@@Zetaphotography well, many many photos. To be honest, I ended up upgrading to the m10 monochrom. But this was about 8 months after I scored a crazy good deal on the 246. I would recommend the m246 to anyone who asks, and if they can afford and choose to, the m10 and m11 monochrom. Gracias por la información y inspiración.
I came here to see a review of the Monochrom 246 and wow ... great BW photos and great review.Thanks Shootng the 240 M-P ... I m very close to pull the trigger on a monochrom one ... Best
Thank you, my friend and glad you liked the photos and video. The MP240 is a great camera, I sold mine in order to get this Mono, they are essentially the same and feel the same minus the color sensor. I haven’t tried the newer Monochroms yet but I’m are they are amazing.
I don't know whether I am hearing correctly. The presenter says at 3:50 that the Typ 246 is based on the m10 with a 40Mpixel sensor. But this is not correct. The typ 246 is based on the typ 240 and has 24Mpixel sensor.
Sweet! I would love an M-D, I know it’s also a camera not for everyone but the lack of LCD seems like such a great way to keep things simple and with less obstruction.
The monochrome images that come out of my M240 feel more organic to me. The M246 although better on paper as far as ISO performance and sharpness, seem to produce very flat images, from what I have seen in many YT videos and sample images on the web. I feel very reluctant buying one.
Great video and Photos as always. I own a Leica Q2 and I’m thinking of buying my first Leica M. If you have to choose between the M240-P and the M246 which one would you choose and which one do you think is a better investment overall?
Hard to say, like I said on the video, this camera is more of a specialty item. If you are happy with your Q2 for color photos and with the fixed focal length then I would get the Mono so you can have the best of both worlds.
@@JLStreetDoc huh? Why would I not want to give the info? If I remembered the artist I would have told him. Anyhow, I recorded this video a while ago and like I said, it was a royalty free track I found.
the sentence "there is really no digital camera that can capture the true essence of photography like a rangefinder" is the the most conviluted statement ive ever herd from someone who doesnt make thier living from photography. anyway we all get to that place at some point and randge finders are special but they dont make photography better. all the best
I never claimed a rangefinder camera makes photography better, I was simply sharing my own personal experiences. What does shooting professional or not have anything to do with that statement? At the end of the day you shoot with whatever camera inspires you, whether you are a pro, semi pro or just a hobbyist.
Haha kazon making money from photography doesn’t make you any more credible. Almost the opposite I would argue. Passionate hobbyists are driven by real interest, curiosity and creativity.
