LGBTQ+ Person Confronts Frank and Calls Him a Bigot - EXTENDED CUT 

Evolution is not the survival of the fittest. It is the propagation of the adaptable over time. Darwin wrote "On the Origin of Species" 165 years ago. Our understanding of it has developed a bit since then.

God doesn't create people of all gender or sexual orientations. The gender differences other than male and female came because of man's sin. Physical imperfection means that in time all sorts of gender differences would emerge. Also the sexual orientations stem from the physical, mental, and emotion impacts that happened because of man's sin. If Adam never sinned then there would be only male and female along with only one sexual orientation. Conscience determines what is right and wrong whether you believe in God or not. If you say God doesn't exist then you would have to prove to me how random chance and natural selection created the conscience we have today. Also you would have to prove why it is needed for survival when so many animals in the world don't have it and they survive just fine without it. What I learned from Frank is interesting there is no moral code for atheism. Meaning that an atheist can live their life any way they want even be as bad as Charles Manson, Adolf Hitler, Stalin, etc... as long as they still say that they don't believe in any god (s) then they are still an atheist. Atheism isn't like a club where you have rules and standards that you must obey or be kicked out as an atheist.

​@@MrGilfred Mav said they are a secular humanist, that is the source of their moral code. Atheism is only connected to the belief in a deity, the non-belief in a deity, or the belief in no possible deities. "Atheism isn't like a club where you have rules and standards that you must obey or be kicked out as an atheist." But society is that club. And many atheists have stronger morals than what is required by society. Some have stronger morals than many theists, like using the Platinum Rule rather than the Golden Rule. Is their club/church the only reason Christians aren't "as bad as Charles Manson, Adolf Hitler, Stalin, etc"? Yes, I agree that "conscience determines what is right and wrong". I can also agree that conscience exists, while saying that "I don't know how it developed", although self-organizing is something that happens in the natural world. The hex-symmetric structure of a snowflake, or the atomic structure of solids, shows naturally occurring organization on the atomic level. Conway's Game of Life suggests that simple rules of interaction can also lead to complexity. Many animals, including humans, have a social interaction component which helps their survival. Elephants, even with their size, stay in herds and protect each other. Atheism removes the personal relationship between an individual and a deity. But atheism is not a religion or a "world view", it is a component of a world view. Secular humanism is a world view, and when Frank Turek was asking Mav about objective morality, their response was coming from their connection with secular humanism rather than with atheism. "God doesn't create people of all gender or sexual orientations." Are you simply asserting that? Did the deity make you a heterosexual person? How do you know one was made but the other was not? And why is all this being passed on to people today because of Adam's sin? It seems pretty cruel to make us keep paying for what one person did once. I would only care about the philosophical side of a deity, but there is a current push in the US for both Christian Nationalism and Sharia Law [Bible version]. It is small, but growing, and it is much easier to push back now rather than in a decade when it is much more powerful.

@@UnconventionalReasoning But Stalin and Hitler had a different form of secular humanism. A secular humanism of their own group that supported them doing what they done. So they weren't booted out of their little secular humanism that is different than what others have accepted. I can say that there are those theists, even though small in number have much stronger morals than their peers or other atheist like Stalin that Hitler. So you think you would need to see how the super rich treat others in order to know how they want to be treated. That is a wrong way to think. The majority of people would want to be treated like you would want to be treated. Which is something that you know very well. You communicate how you want to be treated by your actions. By the way you treat others. That tells others how to treat you. But it doesn't say that you have to be able to give super rich people the same things that they give to their super rich friends as how they treat others, because you wouldn't have to funds to do so. Conway's Game of Life is only a suggestion not a fact or even a proven theory that isn't open for debate. What about the big cats like tigers that eat other animals. I think that Frank failed to describe something that is very important to others. He should've said what I said that atheism is not like a club where you would have rules to abide by or you are kicked out. Stalin and Hitler weren't drummed out of being atheists because of all of the people they had killed. When I said God didn't personally create all of the other genders along with sexual orientations I mean just that. It is not personal opinion. Do you really believe that if God does exist that he would punish his creation for doing what he created them to do? Of course not, I know that man wouldn't take a car about and never put it back together again because it done what he created it to do. In the bible though God clearly says such ones won't inherit God''s kingdom in the book of 1st Corinthians 6:9-11. The verses goes on to teach that is what some in the Congregation used to be. So if they were created that way why would they need to change? Why would they need to be washed clean if they are doing as they are created to do. The only logical explanation is that all of the other genders other than male and female are byproducts of man's sin. The same is true for all sexual orientations. How is the stain of sin passed on to Adam and Eve's offspring. Let's say you have two biscuit pans. One is perfect without any dents or even the slightest of scratches. While the other one has a dent in it. Now the dented pan will make every biscuit that is made with that pan with the same dent. That dent in man is inherited sin. Adam and Eve couldn't pass on perfection because that is what they had lost. They can't pass on what they themselves no longer had.

