Leclerc XLR manoeuvring to its favourite parking spot next to the mighty Tiger II 

written under a video were we can see a Tiger II, which fought in the war, saw service with the French army after the war and is still running with its original gearbox and transmission 80 years later. 5 seconds vs 80 years?

@@HaVoC117X gearbox isn't exactly the same as transmission or engine smartypants

@@yakumoyukari4405 smarty pants wrote gearbox and transmission and even the engine is 80 years old and still running. The Maybach Hl 230 had an average runtime between overhauls of 1000 to 1500km in 1944. Thats exactly the same as the IS 2 with up to 1600km. While a Churchill lasts only 500 miles (800km) on average. But you are free to believe in the MEME.

POV: Teaboo mad the Germans got the cool stuff and no one gives a sh*t about Shermans anymore. We get it dude, German heavies were maintenance intensive. They were also f*cking cool so move aside with your Sherman, we want to see the Tiger II.

Transmissions held fairly good with experienced drivers, which there were a lack of during the war

who said tanks can't be road legal?

Tiger 2 as 10ton more than a Leclerc, but it as only 1800N/m of torque against the 4850N/m of the Leclerc. Tiger 2 engine was too weak for his weight.

@@nicoblacknight7879 But the KingTiger has the double of tracks size, better traction... Im sure the Leclerc would start spinning the tracks without moving the kingtiger, and the king tiger yes, it could move it because better road-traction

@@Big1_ assuming the tiger 2s engine doesn't catch on fire

@@DontStealMyNoEffortName bla bla bla