sited 'epidemic" and is still registered as one. Loads of benefits here! It's hard to fine but if you did, and affected you were compensated under the 'compensation for detriment caused by defective administration scheme'
@@JS-mv8fc there is no hiv , there are other causes of what they call AIDS , there not that smart & the tests are faulty, please don’t give them that much credit
I liked his down to earth and laid back delivery. His point about how important it is for science to be free of external biases was truly well made (although I think the moral debate IS valid in science).
Most offended people in the comments got offended due to the last 10 minutes, when he criticizes climate science. everybody gets uptight. No more laughs from the crowd. That in itself is pretty telling.
He's right that huge grants are given and then a certain diseases or beliefs such as climate change becomes too big to fail. Too many careers, jobs and egos are at stake. Like cancer for example is a trillion dollar a year industry. The big teaching hospitals now all have big buildings dedicated to cancer and cancer research. This is our tax dollars going to a disease they have no intention of eradicating because it's a trillion dollar a year industry. The cigarette industry used to deliver them most of their customers, but since less people are using tobacco products in the US, they have to add other things into the food and atmosphere to ensure customers, and now we are paranoid because of their absolute insistence of injecting rushed substances into our bodies. But, it all works together to keep this industry in place and these large grants coming in.
@@anneteller3128 you had me until the idea that carcinogenic toxins in our environment are somehow encouraged by the cancer industry. I wouldn't be shocked if that were true but I'm skeptical until I see evidence. The issue is that I'm not sure there would be any direct evidence as with a lot of conspiracy theories which come about from bits and pieces of quotes, incentives, paper trails etc... am I wrong?
true I heared about this years ago, lucky there are more scientist's who know this like Dr shiva or Dr Rashid Buttard with C0v1d it is the same I think it is not isolated at least not this one but do not quote me on that, what is true that Karys pcr test are used to prove that someone has this virus but it can not prove that and on bases of that test, a test that can not prove anything we have pandemic declared by WHO.
@@vickiezaccardo1711 pienso que Kary Mullis no hubiera permitido que se propagara,la farsa del test PCR como detector del Covid 19 y su muerte 3 meses antes que se declarara,la,farsa,PANDEMIA para mi es que las industrias farmacéuticas lo quitaron del medio porque el hubiera sido una fuerte oposición,el que inventó el test PCR fue el quien más sabía el real uso y el real no uso. Hoy tenemos la evidencia que por hacer dinero fabrican falsos virus es una vergüenza,el mundo entero engañado.
His comments about how dialogue was initiated in public spaces, pubs, but in order to control it, the king had it contained and controlled. To control is power.
I appreciate this guy so much. His passing last year is painful to the field of Science and Virology. This bullshit mythology of COVID-19 would be crushed by him.... in my opinion
@victorpate24 hi. I've been hearing that lately. Will you please elaborate on why he would consider it mythology? Or lead me to a good video on his thoughts about viruses. Thanks
@@musiccityspotlightpodcast4470 Kary Mullis wrote 'Dancing Naked in the Mind Field', 'The HIV Hoax: 2000 Virologists Cannot Be Wrong' and the forward to Peter Duesberg's 'Inventing the AIDS virus'. Here's an interesting interview with him: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-vaMZ4NyNCwI.html
I knew I wouldn't be the only one looking back to Kary in this AirborneAIDS enslavement scam we have upon us. Really need to get his findings out. And somehow make it fast spreading, easily digested, and rapidly reproductive, just like the "virus" that is trying to occupy us.
@@StopBeingSheeple I'm so relieved to find another thinking & researching individual like yourself. I definitely agree that the info needs to be 'digestible', while still keeping scientific integrity
From the brilliant man who created the PCR test - Wouldn't it be nice if defeating COVID would be this easy? www.ted.com/talks/kary_mullis_a_next_gen_cure_for_killer_infections?language=ky What if he posthumously provided the cure to COVID?
What a pleasure to listen to a genuine great Man - a brilliant scientist, inventor, genius, and an honest person. It's a terrible disaster Kary is not with us anymore. If anyone knows why he died prematurely?
No, he knows that it's not going to be something people at that conference wanted to hear, and it probably wouldn't be well accepted. But he speaks even though his voice trembles. That's how I saw it. He's correct about AIDS. He's correct about global warming and the ozone layer. And he's right on point about the history of science and what science has become today. Industry. He has no BS to choke on. You're wrong.
Kary Mullis once said he regretted never having met Richard Feynman. Their endless curiosity and candid styles made them kindred spirits, very humorous ones too!
**So... why are the ice caps melting?** In the Artic or Anarctic? Both experience the season of Summer and it even melts enough in the anartic for Plants to grow,fertilize,bloom then hybernate it the short warm period ("warmer" anyway)..this is when the South pole faces the Sun. When the North Pole faces the Sun Summer happens up there and the Ice melts. Polar Bears can swim fo miles,they are natural swimmers They swim to eat seals and penguins but will hunt anything,including humans
I just tracked down the "ena" you mentioned . It was meant to read "corrupt". There's a problem with the insertion point cursor jumping around in the RU-vid Post Comment box while I'm typing if my hand passes too close to the touchpad of my laptop. Sorry that it confused you, and for not proofreading before posting.
