No video :(

Liquid fertilizer vs. granular fertilizer | Which is better?

Подписаться 1,2 тыс.

Просмотров 12 тыс.

50% 1

Liquid fertilizer vs. granular fertilizer, which is better? One AgriTec customer put it to the test.
Conventional Fertilizer Program:
Urea: 169 lbs/acre
DAP: 250 lbs/acre
Potash: 450 lbs/acre
TOTAL COST: $446.69
AgriTec's Application Program:
25-0-0 Triazone 5 gal/acre
10-20-10+ (w/Aerate): 5 gal/acre
TOTAL COST: $163.50
Additional Resources:
For more information on Nitro-Maxx: www.agritecint...
For more information on our Bio-Activated Liquid Calcium:
www.agritecint...
To get in touch with an AgriTec representative: www.agritecint...
To view more testimonials: online.flippin...
To view our product catalog: online.flippin...
For more information on liquid calcium: online.flippin...

Опубликовано:

27 авг 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 4

@kyleserros 11 месяцев назад

I am confused

@stoamnyfarms 11 месяцев назад

Right.

@agritecint 9 месяцев назад

Sorry for the confusion! This customer had 2 different plots. One for granular fertilizer and one for AgriTec's fertilizer. The cost comparison is as follows: Conventional Fertilizer Program: Urea: 169 lbs/acre DAP: 250 lbs/acre Potash: 450 lbs/acre TOTAL COST: $446.69 AgriTec's Application Program: 25-0-0 Triazone 5 gal/acre 10-20-10+ (w/Aerate): 5 gal/acre TOTAL COST: $163.50 The AgriTec program was significantly cheaper than the granular and the AgriTec program yielded equal or better results.

@pilsplease7561 5 месяцев назад

I have stuck with conventional dry fertilizer in my vineyards have also done the same with vegetables have found liquid fertilizers to be less effective across the board and tend to leach out and not actually get taken up by the plants @@agritecint