@@UnconventionalReasoning It is not like Adam and Eve were imperfect like us. They were perfect in every way, but they also like us had a free will. Adam decided to abuse that wonderful gift by wanting independence from God by saying he would be better off choosing for himself what is good for him and what is bad for him. God knew that the best way to handle it with the angels watching was to let man have his independence. But God didn't have to bless his independence. He has been letting man try all forms of government that he can think of trying. None of them have ever come close to giving the citizens all of the things that Adam and Eve had in the garden of Eden. This suffering is what will teach obedient mankind the folly of independence from God. So it wasn't just the sinful act, it was independence that was also the problem. If God had destroyed all of the rebels Adam, Eve and Satan the angels could've said you didn't give man any time to find out if he could be just fine on his own. So to avoid that problem God decided to let mankind go through the suffering. Also each person that suffers for the years that they are alive. How long will it take them to forget that pain and suffering when they have lived for thousands of years. I am sure that obedient mankind will forget the suffering. But still remember the lesson of the folly of seeking independence from God. Where man will never have to never go through this again.

Or "that his heart may discover itself" KJV

Sounds like Frank.

Why should anyone listen to Mav? She already showed flaws and inconsistencies in her own moral standard. Frank asked her to stop talking over him and let him speak and she says "fair" acknowledging how wrong it was for her to talk over him. Only to disregard that 2 seconds later and start talking over him because she can't control herself. What a perfect representation on why her standard is based on personal feelings and guess what, feelings change. Truly ironic

​​@@mattr.1887just about everything he says is grounded in the Bible and Gods word. He didn't create it. It's not his opinion, he's following God

@@mattr.1887 “Mav” is asking a question and Frank is giving an explanation. But Mav is refusing to listen or answer Dr. Turek and just talking over him. Mav is not there to have a conversation or learn, but instead just wants to only express his opinion. Frank asked if you want to have a dialogue and she clearly said “No”. Very narrow closed minded response.

What's wrong with telling someone how you make them feel That's what an intervention is.

The unregenerate heart is deceitful above all things and wicked. Emotions can really make us believe so many different lies. If I watch a scary movie my emotions will probably believe it's real. Emotions are a very shaky ground to live by!!

​@sterlingfallsproductions3930 who are you to define what is"normal"? Most people are religious of some sort and their religion informs their morality. You are living in complete ignorance of you think that religiosity is abnormal

There's always been people like that, though I guess that it's worse these days.

@@ryanprosper88Sterling is his own god and hasn’t realized this yet.

he was on the right course; he was asking questions. against the indoctrination of Xtiniaty

Agreed. Would even say militant. No different from anyone else who follows after their own made up moral code. People go to war over these conflicting ideas.

What is wrong with you. The preacher was lecturing, not having a discussion. The kid was emotional but his argument was evolution creates morality. The preacher didn't care and was just like.. you're wrong. How would you not get frustrated taking with that kind of dumb dumb head

Don’t think Mav is a “he”..

I don't really care what pronoun " Mav" uses, it was used in the most generic sense.

Frank may come out stay tuned

I call "they" rather "it" if I am not sure, deal? @@sterlingfallsproductions3930

​@@MichaelMcDonald-my2np You have.

And they’re our future…..

Replace the word "lost" with Genz.

They're not lost....... they're indoctrinated.

@@kenyanr1 JESUS is my future

He is seeking and trying his best to believe his own ideology but grasping at straws, he needs our prayers 🙏

It's a better one than "murder is wrong because my favorite book says so".

@@Maksie0 The book merely echoes what God has put in our hearts. So you don't know what you're talking about.

