It is somewhat telling that nowhere does the report offer any evidence that the situation is better than Labour portrays. I don't recall Ms Kuenssberg being so sceptical of Boris's oven ready Brexit back in the day either.
@@alexander92179 An intimation of no confidence with every second phrase is NOT handling it normally. Only doubting Labour and never criticising 14 years of Tory policies is NOT handling it normally. (Except maybe for her.) Nor is it fair to the very substantial number of voters who made it clearthey wanted anything but the Tories. The biased reporter needs to go.
@@alexander92179 The only criticism she gave when they were in power was along the lines of "this isn´t true Tory stuff", or criticising one wing of the party from the point of view of another wing. She is partisan. What is so difficult about that? Why the need to defend a BADLY BIASED journalist? Keep up.
I didn't find Laura to be biased. Since this programme has aired the labour MP's have repeatedly talked about how difficult the financial situation is.
A lot of the comments say it was a biased programme, I'd say realistic. I speak as someone who has never been a member of a political party and a floating voter. The new government has a lot to do, for all our sakes I wish them well.
nobody is interested in this narritive that the news is saying "labour are suprised that its worse than they thought", most people just want a government to be honest and reliable about the choices they make. Rip the plaster off, tell us all how it is and make the steps to rectify the issues, slow progress is better than none at all.
Oh dear Laura the look on your face when the exit polls were reavealed on election night 2024 was priceless. Your beloved Tories were sunk and you are still having trouble getting over it.😂
Well, she doesn't just dictate your view, whatever that is. She puts whoever is in front of her under pressure to justify their position. That's not bias. That's the definition of non-bias. Look at her interviews with the Conservatives. Then look at her interviews with Labor. Then you can take a breath again and get over your misguided outrage
I have to borrow to invest however I'm not sure where the investable funds are coming from?! I doubt its taxation, pensions or the labour market, or the property market by the looks of things?! It's not from the education sector, education sectors are demanding investments.
@@TimComley She got into trouble with Ofcom over a feature were she edited it so Corbyn said something he did not it was called misleading by the Ofcom.
Watch any interview by LK v Tories and labour.. you can see her bias by not interrupting her Tory Interviewee or hard questions v labour interviews. @@TimComley
@@TimComley She got into trouble with Ofcom over a feature were she edited it so Corbyn said something he did not it was called misleading by the Ofcom.
@@alexander92179 Bias is not always an individual vice. Sometimes, it is a collective vice: a group of people who mostly think alike and rarely look outside of their tight bubble. The BBC has become such a bubble, and the vice/ bias is leaning Tory. But on an individual level, one of the worst offenders, someone who will always find an angle to pejorate Labour from the right, is Kuensberg. The grimace on her face when the exit poll came in, spoke volumes. Firing her would send a clear signal to the collective that the rightward lurch of the BBC has got to stop, and stop immediately.
@@alexander92179 Bias can be induced, not by individual actions, but by collective happenstance. The BBC has become very Try-leaning in recent years, and appointing someone who is outside of that frame of mind, that culd send a smessage of: stop right there, and get back to impartial reporting. Firing one of the few worst offenders (individual actions within the collective happenstance) would also send that kind of message. I have written a more detailed explanation, but for some reason RU-vid has removed it.
Rod Stewart was SACKED by the BBC for writing, not on air, that watching the Countryside Alliance might remind Labour voters why they had voted Labour. If that was a sackable offense, why is Kuensberg still on the air? Throw the trash out, and its bias too!
Laura Ozempic Kuenesburg 😂 When she says the whole expectation management aspect, i mean shed hammer them if they werent ambitious in their solutions 😂 joke.
Their honest optimistic and each of the Labour Party are been as hopeful as possible years and years of the Cons Party electing their own not giving choice #PositiveForLabour
The BBC's political coverage, with Kuenssberg at the forefront, is a disgrace to real journalism. It's not about informing the public or speaking truth to power - it's about maintaining the status quo and protecting establishment interests. The real facts are that Labour is caught in a difficult balancing act. They must navigate conflicting demands: ending austerity and improving public services while also maintaining fiscal responsibility. This tightrope walk is complicated by unrealistic voter expectations, biased media scrutiny, internal party divisions, and the economic shitshow caused by Brexit. The result is a no-win situation where any decision is likely to piss off some segment of the electorate. The UK's current state isn't just bad luck or circumstance as Kuenssberg claims. It's the result of decades of mismanagement, short-sightedness, and a political class more concerned with keeping their jobs than actually running the country effectively. The system is broken, and no amount of budgeting will help fix it overnight. The current Labour budget is a temporary fix that fails to address the deeper issues at play. Without a serious overhaul of fiscal policy and a commitment to meaningful investment in public services, things will only get worse.
Waiting for the inevitable there’s a fiscal black hole and we can’t give the grifters of society free money unless we increase taxes on savings, pensions, and inheritance.
Lammy sounds deluded when trying to underplay the threat of Trump, particularly in terms of Ukraine. Not what we should be hearing from a Labour foreign secretary
Negative questioning is just a form that journalists employ to challenge the interviewee with their positions. It doesn't mean "smearing" the Labour Party members as some people like to put it. What do people expect journalists to be like?
The problem is it evidently impacts on her journalism, rather than just being generally impartial (or just giving shit to everyone like paxman used to do) ,she clearly loves the tories