This video's view numbers which can be treated as knowledge-craving peoples' preferences demonstrate the very things he've said. They don't want to front the truths, but want to make money. (Of course there might be marketing problems though, anyway i've made my point and that's it)
An interesting observation is that the glaciers have been receding for the last two hundred years, and two hundred years ago, the human effect on the atmosphere was not much more than it was two thousand years ago. There most definitely is room for controversy in the global warming question. However, as others have said, there are several reasons for curbing our dependence on fossil fuels, global warming being merely one of them.
Glaciers by and large have been receding for about 10,000 years, since the last ice age, when huge ice sheets covered most of Europe and all of canada and half the US.
24:18 (t = 1458) 2002 (?) TED Talk. The paper Mullis references was published in 2002: “Evidence for Large Decadal Variability in the Tropical Mean Radiative Energy Budget” - Feb, Science 2002
I do indeed plan on checking out what he is talking about the best I can as a layman. We'll see what my 'further research' shows on the matter. I have read numerous essays on the IPCC and arguments against the findings of the IPCC, but never heard any of these things mentioned. Nevertheless, thanks for the heads up TheThomaswastaken.
There was no anti-religious dogma in these 12 minutes. He just carefully said that religious dogma can't be allowed to control scientific conclusions if they're really scientific - and this is indeed an essential rule of science, and if someone finds it scary or irritating, it's too bad! The talk is excellent - although I would probably disagree with him on various other points, I would subscribe 100% to this talk.
@@nickchoporis5901 hey smartass. Go and research scientists who don’t believe in Climate Change and there are thousands and in the meantime bighead the internet is full of evidence it’s a myth. Only gullible fools like you would swallow that nonsense 🖕
Extra heat coming in and not being radiated out, yet no increase in global temperature? Conservation of energy says the energy has to go somewhere. The first thing I think of is the endothermic reaction energy of melting all the glaciers that have been disappearing. That can consume energy without affecting actual temperature. But once they're mostly melted we have a huge problem. The glaciers and the polar ice have been disappearing, no denying that.
Yes, science always checks it's assumptions. You are very welcome. It always has. That's why it's the most dependable branch of human knowledge. It works by using the "Best Available Information" always looking for more and checking it's assumptions as technology improves. That doesn't sound at all corrupt to me ... Making up explainations without evidence to support them, simply because it is more to your personal liking or fits your prejudices seems a lot more like corruption to me.
Well, no. The scientific response (for everyone else) would be to bin the model. The proponents can go away and try again. The adjustment process is what kept the geocentric model of retrograde motion alive so long. It took the binning of geocentricity and the adoption of heliocentric modeling to stop the process of nested epicycles. I'd also say that science, via hypothesis testing, means that until you've got the hypothesis confirmed, hypotheses can be dismissed as speculation.
These have been scrubbed you can't find the one's where he said you can find anything with the PCR test but it doesn't mean what you find causes a disease
@transtlantic Why do u try to convince me out of ur theoretical scheme, when I have had personal - first hand experiences?? Isn't that selfish from ur part? To think u own the truth and never asking ? Besides explain to me why there is so much controversy on HIV-AIDS ? I don't find any controversy on Seasonal Flu, Smallpox, TB, Gastric Ulcer, or any other disease!
from the emory hospital website "The goal of the ED is to evaluate all patients in a prompt and timely manner. At times there are unavoidable delays or waits." . see, even your hospital admits delays & waits
"I doubt that you really know much about HIV/AIDS skepticism." -- That is a completely arbitrary position for you to take. -- "It's a fairly small group, that's true, but it's not as small as it seems to you." -- That's a completely...
**The point is surely not that the ice caps melt (as they do seasonally) but that the degree of melting is increasing (deny that one?)** Being that core disturbances from the change in orbit has caused a 1/2 degree axis shift making the pole point more twoard the sun during their summers of course the Ice menlt more in the summer And in the Winter the Polar bears and Penguins freeze their ass off even more ans the ICe grows back bigger then previous Winter it's Cycles called "Seasons"
If he were alive today he would richest man in the World because of PCR (!) but he would have say, again, not to use the PCR test for diagnosis of infectious disease.
A. Science has preconceived conclusions and bias. This video is a good example of it. B. Religion was clearly a stepping stone for humanity, not a hinder to the development of science as it is presented here. Religion was the original attempt to understand our surroundings, the original science. Next time think for yourself before repeating what was hammered into your head in public school. I know what the American public thinks already, thank you.
the arctic cap hadn't been expanding as far during the winter … but it's adding ice at its core, the winter stays below freezing for just as many days and above freezing for just as many days but the coldest days of winter haven't been, on average, as far below freezing. ie it's only been -35 instead of -40. at the same time, the antarctic cap has been growing.
Antarctic sea ice is enlarging and arctic ice diminished because of natural AMO cycle and probably also for grand solar maximum. Just now these cycles are over
