Your comment isnt a joke. All these guys that go around for youtube views definitely make calls to create content for their channels. Its always a better video when police arrive. The show Cops was the number 1 show for like twenty years.
Someone definitely snitched and he definitely had beer in his room. Proof: had he made the call himself he would’ve made absolutely sure that there’s no illegal substances in the room. He also would have made sure to have a third party recording the whole interaction from down the hall and hopefully another camera surveilling the interior of his dorm room. Thus when the cops gave him the ultimatum that if he didn’t ID himself they would arrest him, he would refuse to ID. This play would potentially give him means to sue for false arrest if things escalate. On top of that if they search his room then he’s got a pretty slam dunk unlawful search without a warrant double whammy. The reason I had mentioned the third party recording and a cam in his room is to cover his ass incase they’re dirty cops and they try planting anything.
@@bzsbzs350 And yet, it worked because the cop did show up and he did harrass them. If the certainty of shitty policing is so absolute that law student debate lords can call them for practice, maybe the system is trash
It's not "exercising their rights" it's "being a needlessly combative asshole to a guy politely doing his job". The fact that he had the right to do that doesn't mean he wasn't being a needlessly combative asshole. He was literally just being the law equivalent of a karen. And let's be fair here, considering his age, the fact that he's a uni student (not exactly reputed to be the most alcohol abstinent of demographics), and the fact that he mentions specifically a "case of beer" when no such thing was at least mentioned on camera as being the thing he was called out for, he probably was witnessed, so the fact that he acted like an ass is probably not only due the fact that he's a righteous citizen that is purely offended that his constitutional would be infringed upon, and not because he knows if they entered his room he'd be caught with a case of beer.
@nathanjora7627 OK so I will call the cops and say that I saw you walking down the street with a blunt, and you went in your house. You're gonna let them trample all over your rights and just let them arrest you? They have no proof. Just a witness and we don't have any indication of who this witness is, the validity of their statement, the distance in which they saw the beer, etc.
No doubt that's what the cops were thinking. I wish the kid had stayed professional all the way through, but I can understand why he was getting upset with them by the end. Seems like he was standing out in that hall a long time.
I mean, that is literally the ONLY course of action left to them if they are called out for suspected possession and the suspect refuses to cooperate, not even giving affirmative or negative answers, which I am fairly sure they would have just left if he had said "nope, no alcohol, can I get back to studying, I have a test coming up" because these are campus police and they get these calls all the time and I can tell you from experience (and talking to campus police) that they are really only there to see if they can smell alcohol since there isn't really anything they can do if the suspect just says "no, I don't have alcohol in my room."
@@naisancoder9487 See, you actually bring the case of beer into the dorm room. That way if you get caught as the caller, it’s not a fake-call because you’re actually breaking the law.
@@apfelbasketbro, that’s what they should say when the cops say those things “those games? You mean the law, the law you should know as a professional”
Lowest hanging fruit phenomenon...what's even more infuriating is the morons will applaud such waste of taxpayer money. It's so much easier to harass regular, harmless citizens than to against the real monsters in society.
My question is who tf is the snitch ass little rat who gotta tell mommy about some bogus. Imagine calling the cops because you think someone brought beer to their dorm 😂
Society is fucked if a college kid *possibly* having a case of beer in his dorm room requires police intervention, *especially when all you have is a third-party report that may not even be accurate...* What if it was a case of soda??? You're going to feel pretty stupid if you make THIS big of a deal about getting in the kid's room...only to find a case of Sprite...
The saddest thing is that if someone reported a sexual assault on that campus, absolutely nothing would be done. If anything, the victim would be asked to prove the claim before anyone gets talked to. This is pathetic.
He knows there’s no warrant for or previous record him so even if they demand an ID that they can’t use it to escalate the situation. Cops use social engineering, much like hackers and con men, to get access to information and locations they have no right to.
or maybe they just wanted to make sure they were investigating the right person and that he was indeed a minor. But go on believing that this kid is some kind of genius when he's just repeating the ridiculous frauditor script.
Good for that officer he is doing his due diligence and trying to follow the law. I feel both handled it well but the kid being a prick is unwarranted and he needs to be careful. Next time he may not run into a cop that cares to do his job correctly and get seriously hurt. That would be horrible and wrong but that's just how America is these days. The cop he got was a good one just trying to do his job properly. He could've refused to give ID without being an asshole about it.
