Largest Creatures To Ever Exist On Earth 

That guy is a character in the videogame Phasmophobia!!

Real chad

When he takes on a banana he'll have my respect.

Dinosaurs may need a human for scale, but humans will always need a banana for scale

We also should give mad respect to the film crew who went back in time to record the dinosaurs

Yeh or the titanaboa 🐍

What?

Giant spider??? No thanks 😂

The faces alone, I mean, rl nightmare show.

Insect aliens would suck so bad. I simply don’t want them here they may be perfectly good bugs.

Crazy and polluted

@@undrwatropium3724 mostly by India and China

There’s crazier rock fish can do it for a day

Sperm whales dive up to 90 minutes and 2,250 metres at those depths their lungs collaspe since the pressure is about 200 atmospheres. So the whale can stay underwater longer if it wasn't swimming and diving that deep.

land galopogos isle turtles tend to pass out with heads in water holding there breath for hours. :)

Watch "your dinosaurs are wrong". you're welcome.

🤏🐛🤘🏻

sounds like a great name for a band lol

@@mokfishing the bit about Jurassic park pushing the theory that their eyesight is actually surprising. The T-Rex would have been even scarier if it could not only smell but see extremely well.

@@Thumbsdwn With eyes the size of tennis balls, they had the eyesight similar to modern day eagles. and could identify smells for over kilometers. They were the most advanced killers the earth has ever seen, and could only be stopped by an asteroid. if they thought you were a prey, you were.

@@FiryaFYIso bad ass

​@@FiryaFYIdon't they exceed birds of prey in eyesight?

@@overheaven8684 we don't have an eye to examine. But the estimates show they could see 5-6 kilometers. While we on the subject, the could smell better then most if not all dogs, and the part they probably were most lacking in was hearing, which is pretty bad. HOWEVER, T-rex could most likely scense vibrations like elephents do. And if a pray was moving 4 kilometers away, they felt it. Im not kidding, we know the Rex is popular because of Jurrasic park, but the T-Rex was the best hunter the world has ever seen.

It's impossible to correctly estimate the intelligence of an extinct animal, but we have some ways. And thanks to our modern technology we are able to undrrstand that t-rex was quite smart

just imagine it as smart as some Birds. predatory Birds. even herbivore Birds are super smart. we know now a lot more about them then we knew back when our imagination was defined by that Dinosaurs are giant lizards idea.

The narrator just reads anything put in front of him - could be a declaration of war or a porn script.

Dude I know... I had to give an updated version of a few of this guys "facts" in my own comment. I know I'm being a karen right now, but seriously. I loved the video concept, I just couldn't understand how he got so many things so incredibly wrong... The t-rex being 40 feet tall and running at speeds of 50mph just stunned me into complete shock. Like how do you not know that's wrong? We have entire museums and dictionaries and google at the tip of our fingers, granted with a decent Wi-Fi connection, and it's incredibly difficult to understand the ignorance. Sorry for rambling, but this is one of the first comments I saw that made note of the incorrect information of the video.

LOL. I previously thought Edward Scissorhands had it rough! I don't think I will grumble about trimming my pet's nails anymore.

.................................................................gay

@@TheVanillatechyou🫵

And I thought MY sense of humor was warped. Thanks for reassuring me that I can still hold some hope.

@@LouZoller hehe

This was corny yet so funny😂

Most die leaving no fossils.

Alot of it was bad research and not accurate

Gigantic is pronounced with a "j", it makes sense

jigga-what?

Its the proper pronunciation in the video

unfortunately a lot of it is wrong.

As long as the guess work is being done by experienced, educated, knowledgeable people in the proper field of study. What else do you expect exactly? Until we figure out time travel and can go back and get proof, we can only do the best we can with the circumstances we have.

I listened to that twice thinking I must've misunderstood. Honestly, that's such a confusing mistake that I can't watch anymore.

Noticed that too. Not going to watch a video if the makers themselves didn't even bother to watch it.

