"Im not going to testify, but I'd like to go home." (so he can get his 4 million $ insurance payout, buy a new red sports car, and post his profile on E-Harmony) said with a smirk! Pure narcissist and psychopath!
Talk about the 3 stooges planning a murder!! I watched some of the trial, praying it was a conspiracy case ONLY & THAT SHE WAS STILL ALIVE! I was 💔 that she's not still with her family. I was shocked to the core that these 3 BLUDGEONING IDIOTS, could pull off stealing candy from a baby, let alone this horrific crime! I watch lots of true crime but occasionally there's a case that really cuts me deep. This was one of those cases. I'm a transplant patient w/ Addison's and it's very hard to find a decent, honest, caring doctor! Sadly most bow down to Big pHARMa & prescribe based on "conferences" aka VACATIONS & 💰 🤑 💸! We probably lost one of the good ones 😢
He's crying only because he was before the court. He didn't expect it to backfire on him. He thought he committed the perfect crime because he was blind sided by the life insurance
@@candyy_crush RIGHT !!! ... He did not believe in his wildest dreams from 2015 UNTIL 2020 that all would have evolved to his Death Row Sentence.... I strongly believe, he thought the Interrogations would suffice, his constant chattttter through the two interrogations and being filmed, helped greatly to convict. A Menace to Society !!..
This case reminds me Chris Watts' crime. Cold, calculates. A woman who loved her family all over everything... The only differences : - he did'nt ask for the children's murder - he was sentenced to death. Watts should be sentenced to dearh too. Even il Shannon's family asked for no.
Many cases of family murders equally as bad as C WATTS IF you care to check out the cases of Anthony Todt who murdered his wife & 3 kids & family dog then blamed it on his wife also the murder of Susan Cox who's body has never been found her husband murdered her then chopped up his 2 sons and blew the house up with himself & his sons inside So these are the 3 truly wicked & disturbing & evil husband & dad who killed their wife.
I personally don't think the DEFENSE LAWYER was a very good lawyer!! He starts out by saying, the Sievers were on the cusp of bankruptcy...Except for the $50,000 in cash, except for vacations they took, and except for their daily lifestyle!!! WHAT!!! That's grounds for bankruptcy!??? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🥴
Just maybe defense lawyer saw the mounted evidence and thought, too big of a hill to climb, so he just put in the minimum amount of energy on the case.
RIGHT ! The defense team WERE NOT TRIAL LAWYERS PERIOD......Have read where his lawyers WERE... COURT APPOINTED, might make a difference re energy vested ??
By looking at Defenses actions they K NEW the evidence was stacked against....The delivery was such an EFFORT on part of Defense team, how MS thought he would get off ?? .. Slam dunk for Prosecution-100 percent team !
I don't think they get the meaning of "jailhouse snitch". He was a part of the crime on the outside, not a witness of someone confessing to the crime on the inside. So basically, by confessing to his part of the murder and how it was done and organized, he probably did the best choice of his life to have a chance to see a daylight on the outside ever again. Every person is not only defined by the acts we did in the past, but most importantly by what we choose to do in the present.
You deserve ever second of every hour of every month and every year that you deserve! What right do men think they have to take away the lives of women----mothers, grandmothers, women, children....
RIGHT !!! He is ALL wrapped up in HIMSELF, manicured nails, plucked eyebrows, and what is MISSING is ....his earring hoop, as seen in past days, side by side with Curtis....If you note, he also has a feminine lip outline.... There IS more to Sievers than meets the eye BEHIND CLOSED DOORS.... High school buddies, then drifted apart and got back together in 1990....Sievers married in 2004.
I don't have a problem with her receiving this pittance to get to court.....Hope she receives more in the future from mags....book deals etc., I hope she changes her life...She's simple but a good person deep down.....because she and she alone broke the case....She was all over it ....showed them where the clothes were! ......A real Delilah for the Good Guys!