@@Parzival0 It is not unlawful to be a prick against a cop that DOES NOT KNOW HIS JOB. If you need to google the law after you started to "enforce it" you are acknowledging that you did not know what you were doing, hence, being unlawful. And if the police officers got violent, that kid would have sued for up to 1.000.000 dollars and be set for a long time.
@hieijangashi so are you saying all police officers need to go to law school? If so you are about to have no cops in this country. Of course a law student will know it better. I never said it is against the law to be a prick to a cop but it is an extremely dumb idea. Sure he could sue if he got violent but no he probably would lose cops win almost every time no matter how out of line they are so either he'd be dead or seriously injured with nothing but pride to show for it.
I think the B- for the officers was deserved, because they atleast tried to play by the law and rules and actually look it up the moment they become unsure over the legal situation compared to other cops who probably would've gotten violent and illegally arrested the student here. So although these two certainly didn't act perfectly, they did way better than many of their colleagues in their profession, who look to uphold their intimidative authority instead of upholding the law. So I wouldn't hold it against a police officer in any country, that if he becomes unsecure about a not-so-crystal clear legal situation, he stops for a second to actually look up the law, that is imho commendable behaviour. Even if the laws they have to enforce are ridiculous like investigating the "crime" of an underaged guy drinking.
It always pisses me off that cops take an anonymous caller's word as 100% infallible yet they won't believe a word you say that contradicts the caller.
My mom got a ticket over an anonymous call and I was so frustrated with her that she didn't fight it. She passed a lady who was going under the speed limit, in a passing zone. This apparently upset said lady because a few hours later a cop showed up at my mom's work and wrote her a ticket for passing on a double yellow. And my mom freaking PAID IT!! I was furious, you basically just said anyone with road rage can call in a false charge and the cops can extort the money out of an innocent person, without ever having witnessed the act. How insane.
@@Yesthatsmyfirstname My step mom had that happen one time when my entire family was in the car. They called the cops and told them my step mom was violently speeding and swerving. When they pulled us over we all said the lady was break checking us while swerving and yelling. Low and behold there she was, still going 20 below the speed limit and pulled over to try yelling at us some more, all while smelling like alcohol. I rolled my window down and laughed at her when she fell over during the sobriety test that she failed.
@@AdamBladeTaylor That's ridiculous , I'm white as snow and the police threw me to the ground and lied and said I battered them and charged me with a felony and I broke not one law all because someone called and said I was suspicious. So you have no idea of what you are saying.
the simple "Is my I.D going to tell you if theres alcohol in that room" is just a perfect clarification of what the cops intentions actually are. To initimidate and hold their power over civilians heads.
You must be quite dumb, any time officers are called to a scene for a crime, they can and should ID the individuals involved in the incident. That's not some intimidation tactic, it's basic procedure and most (if not all) states have laws around IDing yourself to police when they are legally investigating an incident. Please actually learn about what you're going to try to run your mouth about.
tbf he could have had alcohol but he knows they can't do shit. This sounds like smartass law students getting around alcohol rules by using knowledge of laws. The kid was clearly rehearsed on what to say beforehand.
1. Cops always assume they are right and can do whatever they want. 2. Cops will always (unless you are rich and white) assume you are guilty and will push the situation until you either give up or make a mistake. The cell phone with camera is the single most important invention to protect people from authorities.
I think the fact he was having it recorded, he knew this would happen and probably was hoping someone saw him with the case. Smells of a set up for a video
In many European countries you can drink beer at age of 16 if it's at a party with adults and in public such as at a restaurant with parents. You can buy your own beer at 18 and spirits and other strong liquor at age 20. I find it interesting that you can't do that as an adult in the US, but you can go to a war in a foreign country such as Afghanistan at the age of 17 with parental consent 🤷🏼♂️
This guy proves why all states need to get rid of qualified immunity. Those cops knew if they broke any laws, then _they_ would be prosecuted - exactly as it should be!
And illegally detained him well beyond any authority they had. Played mealy mouth intimidation tactics AND illegally seized his ID under threat of arrest. Hell of a thing that we consider this a WIN! Sorry state of affairs we are in that, yes, this is a win. Still pathetic.