I think they mean that they were discovered in the 1970s. But when they did discover it they also discovered that they were damaged in ww2

Script written by AI

Bro just said "Carnivores like horse and rabbit"

Carnivores have forward facing eyes. Herbivores have eyes on the sides of their skulls, ie horses and rabbits

I’m bro just cuz they eyes are on the side of its head doesn’t mean they couldn’t see in 3d. That’s fucking crazy to believe that. If they didn’t have 3d vision then how were they able to understand depth width height angles etc cuz all of that is in the 3rd dimension. They wouldn’t be able to notice that the tree is coming towards them or if something was turning or rolling moving a certain way cuz everything would’ve been viewed in a 2 or 1 dimensional way. Which would be a piece of paper or a flat object that moves left right up and down. Make it make sense bro

​@jayw9992 as someone without depth perception, it is possible to navigate the world. As you say, everything is 2D but there are other clues I can use to determine distance. Think of the different tricks used in art to show depth in a piece of artwork. Farther items being smaller/darker, the placement of an object in relation to others. If one tree is in front of the other, we can infur that the tree in front is closer. My mind interprets those clues without me actively thinking it through because I've always viewed the world like this. It's not without its challenges but it's also not as life inhibiting as you say.

​@@neonbootygoon4385 he meant that' some carnivores had eyes on the side which were traits of horse and rabbit

Actually there’s one breed of snake that is both poisonous and venomous. Rhabdophis keelback snakes store the poison in their nuchal glands.

Drugs are bayd mmkay

@@sunnywantsmoney8483 So is your opinion.

@@mhthekilla it was a Mr. Mackey line... Maybe if you got off the drugs you would know that

​@malcolmhebbes2172 that's like saying you can't tell a persons health by their appearance. wait.

Bet you did druggie !!!!!

Fun comment but it has some issues. You just repeated the same shit that like a dozen other people already pointed out before you.

This comment needs more attention. Edited version of this doc, is also needed.

FFS, these poxy "Cameraman" comments are cringe a.f.

@@THE-BUNKEN-DRUM God bless you😊😅

literally just made a similar comment. Makes you wonder what other inconsistancies the editors missed. Like earlier they said "12 - 15 meters" but the text on the screen said "12 -5 meters"

its like the long gone Ohshit bird, it had 3" long legs and 6"long nuts and as it was landing it was heard to emit the sound OhShit Ohshit....

What?

"When crocs walked on two feet" 🤡 what are you talking about buddy? Mark Zuckerberg?

​@@AlejandroKirkisObeseBatrachopus grandis and Postosuchus were both bipedal crocodylomorphs. Maybe do your research first 🤡

​@@AlejandroKirkisObese😆😆😆

It's those damn Neanderthals...they always found deinosuchus legs such a delicacy... now paleontologists can't find any.

shame he doesn't read his facts properly before publishing

@@antop4597 what do facts matter..we all end up dead

A miracale

Wrong. The name of this therapod has always been pronounced JIGaNoToSaurus... Jurassic Park enthusiasts think Sam Neill's pronunciation of GIGaNoToSaurus is gospel, but we all know how sloppy the movie industry can be. Why we even have a cartoon called Gigantosaurus which further corrupts the pronunciation of this therapod whose greek derivative is giant southern lizard and in no way infers the concept of GIGANTIC. In fact, giganto derives from gigas which is greek for giant, and Gigantosaurus megalonyx was actually a dubious classification of a sauropod named in 1869, so can NOT be used as a classification for this therapod.

@@kevinmiller8051 I agree. I was probably wrong about the pronunciation of a very well known and disputed dinosaur. However, under the understanding that you could also be incorrect, we both have to take into account that the simple Latin and Greek bases of many words are also completely "mispronounced" according to where a scholar or student may reside. Differing dialects have an exceptional way of diversifying speech. So while you might pronounce it, "Jig," I will happily go on pronouncing it "Gig." Although you are correct in calling me out on that. I shouldn't have portrayed my stance as detrimentally factual as I did, and for that, I am sorry. Thank you. TLDR: Most likely. Although... this video was kinda wack regardless.