They arrested her guy, he was the earner. He didn’t want her to work, she was also pregnant. Once Jimmy Roger’s was taken into custody, she lost her income, her housing.
My aunt lived in the complex behind the house it happened in Bonita springs and one of my childhood friends lived on the same street just a couple houses down shits wicked fr
There was no evidence from wright that seivers ordered such a brutal hammer murder?correction on this podcast: Seivers did not hire wright & rodgers. , he hired his best friend Curtis Wright. Wright got Rodgers to come along to help out.
Does anyone know if Mark Sievers was employed or what type of employment he had? Curious if he was jealous of his wife being so Successful n getting more attention than he. Also if he was selfish enough to think of himself and was his biggest concern at his "Best friend's" Wedding Day those are other red flag of his Narcissism/Sociopathy. Plus when someone cries it's their spouse cheating that spouse can almost always point 3 fingers back so I'd just bet he had a "burner" phone n a person on the side or plans to.
She was paid 400/month. Had the money not been available, she couldn’t testify. She had to move, pay bills and feed her kid. She was also pregnant at the time.
this guy never worked out side the home. sure he helped her with the business. I think he was a big reason why they were in financial trouble. he saw dollar signs picturing her dead. just disgusting taking a human life for money!!! taking a mother away from her children!! I hope he goes he gets life no parole!!
You don't have to come back to find out. He gets the death penalty. Mark may have been a pain in the a$$ but he was no murderer, Wright was for sure and Jimmy likely.
The Messiah (Jesus) son of Mary HE IS not GOD, God almighty can NOT have a human Mother so are they saying the GOD almighty is half Human? Search for the truth "one message foundation" here youtube God does not have son and will not sent his son to die for our sin everybody are responsible their own deed Ezekiel 18:20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.
@20:51 ~ Why is Terri saying the jury found that this man murdered his wife for financial gain? As I understand it at @19:30 The jury says it was not for financial gain. Of course they use the word pecuniary. I’ve criticized Terri’s Analysis before but this is the first time that I have caught her in some thing that was absolutely unequivocally factually incorrect. Unless maybe I misunderstanding something, I think she is absolutely messed up here. Everybody makes mistakes so I can’t be too hard on her, but this seems like a pretty easy mistake not to make. You just listen to the clip that’s played and you respond. That doesn’t seem very difficult. But sometimes for some reason your brain just has a dumb moment or two and it misses the word “no“ after the jury four person was reading if they thought the murder was done for pecuniary/financial reasons. So normally I wouldn’t blame her too much, but I would assume as an analyst that she would look into these matters before they ever went on air. I wouldn’t think she hears a video and just starts analyzing it from the hip. It feels like she Hass to have been given the information before, she supposed to read over it and/or watch it, she gathers her thoughts on the analysis of the material, then they go live on air. She might actually have to submit what she plans to say for her own analysis before she ever gets on air, but I don’t know of course. So it seems to me she would have to have missed the part where the jury said this was not done for financial reasons at least two times at the very minimum.
Are you okay? Lol For one thing, just because the prosecution did not *prove beyond a reasonable doubt* (those are the key words there) that he had her killed, partially for the money.. that doesn't then mean that it wasn't still part of his motive, in all reality. Didn't they have a 4 million dollar life insurance on her? Secondly, I know they weren't discussing either Wright or Rodgers, but they certainly did it for the money. Without the money promise of money to them, there is no murder.
Jeneral Jax - You wrote a reply to my comment but I can no longer see it under my comment, but I can’t see it in my notifications. I think basically above I answered your question as well. Not sure why you ask if I’m OK, maybe you’re worried about me. So I’m doing great. Thanks. Hope you are as well. As far as your question, I pretty much answered above. I also believe it was for money that the husband killed the wife, but as I understand it before that’s not what the jury found. And when somebody gives legal analysis in this video online crime networks, they need to give the right legal analysis. So I try to call anybody who makes a mistake specially when it’s multiple times, not being prepared is not good for business.
