Many of her points begin with, "I feel like . . .". Please, get to the actual data/information/sources. There seems to be layers of obscurity. I've stopped watching 24" min in. So far, she hasn't expressed a single positive representation of men or a valid attempt at understanding their perspective, but instead blames repression on the vague term of the "patriarchy". She also doesn't address the notion that in places like Scandinavia that have been socially constructed in favor of gender still show the same preference of men to have more sexual partners than women on average. As a side note, they also prefer gender-traditional careers--female nurses outnumber men 12-1; male engineers are much more prevalent as well. For being a researcher, she seems to stress her own feelings, doubts and skepticism, which is an acceptable part of the hypothesis forming process, but 24 min in and she's still talking about her opinions. She disregards Darwinian explanations with simply, "that's a useful story." If they're erred explanations, give a counter. Instead she only dismisses them as inconvenient impediments to her feelings on the matter. Google, thank you for your attempt at raising public education and promoting dialogue. But it seems your dialogue is one-sided.
I like a woman with a large forehead, very much like a man with a beard. When they play with them, it's a sign of intelligence. I just read an article written by Ben Tarnoff, and found out he's married to Moira. That's why I'm here, and that's how internet works, in case nobody wonders.