@@Maksie0 Yes because some other parents might be delighted that those other parents son was murdered. What does your favorite book say about murder? thanks

​@@Maksie0Who says that? In debate or in trying to "reason", nobody says that. Yes, it's in the Bible, along w/ a great many other things, but there's more to it than that. Especially when unbelievers are the ones asking or just attempting to attack the faith. How disingenuous u r.

Those who doesn't understand the scriptures, its not a mere book writen by a novice writer. Those who have a very good experience of the Book, knows its a very good guide to life. But we need to pray for the grace to undestand it. When one finally sees what I mean, he will understand. Only a humble heart and mind may be able tor receive that gift. But God's grace & mercy will still lead us to salvation even if we are not able to fully grasp the Bible.

Wow, that's bad hate poetry.

@@highroller-jq3ix No, it's truth

@@bigdogbill119 Please provide objective verification to validate your supposed "truth." And . . . go!

@@highroller-jq3ix it’s not my “supposed” truth, it’s GOD’s. Listen bud, ignorance needs no more practitioners. Repent, for the kingdom of Heaven is at hand.

Simple as that The Kingdom of Heaven is at hand .

People like Mav are not there for a conversation or a debate or looking for answers, they go to these events to protest, intimidate, talk over, shout down & in some cases physically assault people like Frank and then they play the victim.

Agreed with both comments. I don't know if I would have the temperament for all that, especially since I'm not always that great at thinking of responses on the fly 🤔.

You are very generous calling that thing a person.

Generation Snowflake

@@bullymaguire9987 Probably, but I admit I am flawed. That "guy" was an a55hole, how ironic though, you are being a judgmental hypocrite while playing righteous. People like yourself disgusted me away from Christianity for all of my life but I have learned to ignore you. God bless.

Some times a close minded person just needs to walk and talk threw all the steps before they can move outside the box assuming they aren't disingenuous

Assuming they're not disingenuous and they are really trying to go through the steps to figure it out

@@bumperxx1 that's a fair point, but to be fair most times you can tell a disingenuous person from a genuine one by their questions and over all demeanor. Most disingenuous people tend to have an air of superiority about the way they respond or in their mannerisms while talking.

Ever

They are so "open-minded", their brains fell out.

Mabye s/he slurred it and it should have been MADDD!!!!

Just say they you aren’t trying to get a word count bud

I knew it as well.

Sounds like the thieves of Palestine.

Excellent !!!

Exactly. They take one thing and run with it. They act like the man is telling people to treat gay people badly, which he's not. All he is saying is it's a sin just like the other sins. the only difference is you trying to make people turn a blind eye to that sin and don't call it out. He does that, and then he has to do the same for all other sins like adultery and murder. That's what I don't understand why they don't get that.

That's the Marxist ideology

They have created a god in their image rather than conform to God in whose image they want created.

Bullies are also narcissistic 100%!!

He’s too emotional in my opinion and doesn’t want to listen.

@@irishtruth6801, typical narcissism, they are always right & everyone else is wrong!!

@@irishtruth6801 You mean she?

They know they are full of it, so they try to silence then person that is right.

😂

Made. meroll my eyes, too, I'm not proud of that, but my goodness. Gee, I wonder why you can't focus, dear...

I'm Asperger with ADHD, he used his statement for his own defense. Part of the LGBTQ community.

ADHD sucks, I understood him there

lol 😆

Because he doesn't actually listen and just says the same thing again and again.

Because he’s a brainless parrot

Yer, frank is pretty bad for that

Amen. Mav only fooled himslf.

Proverbs 15:1

Fools find no pleasure in understanding it delight in airing their own opinions

We do. They just haven’t been fooled into believing the bible.

@@utcnc7mm It's just a gotcha comment. Probably best to give it no attention 🤔.

@@CLDJ227 I would say your right

@@utcnc7mm Would lol?

@@CLDJ227just a figure speech, saying yeah, you’re right

When we're lost we all have a tendency to try to create loopholes of either excusing the wrong we do or justifying the good we don't do. It's man's attempt to try to live up to the moral standards that we can't do. That's why when Jesus amplified the law and even went beyond it. He says the law says do not commit adultery but I say that if you even look at a woman with lust you've committed adultery with her in your heart! The law has a tendency to shut mouths and declare us all as guilty! Once we're willing to see how we don't measure up, we make a proclamation like Paul which was what a wretched man I am , who will deliver me from this body of death!!! But my friend we can praise Jesus that he's the one that delivers us!!

