KIRAT 09 || Who are Rais ? || Rai: Caste or Title || @SarthakNepalShorts 

Thanks Sarathk ji for your good job.

sen poni kirati ho ?

@@razajbaniyachhetri8177 haina. kati itihaskar ra samaj shastri anusar Magar bansha kaa hun!

​@@razajbaniyachhetri8177राई थर , सेन थर सबै बाहुन को थर हो 4,5century मा सिंध मा raj गर्थे ।

​@@razajbaniyachhetri8177sen madhesi raja ho ra rai bhardar sena ma kam garne bekti ho.

हो, सबैले आफ्नो बाउ, बाजे, बराजु देखि मान्दै आएको धर्म संस्कृति जोगाउनु पर्छ!

राई थर नै bahun को थर हो originally।

तर यो सबै हिन्दु ईस्लाम ईसाई यहुदि आर्य बिदेशी धर्महरु भित्राउने छेत्रिबाहुन र युपि बिहारी मदिसेहरु नै छन

गर्भ हैन गर्व

Chapter X: Rais and Limbus: Refugees from Sichuan Who Fabricated Connections with the Kirat Dynasty The historical journey of the Rais and Limbus begins in Sichuan province, China. During the Mongol conquests, significant upheaval forced many communities to flee their homeland. The Rais and Limbus migrated from Sichuan to northern Tibet, and eventually, by the 17th century, they settled in eastern Nepal. Seeking refuge from the conflicts and instability of their original regions, they found protection and land from the Sen kings of Nepal and the Bhutia Chogyals of Sikkim. Genetic and Cultural Evidence Genetic studies provide compelling evidence of the origins of the Rais and Limbus. These studies show a significant proportion of Mongolian and northern Chinese DNA in these communities, distinguishing them from other Tibeto-Burman groups in the Indian subcontinent. Their cultural practices, languages, and traditions also bear closer resemblance to those found in northern China and Mongolia, rather than the indigenous cultures of eastern Nepal. The Historical Dominance of Lepcha, Bhutia, Newar, and Khas Arya Before the arrival of the Rais and Limbus, the regions of eastern Nepal and Sikkim were dominated by various other ethnic groups. The Lepchas and Bhutias were prominent in Sikkim, with the Bhutia Chogyals ruling the kingdom for centuries. In Nepal, the Newars and Khas Aryas held significant influence, with the Khas Malla kingdom and the Sen Thakuri dynasty leaving behind numerous forts, palaces, and inscriptions. These groups had established rich cultural and political traditions long before the arrival of the Rais and Limbus. Fabrication of Kirat Connections While the Kirat dynasty did exist, the Rais and Limbus have no substantial archaeological or historical evidence linking them to this ancient lineage. Instead, they fabricated connections with the Kirats to claim indigenous status in the region. Prominent Limbu historian Iman Singh Chemjong played a crucial role in this fabrication by promoting the idea of a unified Kirat heritage that included the Rais and Limbus. This narrative, however, often overshadowed the histories of the Lepcha, Bhutia, Newar, and Khas Arya peoples. Chemjong's writings and the political mobilization around the Kirat identity contributed to the marginalization of other ethnic histories. Historical texts and educational curricula began to emphasize the Kirat narrative at the expense of the established histories of the Lepcha and Bhutia in Sikkim, and the Newar and Khas Arya in Nepal. The emphasis on Kirat identity, bolstered by Chemjong's work, led to a rewriting of regional history that minimized the contributions and legacies of these other groups. The Lack of Archaeological Evidence for Kirat Dominance by Rais and Limbus One of the significant criticisms of the Rais and Limbus' claimed Kirat identity is the absence of archaeological evidence supporting their long-term dominance in eastern Nepal. Unlike the tangible remnants of the Sen Thakuri and Khas Malla kingdoms, such as forts, palaces, and inscriptions, there are no comparable archaeological sites attributed to a Kirat civilization connected to the Rais and Limbus. This lack of evidence raises questions about the historical accuracy of their claimed Kirat lineage as an ancient and indigenous connection in the region. Erasure of Indigenous Histories The arrival and subsequent integration of the Rais and Limbus into Nepal and Sikkim had profound implications for the historical narratives of the region. The promotion of the Kirat identity, particularly by figures like Iman Singh Chemjong, has contributed to the erasure of other ethnic histories. Historical texts and educational curricula began to emphasize the fabricated Kirat narrative, often at the expense of the established histories of the Lepcha, Bhutia, Newar, and Khas Arya peoples.

