I've always gone true to size with Primals (including the Eco) and been happy about the fit. The Mesa might run a tad small where a half size up could be good.
How would you say the sizing compares to the Primal 2, are they an identical fit? I have read in a few places that the Primal to was its own unusual size range compared to the Primal 3/Zen/Eco, and slightly longer inside for a given size (e.g. Men's 9), but the Lem website doesn't give any info on this. Curious since you have both.
@@Laotzu.Goldbug They seem quite similar to me. If there are differences, they are minor enough I don't notice them. The heel and arch part of the soles are wider and flatter, but I'm not sure if the actual shoe width changed much in the upper - maybe in the arch area. The forefoot seems to have about the same amount of space. Whatever they did with the Eco seemed spot on to me, though it isn't quite as flexible as the regular Primal and the heel seems a little overbuilt. Fun shoes to wear around. I often reach for them.