No it doesn't prove anything. That would mean if a cop gets in a shootout with someone who fired at them first, without qualified immunity, even if it is ruled a justified shooting they can still be found liable in civil court buy the family. That is ridiculous and is why qualified immunity is necessary.
I think you don't actually know what law students learn at college... It certainly isn't up to date laws. It prepares students for very little. That is why they spend years learning after college and are so poorly paid until fully qualified.
"19 year old student, Joel Martinez" - where are you getting that he is a law student? In the U.S., you need a bachelor's degree to even apply to law school... I highly doubt this dude at 19 has completed his undergrad degree, taken the LSAT, and then successfully applied for and enrolled in a J.D. program. It also says he lives in a school dorm in Las Cruces, New Mexico, which is 200+ miles away from the only law school in New Mexico (one of the Cops seems to imply he is a "law student", but that is probably just based on the cops assumption, not anything the student said)... Edit: later it says he is a student at "New Mexico State University" which doesn't have a law school.
And yet someone, him using the THREAT that he 'Could', is not illegal. Which is MINDBOGGLING, cause ANY NORMAL CITIZEN would hear that as a THREAT and thus Comply under Duress of the Threat. And yet the police are not violating your rights or any laws, cause, TECHNICALLY even tho it was a THREAT, you still gave it up of your own free will, so screw you.
Obfuscation That's how they talk. The best defense is to stop talking. With all his legal knowledge, the kid has no humility. That is his weakness. Fortunately for him, these cops weren't smart enough to exploit that.
@@Extem1 Dont know about the US, but here you can sue someone for that IF the caller knows better and is lying on purpose. But here it was an anonymos caller anyway....
The police officer actually googled the law. That is scary af. Could you imagine if a surgeon googles how to do something in the middle of surgery 😬😮💨. That is crazy
You know doctors look up stuff all the time right even surgeons. Now a surgery typically is a planned event but, if outside the norm you bet they may look up some stuff to refresh themselves prior to preforming it. I worked in a hospital you’d be surprised how often doctors are reading diagnostic books to make sure they are right.
When i was younger i had an allergic reaction to something and my face puffed way the fuck up. (Couldnt open my eyes for 10mins, i thought i was blind.) Dunno what set it off to this day. When we went to the doctor he googled the symptoms in front of me. Told me i was having an allergic reaction. Yea no shit sherlock, mom figured that out when she googled it..
@@jetshark970shark4you are in medical school but not a doctor. If you search up “a day in the life of a surgeon” (I think that’s what it’s called), you’ll see that they always refresh themselves in how to perform major surgeries (unless it’s an everyday occurrence) to be adequately prepared.
They just gave him on the job training and turned him into a defense lawyer all in one interaction. What a great service to the public. What would we ever do without these "law" enforcement officers?
that's because the cops adhere to the Constitution and did a great job. I'd love to see how the cop-haters justify that the cops follow one part of the Constitution but supposedly not the other. The tyrant imbecile should be kicked out of the dorms for violating the house rules.
@@andremets they dont care about the constitution, they are oath breakers. this wasnt some sense of loyalty to uphold rights, it was fear of a lawsuit.
As an Aussie I was so confused why the cops would turn up for a grown man with beer, it took me a full 5 minutes before I remembered the drinking age is 21 there haha
Yeah it's pretty messed up. I can understand not allowing someone under 18 to legally drink but if you can die/fight in war, get married, own/rent a home, start a business, take out lines of credit/loans then you should be able to have a beer. It's rediculous.
yea in Germany/Berlin its usual that teens make their first experience with beer and wine at the age of 16 and I think thats a good thing cuz I better fuck myself up while 16 and learn to control my drinking early instead of drinking first time with 18 or whythef only at 21 where people drive cars and do other more critical things that can result in a catastrophe when having your first experience with alcohol..@@Some_Guy6
Yeah its weird. You can vote at 18 You can buy a gun at 18 You can buy smokes at 18 You can go to war at 18 but NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO You cant have alcohol at 18
As an European this amazes me. In most countries here the caller would get into way more shit for keeping emergency lines busy for a stupid reason and no cop would ever show up.
@@royjones7831- Many Americans are just becoming aware of what has been happening throughout this country's history, due to cell phone cameras, body cams, and social media.