Fake

That's one hell of a statement 😮😮😮

Chapter X: Rais and Limbus: Refugees from Sichuan Who Fabricated Connections with the Kirat Dynasty The historical journey of the Rais and Limbus begins in Sichuan province, China. During the Mongol conquests, significant upheaval forced many communities to flee their homeland. The Rais and Limbus migrated from Sichuan to northern Tibet, and eventually, by the 17th century, they settled in eastern Nepal. Seeking refuge from the conflicts and instability of their original regions, they found protection and land from the Sen kings of Nepal and the Bhutia Chogyals of Sikkim. Genetic and Cultural Evidence Genetic studies provide compelling evidence of the origins of the Rais and Limbus. These studies show a significant proportion of Mongolian and northern Chinese DNA in these communities, distinguishing them from other Tibeto-Burman groups in the Indian subcontinent. Their cultural practices, languages, and traditions also bear closer resemblance to those found in northern China and Mongolia, rather than the indigenous cultures of eastern Nepal. The Historical Dominance of Lepcha, Bhutia, Newar, and Khas Arya Before the arrival of the Rais and Limbus, the regions of eastern Nepal and Sikkim were dominated by various other ethnic groups. The Lepchas and Bhutias were prominent in Sikkim, with the Bhutia Chogyals ruling the kingdom for centuries. In Nepal, the Newars and Khas Aryas held significant influence, with the Khas Malla kingdom and the Sen Thakuri dynasty leaving behind numerous forts, palaces, and inscriptions. These groups had established rich cultural and political traditions long before the arrival of the Rais and Limbus. Fabrication of Kirat Connections While the Kirat dynasty did exist, the Rais and Limbus have no substantial archaeological or historical evidence linking them to this ancient lineage. Instead, they fabricated connections with the Kirats to claim indigenous status in the region. Prominent Limbu historian Iman Singh Chemjong played a crucial role in this fabrication by promoting the idea of a unified Kirat heritage that included the Rais and Limbus. This narrative, however, often overshadowed the histories of the Lepcha, Bhutia, Newar, and Khas Arya peoples. Chemjong's writings and the political mobilization around the Kirat identity contributed to the marginalization of other ethnic histories. Historical texts and educational curricula began to emphasize the Kirat narrative at the expense of the established histories of the Lepcha and Bhutia in Sikkim, and the Newar and Khas Arya in Nepal. The emphasis on Kirat identity, bolstered by Chemjong's work, led to a rewriting of regional history that minimized the contributions and legacies of these other groups. The Lack of Archaeological Evidence for Kirat Dominance by Rais and Limbus One of the significant criticisms of the Rais and Limbus' claimed Kirat identity is the absence of archaeological evidence supporting their long-term dominance in eastern Nepal. Unlike the tangible remnants of the Sen Thakuri and Khas Malla kingdoms, such as forts, palaces, and inscriptions, there are no comparable archaeological sites attributed to a Kirat civilization connected to the Rais and Limbus. This lack of evidence raises questions about the historical accuracy of their claimed Kirat lineage as an ancient and indigenous connection in the region. Erasure of Indigenous Histories The arrival and subsequent integration of the Rais and Limbus into Nepal and Sikkim had profound implications for the historical narratives of the region. The promotion of the Kirat identity, particularly by figures like Iman Singh Chemjong, has contributed to the erasure of other ethnic histories. Historical texts and educational curricula began to emphasize the fabricated Kirat narrative, often at the expense of the established histories of the Lepcha, Bhutia, Newar, and Khas Arya peoples.

17 century?? Kun history ma lekheko ko xa khuttayis...

