Let's Chat! GF9/Battlefront Clash of Steel

Подписаться 13 тыс.

Просмотров 2,5 тыс.

50% 1

Jon takes a look at the Clash of Steel website and chats about the upcoming game.
Check out our Flames of War Patreon at for a exclusive Battle Report every month! / allminiaturesgreatands...
Also check out our RU-vid Membership. Members get early access. Exclusive videos, badges, perks and more! / @allminiaturesgreatand...

Развлечения

Опубликовано:

9 июл 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 32

@angrychainaxe2803 4 месяца назад

I will be diving in as soon as this comes out. Alternate history is right up my alley, and I want those T29s!

@samfontaine3755 4 месяца назад

I would love to have super heavies in flames of war - this will definitely scratch that itch for fictional scenarios!

@geralddrake3002 4 месяца назад

I'm pretty sure this is an idea they had to make more use of their WOT models and a way of selling more of them. This will allow them to build more of the crazy tanks that are in WOT and have a secondary use/way to play with these tanks that have no place in their current games FOW, TY, FON ect.

@DeadGamesSociety 4 месяца назад

Likely...but it also allow the crazy gamers to play in a different sandbox than those who want more Historical accuracy in FoW. It could be a great 'containment game'

@batesmt25 4 месяца назад

FYI: Gale Force 9 has a "Clash of Steel" FaceBook page.

@bardylon 4 месяца назад

I think they couldn’t just release it as FoW without upsetting the history buffs. Also I think they want to market it more as a casual quick play game, removing infantry which tends to slow down the gameplay in FOW. Seems like a good halfway point between Tanks/WoT and FoW.

@matttheyak 4 месяца назад

From what I understand many/most these things will come to flames of war in a separate release. I think the idea with this release is to clearly appeal to new audiences, hence the fresh look.

@christianwilson5956 4 месяца назад

I believe this was intended to make a place for the prototype/non historical vehicles that flames of war players typically don't want to have in their games.

@M1sterP1nk 4 месяца назад

Tank on Tank will depend heavy on those dynamic mission. In FoW tank vs tank gameplay is missing so much tactical stuff the game is offering, that it just scratch on the system. My hope is that it might trigger some new people to enter FoW.

@AllMiniaturesGreatandSmall 3 месяца назад

I think that's my take on it. A fun and easy gateway into FOW and TY.

@davidschneider5462 4 месяца назад

Thanks for the video. I like the look of the models. Without infantry, artillery, and aircraft it should play faster and be a good intro game for FoW and TY. However, I don't like the same "I go you go" system. I wish with the fewer number of units that they had alternate or random unit activation like Bolt Action. If I do invest in this game that will be how I will be playing it.

@thomasweller4627 4 месяца назад

One of my favorite things about this game is "NO INFANTRY" so the games will play much faster and smoother in terms of game speed.

@AllMiniaturesGreatandSmall 4 месяца назад

Agreed TJ, Infanty, especially in assaults, are the most fiddly rules in the game.

@CommanderDread 4 месяца назад

Tanks are what made me want to play Flames of War and Team Yankee, infantry and aircraft (Team Yankee) is why I don't want to play anymore.

@turtlecheese8 4 месяца назад

I'm not much of an alternate history type but it does look cool. Kind of a shame the stat cards look so much like FoW/TY, I assume the rules will too. Just doesn't bring anything new to the table other than some fancy models.

@OneofInfinity. 4 месяца назад

Its actually great that the cards are similar for obvious reason.

@nehrigen 4 месяца назад

This looks a lot better than Warlord's new tank game.

@David_R434 3 месяца назад

Could because they want it tank v tank without the infantry in Flames of War

@bageldrone 4 месяца назад

Seems like a step up from world of tanks to then get players into either FoW or TY

@imjodokast 4 месяца назад

I'm glad they separated this from FoW. It's bad enough hearing the cries of manbabies when they announce things like Mid-War Monsters or Late-War Leviathans. Don't need some rivet counter gate keeping because your tank has the wrong shade of green paint.

@spamuraigranatabru1149 4 месяца назад

Shermans are in this game! Huzzah!

@aaronsomerville2124 4 месяца назад

I guarantee that the Soviets will be completely anemic. British tanks will have ROF 2 AT 19, Soviets will have ROF 1 AT 15 Slow Firing. BF have a complete rectal-cranial inversion when it comes to evaluating Soviet gear, especially when compared with the also-ran Allied minor power called the UK.

@durnaxe8708 4 месяца назад

Which is hilarious because in Team Yankee the Warsaw pact rules the tables pretty much in "good enough" guns for dirt cheap in points. Anyway clash of steel is a waste imo. They still have other wars like the Korean War, the other Arab wars, and the promised Checkpoint charlie to work on. Not a Tank game that does not cater to your target audiences. World of Tanks players and Historical gamers. With how much of a bitch fit those historical gamers had over mid war leviathans (and soon to be late war leviathans) this game is going to make them even more insufferable.

@DeadGamesSociety 4 месяца назад

Bruh.... Soviets play different. Don't make me make a video on this....

@aaronsomerville2124 4 месяца назад

@@DeadGamesSociety At FoW Nationals in January (LVO 2024), there were 50 players: 8 British lists, 3 Finn, 23 German, 1 Romanian, 4 Soviet and 11 American. Did you play Soviets at LVO and how did they do? They were only 8% of the field, tied with Minors that are extremely hard to even collect. Soviets have all their books and the models are easy to get, yet they were only a tiny fraction of competitive lists fielded. We both know why that is.

@Nikki_Baugher 3 месяца назад

Battlefront is looking for "Hype Idiots."

@lewisbenzie845 4 месяца назад

World of tanks is dreadful. Warthunder is better in every regard.

@AllMiniaturesGreatandSmall 4 месяца назад

I haven't played world of Tanks (PC) in years but I still play World of Warships. Never tried Warthunder though.

@chriscamp60 4 месяца назад

HARD PASS for me..! I have absolutely no interest in fantasy Tanks and a 1948 war scenario. I'd rather just play Warhammer 40k. Sadly, we still have no current Jagdpanther sets available for WWII...!

@AllMiniaturesGreatandSmall 4 месяца назад

Maybe I'm thinking wrong but I think that the latest plastic Panther box has parts to make the Jagdpanther?

@chriscamp60 4 месяца назад

@@AllMiniaturesGreatandSmall Yes, that box is unfortunately also no longer in Production... :(

@aaronsomerville2124 4 месяца назад

@@chriscamp60 It looks like GBX181 is currently available on the online store, unless I'm mistaken. There also seem to be a bunch on Ebay.