@@masondegaulle5731 Good lawyers will also tell you that you don't know that you're innocent, either. Sure, you may not be guilty of what they're telling you they're investigating, but in the US you HAVE committed some crime in your life.
alot of them have a hard time confronting the cognitive dissonance, since theyve been opposing the goals of the blm movement for a long time, videos and channels like this have essentially vindicated blm and proven their claims more than plausible, now people have to contend with the fact that police are bad - and blm was right@@loki2240
@@ShiningDarknes there’s far more than photo and video evidence to rely on. And you’re acting like he was killing someone bruh it’s a can of beer. Not to mention it’s not about saying “it wasn’t me” it’s about being presumed innocent until being proven guilty. We got rights boss, u not allowed to trample my rights cuz of some random hater makes some shit up
I am not acting like anything. The fuck you mean "u not allowed to trample my rights" I ain't doing shit to your rights, calm down. Don't reply to me again, it is clear you have no interest in being rational and I have no interest in conversing with someone intent to be belligerent.@@RyokoEarth
But then we could all also say "I recall some ninja jumping in my room and drop the items presented as evidence" and BOOM! case dismissed. That's why courts have rules anonymous tips are BS, they can't be used in court.
@@ShiningDarknes Yeah, we should just let cops seize our ID for no reason and perform searches with no probable cause. I'm sure you'd love that wouldnt you officer?
The cops saw the trap he just set and still walked into it … how arrogant do you have to be to see a law student smiling at you and mentioning you don’t have qualified immunity an think you know better
That moment when he got the got the cop to give him the ultimatum, "give me your ID or you"re arrested" his eyes lit up like it was christmas. I reckon he'll get a nice little paycheck sueing that cop in the future.
The cops were within their rights most likely. How arrogant do you have to call someone a pig to their face? He's just a 19 year old brat with 2 courses of law.
@@nvfacc3569first amendment brother, and lmao "most likely" isnt enough, the law is the law and you're commenting on a video that literally explained why they weren't in their rights do better, stop choking down boot leather long enough to think for yourself
“We don’t have to go down this route” aka “you obviously know your rights but I want to abuse them for my own power so just let me abuse your rights” 😅
Even considering getting a warrant for a case of beer is crazy. What's wrong with those cops? If we're going to start prosecuting underage drinking in college we better start building a lot of prisons.
@@jamescordes8673if you watch the badge cam footage, initial contact was made by the officer and a staff member/school security (when he turns the cam after asking for badge number and it cuts) so they probably can’t search all willy-nilly edit: and they talked to the ra at the end so they definitely can’t search
I hope this kid gets through law school because he's absolutely on-point here. Not only did he know the law, but he set up cause for a lawsuit that he has right in his back pocket the second the police push things further than he likes. He even gave his ID the second they gave him the ultimatum, showing that he was playing this game thirty steps ahead and knew exactly the words to listen for.
Yup exactly. He's definitely putting the tuition money to use by actually understanding law and being able to implement it in his life. I hope he has a good future in law
@@ghostsxstars "We're investigating an anonymous tip, that you have Beer in your dorm room. "Officer, I need to inform you that I'm armed... with the knowledge of the law, I'm a law student." "Ok bye" Would've been wiser lol.
@@atomicphilosopher6143 He's an idiot. Albeit a stupid kid, all college kids sneak booze and drugs into their dorm rooms. I know I did back in 1979. Light up some pot and stick wet towels at the bottom of the door to seal in the smoke and the smell. And that's in our spare time when we weren't lighting our own farts. Regardless, they could have probably entered the dorm room even if he didn't consent. They probably decided the dumb little shit ain't worth the hassle.
Right like broskie could’ve been out drinking at a party and driving under the influence but nah Homie decided to stay in his dorm, drink and do his homework
@@brianbagnall3029 No, he only showed ID after threat of arrest. He can actually press charges on that and that's a farily easy win. Whether or not he will press them is up to him, but you saw those cops, they had their asses pucked the whole time.
@@brianbagnall3029if you have the ability to leave a comment that means you dont even listen to the accuracy of the legal advice ATA or Lackluster shows us. So you either listen and still choose to defend tyranny or you just dont get it.
If someone is being disrespected by cops not following the law, why should that person be respectful to them? They are not paid respect, so owe none in return.