Jpt..magar kirati hudai haina bhai..afno mukh ma je aai tiyo bolnu bhaina ni...adhyan garera bolnus otherwise it's laughable 😅😅😅

लिम्बू अलग हाे

😂

Sahi kuro 😊😊

राई र सेन एकै हो किनकि पाल्पा जो मध्य युगताकातिर खुम्च्येर किरात शासन रहेको पुर्वी नेपाल जो त्रिशुली पुर्व फैलियेको नाम थर पदवी नै जात पनि हो हाल ! तेसो त शाह बाहुन छेत्री कामी दमाई सबै पदवी नै हो

K vanna khoje ko hindu castist hun💀 Ma hindu gurung hu and ethinicity is that bahun chetri are khas and they are also a ethnicity

@@forrreal. Yes, Khas (as a whole) is ethnicity. But, within Khas there are Hindu castes , bahun, chhetri, dalit! Similarly, in Manipur , India Meitei is an ethnicity. Meitei are Mongoloid people but When they adopted Hindu religion they became divided into Hindu Castes, Brahmin, chhetriya and Dalit! ( In Khas and Meitei there is no Baishya caste)

Lichivi haru newar hoina ra

@@premossherpa3945 मल्ल हरु रनजघराना भन्छन उनिहरु

Raut yadav ho ra nepal ka kirat bahek ka sabai thula raja madhesi nai ho lichhvi malla gopal bans mahispal bans nag bans sen bans som bans sabai madhesi ho ra yi rajaharu kai santan newar ho yo satya ho.

hasais 😂😂

Kirat Kya hai bhai

@@zero-tv7lr Khambu hun ethnically tara aile Rai caste vayeko ho

@@zero-tv7lr thankyou for the information

राई चाई राजपूत हो ब्रमिन् दाहिर सेन ले हराएको हो

@@zero-tv7lr राई पनि ब्राह्मण ने हो शिन्धमा की खत्री, भिल कि ब्राह्मण हो राजपुत छैनन।

@@zero-tv7lr राई पनि ब्राह्मण ने हो शिन्धमा की खत्री, भिल कि ब्राह्मण हो राजपुत छैनन। RAI Dinasty Sindh भनेर गुगल गर। अहिले पनि कायस्थ, ब्राह्मण र खत्री ले ज्यादा राई उपनाम प्रयोग गर्छन। अर्को सेन पनि ब्राम्हण र कायस्थ ले प्रयोग धेरै गर्छन। दाहीर सेन पनि ब्राम्हण राजा थियो सिन्धको, बंगाली सुष्मिता सेन ब्राम्हण हो, रायमा सेन कायस्थ हो। बर्मन शब्द ब्राम्हण को अपभ्रंश हो सुरुवात मा पल्लव तामिल ब्राम्हणले बर्मन शब्द प्रयोगमा ल्याएका हुन्। कम्बोडिया मा funan dinasty शुरुवात गर्ने द्रविड ब्राम्हण(तामिल)लाई बर्मन उपनाम प्रयोग भएको हो। पछि अरु राजाहरुले पनि त्यसैको शिको गरेका हुन्। थाईल्यान्ड, इण्डोनेशिया लगायत। ब्राह्मणलाई चम्पाहरु बालीमोन भन्थे त्यसैको अपभ्रंश हो बालीमोन टापु या बाली। अशोकले कलिंग मा दमन गरेपछि ब्राम्हणहरुले समुद्री मार्गबाट व्यापार शुरु गरे त्यसै क्रममा विभिन्न देश र टापुहरूमा संस्कृति विस्तार गरे। इश्वीको प्रथम शताब्दीका चिनियाँ इतिहासकार Kang Tai ले funan dinasty स्थापना गर्ने र नागा राजकुमारी सोमा(संस्कृत नाम) संग विवाह गर्ने कौण्डियनलाई ब्राम्हण भनेका छन। तिनै ब्राम्हण कै अपभ्रंश खामेर लगायत राजवंशका राजाहरु ले बर्मन उपनाम प्रयोग गर्थे। नेपालमा ब्राम्हण को अपभ्रंश बाहुन भए जस्तै। राजकुमारी सोमा र कौण्डियान ब्राह्मण कम्बोडिया का राष्ट्रिय विभूति हुन। सुर्य बर्मनको पालामा लगभग छैटौँ शताब्दीमा चिन हुदै कम्बोडिया मा बौद्ध धर्म सुरुवात भएको हो। सुर्य बर्मनको नाति प्रथम बौद्ध राजा हुन कम्बोडिया को।

@@tomcat-xlrai dynasty lai haryera sen le raj gareko jasto lagthyo thiyo rai nai apbhransa bhyara raya bhyjasto lageko thiyo yo sikh Rajput haru le laguxan yo tag khatri,rai chai.

@@tomcat-xl bappa rawal pani sindh tirai hoinara raj gareko.