We often don’t evaluate our sinfulness accurately because we only see the “goodness” in our sins. When we view others, we more accurately see the bad qualities of what they are doing. We only see the goodness in the sin - the passion, the intimacy, etc

Love the testimony and your repentance. May you follow in the steps of Jesus

@@kladies3021 agreed, well said

@@LifeInLandscaping yup yup!! I twisted Romans in my head (too long of an explanation here) to fit my lifestyle, BUUUUUUT I knew, I knew better.

I don't Have the patience Frank has

Perhaps you should try to acquire some empathy.

@@UnconventionalReasoning Empathy Is A pathetic excuse,

@@Revelation.21-13 Is that why you choose to not have empathy?

We're called to love others, to model Christ's love for us. Sometimes that means "tough love". Sometimes it means letting someone who's delusional or hurting or angry feel heard. I think this is where the Holy Spirit working in us comes in. He knows what others need.

Exactly, however your logic and reason and respectfulness in this comment doesn’t matter because their foundation of truth is their own ideas and emotions.

Thats a great point. Everyone needs to approach one another with dignity and empathy even when its uncomfortable.

You're complaining about how the LGBTQ+ people "feel", but you start by saying that those against them "have an inborn repulsion"? Is that not a feeling? And if you think they are unaware of that repulsion and hatred, you're truly clueless. Mav is here because they have experienced that hatred.

@@UnconventionalReasoning Re-read my original post. I said that they (the alphabet mafia) believes (or speaks) as though their feelings supersedes how people feel who aren’t part of their community. And they don’t care that people who aren’t allies are repulsed by their behaviors-they just want everyone to affirm it-“Aww, aren’t Chuck and Bill so cute when they hold hands and kiss.” 🤮 It’s repulsive to someone who is straight and not an ally. I’m not going to be hateful toward that community, but I’m honestly repulsed by it. If that is deemed “hate” by you, so be it. 🤷

Evolution is not the friend of the Materialist.

Lol!

@@mattslater2603 clearly you can't handle the truth

There is a generation that curses their father, and does not bless its mother. There is a generation that is pure in its own eyes, and yet is not washed from its filthiness. There is a generation-oh, how lofty are their eyes! Proverbs 30

"Crybully" is an apt description.

Uh you can be LGBT and Christian 👨‍❤️‍👨

​@MichaelMcDonald-my2np um, but the person can not continue in the lifestyle. Repentance is key to Christianity. Sexual immorality has to be overcome. Just because God forgives doesn't mean we should continue grieving the Holy Spirit. If we do, the faith is either weak or dead.

@@MS-hl8fe Who told you that? It sounds like you've been beguiled by the serpent and brought back under the law by the Nicolaitans.

They have so much hate ????? I did not hear hate from that person . Frank is a BIGOT when it comes to sex . plus Frank does not understand evolution. It is not the survival of the fittest . More the survival of the best adapted to its environment.

You can be LGBT and Christian 👨‍❤️‍👨

​@@MichaelMcDonald-my2np You can be vegan and eat steak every day. 🥩 ❤​

​@@MichaelMcDonald-my2npyou can be a police officer and a criminal 👮‍♂️💰

​@@AImighty_Loafso you cant be Christian and a sinner?

And sometimes, it seems they know it but just don't care.

@@sterlingfallsproductions3930 If only that entity appeared to humanity, lived among us, gave us instructions on whats moral and immoral, and vowed that not only He would return, but that He would bring perfect justice and end to suffering for all of eternity.

@sterlingfallsproductions3930 if you are referring to Jesus and morality. There is more evidence that he exists than Alexander the Great by myriads of evidence and he has given us His moral law. No need for assumptions with that.

​@@PBAdventures146 True! Also, there will be more evidence that Jesus existed than the people denying Him when they die and time goes on. With technology, pictures can be altered so we won't know who was real and who was fake lol.

@jtremaine23 pictures don't really have anything to do with it and never have. It would he foolish to base an opinion on a picture of someone from a couple thousand years ago. The testimony and witness of both his followers and over 100 non religious followers who attested to his existence, death, and resurrection carry more weight to me than someone's drawing of his assumed appearance. 🙂

And he admitted towards the end that he wasn't looking for a dialogue, but rather, an apology.