They shouldn’t. They also shouldn’t be overtly “disrespectful” or they will use that against you and try to escalate until you get yourself arrested or slip up. This kid did an amazing job; stayed calm, and focused on the only thing that matters - which is the exact laws in this case. He played 4D chess and used their disrespect as motivation to destroy them in this case
literally every cop in these videos say that when they do anything but lick their boots and allow them to violate whatever they want lol.. Shit man we need change
It is actually unreal that a cop had to look up the law when they are supposed to be the ones upholding it. He should have already been well versed in it!
@@TNeal629 just pointing out that although cops should know the law, they probably would not know every statute by heart. In the case of the video they were correct regarding the statute they looked up (the concealment of identity statute) and were likely wrong as to whether they actually had a reasonable and articulable suspicion (which is a constitutional issue).
"you wanna go down this route" has to be one of the most infuriating lines a cop could ever say. It's basically a dickless threat so they can try and get you to do whatever they want...
Yeah and the route was we don't have shit but we will make some shit up later and try to get you then. Now they are about to get sued by him for their latest baseless arrest.
F this Little douche. If I was the cop I'd go to court. The citizen had nothing to gain when they reported him. Therefore I say give me ur id or I'll arrest u. But I wouldn't get a warrant for the room. Waste of time
I will never understand how they can call 19 a minor.... you can get married, have sex, have a baby, join the military.... but its illegal to have a beer..... insane
No, it isn't it's due process. They had to make attempts to investigate. What if the student did die of alcohol poisoning and they did not even go to the room after receiving the complaint? That would make the whole school, and them personally, liable for the student's death. People don't think about these things. They HAVE to investigate it to the best of their ability, which they did, the student was an ass and actually violated the code of conduct for the university, and they did their due diligence to the best of their ability and left. Simple as that. What most likely would have happened is the alcohol would have been confiscated and people could have gone on their merry way. But people have to make what is already a difficult situation even harder by acting that way. That is what is ridiculous. People can say "watching these pigs get told off is hilarious" or "These cops have no idea what the law is" all they want, neither of those statements are true. And until people walk in the shoes of these officers, and see the situations they deal with on a daily basis? They have no business talking about things they do not know the full scope of what is involved on all ends of it.
@@stressfulpeacegaming Lol… okay.. So first, I have waaaay too many friends that are officers to even remotely disrespect their position. I’ve actively criticized “defund the police” because I need them there when I need them, and I’d rather them be happy and paid than disgruntled and not taking my claim seriously. Next, my OPINION of it being insane is mine to have. So you literally can’t say “no it isn’t” because, yes it is, to me. Last, had it been drugs, I would have understood. It’s a case of beer. In college. If it wasn’t in his room he could have gotten it from the next. They only cared to do a warrant because he was a smart a**, but most of the time they won’t waste their time…. Over a CASE of beer. So you can relax with your emotions. I’m not changing my stance. However, I understand your point. I feel that way, just with more serious matters.
@@adorimonroe1 Oh my comment was not aimed at you, it was aimed at so many people that don't understand the fundamental concept of seeing things from both sides. On the surface, I completely agree, you are in college, you're gonna drink, no one cares. But from a legal standpoint, if that officer disregarded the complaint and something happened to that kid because of the alcohol, he would be found negligent, lose his job, house, lose everything he has because of it. I think we can all agree the law needs to be changed to allow drinking at 18, or the age for anything age restricted should be 21 and you are considered a minor until 21. One of those absolutely needs to happen. But as far as the law being what it is, they HAVE to investigate is my only real point here. I get it, and I agree the law is ridiculous in its current form, but as it stands, they had no choice but to investigate and confront. My apologies if it seemed like such a direct attack, a bit lack of sleep and no coffee means I should not post until those two things are met! So, absolutely sorry if you took it I was insulting you, my main point was for others to see there is way more than one side to something like this is all!
@@stressfulpeacegaming this guy's a nerd 😂 Youre probably the kid who called the cops (Also jk btw joking around here.. instead of writing an entire 10 paragraph essay on a youtube comment 😉🤙🏽
Honestly, this is ridiculous. I couldn't imagine the police in my country wasting this much time over an adult in possession of 1 case of beer. 😂 America is a joke.
He is 19. Old Enough to drive. Old enough to get studentloans (so legaly get in to dept) but when someone thinks they saw him with beer he gets 3 cops on his doorstep?Edit: Sorry it was 2 cops.
