Keynote Address-Sustaining U.S. Strategy in the Indo-Pacific 

India should aviod stryker deal which is canadian company

US Bharat relationships has reached Escape Velocity with Blatant Election Interference of Demonratic establishment in Bharat. Yeah surely.

Was India robustly standing up to China, increase confidence in India’s defence strength and confidence reason for upping US pressure on China on the Tibet issue. Is it time to push for a more autonomous if maybe not an independent Tibet

Would it we wrong to say that not withstanding India’s reluctance to openly align with USA, it would be in US interest to strengthen India militarily and economically, because the stronger India gets, more Chinese resources will be tied up to counter India, conversely reducing its capacity on its eastern front

One of the theories for China’s aggression in the Himalayas is to tie up India in the northern border and less in the India-Pacific where China sees India’s geographic location and growing strength as a direct threat to it. Secondly China needs to establish itself as the ‘Only’ hegemony in Asia to challenge US’s No-1 position. Would it be to US advantage to strengthen India to be able to stand up to Chinese hegemony. It would serve as a forward base for US for logistics, maintenance and repair facility for US assets especially naval. And if and when India decides to join USA more actively it could do so more seamlessly with experience on common platforms and interoperability

Would it be wrong to say that without India’s active participation the Indo-Pacific strategy would be greatly weakened

先生，由於年齡差異和始終太陽能專注於做出色的壓倒性俄語，因此無法在沒有適當安排的情況下討論主題

中俄阿聯酋軸

you are allowed to study these subjects and not that subjects especially sciences etc. What a nuisance and how generous.