An apology that can only come if Frank had done something wrong, which would require a moral standard. I wish my generation could think and understand what truth truly is.

"Him" ? It was a she.

Don't be surprised when frank comes out

​@@MichaelMcDonald-my2np ?

@@MichaelMcDonald-my2np Or when the stories of his indiscretions come out. RZ, anyone?

agrree, especially to his kind in the end. we saw this with national socialism or communism.

Why should anyone listen to Mav? She already showed flaws and inconsistencies in her own moral standard. Frank asked her to stop talking over him and let him speak and she says "fair" acknowledging how wrong it was for her to talk over him. Only to disregard that 2 seconds later and start talking over him because she can't control herself. What a perfect representation on why her standard is based on personal feelings and guess what, feelings change. Truly ironic

Comrade is confused.

Sadly, the US has a very ethnocentric viewpoint that has broken down into subcultures. That’s why you have LGBT people wanting to change the Bible’s morality.

@@sterlingfallsproductions3930 say what you want to say. I don’t answer to ums and passive-aggressiveness.

They're both clowns.

"Someone behave with such pride and incredulity when they are logically bankrupt" is a mean thing to say about Frank Turek.

@@UnconventionalReasoninghe was talking about u

@@cryogenicheart2019 Haha, so brilliant!

@@UnconventionalReasoning Oh, how cute and unconventional.

He has every right to be offended. Turek is communicating something that harms other people, even he himself admitted this. Yet, he continues to be dismissive and tries to rationalize his actions. What conversation can be had here?

She

​@@gergelymagyarosi9285what are you talking about she couldn't answer the question because she didn't have one

@@qpghostqp9551 Did Turek answer the question? No, he posed just another as a diversion. I say diversion, because if both he and his interlocutor agree that an action is bad, then the moral grounding is irrelevant. BTW, watch again, because she clearly had questions.

@@user-tm2ff3bm8c Turek doesn't disagree that ostracising people (including LGBTQ people) is bad. So what is your point?

I'm sure it would pale in comparison to all the children abused by church leaders... with their ENDLESS pedrophillia scandals....

There's both statistics and national news about the topic. Gay couples being arrested for child r*pe, for example. If Google hasn't censored it, you'll find those articles very easily.

The majority has

All of them.

@@tino0217Nothing but assertions. Where is the evidence or “data”? And don’t cite a bunch of pro-LGBT or anti-Christian sources and expect anyone to take you seriously.

Typical believer… you want an answer so bad you will even believe a 2000 year old fairy tale rather than admit you simply do not know.

@@CryptoBonsaiDogs Bu- bu- but God did it! It says it here in this book!!!1!1!1!

@@rubencampos6298 ha. Wait another 2000 years until they dig up a Harry Potter series. That will be interesting.

@@CryptoBonsaiDogs It appears you need to go and read that fairy tale a bit more. Start with the New Testament.

@@lawrence1318 been there, done that. Why you think I’m now an atheist.

Turek has the ethics of a Trump.

Homosexuality is natural, religion is unnatural.

Thats the problem their standards are based on the feelings of the individual and offending them is a crime.

@@logicalatheist1065 The desire to steal is natural, doesn't make it right.

​@@reggiecurry1612desire to steal is not natural

@@user-uv3ii1vr2g Yes it is.

U.S. soldiers are dying. And killing. So much for the moral objectives handed down from a god. They get a pass because well...the government says its ok. That's not absolute, that's relative morality.

oh no the American slaves following the governments commands to fight and die for no reason!

Yea, Mav's a classic example of multiple DSM disorders. LGBT+ being one of them and ADHD being the other,

ADHD when challenged only. The filter in their minds hates Truth and The Light.

MAV loves the sound of his own voice !

Thats a woman man.

@@chrisbailey9377 you sure its not a man woman?

But he's there, isn't he? He attends, and he hears. God is not finished writing his story yet. Pray for him - or her!

God save him.

Surely God will not bless him only if he repents and humble himself but he is very proud disrespectful judgemental and impolite

Frank Turek's question presupposes his definition of "objective morality", and the requirement that it exists. They talked about murder, where is the objective morality in a deity telling "his chosen people" to murder other peoples?