When the police realize you know your rights they consider it problematic. That needs to change. I'm sure most people have never seen what Academy training is like but they basically teach you how to step around people's rights on purpose. If someone's asserting their rights and you're not getting what you want you're losing the game as a police officer. That's why they become hostile when you assert your rights.
The 2 cops were pissed and it showed how small their p-p’s were and how ignorant of the laws they try to enforce, allot of cops have this mentality of your not gonna be above me on any grounds, I understand trying to maintain control of the situation but at the end of the day the laws written are the laws period and this kid took them to school and I hope he files a complaint and sues them.
@@tucarnal7439 You can drive legally and purchase a vehicle. But renting a car and drinking alcohol are the only things needing 5 more years of adulthood.
@@mavericks4269 It's not even illegal. It's like consumption/possession in public which is not the case here. If you just google "New Mexico underage drinking" you get "Possession is prohibited WITH THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTION(S): private location AND EITHER parent/guardian OR spouse" So it's a private location so perfectly legal
Exactly, super important thing he did there, seems like a lot of people in these comments missed it. He wasn't just being obstinate, he was making sure it was an order and not a request, so he can argue later that it was an unlawful order.
It's really great that there is no serious crimes or acts of evil happening in that community that the police are investigating a college student possibly possessing beer.
The cops know the law, and intentionally choose to ignore it, because they're so used to people not knowing their rights, they choose an approach they can't back down from when encountering a situation where someone with a camera also knows the law.
They could back down, but they would have to admit they were wrong, and in turn, admit they don't know how to do their fucking job and are a waste of tax dollars.
I saw that too i thought maybe he was a bit nervous cuz he doesnt know the laws like this kid does and the simple fact that the kid is calmer then he is despite their position of power in interrogating him
No the kid was ruining his own life by breaking the agreement with his college by not having alcohol in the dorm. Instead of taking accountability for his poor choices, he decided to make a spectacle by demonstrating how ignorant he is.
@@DeadCool6014 sir get a grip. He’s in college and this was a petty reason these cops are there for an anonymous call that he had alcohol in his dorm. You’re saying he showed ignorance when really he showed he knew his rights period.
@@DeadCool6014 so if i went and picked a random college kid and made an anonymous tip they have alcohol in their room, that college student would then be "ignorant" and "making a spectacle" by standing up to and defending himself from the police? they have no way to know if the tip was accurate or not, the police can come ask questions but legally thats all they can do, youre an idiot if you think the kids in the wrong
So in the USA people can snitch on 19 years old LAW students for possibly having alcohol in their room, and COPS actually come in FORCE to ARREST this DANGEROUS criminal? Thee cops have NOTHING better to do than stand arguing over some beer that allegedly has been attained somehow. It is truly mind boggling to my Dutch brain that this can happen in the so-called free world. Don’t these cops have actual criminals to find and arrest?
One could point out that that's rather entirely the point. Either it's such a low crime area the cops have literally nothing better to do with their time. Or An hour or two spent "investigating" the mystery of the missing beer, arguing with a random college law student just to get his ID, means an hour or two those cops don't have to spend dealing with real problems and actual criminals. Those people are dangerous and might make things physically difficult on the officers. Plus I'm guessing they hoped when they ID'd the kid, they'd find something juicier to warrant the time spent on him, and that would give them an excuse to arrest him on unrelated charges from the original "anonymous tip", let them search his room, and hopefully find the case of beer so they could tack on minor in possession ontop of the standard "resisting, obstructing" automatic charges as well. Guessing his ID came back clean, and that's when they knew they had nothing. They still managed to spend time away from the "uncomfortable" part of the job on a fishing trip that went bust. They probably still count that as a win.
University might be a dry campus. Btw all these laws that seem fucked up, are… they’re used to screw with people. Especially marijuana laws in this part of the country.
You exactly perfectly pointed that out, the hypothetical irony is nauseating! Along with the lie that as 🇺🇸 citizens & the world have been, ‘’Sold’’ the illusion that 🇺🇸 is ‘’BRAVE, FREE & LIBERTY [🙃FAIR😆] & LIBERTY’’ x♾ although it’s abundantly clear that most cops in 🇺🇸 don’t actually understand what that means or understand anything about our constitution. It’s a difficult thing to grapple with digesting daily how backwards of a corrupt lying ‘’world power’’ government system we have. It’s truly a security state, ran by post modernist, that are obscenely wealthy fascists & are obsessed with not only attempting to be a perfect hedonistic example of a transhumanist but they use their corrupted power in cahoots w/ Mother WEF’rs to turn the whole world into the same. 👎🖕👉Khazarian Mafia
"Guilty until proven innocent" every time somebody calls something in. They really need to investigate these callers to ask them some questions too, make sure it wasn't a fake call and hold them accountable if it was.