@@rookmagorium First, allow me to apologize for my rude opening comment "wrong". Also, I am not sure why I was so adamant about the pronunciation of the name of a dinosaur that was just discovered in 1993...surely not a sufficient timespan to support my use of an adverb "always".

@@rookmagorium With that said, you have spurred some reconsideration on my part, so I wouldn't be so hasty to apologize for your selected pronunciation. I agree with you that there is controversy when it comes to proper pronunciation of words derived from ancient languages. Also, regardless if one accepts the practice, the editors of dictionaries are constantly modifying such criteria, based on ever-changing contemporary usage. So, who is to say how the prefix GIGA is pronounced. Do we use the hard G as in giggle, or the soft G as in giant, and then is the letter "i" long or short?? I am sure someone steeped in linguistics or philology education could speak to this more effectively, but I am just someone who takes a casual interest in the subject. So, while Ruben Carolini may have wanted to use the name Gigantosaurus, rules prevented him from reusing a name previously adapted, so he selected Giganotosaurus. I would like to think he had the word giant in mind, so my preferred pronunciation would stick with this softG usage. I would however alter my previous offering of JIG that uses a soft i sound, and instead use the hard i sound and also assign the letter G to the second syllable. THus, JEYE-GAN-O-TO-SAUR-US. Yup, that is cooler sounding, so it's perfect! LOL

@@rookmagorium ...and yes, while well-intentioned, this video was ill-prepared and full of errors and inconsistencies which just turned it into a whimsical piece of entertainment rather than a reliable documentary.

Theres cave drawings of them and many other instances where humans depicted dinosaurs perpetuating the theory that humans and dinosaurs existed simultaneously.

​@deepinyamouf1, can u provide a source? I really would like to learn more about it. 😊

​@@deepinyamouf1Yes, I'd like to see the link of where you learned that. Cause apparently, you know more than every scientist on the planet. Sorry, but no, dinosaurs and humans didn't live at the same time.

Humans most likely found bones here and there, but no one really cared about them or really thought about what the bones were from until more modern times.

They did have records of it; creatures like dragons or cyclops were born from the scholars of ancient civilizations trying to explain the massive and weird bones that would occasionally be found during construction or after any dramatic natural disaster that would expose them.

Don't forget my man Ghidorah

We don't knpw exactly if it had or not had feathers. We know that it had scales, but many birds today had both scales and feathers. So we cannot say for sure. Also, there is an high chance that it could have sexual dimorphism

It's all educated guesses that have been completely wrong many times. Realizing how off when much more complete fossils found. Like in beginning of vid, all they have are a pair of arm and hands w claws but they have the dino w whole skeleton, skin w color,spots an even hair on places. All from some arms. 🤷‍♂️

​@@Jerk_ANCIf you found half a human skeleton, you can guess what the rest looked like based on other human skeletons. Multiple dinosaurs, some much more complete, have traits in common. It's common sense to assume, by default, that similar dinosaurs share similar traits.

@dezember25th I understand, but how do they know the color of fur, feathers, or skin? Some are very colorful while others are very dull. I always wondered.

@@Jerk_ANC We usually don't, but sometimes we guess based on what makes sense, lile dinosaurs in deserts probably weren't brightly colored or fully feathered in white. However, we also sometimes find traces of pigment cells that tell us what shades the skin probably was

Same. I was so disappointed to hear that lol. Not all European accents are made the same lol

man, they care about dinosaurs not minute language details nobody but nerds care about

The whole script is so obviously written by an AI

@@SprinkledFox how did you notice and why is it "obvious" to you

I said a similar thing, it's such a annoying misnomer especially from a supposed scientific channel. Although most of the rest of the video has gotten its info right.