​@@UnconventionalReasoning"Unconventional Reasoning" "Repeats tired cliches about objective morality" Why do so many atheists have some variation on "logic" or "rational" in your names? Can't you think for yourselves? Why do you argue against objective morality and then accuse God of being "wrong" or "bad"? That doesn't exist according to you so chill out buddy. Nothing to worry about.

​@@UnconventionalReasoningGod never told anybody to commit an unjustified killing, either. That's the definition of murder. Those who God passed judgement upon were evil and were given their reward. It's impossible for God to commit or counsel evil of any kind from both of our perspectives. From your perspective evil doesn't exist and from mine God is perfect love, even when He punishes people. Everybody's happy!

@@showmeanedge The word "justified" does a lot of heavy lifting. Every time a person kills someone today, they can say, "God told them to kill that person", and it's fine. Please grow up instead of pretending that "it's impossible for God to commit or counsel evil", it's how bad things are justified all the time.

@@showmeanedge I promise you that I can think for myself much better than you. If I read a book like "Lord of the Rings", I can talk about the things that characters do which are wrong. I treat deities in religious texts the same way.

😂😂😂😂😂

Amen.

Mav is a dude.

Mav is a God-hating reprobate

Seems like a guy to me - how do you know it's a female?

Frank was talking about the source of morality, and that there can be no objective moral laws without an objective moral lawgiver.

"Girl"

Even if there is a lawgiver, what makes the law objective?

So what is it when gorillas will have a “tribe” that takes care of each others’ offspring and punishes those who harm others within the tribe? Surely it can’t be objective morality. If not, what is it and why can’t humans have that as well?

​@@mattr.1887Because the only morally perfect being to exist is God he made the laws he has authority to give the law because God is perfect in all his ways. Humanity is inconceivably immoral

Well said.

That strength is hollow. Frank simply claims his morality comes from an old book written by ancient men.

​@@Moist._Robotby what standard is it hollow? By NEW books written by men?? 🙃

@@Moist._RobotIf that’s what you think, you haven’t listened to much Frank Turek.

@@alantinoalantonio Because you get your morals from an old book written by men who thought slavery, rape and stoning children to death was ok.

@@yosiyyahu.bar.stephen Can you elaborate?

The ones that didn't happen?

@@mattslater2603Christianity living in your head rent free. Eh?😊

No in Noah day there was hope in our day things could very well wrap up. I had an individual tell me how the gay been hurt by people of faith. I asked them who there hero is an they said MAO SE TUNG. So I asked them if Mao was wrong for killing over 60 million of his own people. They told me that was a lie he did not kill his people. That's folks what a 6 year college masters is doing and they think we should pay for it. Lord. Notice the calm peace of Frank and the frenzied victim hood nature of the wannabe god individual who has created God in their image

​@mattslater2603 When you see a Great White Throne, well, know you were warned. Good luck with that.

@georgewood7381 wow do you understand luck has no place in the Gospel? Not one bit concerned about great white throne because I am attoned for and accepted In the first judgement. Plus if you understood the white throne judgement you'd know every thing to do with the old Jerusalem an Earth are no more like I said above.

Yes, it's so sad that Frank Turek has no platform to speak, Mav stopped him from ever saying what he wants to say.

My daughter has no problem with morality yet. She’s 2.

Or ask any parent "when raising your child, did you have to teach them to lie or tell the truth? Which did they do naturally???"

Yep, and there's absolutely no reason why that morality should come from a supossedly magical book about an imaginary man in the sky.

@@rubencampos6298 Wrong, as you usually are. Nobody but smug idiots call the Bible a "supossedly (sic) magical book". It's the word of God, so it IS the foundation for morality.

@@rubencampos6298 You don't know what you're talking about. The bible simply refers to the morality we already have in our hearts.

Simple things....

It’s not a guy

It's easy to look at that young man and have the attitude of go get him Frank. What is not so easy is figuring out how Frank does it. In my experience removing the log in your own eye before trying to remove the splinter in your neighbors is not a simple task and I find Frank is an excellent video example of a how to vid.

@@ewxlt oh wow seriously ima change it to it maybe?

If we think that the point of these discussions is to "get them" then haven't we lost our focus? Yes, we reason with people and ultimately want to share the gospel. But it's easy to fall into a battle of who had the best arguments and who won the debate. I'm not here to give you a hard time. I just hope you'll consider refocusing.

@@soon2bsaint680 Change it to "her", because that's a female.