Keith Olbermann on the Anniversary of Pete Rose’s Banishment from Baseball | The Rich Eisen Show

Подписаться 787 тыс.

Просмотров 4,8 тыс.

50% 1

Sports & Political Commentator/Baseball Historian Keith Olbermann and Rich Eisen discuss the anniversary of Pete Rose’s banishment from baseball for gambling and what it was like being at the press conference where the Reds’ legend’s punishment was announced.
Watch the Rich Eisen Show, an Emmy-nominated sports talk show, streaming live on NBC's Peacock, Audacy, and SiriusXM Ch. 211 Monday through Friday, noon--3 PM ET.
Showcasing Rich Eisen’s uncanny ability to blend insightful sports expertise with an offbeat mix of humor and pop culture, The Rich Eisen Show attracts the most recognizable names in sports and entertainment.
Subscribe to this channel to keep up with the internet's best sports and pop culture commentary, interviews, and much more!
------
SUBSCRIBE HERE:
bit.ly/2VjWSBC
FOLLOW US HERE:
/ richeisen
/ richeisenshow
/ richeisenshow
www.audacy.com/richeisen/listen
Thanks to our friends at Grabyo for supporting our live production and editing needs. Truly a game changer for what we're trying to accomplish here at the Rich Eisen Show. You can check out Grabyo and their suite of offerings here: bit.ly/3aac366
#RichEisenShow #MLB #PeteRose

Спорт

Опубликовано:

23 авг 2021

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 13

@tomsperduti2967 Год назад

Keith the main man.

@r3tr0actiongamer24 Год назад

Dan and Keith, Rich and Stuart were Priceless back in the day. I stopped watching espn when they left.

@BLAB-it5un 8 месяцев назад

What this fails to fully address is that Pete Rose is dumb as dirt and he was led to slaughter by inept lawyers. Key to the ruling that validated the suspension was that no explicit finding of guilt was agreed to which is where the one year reinstatement technicality comes in. Giamatti then said directly at the press coverage that he determined Rose bet on baseball which was a violation of the wording of the agreement. Rose's lawyers apparently counseled him to surrender the fight, take what they told him would be temporary punishment because no finding of guilt existed and a year later he would be back. Giammati then announced instead that Rose was guilty and the ban was technically reviewable but really amounted to a life-time ban. The video I would love to find is Rose reacting to the news. He appeared totally caught off guard and genuinely thought he had agreed to a one year ban. But then when he finally acknowledged his transgressions decades later that ended any chance of a reinstatement.