KSP2 - Detachable Plane Cabin 

Please return to us, the fall of KSP 2 brings dark times and one man’s silliness can break the suffering

lol 🤣 lmao

Good suggestion!

However, in a real plane that also means deploying the nose gear as well, which will stop aerodynamic flow and cause a nosedive.

@@usvmchc2843but as proven when deploying the gear for landing, the cockpit and the fuselage gear are not linked after disconnection so you could retract the front gear and keep the back gear down

​@@usvmchc2843could there be a way to make the main gear controls and the nose gear controls seperated? ex: you only activate one and the other doesn't open up

@@AceSpaceSFS KSP has action groups, you can assign gear there. In real life, this can be done using two pneumatic systems

due drops?

Element Animation villager reference?

Happens at 5:10

That may or may not have happened during my gaming session. ;)

@@SWDennis 🤣

The best solution would be to leave the plane be and let it just land. Planes are designed with ability to glide, pilots are trained to make an emergency landing should anything happen, and larger aircrafts even have extinguishers for their engines in case they catch fire.

Purchutes could be an idea but if the mass is too huge then R.i.p

Theoretically it's better in the event of a total loss of hydraulics, since you can't ditch a plane you can't control. But it's still incredibly risky.

@@ReddwarfIV but even still, UA232 lost all hydraulics and managed a controlled crash landing and 184 of the 296 passengers survived.

@@alt8791 Turkish Airlines 981 wasn't so lucky.

And what about the pilots? No save system for the pilots?

@@arthurlunar7835 why can’t they just go into the cabin

KSP1 is recommended. KSP2 needs more time to cook.

@@Aeretoi would recommend ksp 2 right now, it has a great recipe hand down from grandma

@@screech2730 I'd recommend ksp 1. It's more stable, and the mods have had more time to stabilize and be vetted. KSP1 is better if you want a more stable experience, and want to customize the experience with mods. KSP 2 is in a constant state of patching, updates, and other forms of flux, breaking what few mods it has. If you are willing to gamble that KSP2 will improve upon KSP1 in every way, and are willing to wait for KSP2 to reach that point, then go ahead and go for KSP2, but be aware that it's not a sure bet. A good bet, maybe, but not a sure one.

You didn't watch the whole video? :D

Maybe in game, but in real life the best course of action would be to: 1) Jettison the engines and ditch all of the fuel, to minimise risk of fire after touchdown 2) Save the entire plane with one chute (and that is a current solution for small planes).

Because money!

Because it would crank up the weight and complexity, as now you need to rethink pressurization, carry shutes, design a parachute system, make it pass regulations This would make the plane heavier, reduce fuel economy, less environmentally friendly, more complex and it would bump up the costs of tickets. Its not worth it as planes already are the safest means of transport

​@@Zeusbeerindeed Like i get they wanna improve that but yeah

Given the high safety of commercial flights, it's arguable that the increased complexity would instead result in *more* incidents. It's very rare for there to be a failure of the sort that would require this type of system, and it also wouldn't be usable during takeoff or landing, which is when most incidents happen.

I don't think funds are coming to this game.

That one guy in window seat: You are not alone.

Unironically, who asked?

@@SebastianBOZO-ii7hq if its stock then i feel kinda bad for him lol but those mods look pretty epic

@@SebastianBOZO-ii7hq nobody, they just stated their opinion.

​@@SebastianBOZO-ii7hqWho asked you to ask?