I've been saying for years the investigation should start with the complainant. If you can't get info from the complainant then leave the suspects alone or observe without interacting.
@@ajkendro3413 It's very clear you've never heard 911 callers, most people don't know anything, but a lot of suspicious are crimes, even if people can't articulate them. It isn't like they're putting him under a serious investigation or charging him with a crime.
@@redeyesb.dragonite8562 Ask for name and address so the cops can stop by and start an investigation. If they are unwilling to give the info the cops can only go and observe, WITHOUT contacying, the suspect.
I find it almost unbelievable that a "possible case of beer in a dorm room" involves the police. That's such a non-issue to even investigate... Catching people who are speeding has a higher public good than that!
I suspect the law student 100 percent purposely did this.. And the dorm tried to deal with it the student but he wanted the cops to come. That is why he filming it to. And that he is why is asked for the sargeant. And that is why he is spewing his legal knowledge. I ain't impressed at all.
@@lesliesmith719 i mean there's thousands of videos of people recording cops and asking for sergeants, doesn't prove they all 100 percent purposely did this
He committed a crime and got away with it. That isn't good, that's a criminal stroking their ego because idiots like you think it's super awesome to break the law and then give police a hard time because you're scared of being busted.
Its interesting to see how they go out of their way. To harrash a law student, when they themselves drank in school. Actively wasting everyones time. You know they go home complaining about him.
@@DontUseHack these calls are only expected in countries that are crime free. But if you have alot of crime, students buying beer shouldn't be that high on the priority list
@DontUseHack exactly. They did it, they know it happens and yet here we are. He could have knocked on the door, asked if he had beer and left with no issues.
The guy set the whole thing up. Had his friends call more than one time anonymously to the cops. No student gives a flip qnd it they did care they would talk to the RA. And an employee calling would have given their name. He wanted the cops to screw up so he could sue them. He used that word.
@@lesliesmith719 if it were a set-up I think he'd have something more substantive than a case of beer. Quite the set-up for something that will likely be dismissed in court
Half these officers dont seem smart enough to actually graduate high school. We NEED to start taking a more active hand in how these small town cops are hired
@rushoflife2368 well any self aware adult knows that it takes a certain type to be a police officer. I couldn't do it!!!! You have to be smart enough to know the law and you have to have skin as thick and tough as plate steel. Small towns seem to hire whoever will do it for the least pay and will do whatever small town politicians tell them. Most have had MASSIVE inferiority complexes for their entire lives and they see the badge as a chance to finally BE somebody and force respect upon themselves they can't earn. Most of us are to busy trying to live life to constantly oversee what local government is doing, and then we wind up with a LOT of small town cops like this one or worse.
I love how the sergeant admits to the women at the end that their tip was anonymous, essentially making their claims of “reasonable suspicion” earlier highly suspect and likely insufficient to either I.D. the student or obtaining a warrant.
Craziest part to me is that apparently citizen informants are considered more reliable because "they have no reason to fabricate a crime". Really? I can think of a lot of reasons why someone would do that and, indeed, it's not hard to find instances of people lying anonymously when they call in a tip.
You are doing the thing you are accusing citizen informants of doing. Just saying. Your argument is you can personally think of reasons to fabricate a crime but a reasonable concerned citizen wouldn't and you can't prove they fabricated anything. Are you suggesting police ignore anonymous tips simply because sometimes they don't have the whole picture? The problem is they can't just ignore anonymous tips, they may have a priority list assuming not enough available units to investigate everything as it comes in but if they get in the habit of assuming a tip is false, and it turns out not to be what are the consequences? In this case, probably not much but it could be as much as a drunk driving incident involving that person they decided not to investigate. Cops do not have the luxury of assuming a tip is false (unless of course it is so outrageous it couldn't possibly be true, in which case they attempt to trace the caller and investigate that person).@@Netist_
