KSP: Building a Space Station with Shuttles! 

MATT YOU WONDERFUL WIZARD. HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN?!?

Great Scott! how could this happen?

Are you that desperate for money, that you would recreate your most viewed video, jk I love your videos

nice station! you should make a soyuz alike rocket and capsule for the station!

You should try using scifi visual enhancements, they have better performance than SVE while looking good at the same time. Useful for youtubers

Kelvin wait are you sure??

@@viethung9312 yeah

Capitão Explosão oh shit

@@viethung9312 exactly DUN DUN DUUUUN

RIP columbia

*ptsd*

Vietnam flashbacks

laughs in Apollo 13

*atlantis near miss flashbacks*

*Columbia Flashbacks*

@potater mater some time before that we had a rapid unscheduled disassembly

Eh, that's pretty weird to think it's funny...

Wah-waaahhh....

R.I.P Columbia

@@andrewjacox4655 And Challenger

Maybe he’s doing sandbox mode?

He doesn't use them cause you can't refuel that stuff in ksp

@@ekrm7577 You can recover the spacecraft and pretend like you are launching the same one. Or make a craft that docks to it and transfers fuel. You can transfer fuel.

@@mrpielover615 for this rocket it is impossible to reuse it, when the rocket comes back to earth it just has the "plane", it isn't possible to put it all together

@@KingLordLele you could put a few clamps under the shuttle and clamp in on a new booster

Actualy, you are right in regards to KSP and real life. They were basically just a failed idea by NASA.

Looks great though. xD

For NASA, the space shuttle was a vanity project more than anything, the cost/payload ratio multiple times that of an r-7. For ksp, I've partial recoverbles, using nice cheep drop tanks to be most cost effective, and have managed to get 100 tonnes up for only about 6000 units.

Quite effective.

If you balance them right they can be fairly easy to fly. I've been able to develop a very well balanced shuttle type thing that's pretty casual to fly.

We are ok.

?

ĐαякΛяcнεя i mean it's true

latt mowne no sfs(Spaceflight simulator)

Mowne Latt is it 3d

I think there's a mod that allows you to build craft in orbit, extraplanetary launch pads I think it's called.

he did that already

You would send each piece up via a separate SSTO, then you would attach them together with docking ports on each of them and fly it back down to the KSC

He could use the Mün launch site.

Be meant built an *SSTO* with a *Space Station*

@latt mowne Wasn't Ganymede destroyed due to s virus

The station would be too heavy after all the tea they would have to bring

Murica

Well the astronauts need to pay them because they keep them safe from communist aliens obviously

By heavily tax it I assume you mean tax it a tiny bit more than the previous almost non existent rate. By heavily tax it I assume you mean tax it lower than every human not on the station.

Philip Robb space colonies

jocax188723 d!ck

SAUSAGE!!! Bill, that was the missing snack, a sausage Bill?? Oh, sorry Jeb, I was just watching through the window The new Kerbal Space Station's design is awesome, but it reminds me a big...

Malcom Scott Hardpoint! Eh?! What do you mean, Val? Well, we could mount the engines on hardpoints. It would make them safer in case they need to be detached. Anyway, did you see the new station? They said it wasn’t on purpose, but everybody can see it looks like a-

latt mowne you need to watch those Austin Powers puns 😂

The suspence is killing me😵😵😵

Don’t u mean Columbia?

Wut is that

You are not alone

Have the last 3 years done anything for that?

Not even a little bit

@@phreeesubz have you tried downloading the MechJeb mod? it shows lots of extra info and automates dockings, landings, and other difficult tasks.

More than one space station LOL the international space station There is really no “the” space station

Check some of his single launch space stations, for instance his single launch jool launch

The most powerful rocket I created had 34 of the most monsterous dlc engine and I got to the mun in 1 second

Thonking

Same

Darkner *HOLD MY BEER*

Darkner how are you supposed to land an ssto on eve and take back off

Simple, use nuclear rockets for landings, use Ion engines for space travelling, and LF/OX engines for taking off.

9/11 or 911 which one do I call becuz there is a trespassing George Bush in my backyard

A man of his word 😂😉

The spyware has been removed some time ago.

the old fuel tank is still available in 1.4

No it is slightly changed

latt mowne but I want Matt to do that :p

KingPeppie it is cheaper and more practical in real life and in ksp

But everybody prefer space shuttles.

Agustin Murat not really because of space X's recoverable boosters,and the fact that the main tank is really wasteful, that it's nicknamed the "flying brick", the separation of the boosters and the main tank can cause the entire craft to blow up,coupled(ha get it coupled),with that the heat resistant panels in the bottom of the shuttle can just fly off,causing more damage to the shuttle,AND that it's actually MORE expensive than a regular rocket,so no,it's not preferred

A box o' Juice but ssto's doesn't exist. And in ksp everybody prefer space shuttle

Agustin Murat have you ever flown a space shuttle?do you know how finicky it can be to launch one?what about a normal probe-fairing deployed one?ever notice how smooth and stable it can be(if built correctly,although it isn't very hard).I'm just sayin.

latt mowne can you land on it if you wait till night?

I see you everywhere

Если мы будем понимать что он говорит то мы не сможем нормально смотреть видос

Но это не точно

Yes ....

Он говорит что Шатл не мог выводить модули тяжелее 12 тонн, а основные модули станции выведены ракетой Протон.

Ryan M. You can't tell what to do

Shove donut up ass

Look at all the butthurt comments you caused lol, ppl need these vids cuz these folks commenting on your comment cant do this haha

You're*

Same

yeah thats hilarious...

lol. There was 99 comments when I got here, I commented, refresh, and it says 100 comments